Home    2001    2002    2003    2004 

Jan-Jun2005     July-Dec2005    2006

Jan 2007-THE E-MAIL

THE E-MAIL-Chase the Hunt

Chase the Hunt-Dec 07

Jan - May 2008    May - Oct 2008    Nov - Dec 2008

Jan - March 2009    April - June 2009

June - August 2009    Oct - Dec 2009

Family Tree

Jan - Mar 2010    April - June 2010

July  - Sept 2010    Oct - Dec 2010

Inserts     Eva Braun     Eva's Story

Paintings     Targets 02-04     05-07

Xmas 04     05   Tree     Notes   ISM

Bar     X-Targets     Tax-Mice

PresViv     E.Indicators     SepticTank

   NewLaws     NewSci

MostWanted     Attic      Fupi Is A Dummy Targets

Sunday June 14, 2009

Dear Dr. Henderson Cole;

Now that I have your attention, I have a few questions about Eva/Jean Braun/Bouricius’ side of the story.

I understand that during the last days of World War II, you were all in the bunker with Adolph/Stanley Schicklegruber/Schweitzer. I also understand that the text books explain this was in Berlin. It sounds more like Berchtesgaden.

WHERE WAS IT?

I understand there was an elaborate tunnel system. And I understand that Adolph’s Great Grand Niece, Monica Christiensen, learned how to create one. This was how she escaped her imprisonment in Yemen.

WHY GO UNDERGROUND WITH YOUR SYSTEM?

I understand that the Nazi flag-emblem was a reproduction of the shape of the antenna used to communicate with the allied countries.

WHICH ALLIED COUNTRY?

During one of our telephone conversations, Prince William of Wales informed me that his ancestors worked with Adolph/Stanley. This suggests to me the possibility that communication was with Great Britain. It also suggests to me the possibility that Keith Pennington was with you all. He, of course, has a British accent.

WAS HE?

Robert Tallman was also a member of your secretive group. I can’t imagine what you needed a corporate attorney for.

WERE ANY GERMANS WITH YOU?

I understand that during these last days of World War II, Adolph/Stanley presented two flight tickets.

WAS THIS TO ARGENTINA OR THE U.S.?

I understand that during these last days, you needed a bride with a similar physique to you. I realize that similar wedding gowns were made for each of you. First, you ran out of there veiled, then she, unveiled.

WHY? WHO WAS OUT THERE?

If this was Berlin, it was not the Allied military. We did not have foot soldiers patrolling while bombing the area. And it wasn’t the Prussian Generals. You already killed them.

WAS IT GERMAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE?

I understand that Eva/Jean’s mathematician-husband Willard was in Los Alamos, New Mexico, helping to develop the first nuclear bomb. And I understand that he imported this technology to Germany. The United States Government could not wait to use this weapon. It had to attack before this country was attacked.

WAS DR. BOURICIUS ALSO IN THE BUNKER?

When I was growing-up, I knew you had three children. According to the Fellowship telephone directory, there were four. Her name was Dawneva. I understand that as an associate of IBM (Inferior Brained Massacre), you have an obligation to provide one child for human experimentation. These children are strapped-down and injected with various potential biochemical weapons. They scream all night, and then are dumped into a medical waste dump.

WAS THAT HER FATE?

They developed Hogwort’s Juice and Privet Berry Poisoning. These produce large warts in the lymphatic system. The glands swell around the vagina in the form of a W for Wicca. It is a slow death with no diagnosable symptoms. The patient looks like she is going crazy to death.

WHAT DO YOU DO WITH THAT?

Nonetheless, you continued to give your loyalties to this corporate giant. During the Cold War, you traveled to Russia to teach the KGB how to hack into FBI files. And during the 1990’s, you lived in Venezuela to teach the socialists how to drain our economy. I understand their latest venture is identity theft.

WHAT DID YOU DO?

I am giving you one day to deprogram this financial drain before I tell everyone where to find your picture in the media. Don’t tell me you can’t do it. It isn’t complicated. It is just set in many countries, including Kenya.

DO IT!!!!

Tuesday June 16, 2009

Today I would like to change the subject to the Small Claims Court action against me.

As you already know, I am the defendant.

And, as you already know, I motioned the Court that I be substituted as the defendant by Wells Fargo Bank. My opposing counsel agreed that the Bank should be added as a defendant. I agreed and then counterclaimed the plaintiff. To preserve my counterclaim, Judge O’Keefe granted my opposing counsel’s add-motion and instructed my opposing counsel to file a revised writ. The writ is the Small Claims Court form. The Judge also gave my opposing counsel until June 09^th to answer my counterclaim.

To my knowledge, my opposing counsel has filed nothing. I researched Connecticut Practice Law and learned that there was nothing to stop me from filing the revised writ.

As you also already know, the service-address of Wells Fargo was in dispute. I used the address of the house.

I asked for $1.00 with the following argument;

“The 2006-2008 foreclosure action (Superior Court TTD-CV06-5000959S) by above co-defendant/cross-claim-respondent Wells Fargo Bank against above co-defendant/cross-claimant Vivian Lehman, was for the purpose of acquiring the asset without the liabilities. The asset is known as 891 South Street of the Town of Coventry, State of Connecticut (see above service-address). As per the 2009 Small Claims Court plaintiff’s Nature of Action, Wells Fargo does not accept the liability of the heating bill. As per the Land Records of said Town, Volume 1027, page 84, the value of the house is $1.00 (see attached). According to www.lectlaw.com, “money” includes “bank notes… and negotiable notes”. Vivian Lehman demands unencumbered title to the house.”

Wednesday June 17, 2009

I would like to make one more point.

What is common knowledge to the Connecticut Small Claims Court practitioners, is that “money” is the only object of action recognized by this judicial domain.

I researched it. Cash is one form of “money”. So I believe Judge O’Keefe can give me my house back.

One complication may occur…

In the revised writ, the service-address for Wells Fargo is my house. It is non-deliverable to addressee because the post office does not recognize their occupation of the house, and because I never had a mail box, only a post office box.

Typically, when the service-address is unusable, the Court must automatically dismiss the action. But in this case, the Court must understand I mechanically reproduced the information of the Land Records. Therefore, I should not be penalized.

What will happen next?

Will I be required to revise the writ again?

Or will the Court use the address I provided in a letter I received over one year ago from Wells Fargo which originated in its Maryland office?

Or something else?

But if it is non-deliverable to addressee, that proves my point that a phony foreclosure occurred. So my amateur legal advise to Wells Fargo is to inform the post office of its presence, and either erect a mail box, or rent a post office box.

Thursday June 18, 2009

The news show of FOX has been advocating my statement that title is a form of “money”. They argue that their MONEY shows include discussion of cash, but can’t be limited to it.

It is also my understanding that the Court will arrange for a complete service. Wells Fargo Bank cannot pretend it does not exist.

There is also some concern for the fact that I did not ask for any cash. Since the maximum request of Small Claims is $5,000, I could have asked for $4,999.

