Jan - May 2008 May - Oct 2008 Nov - Dec 2008
Jan - March 2009 April - June 2009
June - August 2009 Oct - Dec 2009
Jan - Mar 2010 April - June 2010
July - Sept 2010 Oct - Dec 2010
PresViv E.Indicators SepticTank
MostWanted Attic Fupi Is A Dummy Targets
Saturday January 03, 2009
I just faxed the following letter.
|
PO Box 629 Coventry, CT 06238 January 03, 2009 Ms. Linda St. Pierre HUNT LEIBERT JACOBSON PC 50 Weston St. Hartford, CT 06120 Re; 891 South Street, Coventry, CT 06238 Dear Ms. St. Pierre; We first met on the night of March 15, 2008. You
visited for tea at the above-specified address. We met again on April 07,
2008. You were with Judicial Marshall Tim Poloski and served me with
ejectment papers. We met again on the day of the ejectment of April 09th. In Late August, I received the property tax bill for
said address. You already paid such on July 02, 2008: $2765.60 + $69.00
(trash). I have the receipt from the Town of Coventry and thank you for your
advanced-payment. Because the bill and payments were in my name, for IRS
purposes, I am planning on reporting a gift of $2834.60, and henceforth the
deduction of $2765.60 on my Schedule A. My assumption is that the IRS will
qualify all your landscaping and other expenses as gifts for which I must be
taxed. I would like a list of all your expenses, as well as
your advanced payment to me. My tax rate is 12% plus tax preparation fees. If
I receive overpayment from you, I will return extra monies. I would
appreciate the responding courtesy for any underpayments. Thank you very much. Vivian Lehman |
Wednesday January 08, 2009
Yesterday I was at Kmart performing a Nabisco project. As I was
placing my empty boxes in the bailer, a man insisted on speaking to me about
the professional problems his wife was having. She is a judge of the Department
of Child and Family. According to him, she cannot focus on the children because
dirty politics are dominating the system. We will be dealing with this. I don’t
know when. I don’t expect anything of the Chief Justice of the Connecticut
Courts nor Governor Jodi Rell who are not capable of understanding the problem.
They will probably assemble a committee.
Next issue…
Governor Bill Richardson has withdrawn his name from the candidacy for
Commerce Secretary to President-Elect Obama’s cabinet. The media is speculating
why. I already know.
Obama promised 3,000,000 jobs in a short time span. He assured Mr.
Richardson that our Targets will take care of this as well as all other facets
of the aggressive and ambitious economic stimulus package. He forgot one
detail.
His two daughters. They can’t do what I assigned. And what I assigned was
not nearly as ambitious as my previous assignments. I expected that.
He is lucky my mother and grandmother are no longer alive. They endlessly
ridiculed over-achieving men who married women with half their intelligence,
and bequeathed such to the next generation. I can’t repeat their jokes because
I was too young to understand these. But they would have had him laughed-out of
his inauguration.
President Bush still wants us to Target the issues in the Middle East. I
have decided to take care of myself first, especially since a nation of people
who like to boast of their superior intelligence should not need anything from
us. And if they are anti-assimilation, they cannot accept.
I currently have a huge IRS problem.
I suddenly realized that the $10,000 in back taxes the law firm paid in
2007, must also be reported to the IRS in the form of an amendment. Although I
don’t like to make excuses, and I know the Federal Government doesn’t like to
hear these, I did not know that the property taxes were still in my name until
August of 2008. And I didn’t figure any of this out until January 1st
and 2nd of this year, when I studied the tax website trying to
pre-calculate my refund.
As to the taxes which must soon be filed for 2008, you are probably
wondering why a gift of approximately $5,450 cannot be counterbalanced by an
identical deduction. The answer is that this figure is the amount of the
standard deduction. Without the counterbalancing gift, it augments the refund.
With the gift, it creates a debt which must be paid.
Working on this website was not in my plans for today. But this morning I
assembled my paperwork to perform some tasks for Crossmark. Even though I
wasn’t going to be doing any sewing or museum-touring, I didn’t mind. I opened
the front door and found myself greeted by a hail storm. I rescheduled
everything. It is nice not to owe anyone any explanations.
I turned on the television set to Fox cable news. Immediately there was a
report that the IRS understands this is a difficult economy. Arrangements and
even compromises can be made. Of course, reporting still must be done
accurately. This is what I need.
1. Next month, I want my refund. If the law firm provides me with full
cooperation by then, great! If not, I want the IRS to allow me to file an
amendment for this tax return, as well as that filed in 2008. I cannot control
what Hunt & Leibert does with the information I need.
2. A pre-emptive IRS hearing to establish how this unique situation should
be filed. And I want them, not my tax-preparer, to calculate how much money
they owe. It would be best if they paid the IRS directly, rather than have me
relay the money. I believe this because after they paid the September 2008
property taxes, they attempted to steal the money out of my bank account. The
IRS can save me much trouble.
Thursday January 08, 2009
Dominating the news has been the issues concerning
Illinois Governor Blagojevich. This state is, of course, the home of
President-Elect Barack Obama. The Governor’s wife’s name is Patricia. It is my
understanding that she was the realtor for the Obamas when they lived in
Chicago.
I can’t find any record of her license. Of course, it could
be under her former husband’s name.
I would like to know.
I found the following on freerepublic.com. Thank you!!!!
Looking For INFO-Patricia
BlagoJevich Was The Realtor In Rezko-Obama House Deal?
TCRLAF | 12-10-08 | TCRLAF
Posted on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:27:38 PM by tcrlaf
I'm trying to find info and links
to what Bill O'reilly just said on his show, NAMELY that Patricia Blagojevich
was the Real Estate Broker in the Rezko-Obama land deal!!
IF TRUE, this could explain how
Obama "Paid" for Governor Blutarsky's support for his Senate run!!!
ANY AND ALL HELP IS
APPRECIATED....
I am finding links and story's
from the trib describing some of her crooked deals, and she was a partner of
Rezko's in his Real Estate ventures.
She has a "Home-Based"
Real Estate business called "RIVER REALTY".
THANX IN ADVANCE!! LET's GET TO
WORK!!
I researched RIVER REALTY and found nothing.
Is she a real estate agent or mortgage broker?
Saturday January 10, 2009
Dear Mr. Obama;
Ten days away from your inauguration and I want to reach an agreement with
you. Before I go into the details I want you to consider a few facts.
If your eldest daughter were born a Bush, she would be three-years-away
from her first abortion. During his time as a Texas governor, he spent more
time executing prisoners than doing homework and spending quality time with his
children. And while in the White House, he committed himself to constantly
harassing me. While he was concentrating on sending trespassers into my home,
one of his daughters was very relieved when she learned she did not have to
abort her last pregnancy. The father did agree to marry her. But the wedding
was postponed until after the delivery.
Is that the life you want?
If you spend one hour each day with each child, you can easily
counter-balance the negative impact your wife’s negative intelligence has had.
And they can do the Targets.
Give me back my house, no mortgage, a property tax bill reflective of a
value of $1 + $30,000-down-payment, a salary payable through Crossmark as I
continue to work for them, and a thorough cleansing of the Coventry Police
Department. You will have to find competent, non-corruptible, well-trained
officers. I don’t think it has ever been done before in any police precinct.
But you did promise “change”.
And remove Hilary from her candidacy as Secretary of State. This is also in
the best interest of your daughters.
Sunday January 11, 2009
I know what Nancy Grace is trying to do every night as
she devotes a full hour to the Casey Anthony investigation. She is trying to
force the obvious killer to confess. This person is NEVER going
to admit to practicing Wicca/witchcraft. I hope watching this, that everyone
understands the frustrations of law enforcement agents of past centuries.