I researched everything in the Connecticut Practice Book. The only time a judge is limited to the cash relief requested is in a personal injury default case. So as far as I know, if Judge O’Keefe wants to take further initiative, he can. Unless, of course, Federal and/or State law states otherwise. But I don’t believe he should.

My opinion is because I believe the plaintiff’s attorney has decided not to handle this case any further. Wells Fargo will probably behave the same way. I should win by default on the counter-, cross- and original claims. If I am awarded cash from my co-defendant, a connection is made. Wells Fargo may contest.

The only thing I need is a default Decision made by the Court, and filed by such Court in the Land Records specifying value at $1.00.

On a related issue…

The property tax bill is still in my name. This is because the Town does not want to recognize the $1.00 transaction and make the appropriate adjustment.

It was on May 23, 2005 that we closed on the house. In early September, I received the property tax bill based on the original assessment which was below the purchase price. I paid the Town by the end of the month. And in October I received a supplemental bill for the added value.

If you are a homeowner in Bedford, New York, you know that the deadline to challenge your assessed value is April 1^st for affect in the same calendar year. In Coventry, Connecticut, it is March 1^st. These Spring dates are because the fiscal calendar year is actually an academic year: Fall plus Spring semesters. But when a transaction rather than a paperwork challenge occurs, it is different. It takes affect immediately, and may take a few months to fully process between the offices.

In January of 2007, if the Town officially recognized the $1.00 assignment of mortgage, it would have cancelled all succeeding property tax bills. And had one more affect.

Any homeowner with a house similar to mine would have been entitled to an adjustment. And Eric Gregan as an independent contractor, as well as his original employer, Mr. Blanchard, built many of them. The Town could go bankrupt.

Before this occurs, I would like to remind the Town of two officials of the Police Department who have nothing to do. They can go. The Town would probably be safer. Burglars and stalkers know when no one is watching. And who needs people who interfere with FBI investigations?

The two Police Officers who just followed orders can also go. They participated in the ejectment on April 09, 2008. I believe they knew better. And I don’t want to hear any sob stories from them about having a family to support. My mother did not just follow orders. She blew-the-whistle instead. Maybe if they had her for a parent, they would have done better.

So let’s fire the four, then watch the Town’s safety statistics improve for the better.

I just found this…

“Sec. 17-41. Relief Permissible on Default

Upon a default, the plaintiff can have no greater

relief than that demanded in the complaint…”

On a very different subject, I have not had any spending money. But that didn’t stop an unoccupied frame from jumping in front of my car. I parked behind my bank, and there it was, underneath a tree. It had no glass, no matting and no backing. It is 16 x 20” wood with a beautiful red trim. It must have been $50 at original price.

For Red Frame

Friday June 19, 2009

So let’s return to the subject of Hitler’s bunker.

Until a few days ago, there were television commercials advertising Lifelock. Its purpose is identity theft protection. One of the features of these advertisements is a crowd of street people receiving a lecture on the benefits of purchasing this service. The person who is front and center is large, quite bald and is stroking his face while thinking about something.

He is Dr. Henderson Cole, or his twin brother.

I heard the word targets.

Once I realized we were Internet-communicative, I went out to my car, reached into my trunk, and pulled out a purple tote. I bought it at Staples because of its unique color. When I left my New York home, I placed only one thing in it.

After I removed it from my trunk, I returned to my room and packed-it-out from all of the styrophone chips. I placed it in the window.

The satellites have recognized it for its grotesqueness. I would like to remind everyone of the story behind it.

I was in college. My mother, brother and I were celebrating Christmas at the Unitarian Fellowship of Northern Westchester located in Mount Kisco, New York. This is where I was baptized and raised.

The building was constructed during my early childhood around 1970. There were a group of people who, every Sunday, arrived at services before we did. I now understand these were Stanley/Adolph Schweitzer/Schiklegruber (Hitler); one of his two wives, Gertrude/Gertrude Schweitzer/Weiskar; her cousin, Jean/Eva Bouricius/Braun; her husband, Willard Bouricius; Henderson Cole; Robert Tallman; and a few others.

Jean Bouricius was the one who taught me world leadership.

And it is her writing style which I imitate.

In high school, college and graduate school, she helped me with my scientific homework. She never had to look anything up. Her understanding of biology is that extraordinary.

In my early childhood, I had a difficult time relating to Dr. Henderson Cole. He is a physicist with IBM who went on to a career of selling such computers. When I was a physics major, he tried to help me with my homework, but agreed that the professor had presented it in unworkable format.

So I went into anthropology.

The corporate attorney was required for negotiations with the oil companies. If you were in Germany during World War II, you would know that the United States oil refineries were there, not in China nor Russia as these are today.

Those issues aside, let’s return to the Christmas party.

The annual tradition was that everyone brings an anonymous, wrapped gift, and then takes one. My brother selected the large box. The man who made its content was very disappointed to see it received by someone young who may not appreciate it. My mother was with him at the time. She assured him it will be well cared for. I don’t know if she acquired his name. I did not.

It is black metal with some candles. A few weeks after the images of the Iraqi prison Abu Ghraib were released to the media, I realized what the sculpture was exhibiting. This must have been Fellowship activity during those early mornings.

Should I put Todd Davis’ Lifelock out of business, or is someone going to explain something?

Part II----------June 19, 2009

If you will recall, my opposing counsel had until June 09^th to answer my counterclaim.

I just received service of this in the mail. It was sent yesterday.

“1. The plaintiff in the above-entitled action hereby denies the Defendant’s counterclaim.”

And that’s it.

He knows Hunt & Leibert have the cancelled check.

My guess is that a hearing will be scheduled for the counterclaim only. Wells Fargo will have the option of appearing because it is a party to the action, although not directly affected by the claim and counterclaim.

My guess is that my opposing counsel will not show for the hearing because in a default judgment case, the Judge cannot award anything over the demand. And my opposing counsel knows that $500.00 is a very fair request for such harassment.

This is what I was thinking about on Thursday…

“Sec. 16-19. Reading of Statement of Amount

in Demand or Statement of Claim; Arguing

Amount Recoverable

In any action seeking damages for injury to the

person, the amount demanded in the complaint

shall not be disclosed to the jury. In the event that

the jury shall return a verdict which exceeds the

amount demanded, the judicial authority shall

reduce the award to, and render judgment in, the

amount demanded. Counsel for any party to the

action may articulate to the jury during closing

argument a lump sum or mathematical formula

as to damages claimed to be recoverable. The

judicial authority shall issue cautionary instructions

pursuant to General Statutes § 52-216b.”

emphasis supplied

It is my interpretation of the situation, that because this is not in injury case, and if either or both of my opposing counsels representing the plaintiff and co-defendant, appear at the hearing, Judge O’Keefe can, on his own motion(s), raise the object of the action to as high as $5,000. I have to research if this is the combined sum, or if each has the potential to loose up to $5,000 in “money” including cash.

Tuesday June 23, 2009

There has been no activity with the law suit. I will file amendments to the objects of the actions. I will go for maximum on BOTH, and let the Court decide what is appropriate. But these amendments will have to wait.

I am having some car trouble; $300. The owner of the condominium where I am renting a room insisted that I re-learn how to drive an automatic transmission car. Then he insisted I borrow his Cadillac. His father also lent me his extra car. This is a very old Cadillac. I found it more comfortable than the modern version.

I have been completing all of my work. But, nonetheless, I have my limitations. I have not been taking the time on the road to purchase a replacement printer cartridge. So I have been using the local library’s computer. It has been a nice place to routinely visit.

The following Motion will soon be filed with the Court. And after that is resolved, I will make the amendments.

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the Defendant pro se in the above-captioned action. I hereby file this motion to change its caption from that above to

VIVIAN LEHMAN, plaintiff

-vs-

PROTECH OIL & WELLS FARGO BANK, co-defendants

2. On May 11, 2009, Magistrate O’Keefe granted Protech Oil’s Motion to add Wells Fargo as co-Defendant; “(Protech Oil) must file Amended Writ for service on new Defendant.”

3. On June 18, 2009, Protech Oil Answered the Counterclaim nine days after its Answer Date of June 09, 2009. The caption heading such legal brief was Protech Oil versus Vivian Lehman. It was without the Added co-Defendant. Henceforth, original Plaintiff was non-compliant with Order.

4. On June 16, 2009, original co-Defendant Vivian Lehman suspected a Revised Writ had never been filed by Protech Oil. She therefore filed a Revised Writ as part of her efforts to preserve her Counterclaim, and to ensure full resolution to all of the confusion involved in this case.

5. The Counterclaim requires of Protech Oil to pay Vivian Lehman $500.00 in cash.

6. The Revised Writ requires of Wells Fargo to pay Vivian Lehman $1.00 in money.

7. There is nothing in Connecticut Practice Book 2009 which requires same object of action for multiple defendants of same caption.

WHEREFORE, Vivian Lehman respectfully requests said change of caption.

_________________________________June ___, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this Motion to Change Caption in two pre-paid postage envelopes, and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to

Mr. William G. Reveley and Associates LLC

PO Box 657

Vernon, CT 06066

&

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

_________________________________June ___, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

Thursday June 25, 2009

Yesterday, I served Wells Fargo at the house. I know it will be returned, Non-Deliverable to Addressee. So I will have to spend $30 to hire a State Marshall (such as Tim Poloski who served me with the ejectment notice) to serve the unoccupied house.

And because I am still having car trouble, I mailed-in my paperwork to Magistrate O’Keefe.

Before we go any further, a clarification is long overdue.

I was very confused by the difference between the status of judge and magistrate. As I understand it, a magistrate is an attorney who is appointed by the Courts to handle issues such as small claims.

I sent Magistrate O’Keefe the Motion to Change the Caption of the case, as well as another Revised Writ which, I believe, says what he wants to hear.

I want $5,000.00;

“In 2007, Wells Fargo Bank seized the asset known as 891 South Street in Coventry, Connecticut. In 2009, Protech Oil took action against Vivian Lehman for the liability of the post-seizure heating bill. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, 7^th edition, “money” is, “Assets that can be easily converted to cash”--such as a house valued at $1.00, as per the Land Records of said Town, volume 1027, page 84. Protech Oil originated this action aware of Wells Fargo’s unwillingness to accept the liabilities coupled with the asset. This is evidenced by its lack of presentation of Cause of Action which would have included invoices and a witness identifying herself as an associate of Protech Oil. It would also have included a substantive argument against Vivian Lehman’s counter-argument of harassment. Vivian Lehman demands the house valued at $1.00 as well as $4,999.00 compensation for harassment. She also demands costs, disbursements, and all other relief as the Court deems proper.”

I can’t give the Town of Coventry legal advise. I can say I think it should try to convene a hearing to void the Land Records document. And then present its conclusions to the Court.

Don’t blame me when the Town goes bankrupt because no one has any tax liability on $1.00 homes!!!!!

Friday June 26, 2009

It required the involvement of the whole neighborhood, but the car did start this morning. We needed jumper cables, a car with an accessible battery operated by a person who just happened to be leaving for work a half-an-hour early, someone who knew how to apply all the technology, and me in the driver’s seat. But the car successfully arrived at its destination.

The shop.

$398.

There has been no activity on the law suit.

No news is good news because it suggests to me the possibility that the Magistrate rejected the $1.00 object of action. It also reassures me that my opposing counsel did not file the Revised Writ. I doubt if I will see $4,999 cash. But if I do, I will go directly to the frame shop and sewing store.

Sunday June 28, 2009

Dear Lieutenant Solenski;

Do you ever wonder about the fact that the last day I drove through Coventry, was also the day after Palm Sunday?

Tuesday June 30, 2009

The bad news is that it is my understanding that the Court delay in rulings on the selection of Revised Writs and other Motions, is being caused by Connecticut’s intolerance to the concept of a $1.00 house.

The good news is that no one is blaming me.

Wednesday July 01, 2009

The only law suit news I have is that the Court has acknowledged my opposing counsel’s denial of the counterclaim.

But no hearing has been scheduled yet.

Otherwise, the copy of the Motion to Change Caption which I sent to Wells Fargo at the house, was returned, unopened.

Friday July 03, 2009

The events of the past few months have reminded me of a few things which occurred in the early days of my parents‘ marriage.

My paternal grandfather died before I was born. He left my paternal grandmother $100,000 cash, not money.

In their lifetime, they had two sons. Growing up, I had an Uncle Ross and Aunt Peggy. They had three children who were all born before me.

In my childhood, I addressed this grandmother as Grandma, and my maternal grandmother as Oma. This is German for grandmother. There were no ethnic issues on my father’s side, as he is sixth generation American with little understanding of his roots. Grandma knew of an ancestor from Vienna, Austria. I believe this was confirmed by my ability to play Waltzes on the piano when I took lessons. I astonished my instructor, Mrs. Edith Harris, every time. Although I wasn’t meant to be a musician, this was too easy. I also believe there was an Italian ancestor, which is why in my earliest days of piano playing, before Mrs. Harris, I could easily play Tarantellas. This is also why I can only eat Italian foods when I have the flu. This would explain my dark brown eyes.

My father left when I was two-years-old. My mother distanced herself from his family. So I never witnessed the fighting.

According to my mother, Grandma tried to orchestrate a battle between her two sons and their spouses for the inheritance. My parents refused to participate. My Aunt and Uncle tried to talk to my mother, explaining that $100,000 is much money.

My mother answered; “That’s $50,000 for each couple. Besides, who knows how many nurses she is going to run-around-the clock before her death. We will be lucky if she doesn’t cost us. And it would be easier for me to go out and earn the money than to bother with her.”

My mother tried to explain to me the expression in my Aunt Peggy’s face when $100,000 was reduced to the negative. Then my Aunt decided to put her secretarial skills to work and opened a business of typing dissertations. (She typed my father’s for no charge.)

My Uncle Ross never figured-it-out.