When we intellectually discuss the witchcraft trials of
Salem, Massachusetts, we recognize The Crucible as a truthful reflection
of the alleged travesty of justice. The fact is that the author reconstructed
these events, while never specifying if he was also such a witchcraft
practitioner. I don’t know much about Arthur Miller. I do know he was Jewish.
The book of Ezra Chapter 4 characterizes such people as witches.
The later-date book was published during the McCarthy
era, when seemingly innocent people were accused of being communists. One of
these was Lucille Ball. She and her Cuban husband divorced one year after Fidel
Castro became the dictator of such country. After she and Desi Arnaz completed
the television series I Love Lucy, they co-starred in the movie, The
Long Long Trailer. In this, they assumed roles similar to Lucy and Ricky
Ricardo. The difference is that in the end, the question is raised on whether
or not they should stay together after the “project”. In the movie, they do,
after he discusses everything with his father. But that is the Hollywood
ending. In real life, he probably dumped her. The true test of whether or not
he was a spy is by scrutinizing their children. Offspring of spies are not
allowed to talk to anyone. Their children were not very conversational.
When I first noticed what the people of Wicca and
“communism/socialism” are capable of, their first offensive strategy was to
destroy my reputation. They were very good at it.
Nancy Grace is also outraged at the donations Casey
Anthony is receiving into her prison account. Instead of forwarding the money
into funeral expenses, she is purchasing snacks and health-and-beauty
necessities such as body creams. In my opinion, Ms. Grace should not direct her
attention at how the money is being received, but rather who is sending. My
guess is these are “pro-life”/anti-abortionists who understand that mother is
the one of many. And if the grandmother had not made the 9-1-1 phone call, no
one would have noticed the child’s absence.
It is the only good thing I have to say about the
parents. Otherwise, I believe that the practice of Wicca is genetic, and the
secrecy is learned most likely from family.
I believe this because I once had a co-worker who looked
very Saxon. She was raised by an adoptive family of whom I know nothing except
one detail which was connected to her job-attendance-rate.
Her absenteeism was very high. I wondered why the manager
was not firing her. He finally explained she was not routinely sick, but rather
recovering from her father’s latest beating.
I would have called Department of Child and Family, but
she was over 18-years-old.
This Saxon explained to me why she was adopted. Her
mother was single and 21-years-old. It made sense. These people are always
pregnant with children they don’t know what to do with.
One of the first things I learned about this co-worker is
that she practices Wicca. She never mentioned that her adoptive-parents shared
in this. So I assume they didn’t. Henceforth, it is genetic, except for the
secrecy.
The only specific detail of witchcraft that she shared
with me was the use of the herb bilberry. It affects the eyes. According to
her, in large dosages, it creates hallucinations.
Maybe Casey Anthony had one when this occurred.
Tuesday January 13, 2009
Dear Hunt & Leibert;
If you kill me, then the house will have to be processed via my estate.
This will require another court, justice, and one year of time.
If you settle peacefully with me, it would take one week.
Saturday January 17, 2009
As you probably guessed, another Ezra-4/ricen attack
occurred last Sunday.
I took an afternoon nap, awoke, took my asthma pills, and
then prepared for night-sleep. My blood-pressure dropped and the major heart
attack began including left arm paralysis. I took one birth-control-pill, and
one of each of Solaray’s Butterbur and Tart Cherry. It was a five-minute-event.
My guess is that some time earlier this month someone
entered my room and removed one pill from the bottle. They submitted this to
the lab which laced it with ricen. It was then returned.
The satellites must have helped by providing the
necessary information on my routine.
A few days before I took it, while I was servicing one of
my Home Depots, an FBI agent walked by me. Although I had never seen him
before, they all share the same facial expression. I knew trouble was coming.
He was unusually tall, even for an FBI agent. He wore a dark business suit
which matched his dark hair and Caucasian skin.
I do not believe that the information on my schedule came
from Crossmark. Rather, he arrived approximately one hour after I did. This
suggests to me that the satellites provided such information.
If the Bureau knew I was about to be attacked, why didn’t
they stay with me 24/7?
So therefore, I will tell you everything else I told
them. You are much more useful than they are, and could probably do more with
the anthropological information. Here it is…
Because Osama-Ben-Laden/Robert-Crowe/Antonio-Mendez is
Aztec, I suggested that they decode with such. It is my understanding that it
required approximately one year for their sub-organization, “CAT”, to perform
this, but it was done.
And I suggested they study the Olmec.
When I was a college student, taking Prof. Bruce Byland’s
brilliant course on Mesoamerican Archeology, studying Aztec sacrifices was
included in the curriculum. I was actually the only student in the class,
because I changed my major from physics into anthropology very late in the four
year term. This course was required, and the only way we could beat the
deadline was with an independent study.
When I arrived for our appointment one day with deep,
dark circles under my eyes because I couldn’t sleep between nightmares, which included
the sacrifice of my dog, Professor Byland realized I could never study these
people. Most students would then flip-over to the Maya or Incas. But I had
already begun very exciting research on the Olmec. They lived near the Aztec.
Included in my readings, I found a comment that Stela C
of Tres Zapotes had never been interpreted. I asked him if I could do my term
paper attempting to do just that. It would be more fun than the standard…
The Olmec were…
They lived in…
Etc.
He agreed.
Then I had to find a picture of this. At the time I
thought that a Stela and a Monument were the same thing. When I later told him
of my mistake, he thought it was funny. But I found an excellent sketch of
Monument C of this same site. It would take me awhile to realize it wasn‘t what
I was looking for, but it was a reasonable substitute.
Monument C is a frieze sculpture in three parts on a
rectangular shaped rock which looks like it was once shaped into a building
block. I thought the first image represented prosperity, and the third a
drought-induced-famine. The middle had me perplexed.
As to this middle picture, Prof. Byland noted the
aggressive pose of the warrior. I didn’t think it was aggressive. He imitated
it until I agreed. He also noted it was upside-down. According to him, this
represents a divine connection.
Over the years, I decided that just because I don’t like
the Aztecs, does not mean I don’t have to have literature on them. If I was
going to be any good as an anthropologist, I had to be able to research anything.
I collected such books at library sales, among others.
Two years ago, when I realized that Robert Crowe is Ben
Laden, and already knew that he is Aztec, I pulled one of the books off of my
shelves and researched a September annual ritual. In the first few pages, there
it was. The War of Flowers. At the end of the harvest season, a major death
toll of the enemy is required.
I remembered this Monument. I decided someone recorded
this ritual, and left this for future investigators.
The plane in Pennsylvania was upside-down.
Other books mentioned that the Aztecs attacked the Olmecs
at their site of San Lorenzo. This Monument was found at Tres Zapotes. I
concluded the survivors must have fled there. This must have been carved on a
piece which was salvaged from one of their wrecked structures.
When I was at the FBI office, I showed the Special Agent
the picture. He anxiously wrote down Monument C of Tres Zapotes and was quite
fascinated by this 2,000-year-old relic.
In my follow-up visit, I brought other books. One of
these included dates of Aztec history recorded by two explorers. There are
actually two columns of dates. Their accounts differ slightly. I explained that
the second column must be the set-of-dates corresponding to that of the Aztec
records. It can be used to predict future attacks.
(And because Ben Laden is pro-Sandinista of Nicaragua,
any dates on which they lost power can also be used as predictors. All dates of
attack are easily predictable.)
But why the same calendar as that of the Europeans, they
wanted to know. How was it possible?
Let’s look at the archeological facts.
The Aztecs and Egyptians lived on approximately the same
latitude. The former built pyramids within the last thousand years, the latter
approximately 10,000 years ago. The Olmec built such approximately 2,000 years
ago.
Modern anthropologists believe that American Natives
peoples came from Asia across the Alaskan Bearing straights. Throughout the
cycles of the last glacial age, water was frozen within the Pacific Ocean
thereby routinely exposing this land.