Before I was served with the Small Claims Court Action, it was made very clear to me that Mara Addison had a payment on her home equity line of credit due on March 23^rd. Henceforth, the $1967.42 plus interest and court costs were due by then.

So $2,000 which I was billed for, was turned around into $5,000 which I believe I am owed.

Tuesday July 07, 2009, 1:30 pm

Before 5 pm today, I want the Coventry Police Department to perform routine on-the-job drug tests of an Officer who telephoned the Police Department local to my current residence, and have him talk to me about repeated offenses of trespassing on the property and telephone calls to 891 South Street.

I called this Officer at the Coventry Police Department. He said he lied to my local Police Department and that the issue was letters I had been writing. According to him, and I think this is what I understood, I sent them a “Blank Midget Notice”.

I assume the “Blank” refers to a profanity.

I was too shocked to answer this allegation.

If the Coventry Police Department wants to dispute this, they can provide me with a copy of the tape recorded telephone conversation. I have the technology to hyperlink it to this website.

I asked for this Officer’s allegations in writing. He refused to provide such.

Is it possible he is too drug-induced to write?

When I spoke to the Dispatcher of the Coventry Police Department, I was informed that the Union does require routine drug tests.

I want the results of someone who talking to ghosts and cannot write a written report!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wednesday July 08, 2009

These are the next papers to be filed. I was certain they would never force me to do this.

　1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the Defendant pro se, in the above-captioned action. I originally served a copy of the Motion to Change the Caption of the above-specified case to,

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

It was returned, unopened. The new address should be;

Wells Fargo Bank of 891 South Street

c/o Officer Robert Dexter

Coventry Police Department

1585 Main Street

Coventry, CT 06238

I would like to ask the Court to recognize the necessity of invoking law enforcement to ensure compliance with all issues of Constructive Notice. While captioned as a business, this house is residential, and unoccupied.

_______________________________________July 08, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Motion to change co-Defendant’s Service Address, in two pre-paid postage envelopes and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to

Wells Fargo Bank of 891 South Street

c/o Officer Robert Dexter

Coventry Police Department

1585 Main Street

Coventry, CT 06238

&

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

_______________________________________July 08, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Friday July 10, 2009

Dear Mr. Kibler;

Would you please telephone Mr. Kevin Williams, TAC of the Superior Court of Tolland County, and ask him if that is his signature on the Judgment of Strict Foreclosure? I assure you, it is not.

Then, would you please review the Courthouse file, and find this original Judgment of Strict Foreclsoure? I assure you, it isn’t there.

Then, would you please look at signatures of Andrew Barsom of the law firm of Hunt & Leibert, and compare his signature of this Strict Foreclosure Judgment to his signature on other documents in your files of other cases? I assure you, it is characteristically identical.

Then, would you please contact Mr. Barsom and ask him for a copy of his license? I assure you, it doesn’t exist.

Judgment

Yes, I received your first e-mail in August of 2007 with the attached Judgment. I lied to you when I said I never received it. But I knew it was a phony Judgment.

Before I go further in this, please understand, I am not blaming you for anything. You did all you could. But you are not an anthropologist. You cannot see through lies. And you have not lived with these people as long as I have. If anyone wants to become angry with you, let’s remember a few things:

At the time Hunt & Leibert tried to take me into Housing Court to evict me, you, for no charge, copied the 200-page manual with all the forms and written instructions. You gave me a complimentary set of oral instructions. There is textbook law, and practitioner law. I had both. Hunt & Leibert never showed for the Court date. I won by default.

At the time Hunt & Leibert tried to take me into Superior Court to eject me, you, for no charge advised me to file an Ex Parté e Motion. I lost, but that is not your fault.

And no one saw you laughing at Hunt & Leibert after my WHO, WHAT, WHERE… legal brief. When I delivered to your office front desk a copy of a later date motion, you were standing in the hallway with a big smile, “Hi Vivian. Shaking them up some more?!”

At the time of your e-mail with the attachment of the Strict Foreclosure Judgment, is when Crossmark decided to play a pro-active role in all this. They sent me a carefully worded e-mail explaining I had no obligation to acknowledge this. They thought I did not understand. So they sent it again. I did understand something else before their first e-mail.

I had no obligation to acknowledge your e-mail with the attached Judgment because the document is not stamped by the Court. Henceforth, it is null and void. This means that legally, it never existed.

Saturday July 11, 2009

And if you are still not convinced that this is a phony judgment, please call Countrywide Home Loans and ask them for a copy of the Deficiency Motion they attempted to file in March of 2009. Why would they want to do that?

Monday July 13, 2009

Dear Mr. Michael Blouin;

Do yourself a favor. Call the law firm of Hunt & Leibert and ask if you will ever recover the $10,000 you spent on a driveway, fencing and everything else purchased and installed to prove to me that someone is living in 891 South Street of Coventry, Connecticut.

The purpose of the improvements was to play with my emotions. I was expected to drive-by on June 09^th, the answer date for my opposing counsel. He was assured by Hunt & Leibert that my emotions would be adequately tampered with by then, and I would submit to his legal claim. And, of course, my lack of responsiveness was because I have not driven through Coventry since early April, and because my emotions cannot be abused.

The associates of Hunt & Leibert surmised that my resistant emotions are resultant of my lack of emotions. In 1997, instead of giving me equal-pay-for-equal-work, these cohorts sent me a married man with AIDS and a ten million dollar debt who was going to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he could have one erection with me.

Their purpose was to steal my second book. They inspired me to write this so Mara Addison, the assistant managing editor of my former publisher, Dorrance, could recover her gambling losses at Donald Trump’s Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. I don’t know exactly how the theft was going to work, but I don’t think she knew either.

In 1997, they assumed my non-responsiveness to the emotional abuse was either because

I have no sex drive;

I hate children; or

I don’t understand that my biological clock is ticking.

Their solution was to cure my problems. I was declared to have a psychological disorder because I could not be lured into a death camp. Any professional could cure this.

Mara Addison believed that her gambling losses were refundable if I would sit still for Donald Trump’s sabotage of my first book. It was my fault she gambled away her home equity line of credit.

In 1998, Kathy McTigue believed that Addison‘s associate, Monica Christiensen, had $30,000 to give away upon my demise. The latter female had to steal clothes from Kathy’s department store so she could conform to the dress policy. The store’s other executives, Dina Sturtevant, Debbie Walker Hauptman and Chris Poleto, also believed Monica had even more money she would want to give to them.

Are you joining the idiot list?