According to that theory, 10,000-years-ago or more, in
North Africa, there lived a people with pyramid technologies. They split. One
stayed, the other eventually journeyed through Asia, across Alaska, and into
Mexico. They then each developed their technologies nearly identically.
Let’s try something else.
Consider one other fact. Approximately
40,000,0000-years-ago, early-primates/pre-monkeys found their way from Africa
into the Americas. No one knows how it happened. It wasn’t across the Bearing
Straights because there is no fossil trail.
I suggested to the FBI the existence of another
land-bridge across the Caribbean. They consulted with scientists who called me
crazy. I suggested that they not talk to office-geologists, but rather the
phone company. They set the cables. Very reluctantly, the FBI did as I
instructed.
They confirmed the existence of this land-bridge.
And, of course, the European calendar is a derivative of
that of the Ancient Egyptians.
Sunday January 18, 2009
A correction…The Olmec site attacked by the Aztecs, according to the
literature I cited for the FBI, was Oaxaca, Mexico. San Lorenzo is another
site. A fourth is La Venta. But I never mentioned that before.
To change the subject…
The Casey Anthony case in Florida.
Last night on Nancy Grace, a female caller made a very interesting
observation. The murder victim’s date-of-birth is August 9, 2005. She
disappeared in early June of 2008. Casey, the mother and accused murderer, said
in a recorded jailhouse interview, that she believed Caylee would return home
by her third birthday. On August 11th, a meter-reader for the power
company found her remains. The caller raised the question of whether a leak
existed.
The meter-reader claims he called his supervisor and police. It is my
understanding that he originally lead the police to the wrong area. It is also
my understanding that the responding officer does not have a reputation for
reliability. Three months later, the same civilian made the discovery a second
time, called again, and lead them to the correct area.
It is also my understanding from watching Jane Valez Mitchell, that the
former career of this meter-reader is a bail bondsman.
Where have we heard something like that before?
According to Wikipedia, on August 21st, Casey Anthony was
released after one month of incarceration. Her bond of $500,200 was posted by
California bounty hunters Leonard Padilaa and his nephew Tony.
If I recall correctly, Casey Anthony’s father is in law enforcement.
Although I admit it is difficult to keep-up with all the details of this case.
All of my understandings and recollections may not be accurate.
I would like to know…
The identity of the “supervisor” the meter-reader/bail-bondsman claimed he
called upon finding the body.
Why was bail posted ten-days after this original moment?
Is Mr. Anthony in law enforcement? If so, was he ever connected to any of
these bail bondsmen and bounty hunters before this occurred?
I would like to “target” these issues, but I need assurances that no one
will laugh at the Obama children. It isn’t their fault their father won’t help
with homework.
Thursday January 22, 2009
Do I understand the subliminal information correctly?
The management company caring for the house to which I
have title, turned the water back on in the house even though I purposefully
turned-it-off? Then they did NOT turn the heat on, and now there is a burst
pipe?
If this is true, I would like to ask the Town of Coventry
if this is adequate grounds for revocation of the certificate of occupancy?
If not, does this change the value of the house? I would
like reassessment.
Friday January 23, 2009
Two related issues…
It is my understanding that the midnight-stranger/FBI-Agent is considering
proposing to me without apologizing for abandoning me. But despite that issue,
he seems concerned that I am 42-years-old and may be past child-bearing age.
I would like to inform him of something I once briefly mentioned on this
website. I think it was in 2001 that I had a complete abdominal sonogram. Because
I was tired of everyone’s panic about this issue, I suggested that the
gynecologist give the results to a radiologist who does not know me, and
ascertain my age and potential. This person concluded I was a very healthy
25-year-old and confirmed I could have as many children as I want.
I should have also mentioned on more thing. When I had the exam, the
technician showed me the photograph of the imminent ovulation.
While I probably can’t have ten children, I am certain I can have the
standard quantity of 2.3. This is because I did not waste myself on any married
man with AIDS and a $10,000,000 debt who wants to do me a favor and sign his
name to my copyrights so he may have one erection with me.
The second issue…
I believe Bank of America, formerly Countrywide, finally looked at the
paperwork.
I will never know what took them so long.
They are acknowledging that they have to settle with me. Before they
approach, they must understand that they will have to present to me the
following paperwork:
Certificate of Homeowner’s Insurance purchased by Wells Fargo, not
Countrywide. If anything serious happens, I do not believe the courts will
recognize a policy of the latter after they awarded ownership to the former.
Certificate of Occupancy dated within 30-days of the meeting.
Certificate that the Building Inspector of the Town of Coventry surveyed
the condition of the house within said 30-day-period.
Assurances from the Town of Coventry Police Chief that their mushy
sergeants and lieutenants have better things to do than wait for my dying phone
call.
Receipt that the oil tank was filled and paid for within said
30-day-period.
An acknowledgment of the fact that attorney Sean Sweeney informed the Court
on April 07th that I did NOT default on my mortgage with Countrywide.
Reversal of all damage to my credit.
An apology for the fact that I was given 41-hours to vacate, and everyone
was instructed not to help me, including the FBI agent.
Do you take this ass-licker…?
Part II--------Friday January 23, 2009
I just performed my routine surfing of the internet. I went on the
Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website and researched my name.
What I always find is two cases: 2006 foreclosure and 2007 eviction. The
latter, if you will recall, I won by default.
Today, I only found the 2006 case. For some reason, Hunt & Leibert does
not want Bank of America to see the Housing Court action. If they don’t want
them to find the Assignment of Mortgage, it was filed by them in both actions.
For the earlier, this was in January of 2007.
If they don’t want them to see the who, what, where, and when brief
I filed, they may want to consider one critical issue.
The Bank-of-America/Countrywide representative visiting the courthouse will
not ask to view any file captioned, Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman.
There is a very good reason for that.
So they will find that despite the law firm’s assurances that the matter
was being resolved, they never filed anything on behalf of their paying client.
Bank of America is entitled to a refund of their fees, and rebate of the
value of the mortgage of $278,000.
Saturday January 24, 2009
Bank of America is probably now considering the
initiation of a foreclosure action. But they must understand that on March 19,
2007, my attorney filed a bankruptcy petition on my behalf. Although Sean
Sweeney told the Superior Court it was denied, the fact is, it was granted. I
am officially discharged from my debt to Countrywide Home Loans.
Part II---------Saturday January 24, 2009
Dear Bank of America;
Don’t tell me! Let me guess!
Yesterday your representative visited the Tolland County
Superior Courthouse and could not find any file captioned, Countrywide Home
Loans vs. Vivian Lehman. Then the person researched Bank of America vs.
Vivian Lehman. While Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman was found, s/he
didn’t review it. A waste of time.
The person then stood in front of the courthouse,
probably pale and shaky because s/he was afraid that no manager would find this
believable, and placed a cellular phone call to you. To this person’s surprise,
it was believable. The manager probably then arranged a three-way conversation
with an in-house attorney who, after careful consideration, suggested reviewing
the Land Records of the Town of Coventry.
The employee then found the $1 Assignment of Mortgage and
probably received permission from office personnel to use their FAX machine.
You all looked at it last night, and then took as many pills as you could find
in your medicine cabinet.
Let me continue to guess…
This morning you are having an emergency meeting with
managers, in-house attorneys, and probably a few executives. My file is
probably sitting on the conference table, open and empty except for a few
pieces of paper; the bills from Hunt and Leibert which are stamped PAID. You
are asking, Where is the les pendens document filed with the Town?
Where is the Certificate of Foreclosure? Where are the original motion
papers? Where is the judgment of foreclosure? You are probably
considering firing the individual who was in direct contact with Hunt & Leibert.
While these circumstances may seem unique, are these really? No money has ever
been stolen from you before?
I believe you should fire this person.