Wednesday July 15, 2009

The quiet of the Court led to my conclusion that I did not ask for enough money. So I revised the writ again. This time I did two writs, one for each co-defendant. The object of action of each is $5,000 in cash and title for a total of $10,000 money. This is the Cause of Action for Wells Fargo Bank:

“In 2007, Wells Fargo Bank seized the asset known as 891 South Street, Town of Coventry, Connecticut. In 2009, ProTech Oil, this Small Claims Court Action's original Plaintiff, filed suit against Vivian Lehman for the liability of the post-seizure heating bill. As per my April 2008 interactions with this Oil Company and the foreclosing law firm of Hunt & Leibert, I will offer Court testimony supporting my claim that ProTech Oil originated this Action aware of Wells Fargo's unwillingness to accept the liabilities coupled with the asset. My claim is also evidenced by ProTech Oil's lack of presentation of Cause of Action (see other writ). In addition to my testimony, I will be serving-and-filing interrogatories to support my argument and profer an explanation as to why I was given 41 hours to vacate, and then handed the $1967.42 heating bill. Vivian Lehman demands the house valued at $1.00 as per the Land Records of theTown of Coventry, Volume 1027, Page 84, as well as $4,999.00 cash for harassment.”

And this is the Cause of Action for ProTech Oil;

“ProTech Oil was this Action’s original Plaintiff. Connecticut Practice Book, Sec. 36-a-646, “No creditor shall use any… deceptive or misleading representation… to collect or attempt to collect any debt.” ProTech Oil’s Writ attached a supporting affidavit signed by Louis Zematis. She was “for the plaintiff”, but no one knows why. Under penalties of perjury, she included an “attached invoice (paragraph 3)”, but no one knows where that is. Paragraph 3 also provided a list of possible explanations for the debt: “heating oil delivered and/or heating services and repairs and/or installation of heating equipment rendered by plaintiff to defendant at defendant’s request”. The affidavit is “deceptive” and “misleading” and is presented to the Court in the guise of a Cause of Action. According to Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, “harassing litigation” is “vexatious litigation”. Henceforth, Vivian Lehman’s Cause of Action against original Plaintiff ProTech Oil is harassment.

I also included a Memorandum of Law:

1) I, Vivian Lehman, am the Defendant pro se in the above-captioned action. I am herewith submitting this Memorandum of Law in support of my Counterclaim against Wells Fargo Bank.

2) Connecticut Practice Book; “Sec. 24-2. Allowable Actions These rules (of Small Claims) shall apply to actions claiming money damages only” (emphasis supplied).

3) According to Black’s Law Dictionary, 7^th Edition, “money” is “Assets that can be easily converted to cash”.

4) According to www.lectlaw.com, “money” is “bank notes, a check, and negotiable notes ... To support a count for money had and received, the receipt by the defendant of bank notes, promissory notes… is sufficient and will be treated as money.”

5) The issue of the Counterclaim is the fact that in September of 2007, Wells Fargo seized the asset of my former residence known as 891 South Street of the Town of Coventry, State of Connecticut. However, as this Claim against original Defendant Vivian Lehman (not added co-Defendant Wells Fargo) exemplifies, it refused the liabilities, such as the heating bill of ProTech Oil, above-Plaintiff.

6) As per the Land Records said Town, Volume 1027, page 84, the value of the house is $1.00. This is within the purview of the Small Claims Court of the State of Connecticut.

WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests of the Court to consider the Title of said property as an actionable object of this Small Claims Court case.

_________________________________July 15, 2009

Vivian Lehman

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Memorandum in a pre-paid postage envelope, and addressed such to the counsel representing ProTech Oil;

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
Juris No : 423840
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

However, I could not perform the same for;

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

Officer Robert Dexter of the Coventry Police Department demanded of me to cease all postal activity. This request was initialized on June 30, 2009 by Michael and Holly Blouin. These are the caretakers hired by the foreclosing law firm of Hunt & Leibert. I would greatly appreciate if the Court would counsel these attorneys on the concept of Constructive Notice. That is, returning legal papers in an unopened envelope with the handwritten note, “This is a residence not a business” while they know their original employer is the Bank, does not exempt the co-Defendant from liability.

__________________________________July 15, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Thursday July 16, 2009

I believe the Blouins do finally understand their $10,000 will not be reimbursed.

Their job is to mow-the-lawn. I paid my neighbor $60/mow. But I never had the silt fence removed and the brush cleared. The law firm invested in such landscaping. The lawn is much larger now. They are probably charging $100/mow.

$100 x 100 = $10,000

Five years.

And the $10,000 is what I know about.

If you will recall, my troubles began in 1990. Donald Trump began finding all of my friends and asking questions. When Sarah and her mother became involved, they immediately bought a Volvo Station Wagon. Even though Trump’s issues with bankruptcy were publicly known, they thought they would earn a fortune selling my privacy.

In 1999, when Kathy McTigue learned I was terminally ill, she signed a contract to have her kitchen remodeled. She didn’t like it when guests walked into the house and were able to immediately see into her kitchen. She also wanted a half-kitchen near her children in the upper floor.

It is very likely that the Blouins already spent the non-existent money. For some mysterious reason, people believe that abuse is profitable.

The bottom line is that the Blouin children will not have the financial means to pursue college careers.

Friday July 17, 2009

Dear Satan;

Thank you for your interference.

Thank you for changing this matter from the intelligent police officer to the dumb COP.

I have the letter.

I will await your further instructions.

P.S. Are you sure you want to scare Joe? I thought you are targeting the other one.

Dear FBI;

I have the letter from the Coventry Police Department of the State of Connecticut. It is signed by Officer Robert Dexter. It verifies that Holly and Michael Blouin are residents of 891 South Street.

While it is true they are not such residents, only caretakers, it is also true that detail is no longer a relevant legal issue.

According to the Land Records of the Town of Coventry, Wells Fargo is the record owner of this residence.

According to the property tax records, I am.

Neither this company nor I authorized this occupation. Henceforth, they can be charged with felony trespassing. Additionally, you need a search warrant, especially for their garage. There you will find all you need to prevent any future Trump activity.

Don’t believe me? Go look at it while they are not looking.

Dan….Please shut the water off in the basement by raising both levers up. And please pay Debbie to mow-the-lawn until I return.

PART II, July 17, 2009

Unfortunately, I cannot scan-in the letter. I can reproduce in verbatim. It was sent registered mail, return-receipt. And because they thought I would reject it, it arrived on a day at a time when I was not at home to receive the mail. They thought I would reject it. They were wrong. I have been waiting for it. It is dated July 07^th, yet arrived on the 17^th.

Vivian Lehman

This letter serves as a notice for you not to contact Holly or Michael Blouin who reside at 891 South Street. Any further contact by you in violation of this statute will be considered harassment;

Sec. 53a-183. Harassment in the second degree: Class C misdemeanor. (a) A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when: (1) By telephone, he addresses another in or uses indecent or obscene language; or (2) with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he communicates with a person by telegraph or mail, by electronically transmitting a facsimile through connection with a telephone network, by computer network, as defined in section 53a-250, or by any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or (3) with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm.

(b) For purposes of this section such offense may be deemed to have been committed either at the place where the telephone call was made, or at the place where it was received.

© The court may order any person convicted under this section to be examined by one or more psychiatrists.

(d) Harassment in the second degree is a class C misdemeanor.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Officer Robert Dexter #346

If anyone does not understand this letter, please ask any of the helpful officers for assistance. For example,

What is a “class C misdemeanor“?

What is “second degree”?

What is Sec. 53a-250?

Why a “psychiatrist” rather than psychologist?

Does this suggest the perpetrator requires medication?

Don’t you have anything else to do?

(860) 742-7331

Tuesday July 21, 2009

WELFARE TARGETS FOR

BABY BAMA

The Presidential Baby can’t do his job.

So I would like to ask each of my students

to act as a welfare case worker

to interview him

and establish his defects.

Don’t forget to ask:

How many children do you have?

Do you have any teenage parents in the family?

Are you behind on your rent?

Do you need food stamps?

What work skills do you have?

Were your skills replaced by the

vacuum cleaner, washer/dryer, dishwasher, or some other electric appliance?

Remember, the taxpayer hasn’t paid him since he arrived on office because

You have to work to be paid.

He claims he has no work ethic.

But that is not his fault.

He was born that way.

I don’t know why.

Otherwise…

Re; Officer Robert Dexter‏

Dear SA Palmer;

As per our conversation today, I would like to explain my complaint, and demand a public apology.

On Tuesday July 07, 2009, I received a visit from Officer Ray Sypher of the Deep River Police Department. According to him, Officer Robert Dexter had told him that I was systematically trespassing on my former residence of 891 South Street, as well as making harassing phone calls.
I explained that was impossible. My car was disabled in my driveway for two weeks, and there was no phone in an abandoned house.

I then telephoned Officer Dexter. He had a different story. First, he explained I was transmitting letters. Then he said I sent a BLANK MIDGET NOTICE. (Today you explained Blank Eviction Notice).
As I was accusing him of falsifying everything, he reminded me of the fact that I was talking into a tape recorder. In simpler terms, I am not allowed to contradict him.

I should not have to explain to someone who graduated from the police academy that there is an American flag waving above your building which stands for a very different concept. If I can't contradict him, then this is a militia.

By the end of the day, I telephoned your dispatcher and left a message for you that I wanted emergency drug tests on Officer Dexter. He was not lucid, could not understand the Constitution, and was continually changing his story.

I also could not acquire the name(s) of those who complained. He did not know. I personally believe he was talking to ghosts.

As I explained to you on the telephone, Holly and Michael Blouin bought $2,000 worth of oil in my name for this house. I don't know why. They don't live there. I am now being sued for this money. I have to send copies of all papers to this address. There are two at issue now: Motion to Change Caption, and Memorandum of Law. In the former, I am requesting that my status change from defendant to plaintiff as I followed the instructions of the Court, but my opposing counsel did not. In the latter, I am requesting of the Court to understand my interpretation of a facet of the laws at issue.

You are aware of the July 07th letter which Officer Dexter transmitted to me, registered mail, return receipt, at taxpayer's expense. In this, he finally identifies who complained; Holly and Michael Blouin.

Are you sure he is not taking hallucinogenic drugs?

If you believe I am making false and malicious allegations, then please hold a public hearing at which Officer Dexter will have to face my cross-examination.

If you believe I am making false and malicious allegations against Holly and Michael Blouin concerning purchasing $2000 of fuel in my name, then please give them a copy of this e-mail. I am certain they will file a civil action against me for defamation of character and libel. And then they will have to explain why their visitations to the residence known as 891 South Street, is not criminal trespassing. They do not own nor rent this residence. The owner, Wells Fargo Bank, did not hire them to do anything.

I would like a letter from you, copy corresponded to Magistrate O'Keefe of the Small Claims Court, that affirms that transmitting copies of legal briefs is not in violation of the Harassment Laws as quoted by Officer Dexter in his letter to me. And that I am allowed to continue this practice after the transmission of Officer Dexter's letter to me.

As I offered today, I will provide law enforcement with a set of my fingerprints to confirm my denial that the Blank Eviction Notice was transmitted by me. Although you don't want incontrovertible evidence, you will receive it.

I WANT A PUBLIC APOLOGY.

Vivian Lehman

Friday July 24, 2009

I had long talks with Coventry Police Chief Palmer about the letter. According to him, while Officer Dexter forbade me from contacting Holly and Michael Blouin, sending them copies of the necessary legal papers is not a violation of the statute cited in his letter.

Two-days-ago, I offered to visit this Police Station and stuff the envelops in front of any of the Officers involved. The Chief declined my offer. So yesterday I visited my local Police Station. The Officer who visited my home was not there, but a State Trooper unfamiliar with the situation was. He did not understand the purpose of my visit, but I showed him every document before it was stuffed into each envelop, and sealed. I offered to mail it from there. He declined.

The envelops are addressed to

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

I would like everyone to understand how significant Officer Dexter’s letter is to me. The issue had to explode before it would stabilize. The Blouins did not have a right to speak on behalf of their employer and return the Motion papers, unopened, with a handwritten note, “RETURN TO SENDER. THIS IS A RESIDENCE, NOT A BUSINESS”. But without this explosion, this matter would never have been clarified. I do not believe these people are still there. I do not believe the envelops will be returned.

But if these are returned, I will file a motion to have the Blouins added as co-defendants. I still do not have the invoices. My original assumption was that claim was made for the heating fuel for the winter of 2008. And my original knowledge was that the foreclosing law firm has the cancelled check. I should not have assumed anything. It is possible that this involves heating fuel purchased after my ejectment. If I am correct, then the Blouins must be criminally prosecuted. This is fraud.

Yesterday, I stuffed everything into three envelops because there was so much of it. In the fourth envelop I stuffed a few items not hitherto fore received by my opposing counsel.

Wells Fargo received

Motion to Change Caption

Memorandum of Law

Copies of both Revised Writs

Lis Pendens (soon to be filed)

My opposing counsel received

Copies of both Revised Writs

Lis Pendens

The Lis Pendens will be filed with the Courts and with the Land Records of the Town of Coventry. It is a statement to anyone with any interest in buying the property who appropriately performs a title search, that a judgment may soon be entered affecting ownership. As you can see, such filing will have to wait until after the Magistrate rules on the caption, and until after the he recognizes my Revised Writ against Wells Fargo.

Notice is given that the above-entitled action was filed in the above-entitled Court on July 15, 2009 by Vivian Lehman, plaintiff Against ProTech Oil and Wells Fargo Bank, co-defendants. The action affects 891 South Street of the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland, State of Connecticut, and described below. Its current title-holder is Wells Fargo Bank. Title to specific real property is taken action upon by the claim. The Object of the Action is title to said property. Any persons in any manner dealing with the above-described real estate subsequent to the filing of this action will take subject to the rights of the Plaintiff Vivian Lehman as established in this action.