Your attorneys are probably on their laptops, researching
the judicial branch of the State of Connecticut. They found Wells Fargo vs.
Vivian Lehman and a resolution in their favor.
Now what?
An experienced attorney probably then raises the question
of the time limitation for opening a judgment. They then research the State
Laws and learn it is four months.
This has passed.
But there is an exception. Both parties must agree.
THAT’S IT!
Wait a minute, an executive says, We are
not one of the parties.
Oh! They all sit back in disappointment.
There is only one thing which can stop Wells Fargo from
going before Judge Sferrazza and explaining that they knew nothing about this.
I have a letter from them dated April of 2008 in which
they confess to me that it was a malicious act. It came from an office
positioned closely to the White House. In simpler terms, if I lie by omission
to the court, it is perjury.
I won’t do that.
The first thing you need to do is threaten to sue and
prosecute Wells Fargo and Hunt & Leibert. If you approach me nicely, I will
give you a copy of the letter. Then a settlement can be reached. But understand
this…
I am not giving you any money. My favor to you will be
relieving you of your expenses for managing the house, and paying a law firm
which obviously wants to go out of business.
Wednesday January 28, 2009
This week’s FBI Special Agent was at a different Home Depot and wore a
black coat. I don’t believe another attack is coming. I think my so-called
advocates are trying to crawl into the winner’s circle before the final
victory. It amazes me how they see nothing wrong with that.
Otherwise, as to the national economy…
I have been watching the list of the companies which aren’t doing well.
Crossmark’s primary stores are NOT included. And there are several reasons for
that.
But first, an acknowledgement is long overdue.
Selection of the word Target was not my creative product. Rather, I
borrowed it from Lord and Taylor. While statistics of the whole store were
always monitored, every season the Area Sales Manager (my manager’s boss and
Kathy McTigue’s immediate subordinate) would select a Target department.
The logic to me was very obvious. Dina would devote extra attention to that and
apply what she learned to the bigger picture. Loss Prevention (security) also
used that term. One season the whole store was a Target in that our
inventory discrepancies were too high (i.e., Monica’s theft).
For Crossmark I am given two types of Targets.
I either survey the store to learn what is on display and how it is being
marketed. Sometimes, staff members believe I am there to recommend reprimands.
It is the opposite. If they understand that, they explain everything which is
going right or wrong. I relay the information to the project owner. This
person works with the client.
Or I have to merchandise one department. In the Home Depot, for example, I
care for the candy. At first I dreaded the assignment, then I invented a game.
Now I enjoy it.
Recall the incident I had in 1992. I visited a Loehmann’s clothing store in
Mount Kisco, New York. The bleach-blond manager was not on the floor. Neither
was the staff, except for one moment. She emerged briefly, didn’t speak any
English, and went to find the manager. That latter event took her 20-minutes.
Despite all of that, these people still believed they were competent enough to
make judgment calls on sales floor activity, and attempted to use such to
damage my reputation. Obviously, upper management had no knowledge of the
incompetence and negligence. Sending a Crossmark representative in there
routinely would have resolved that. If we can’t find a manager, we can’t perform
our tasks.
As far as I know, all departments I care for are doing well. I can’t give
you statistics. Crossmark won’t allow it. They believe I will place such on my
resume and leave.
It was Filomena Serra of Lord & Taylor who taught me to obsess myself
with keeping everything out of the stockroom, and finding ways to reorganize
the sales floor to accommodate everything, without looking over-stuffed. Kathy
McTigue also taught me much. I applied one of her techniques to my Kmart
Nabisco project. Over a year ago, I was explaining this to one of the managers
as I applied it to an end-cap display. (These are found at either end of the
aisles.) I offered to show him. He decided it was worth a few minutes of his
time to walk over. When I returned two weeks later, he gave me a direct order
to merchandise in this way. Obviously, it worked.
If I had statistics, I could also tell you how well Nabisco was doing as it
relates to the whole store. My guess is very well. Because after January 1st
of this year, Kmart suddenly obsessed itself with cleaning-out the
stockrooms. I am no longer climbing all over merchandise while resolving not to
perform any archeological excavations to find cookies and crackers. Both of my
stores have almost empty backrooms. Now they can use the area for sales space,
such as a sewing department or a museum of Kmart history.
When I read Crossmark’s internal bulletins, I learn of other techniques.
The most fascinating related to a coupon promotion. It encouraged the consumer
to buy one product so they could save on another. But these were merchandised
in different aisles. One of our representatives suggested converting an end-cap
to display these two products. It worked because those of us on the field see
things differently than those in the office.
On a related subject…
President Obama seems convinced he can include in the deal-making for my
house my act of proving I am the only one capable of being president. This is,
of course, because I was trained by a world leader, Eva Braun. He must understand
this.
I will gladly rebuild the economy without his participation in my final
negotiations with Hunt & Leibert. I am only asking for this in return.
His testimony, with non-compromised cross examinations, at the impeachment
hearings of the Governor of Illinois. The issue is the possible act of selling
the senate seat vacated by the current president. I personally believe that if
Obama doesn’t know anything, he has no executive skills. But he does have such,
and must know.
He can begin with the accounting of the Illinois home he and his wife
purchased. I want copies of all documents submitted, with copies to the media.
And I want it now!
Thursday January 29, 2009
Dear FBI;
One is a silk chiffon, the other is a silk organza.
Saturday January 31, 2009
Good News! It has been over one week since I last had any asthma
medication. The last time I went for 24-hours without needing such was when I
was 17-years-old. I am 42 now.
A few weeks ago it became ferocious. I thought it was because I no longer
needed the inhaler, but rather the pill. This didn’t always work for me.
Suddenly, it was very effective. Then, I occasionally heard cracking noises in
my neck and back---such as from chiropractic therapy. Then the big progression
suddenly occurred.
Some weight has come off. At the time the asthma stopped, so too did the
swelling in my feet. I found myself admiring these. I hadn’t seen them in so
long. My house-slippers are too big. I have to wear sneakers when going
up-and-down the stairs.
Otherwise…
As to impeachment proceedings of the Governor of Illinois, I heard a
journalist characterizing one of the allegations against this individual as the
selling of professional licenses.
These “professionals” are not licensed. Rather, they are certified or
registered. The emergency room physician who characterized my high white blood
cell count as a “psychiatric disorder” was certified, but unlicensed.
The attorney who had an Addition Consulting Business, while she could not read
her monthly checking account statement from the bank, was registered and unlicensed.
The lawyer who is trying to collect on my last oil bill of the Coventry house,
is unlicensed, but has a juris number. (Even if I wanted to give
him money, I couldn’t.) I would complain to the State, but our Governor would
give a juris number to a licensed dog. The people of Illinois should consider
themselves lucky that he only issued such to human beings. Or maybe unlucky. I
would like a dog-doctor, or a barking-attorney.
The Illinois gubernatorial impeachment hearings have concluded without
President Baby-Bama’s testimony. So I would like to make another stipulation.
For one week, if he only makes a public statement when he has something
intelligent to say, I will rebuild the economy for him.
I am only asking for seven days.
Otherwise…
I have been watching Nancy Grace cover the Casey Anthony court proceedings.
As I watch Nancy carefully review every detail as this enigmatic situation is
slowly understood, she seems to believe that the identity of the unknown father
is not an issue. I believe it is. We still do not know the motive for the
murder.
I will take a guess based on everything I understand of the people of
Wicca.
It is possible that he, or someone else, finally agreed to marry her. But
he didn’t want the child. Disposing of a child for a potential husband is not
unusual for these women. We have seen many such cases in the media.
Casey Anthony sits in court and is escorted around the jail in handcuffs as
she wears a smile indifferent to the circumstances. She believes that this guy
will take care of everything. These women always believe that. That is why he
has to marry her.
I believe prosecutors should try to communicate via her attorney using
Wicca concepts. This defense lawyer will probably laugh at the idea, not
understanding which area of her brain is dominant. It is not the same as his.
They should talk to her about her act of becoming pregnant on Halloween night as
a result of an unplanned act of passion. They should ask if she had
any communication with the father or another male a few days before the death
of Caylee. Did she receive a promise of marriage, or a subliminal promise of
such?
Sunday February 01, 2009
On Friday, I met with my tax preparer. She didn’t look
good. I even told her so. I think she knows about the issues and is having a
hard time finding her way.
I showed her the receipt for the September property
taxes. She said it is my deduction and I do not have to claim it as a gift. She
cited the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007. I researched it on
Wikipedia:
“The Mortgage
Forgiveness Debt Relief Act was introduced in Congress on September 25,
2007, and became law on December 20, 2007. This act offered relief to
homeowners who would formerly owe taxes on forgiven mortgage debt after facing
foreclosure. The act extends such relief for three years, applying to debts discharged
in calendar year 2007 through 2009. (With the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008, this tax relief was extended another three years, covering debts
discharged through calendar year 2012.)
Normally in US
law when a lender decides to forgive all or a portion of a
borrower's debt and accept less, the forgiven amount is considered as income
for the borrower and is liable to be taxed.
However, after
the signing of the Mortgage Forgiveness Act, amendments have been made to
remove such tax liability and allow the borrower and lender to work freely
together to find a common solution that is beneficial to both parties. This
protection is limited to primary residences -- rental properties are ineligible
for relief -- so consultation with a tax advisor is necessary to ensure that a
borrower qualifies.[1] The amount of forgiven mortgage debt allowed to be
excluded from income tax is limited to $2 million per year.” (emphasis
supplied)
I think it was passed with my situation as issue. And I
will ask her about an amendment to my 2007 tax return filed in 2008. If you
will recall, in 2006 I stopped paying property taxes when this action began
because I believed I had a small chance of winning. In November of 2007, the
law firm paid everything. I might be entitled to that deduction too, with
retroactive refund.
I understand what my tax adviser is saying. But I
reminded her of one thing---I NEVER HAD A MORTGAGE WITH WELLS FARGO. They do
not have my social security number in their system. She said we will see what
they file. She asked me if I received the Schedule B---discharge of debt. I
didn’t. Above, I underlined the entries relating to this issue. Without the
“discharge” and “forgiveness”, I don’t know if this law applies.
But there is
one thing the IRS must understand, if we are proven wrong, it was NOT a
malicious act to defraud the United States Government. They must understand as
much as we do that the records must identify with each other. According to the
tax assessor of the Town of Coventry, I am a tax payer. This must be cited on
my tax returns or there can be complications at a later date.
Monday February
02, 2009
Dear Donald Trump;
Now that you have emerged from your bankruptcy and are no longer defaulting
on your loans, do you think you can pay for the $1,300 in damage you did to my
book in 1994? At the time, it was resolved I would pay because I had more money
than you with no default record.
But if you really believe you know something about finance, would you like
to explain which leading economic indicator is your favorite? If you can’t,
should I assume that your specialty is theft? Such as the way you attempted to
steal $4,500 out of the hands of my terminally ill mother in 1991, or
break-into my mother’s safe deposit box in 1992?
In 1992, you also attempted to influence Barbara Pickett, the “attorney”
administering the estate, to have me make a list of all my household expenses,
while understanding that it would be cheaper for me to stay in the house I
inherited, and then have me enter the labor market to find myself unable to
support such. Then I was supposed to go to you for money, after I gave you my
research for free so you could negotiate yourself from bankruptcy status. This
was after you insisted I should never pursue you for money.
Why did that make sense to you? Was it because these are different areas of
the brain dominating different moments? Or is there some other reason?
In 1995, the agreement you reached with my publisher, Dorrance; employer,
Linda Mallon of 7-Eleven; and banker, Sue Hallinan of Citibank, was that you
would leave me alone without paying for the damage you did to my book. You
didn’t leave me alone. That means you must pay. And if you don’t, I must
conclude that you can’t afford it.
Why would I want someone with no money?
Saturday February 07, 2009
Yesterday I picked-up the mail from my PO Box in
Coventry. It had been three weeks since my last visit.
There was no Schedule B--write-off of the debt.
Last year, they threw me out before April 15th.
This year, for all the same reasons, they must put me
back in by this same date.
What was in the mail was a jury summons. I am on such
duty on March 25th, at that same courthouse. This means they either
want me to sign something, or deliver something.
(I like jury duty. I consider it reverse-tuition for law
school. I appreciate anything I learn.)
One emotional issue must be resolved first.
Mara Addison, assistant managing editor of my former
publisher, must understand that it isn’t my fault that Donald Trump did not
refund her gambling losses.
I signed the contract with Dorrance Publishing in
September of 1993. The people I originally worked with were Diane Hartmen,
Karen Van Winkle and Brenda Abretski. Their craftsmanship was extraordinary. By
the summer of 1994, these people mysteriously disappeared. I now understand
that their colleagues, Pamela Chapla and a few others, were transported by bus
to Donald Trump’s Taj Mahal for a few days of compulsive gambling. For a reason
I will never understand, they thought their losses were refundable if I would
sit still for the sabotage.
By November, we were still reviewing the typeset piece.
We were going back-and-forth as I carefully proofread 300 pages. It seemed like
the last round. But according to them, the typesetter had locked everything in
her apartment and left town for the holidays. They did not know when she would
be back. This was my fault because it says in the contract that staffing their
company was my problem.
As Pamela, my production assistant, was trying to force
me to take the blame for the delay, I suddenly found myself talking on the
phone to a woman named Mara Addison. Until that moment, I never heard of her.
By Christmas Eve, I found the $1,300 in damage. To
continue with production, this must be paid for. They were going to do me a
favor and allow me to do such.
They rallied my employer, banker and neighbors to help me
rescue my book and make such payment. There was an unwritten guarantee of sales.
The pressure was incredible.
I now believe it wasn’t myself they were concerned with,
but rather investments they made. It was apparently an advertising contract
which would also guarantee sales. I believe the contract was with THE NEW YORK
TIMES. This is owned and managed by Jewish families. Descendants of journalists
who are unofficially charged with the cover-up of the Holocaust. They had a
right to push the Constitution aside and tell me what to do. They have the
monopoly on the intelligence, and the victimization after the dumb Gouyem
murdered 6,000,000 of their superior brains in less then a decade--a very
believable story.
Mara Addison, who liked to boast proudly about her
superior Jewish business brain, did not know that according to the contract,
the original production quantity was 1,000 books.
By 1996, they decided to change strategy against me. They
had David Duchovny, the married man with AIDS and the $10,000,000 debt, send me
the subliminal information that he wanted to marry me. Before his wedding to
his girlfriend, who I originally knew nothing about, I wrote a script. It was
what they really wanted. But for some reason, to complete their plans, I would
have to surrender copyrights.
For my inability to understand that this would enable me
to become pregnant, I was given the reputation of a child-hater. All they had
to do was inspire my sex-drive, and their problems would be resolved. By this
time, the year 2000, I was working for Lord and Taylor. Out of payroll, this
department store gave the television production company, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX,
$10,000,000 without a contract. This would be easily compensated for as some
raises were not issued, others were cut, and the proceeds from the
movie-induced-sales-boost would overwhelmingly compensate the company. All I
had to do was pursue the opportunity. There was something wrong with me. It was
my fault they lost money.
In 2003, Sue Hallinan, my banker (remember her? She
agreed that Fluffy was to blame for the illiteracy of another neighbor’s child.),
finally caught-up with my website. She and her husband sold their home and
moved away.