The property is described as follows:

A certain parcel of land in the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland and the State of Connecticut and shown as Assessor’s Lot 6 on a map entitled “Boundary & Wetland Survey, Prepared for Sonia Cohn, Showing reconfiguration of lots 6, 7, & 8. Lot 8 split into Parcel A and Parcel B, for property located at 85 South Street, Coventry, Connecticut. Sheet 1 of 1, Job #2003-0029, Scale 1’ = 100’, Dated February 2^nd, 2004, Revised 3/18/04. 4/04/04 and 4/13/04, Prepared by Bob Hellstrom Land Surveying”, which map is on file in the Coventry Town Clerk’s Office, and more particularly bounded and described as follows:

Said parcel is more particularly bounded and described as follows:

Beginning at an iron pin on the west street line of South Street as the southeast corner of lot 6 and the northwest corner of lot 7, thence

S 06° 27’ 54” W for a distance of 52.11’ to an iron pin, thence

S 14° 59’ 50” W for a distance of 129.17’ to an iron pin, thence

N 86° 08’ 16” W for a distance of 87.90 to an iron pin, thence

S 47° 13’ 46” W for a distance of 88.41’ to an iron pin found;

the preceding three (3) courses are along the land known as lot 7, thence

N 46° 20’ 37” W for a distance of 243.08’ to an iron pin, thence

N 43° 17’ 08” E for a distance of 309.67’ to an iron pin found; the preceding two (2) courses are along the land now or formerly of Hayes; thence

S 42° 39’ 47” E for a distance of 149.03” to an iron pin found, thence

S 45° 46’52”E for a distance of 75.97’ to the point of beginning, the preceding two (2) courses are along the west side of South Street.

_____________________________________, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Plaintiff pro se

Monday July 27, 2009

I have had many job interviews lately to supplement the $100 I am permitted to earn and the $180 I am permitted to receive through unemployment insurance benefits.

In April and May I was a seasonal at the FTD, Floral Transworld Delivery, call center. When the “season” was over, they apologized to me and let me go. Today I saw the HELP WANTED sign again. I assume it is for the Fall holidays. But the human resources manager researched me and learned I am not eligible for re-hire. She refused to say why. I was not even permitted to greet my old friends.

I have had many job interviews over the past few months. The interviews go well, and then there is no phone call. I call, and the phone call is disconnected.

I know why.

It is because former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and President Barack Obama want me to believe and practice the concept of White Supremacy. The FBI endorses this concept. My midnight stranger went from giving me good sex to grotesque sex as this issue was developing. His name is Special Agent Dan Curtain of the New Haven, Connecticut FBI headquarters. I do not know the color of his hair because he is bald with very little chest and pubic hair. His penis is approximately eight inches long. He explained to me that he often can’t have an erection. He did this by presenting his impotence to my face one night.

I believe that White People are more intelligent than Black. I believe it is the WHITE HOUSE not UNCLE TOM’S CABIN. And I moved to Connecticut because it is considered the wealthiest state in the United States. This means it has the smallest welfare population and henceforth, the smallest quantity of minorities. I believe it was natural for Secretary of State Rice to assume her role without showing-up for work. To her, it is a fancy welfare check. I believe the same for President Obama. I believe that God’s purpose for placing them in such roles was to prove such supremacy. After the failures of these two, no one would elect nor allow appointment of other Blacks, including Black people. I saw Blacks quit their jobs after he was elected. They assumed the welfare check was in the mail. It wasn’t. The White governors refused the money.

I had one Black friend in high school. I did not know her “younger sister” was her daughter until it came to the fore that every Saturday morning she was in the welfare office demanding an apartment for the two of them. According to her, she became pregnant after an unplanned act of passion, and did not understand that the consequences of her actions would be a pregnancy. In simpler terms, she characterized herself as a monkey.

So I would like a list of the tasks which the President cannot perform, as well as those which Rice could not, and I will begin to Target each one. The only one I cannot help him with is the fact that his wife does not orgasm. Is he asking for my help with that too?

I have observed that only White children do the Targets. The reason is obviously that the Blacks, including the First Children, cannot.

Tuesday July 28, 2009

Yesterday I received a circular letter from the Office of the Attorney General, State of Connecticut, Richard Blumenthal. It stated;

“You are eligible to receive a payment as a part of the settlement entered into between the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut and Countrywide Financial Corporation...”

I researched it on the Internet. It is an $8.3 billion settlement resolving issues with its clients concerning inappropriately mortgage marketing practices.

This is why Nancy’s Pelosi’s House of Representatives can Bank of America all of that money.

Can you guess how much I am entitled to?

I wish I knew exactly how much Mara Addison’s mortgage payment is for. I am certain Mr. Blumenthal knows. They belong to the same Synagogue.

To receive this payment, I must sign a release and return it postmarked no later than October 22, 2009.

It is no coincidence that on October 09^th, my car lease expires. I have attempted to work-out a new lease with the dealer to purchase the car, not replace it with a new one. My dealer, Michael Howard, never returned my calls. According to his colleague, Sean Murphy of Columbia Ford in Connecticut, I need a $2,000 down payment. He informed me of this a few days ago.

On a related subject…

I researched the KKK on the Internet. I want to join. The only problem is that they require that I purchase my own robe and hood. In this economy, I can’t afford it. They probably loose many potential members that way. They should begin a Black Victimized Program.

Part II-----July 28, 2009

Dear Holly and Michael Blouin;

I told Satan you would never do it.

Don’t believe it? Look at all the snakes on the cable channels after your lie to the police in June 30, 2009. And there were suddenly many of these reptiles with the news reporters talking about a “recoil“. The satellites which observe me never noticed my lack of fear. And I am normally terrified of these animals, even tiny gardener snakes.

One of them was he.

You forgot that in

January of 2009,

I checked the Coventry Land Records as I was researching the related issue of the property tax payments. The transaction which you claim was made on

July 02, 2008

---sale of the house for $277,900--did

not

happen.

Felony trespassing is one thing. Falsification of Land Records is another. And according to this Land Records print-out you sent me, the record is Volume 1083, page 253. The Magistrate finds you very convincing. If he researched the Land Records and/or communicated with my friends, he would not.

On the date of this transaction, your husband did not have a profession. No mortgage lending association would have given you any credit.

And if you are living in the Coventry house, why was your print-out of the Land Records mailed from Hartford, 30-miles away?

The FBI did not arrest you for felony trespassing, nor did they perform the search of your garage. It doesn’t matter. I have something better.

Michael Blouin is an associate of Alliance Mortgage. He has a temporary mortgage origination license. If Governor Jodi Rell has any intelligence (and I do mean any), she should use this falsification as an excuse to revoke it.

What could that possibly mean?

The house in Coventry is almost within walking distance of a branch of New Alliance Bank. When I moved my accounts from New York, I refused to enter this bank. I never even asked for change. The FBI never thought to ask why.

“New Alliance” is a code for al-Qaeda. It means itself.

If this bank and such financial institution want to disagree with me, then they can place their denials in writing, and I will publish such on this website with an apology.

If the FBI plays its legal cards exactly right (and they probably won’t) this can go from a title-records-falsification, to other accounting issues. Once they enter the New Alliance financial radius, they can destroy all of al-Qaeda.

My grandfather was a urological surgeon. If you will recall, he said, “The key to surgery is to enter the correct layer, then you can excise everything.”