I have thought long and hard about why my side of the
story frightened her. Her entire understanding of their story was that I had to
give money to secure sales and profits of my book. (Is anybody really that dumb
as to believe that?) The only explanation I can think of is that money was
stolen. There was once an issue with missing paperwork. I transferred $2,000
from this account into my checking account of another bank. I did this by
having a bank check prepared. Audrey, the teller who seemed to know what was
going on, gave me the original, but never my copy. The bank copy mysteriously
disappeared.
Before Hunt & Leibert, Bank of America and I settle
anything, there must be some rules. The first will be that the Jews must blame
themselves for what they do to themselves.
Part II------Saturday February 07, 2009
On another subject…
Before I picked-up the mail yesterday, I drove by the house. Instead of the
usual one car parked in front, there were two. By the curb there were a few
bags of garbage.
After I picked-up the mail yesterday, I visited Town Hall. I needed a
tax-payment history for my advisor. I believe that the clerk who helped me knew
who I was and what this was about. I stepped-out of the office and walked
up-and-down the hall looking for the Building Inspector. I found the Tax
Assessor’s office. I entered and asked the person standing there where I might
find this other person. He was he.
I gave a synopsis of the $1 transfer and the fact that I was kicked-out. I
showed him the tax receipts with my name on them, my PO Box #, and the address
of this Coventry house. I then explained that I heard a rumor that they
turned-on the water in the house, without the heat. I explained that this
mistake was inconceivable to me, especially by a company which is paid to know
better. He knew what house I was talking about. In October a couple applied for
a permit for a wood burning stove. He pulled the file and showed me.
Over-and-over I repeated that I could not understand the stupidity of
inviting water damage. He said that a burst pipe is not adequate grounds for
revocation of the Certificate of Occupancy. But he understood my concerns that
I could not negotiate anything with them until I was certain that the house was
in the same condition as I left it.
I explained that my experiences have been that water damage is more
frightening than anything. Fire can be seen and smelled by someone other than
the occupant. However, water can leak unnoticeably until there is several
thousands of dollars in damage. It doesn’t take much before you fall threw the
floors.
We concluded on a good rapport. I drove back and again passed the house.
The garbage and second car were gone. To me, it is obvious that someone is
using this property to dispose of their own trash, and is heating the living
room during the wait.
I am now receiving the subliminal information that my concerns are a “pipe
dream”. If they believe that, then they will have the Building Inspector write
to me an official letter.
They obviously don’t believe it.
Part III---Saturday February 07, 2009
On a completely different subject…
Before the Anti-Defamation League meets with the Pope
next week, I would like them to answer the following questions:
1. What religion was Adolph Hitler?
2. Is it true that Hitler’s real last name was
Schicklegruber?
3. Is it true that Heil Hitler is a Yiddish
expression which means Hail to the Leader?
4. Is it true that Gestapo is an abbreviated
version of the term, Jewish Getto Police---the Jews whose responsibility
was to bring other Jews into the Concentration Camps, but their behavior was
excusable because they were just following orders?
5. Are the eye-witness accounts by the German people
true---that the Jews who stood at the train stations waiting to go into the
Concentration Camps were NOT under arrest?
6. Is it true that in Yiddish the word for Concentration
is the same as that for Settlement?
7. Is it true that the Orthodox Jews consider their
communities to be Settlements?
8. Is it true that the self-characterization by the
Orthodox Jews as the only true Jews is a convenient excuse for
extermination of other sects?
9. Is it true that the anti-assimilate Jews
financially genocide the United States welfare system by billing such for their
females’ inability to lactate for their babies---$1,000/year/baby?
10. If yes to question 8, is it also true that the
cause of this inability is cannibalism, and that this also causes the peculiar
tint to the Jewish skin-tone?
11. Is the Book of Ezra Chapter 4 accurate by describing
the Jews as non-Israelis who “weakened the hands” of the latter people when
they refused to share their identity because the former observed no holidays
and paid no taxes?
12. Did the dumb Gouyem (a characterization ascribed to
the Pope and his Bishops and Cardinals) incinerate 6,000,000
superior-brained/over-protective Jews in less than a decade?
February 10, 2009
Dear Hunt & Leibert;
I checked the court calendar. On March 25th, only two cases are
scheduled for jury selection. One is medical practice. It looks to me like it
will be resolved before this date. The other captions Walmart as a party to the
action.
As you may already have guessed, this department store is a client of
Crossmark. Henceforth, I am an indirect employee. This conflict-of-interest
prohibits my participation.
I will be on jury duty for one day.
Tell me the truth: Did you know this, or is this someone else’s sense of
humor?
What happened today is probably just the beginning of your campaign. The
more you harass me, the more you convey to me the information that you are in
serious trouble with the IRS. Didn’t law school teach you anything about
negotiations? You never reveal your disadvantaged position to your opponent.
Saturday February 14, 2009
Dear President Obama;
Is this your father?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_Awori
He is Arthur Moody Awori, born December 5, 1927. He was
the 9th Vice President of Kenya from September of 2003 until January
of 2008. He holds an honorary doctorate degree from the University of New
Hampshire, a state next to Massachusetts.
Obama was born in 1962. Mr. Awori was 45-years-old. So
Obama’s mother was probably his third or fourth wife.
I do not believe that Obama was raised by his grandmother
who died a few weeks before the election of November, 2008. I believe that he
spent at least the first decade of his life in Kenya.
Why?
Because I recognized it.
President Obama forgot that I majored in anthropology.
Yesterday, I received the subliminal information that if I reinitiate Targets
while the first idiots are on excusable leaves from school for photo
opportunities, he would arrange a marriage with me and a man who was going to
“spoil” me. This is how a tribal chief talks.
The name Barack Obama is probably phony. Michelle Robison
is probably not. The FBI needs to research her.
Sunday February 15, 2009
On Friday I picked-up the mail. There was nothing from the Town of
Coventry’s Building Inspector. This suggests to me that he did find a problem.
It is my understanding it is water damage. And it is my understanding that
professional insurance of the caretakers does exist.
I am certain there is a $1,000 deductible-per-claim. This is standard for
homeowners’ policies.
I am also certain the underwriters will need a copy of the court order. If
they do not routinely require this, then all of the friends of these caretakers
could collect on this policy. And this court order does not exist. If they are
not careful, the caretakers could be charged with insurance fraud and criminal
trespassing.
After I picked-up the mail, I drove-by the house. There was the second car
awaiting trash service. The law firm obviously did not fire them for this
negligence.
The neighbor in whose home I was routinely invited for the holidays, is
also the sister of the purchaser they arranged. They made a down payment on the
house in September of 2006. This sister with her two children, ages 6 and 10?,
left their home down the street, and moved in there. They awaited the
ejectment.
In January of 2007, my neighbor (not the sister) defaulted on their
property tax payment. And they had fewer parties. In September, and January of
the following year, they again defaulted. I was ejected. They attempted to
close the deal. The title search revealed me as the title holder. Their down
payment was refunded. They paid their back taxes.
I don’t know what home the sister left-behind. I think it was sold a few
months after she left. My guess is that it was the property of
her estranged husband who perhaps allowed her to live there rent free. She
probably had an excellent arrangement, and threw it away for something silly.
This neighbor is also my landscaper. We otherwise have a good rapport. Their
cat would often visit me. I would then call them and report, “I have Princess
and I’m holding her ransom.” Then she invited me over for dinner and received
her cat back.
I believe they learned their lesson of business dealings with such people.
And if he she has, I would like to suggest that she watch-over the house. The
mistake which the caretakers made is beyond her. I don’t know if her
professional insurances would cover this. I do know that because she is a
neighbor, no one can mistakenly charge her with criminal trespassing. Neighbors
are often asked to watch-over homes. And I could give written permission for
this activity.
So as Countrywide is preparing to offer me a compromised version of the
$270,000 mortgage I once had, even they must agree with me that no deal can be
reached until this matter is resolved.
And not until one other resolution…
The fact remains that Sargeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski knew of the
existence of a tape recorded telephone conversation with a man I suspect as
Ayman al-Zawarhi, second in command to Osama Bin Laden. They never told the FBI
this.
And then there are a few other facts I did not mention before, because I
was too enveloped in other issues.
In 2006, I had problems with trespassers going into my garage while I was
home. I would call the police. They came, and had a few personal questions
prepared. Their favorite cop killer needed this information. They obviously
appreciate his act of murdering 60 of their colleagues on September 11, 2001.
(If that is the way the Blue Line feels about it, we can pardon every cop
killer in America. And I would like to ask of prosecutors not to bring charges
against the alleged hijackers for these murders. This is something which law
enforcement has to work-out within themselves. They encouraged this activity
before, during and after.)
And then, of course, came the incident on the night of March 15, 2008 in
which Linda St. Pierre, with the help of another law enforcement agent,
Judicial Marshall Tim Poloski, broke into my home and poisoned me. Coventry
Police awaited my 9-1-1 call. Their loyalties went to her because she was their
universal girlfriend.
This is an unacceptable conflict-of-interest. Any of these people who had
sex with her must be suspended without pay until further investigation.
Verifying who performed such is very simple. I am the granddaughter of a
urological surgeon.
In my ancestor’s time, books were written on the affects witchcraft/Wicca
has on the penis. Because their “magik potions” work on the circulatory system,
these typically mutilate this organ. My grandfather had one book devoted to
such photographs. My mother found it when she was a teenager and was shocked.
The only thing the Police Chief needs to do is to bring into the precinct a
urologist. They can use the single-cell-prison as an examination room. Each
male officer will have to drop his pants. If there is malformation, there was
intercourse with a woman who practices Wicca and likes law enforcement agents.
That woman is attorney Linda St. Pierre.
As I have stated many times on this website, anyone who
wants to dispute anything I have published, may do so in writing. I will place
it on this site and apologize. No malice was intended.
On March 25th, I should be encountering these lawyers and a few
colleagues of Marshal Poloski. If he wants to, he can be there. He is
considered to be on the same courthouse staff. They all have the title of judicial
marshal.
But if the law firm wants to refute me, they are going to have to include
urological examinations of her colleagues, who probably have similar or
identical damage.
Such altered males are typically violent, because of the hormonal
imbalances which ensue. It is both emotional and physical.
The book my mother found was published before the McCarthy trials which
were coupled by the publication of the book, The Crucible. The latter
had the cultural consequence of ostracizing anyone who believes that
witchcraft/Wicca is a threat. Television shows like Bewitched glorified
it by portraying media-magic, without biochemical-“magik“. The international
medical community stopped devoting so much research to it.
But anyone who has read the book of Ezra, Chapter 4, and has encountered
such people, knows that the threat is very real and would like to add to
Biblical text that their only improvement-mechanism is find new techniques to
perform effective public relations. They are socially-non-adaptive-animals
pretending to be adaptive-human beings---very dangerous.
Wednesday February 18, 2009
And one more thing happened in 2008 which now seems worth
mentioning…
My primary employer is Crossmark, but in the last year I
worked for six different companies. It is normal in this line of work. One was
for a company named Channel Source. It sent me into three Rite Aid stores to
assemble a display for Sally Hansen cosmetics. Each time, I toured the
stockroom only to learn that the large box was thrown into the garbage a few
days before my arrival.
My supervisor was confused, and advised me to credit
myself with 60-minutes for each visit as well as mileage. Even though they
offered me more work, the check never arrived. I never made it an issue, but
never worked for them again.
In the fall season, a check for $44.19 suddenly arrived.
I wondered why.
On December 15th, a duplicate check was again
issued. I didn’t understand why. I thought I misremembered what work I did for
them. The check was of Wachovia Bank, and it has branches near me. I asked them
if they could cash it for me even though I don’t have an account. For no fee,
they said they could. But the check was bad.
I never received my W-2 from Channel Source.
In mid-January, I met with my tax advisor. I only had the
W-2 from Crossmark. But I had enough information such that we could input
everything into the computer. My refunds are $944 from the IRS and $142 from
the State of Connecticut. She explained that all W-2s had to be postmarked by
January 31st.
On February 6th and 13th, I again
checked my post office box. Channel Source’s W-2 still wasn’t there. My tax
advisor explained that with my pay-stub, I could file after February 15th.
On Monday the 16th we again met. She said she
cannot electronically file because of the missing Employer
Identification Number. I e-mailed my supervisor as well as another office
associate with whom I connected at the time of employment. They never
responded. I also telephoned a man named Reggie who is the individual
authorized to handle such issues. He said he would work on it today, but when I
telephoned him this afternoon, he said he didn’t.
|
February 16,
2009 Channel
Source, Inc. Thank you for
visiting our website. Currently we are undergoing a complete overhaul and
appreciate your patience as we work to create a website that will allow us to
serve you better. Please contact
us and let us know what we can do for you. Operations
Office: P: 972.401.4146 Corporate
Office: |
Thank You!
Thursday
February 19, 2009
Dear Baby-Bama;
I should have my refund of $944 - $278 (preparation fees) today. But
because civil liberties are an unknown concept in your Administration, I don’t.
I was going to use the money for a $300/60,000-mile servicing which my car
needs. It is at 65,000. I don’t expect you to understand such because while my
mother instilled in me an understanding of the care which automobiles require,
your mother instilled in you an understanding of how to repair a mud-hut.
On March 1st, I am going to begin a major research project on
Kenyan government. My primary purpose will be to learn why your wife is so
nervous, she cannot orgasm despite all the romance you claim to shower her with
(i.e., one-date-per-week, no excuses). Such nervousness must have affected the
gestation period of both of her children. She probably couldn’t transmit
nutrition. The brain is the last area to develop. Theirs are defective, if
these even exist. We should perform cat-scans.
Despite your instruction, I will perform this investigation while the first
idiots are attending school. While I am demanding that no one should ridicule
them because this isn’t their fault, I would also like to know if they are
allowed to speak to anyone. Children of spies never are.
Part II-----February 19, 2009
Reggie of Channel Source just called and apologized to
me. I have the Employer Identification Number, and they will replace the bad
check. I explained that I don’t remember doing that additional work. He
explained if they don’t give me the money, they will have to incur the expense
of a payroll adjustment.
THANK YOU!!!!
Sunday February 22, 2009
The original EIN was missing one digit. I told Reggie it was phony and
threatened to publish it on this website. There could be no legal ramifications
because it is lawful to publish phony tax identification numbers. Then he
telephoned me and explained where the missing digit was. Hopefully, everything
is now fine.
Otherwise…
It is my understanding that the White House has released the information
that I will be receiving the “foreclosed” house for free. I know because
several people have approached me for the purpose of ass-licking. I would like
to know why no one was that nice when I had nowhere to go. Knock it off!!!
On a related subject…
My former supervisors and executives of Lord and Taylor, Kathy McTigue,
Chris Poleto, Dina Sturtevant and Deborah Walker Hauptman, have never answered
any of my allegations. But I have received some subliminal information.
Everyday, at 5 pm, the managers and executives had a meeting. As I
understand it, a few months after I was fired, Kathy McTigue’s daughter died.
She knew who poisoned her. At the meeting, Kathy announced that her daughter
Caitlin was dead, and, for the production of a corpse, demanded $30,000 from
Monica. Although I wasn’t dead, she believed that she performed her duty and
deserved something for her participation in biochemical experimentation. But
suddenly, the revelation occurred that Monica had no money, which is why she
had to steal clothes to conform to dress-code. Kathy had to be restrained as
Monica expressed an attitude indifferent to human suffering, and justified her
murderous act by insisting that Irish reproduction must be curtailed because if
the Nazis don’t kill these children, their parents will. Kathy rebutted by
saying that one of her children is still alive. And a survival rate of 50% is
higher than zero. Monica couldn’t disagree.