President Baby Bama is constantly teasing me with the “key”. He never noticed the engraved choice of words which were made long before his.

Satan, a child of God, is the tempter. Humans are the evil-doers.

Dear Coventry Land Records;

The print-out sent to me indicates that on July 02, 2008, Holly and Michael Blouin purchased 891 South Street and that such is recorded on

Volume 1083, page 253.

Would you please print-out this page and transmit to

Magistrate Thomas O’Keefe

Centralized Small Claims Court

80 Washington Street

Hartford, CT 06106

Thursday July 30, 2009

..and, of course, if the house sold in 2008, I would have received a 1099-c in January of this year.

Otherwise, the three envelops I sent to 891 South Street were returned, unopened with the note that “you used to live here and should know this is a residence, not a bank.”

I followed God’s instructions. I did everything possible to bring Countrywide to the negotiating table. I can’t stop what will happen next.

If everything proceeds as per the planned trap, Countrywide will throw a tantrum at the thought of paying the next property tax bill. It is due in September. If you will recall, last year it was paid in August, before I received the bill and had an opportunity to explode in wrath.

Countrywide/Bank-of-America has no choice but to sue Hunt & Leibert as well as report all involved to the Connecticut Bar Association. Disbarments are likely, as well as revelations about who has phony credentials.

Countrywide paid a fortune in property taxes, without the benefit of the tax break. It also paid for landscaping, caretaking, and legal fees They must be out at least $50,000 as well as the $278,000 mortgage. They will probably consider offering me a deal which includes my agreement to open the foreclosure judgment. That would force Wells Fargo to tell the Court the truth. Won’t happen. And I can’t change the fact that it has been over three years since my last Countrywide mortgage payment. This means that Countrywide legally abandoned the mortgage as per Connecticut statutes. And, of course, I have a print-out of the land records history of the house. Countrywide is not included on it. This means the mortgage never existed. I can’t change that either.

It is now in Satan’s domain.

Monday August 17, 2009

Legally, I have performed some research. The Countrywide legal settlement is not for foreclosure activity, but rather mortgage marketing. They believe I was not treated properly as a client.

I still have not filled-out the form. I have until October 22^nd. Checks will be issued in January of 2010. I have been thinking about taking a little trip. If I loose weight, it would be to Florida. If I still do not look presentable in a swimsuit, I would go on an ice skating trip into the crisp mountain air. Many years ago, a friend recommended her home state of Vermont for my asthma.

I would go, except for one problem; money. I listened to the commercials promising any flight-package, anywhere, for $99 or less. Of course, I couldn’t find one. This is what a trip to Vermont would cost:

$450 round trip flight or

$ 83 round trip train tickets

$200 = $50/hotel-night x 4 nights

$390 ice skates***

Totals

$1040 or

$673

***You are probably thinking I should rent ice skates. But each shoe size is different. I ice skated during elementary and graduate schools. The only way for me is custom made.

Tuesday August 18, 2009

I should have also mentioned that my friend is a paralegal who, several years ago, advised me of extreme caution in reading the fine print of those “deals” offered. In traveling to Vermont, the most important issue is flexibility of the dates in case of snow storms. I do not want to become one of those travelers who sits endlessly in an airport watching through the window as Mother Nature decides my fate. The law firm that she works for specializes in contract disputes.

I should have also reminded everyone of the fact that on July 28^th I announced that I may be eligible to receive $1944.35. It is now three weeks later. It is obvious that my friend performed the same research as I; reviewing the judgment in the Countrywide Home Loans settlement. After careful consideration, we obviously reached the same conclusion. Signing the waiver precluding myself from future legal activity against Countrywide concerning actionable mortgage related issues would not adversely affect my legal position as a defendant in the currently non-disposed case against Wells Fargo Bank.

The next question I anticipate inquires as to why she did not contact me herself, but rather used the “enhanced” system. The answer is that she does not have my phone number nor e-mail address. If you will recall, I am renting a room. The phone is not in my name and I never stated on this website in whose name it is.

She has privileged information on a certain law firm. It is pursuant to a contract dispute. She is willing to show me the file, but not give me a copy nor provide the name through the enhanced system. They will never be able to prosecute her, because I won’t reveal her name. But if they prosecute, they admit its validity. If they sue for libel and/or slander, they must explain under penalties of perjury it was false.

A signatory has a previous conviction for prostitution and felony drug dealing in another state. She or he should have been disbarred from the State of Connecticut.

Research it yourself! Then tell me who it is, because I am very curious.

Thursday August 20, 2009

I might have misunderstood her. I might have heard what I wanted to hear. Or I might have conjoined the information with something unrelated. She knows something that she believes I need to know. And three weeks after I announced I was going to receive almost $2,000, she extended the invitation.

I believe that the people calling me liar performed research by asking a certain law firm. Is that enough to call me a liar? Are they so credible? Do you really think they are going to admit to anything because they were asked?

Something to think about…

Concerning the ejectment over one year ago, my opposing counsel, Sean Sweeney, looks twice my age. Yet I am certain that our birth certificates will reflect a nearly identical year. This means he has had twice my life. Why?

How about if I take a long overdue vacation and find out?

Sunday August 23, 2009

This is what has been happening in my world.

Officer Robert Dexter was never disciplined for walking up to a vacant house, receiving a complaint from a ghost, and then aggressively acting upon such. According to the Coventry Police Chief Palmer, these are not symptoms of on-the-job hallucinogenic drug use. According to the Great Uncle of their neighbor Monica Christiansen, these are symptoms of an inferior British brain. If I ever have a face to conversation with this Uncle Adolph Schicklegruber, what would Officer Dexter want me to say in his defense? I would like a written answer. They have my address and phone number.

And the President arranged with my new part time employer that my $40 first paycheck would be sent to the nation of Kenya. According to him, the Natives are restless and can’t work. The new nationalized health insurance plan should fix that. We will become sick while watching them waste our money.

On an unrelated subject…

The lady who is my local postal delivery person is out sick for a few weeks. She was bitten by a dog. According to the medical philosophies of my former New York neighbors, she will never be able to read-and-write again. (I think she is on vacation, and the crusade to convince me that Fluffy is responsible for a child’s scholastic failure goes on. In the meantime, a 27 year old can’t find the Ladies Room, and I don‘t know what her mother is trying to accomplish by focusing on my childhood dog. Would someone please explain such to me?)

Otherwise, tensions are mounting as the property tax bill will be due on September 31^st. It is for approximately $3,000. If Linda St. Pierre’s ovaries are still functioning and producing estrogen, she is still alive. A hormonal explosion should soon occur, must worse than what she had in March of 2008. I would like to give the Coventry Police Department some well intended advise.

When she files phony police reports against me, please have her phone such in. In her hormonal condition, there may be peculiar odors. Because of the Wicca she practices, this could be dangerous. If you are having a person-to-person encounter, please wear a surgical mask and rubber gloves.

They will probably rebel against me and do the opposite. Guess what will happen next!

Sunday August 30, 2009

Here comes the Devil’s Alternative!