But nonetheless, the anguished screams of a mother who buried her child in
financial-vain is a scene which can never be forgotten. They are in a silent
state of shock.
As for Dorrance Publishing…
After I fired my publisher, Pamela Chapla, my production assistant, made
numerous phone calls to me asking for the money. One day, she called for
routine issues as we were working on repairing the damage. In the middle of the
conversation she suddenly remembered, with a giggle in her voice, that the
other thing she had to tell me was that on a certain date, I will be receiving
a telephone call from a certain person of the accounting department. A few days
after this, and before that date, I received a letter demanding the money lest
the issue will be turned-over to an attorney or collection agency. I
immediately faxed a letter explaining that I have no obligation to pay for the
damage which a billionaire did to my property, and forbade the accounting
department from ever again telephoning me.
My supervisor of 7-Eleven, my then employer, left her pager in the office
and went to a meeting. At the time, I thought she believed she was doing what
was in the best interest of my book. The way she understood it, this was the
only way I could have a publisher. And the rule in her store was that the
victim pays for everything. I was the only one who understood they were no
longer my publisher. But was I alone in this understanding?
I now understand that Donald Trump was at that meeting. He announced he was
recruiting people for a project to ultimately become the owner and builder of
the world’s tallest building. To this end, he would have to tear down two which
were taller than his. Linda volunteered her son, Marc Mallon, a pilot for
American Airlines, and his friend from high school, Officer Steven Patrick
Driscoll of the Lake Carmel, New York Police Department. This law enforcement
agent also volunteered his father, an engineer. Before this meeting, the plan
was another car-bomb. After, it was different as they were each given Arab
identities coupled by their Caucasian faces.
Linda knew she was not promoting the book, only herself.
Another person who may have been at that meeting, and involved herself in
this, was Sue Hallinan, my neighbor and banker. After I left 7-Eleven because
the harassment was unbearable, she learned of my new employer at the time I
deposited my paycheck. She relayed the information. Until a few weeks ago, I
believed that she was erroneously promoting the book.
What was her interest?
This is the same person who participated in the neighborhood effort to
blame Fluffy for Whitney Whalen’s illiteracy. According to that story, the
child was on a normal reading level until the age of six, when Fluffy bit her.
Although her mother had no medical evidence and refused to sign the police
complaint, this rendered the child unable to read-and-write.
Is Sue Hallinan really that dumb?
When I raised this question a few days ago, she subliminally answered that
Mara Addison’s hormonal explosion was that overwhelming. But why jeopardize her
banking career? And did she really believe that the publisher’s concern was for
my best interest?
On a related subject…
Before Hunt & Leibert and I go into final negotiations, a few issues
must be addressed. Of course, I will need a certificate from the Town Building
Inspector, as well as from the Homeowners’ Insurance Company, but I will also
need Leibert to be in his Jewish place.
I would like to ask of the governors of each state with large Jewish
welfare “settlements” to stop such payments from going into such addresses. I
would like to warn them that the dollar amount is grotesquely large. Please be
sitting-down when you receive this figure. (It should adequately cover their
deficits. And since many Republican governors do not want to accept the monies
from President Baby-Bama’s economic stimulus package, this should
counterbalance their loss.) The Orthodox, anti-assimilate Jews will
vociferously protest. Then, state auditors should find an excuse to enter their
premises. When they do, please search the backyards, there are probably
mass-graves of “phony Jews” of other sects.
Wednesday February 25, 2009
I took another look at my jury summons. It is not for the
Superior Court where all of my activity has been. Rather, it is for the
criminal court across the street. I tried to research what cases are on this
calendar for March 25th, but such is not published.
I will bring you a list of all judicial marshals who did
not have sex with Linda St. Pierre. I won’t bring a pad-and-pencil. It should
be easy to memorize the few names.
I believe they are planning something. If they are going
to launch a biochemical attack against me, it could place me in the hospital.
This will jeopardize their deadline of April 15th.
They must have noticed that such time limitation is not
mine. It is theirs. All negative consequences are their problems. If this
matter is not resolved by September 30th, they will have another tax
bill. And in the interim, they are paying a company to care for the house. When
are they going to learn the lessons they teach themselves?
Saturday February 28, 2009
Holy Thursday is April 9th. If this date sounds familiar, it is
because this is the day of my ejectment from my Coventry home. This is no
coincidence. And I would like to welcome everyone to the final stages of the
trap. Although it didn’t go exactly as planned in that when I ran to Eric he did
not receive me, everything should be adequate.
Of the three National Whistleblowers’ Days--Holy Thursday, September 11th,
and December 21st-- the former has always been the most successful.
The most logical explanation is the connection to the archetypes. This is very
surprising to me. While Jungian theory ascertains that these are so young as a
few thousand years old, in my book, I surmise these are a few million years
old. Although I can’t compare myself to Jung, I can say that the evolutionary
theory of the Aquatic Ape is very consistent with Biblical text found in
Genesis. The “on-the-waters” mermaid emerged onto land four million
years ago, followed by the first pluvial two million years later. It doesn’t
make any sense to me that an archetype would only be 2,000 years old, because
this is such a short span in cranial development, and because I believe that
the archetypes are adaptations we still have and don’t use. These manifest
themselves in art and other cultural conditions.
But anyway…
I believe the harassment against me which began when I was in graduate
school, is directly connected to my mother’s Whistleblowing, which occurred
just before I graduated college.
The concept of Holy Thursday as National Whistleblowers’ Day has been
endorsed by the Vatican. This makes sense to me because I had the idea while
attending services at an Episcopal Church. I appreciate that, but we can’t
forget that retribution against the Whisteblower must be stopped. Every year I
warn about this before the day, and every year people are maliciously fired
from their jobs. And that is harassment I know about. I don’t want to think
about what I don’t know about. I thought about telephone campaigns to help
these people, but decided such would be ineffective.
This year, we are going to do it correctly.
Targets
What is the American Bar
Association?
Who is the leader?
What is his/her address?
Are there any law libraries near
you and accessible to the public, such as in a courthouse or school?
What is jurisprudence?
What are the state and federal
laws protecting Whistleblowers?
Are these statutes?
Are these governed by the penal
code?
When were these enacted into law?
Are there any precedents?
Explain everything to this leader
of the ABA and ask for an acknowledgment coupled by his/her act of demanding
compliance by the associates of the ABA.
Contact local leaders of the ABA
and ask if such compliance demand was issued.
Convey all of this to your
federal, state and local representatives, as well as all union leaders.
Bear in mind the fact that there
is a clause in union/labor contracts disallowing court actions, including those
to order whistleblower-protection. Remind all attorneys employed by these
unions that their obligations are primarily to the American Bar Association and
its principles, and secondarily to their employer and its lack of principles.
The purpose of such protection is from both civil and criminal wrongs. The
latter issue is not a union concern. Henceforth, they should comply with the
conditions of their professional contract with the American Bar Association.
|
Before these
unions boast of everything else they have to offer, remind them of the fact
that as a non-union worker, I made more money-per-hour than when I was
obligated to join a union and pay its membership fees of $5/week plus $50
initiation. The benefits of which they were so proud provided me with
prescription medical coverage. As a union associate of the supermarkets, I
made no more than $8/hour. Although I began at non-unionized Lord &
Taylor for $7/hour, one year later I was at $9/hour with no benefits but more
vacation time. In the year 2001, my only full year with this department
store, I made more money than any other year in New York retail. The year
2007 broke all my records, and 2008 broke that. In the former Connecticut
year, I had no medical coverage with Crossmark. In 2008, I did. After
consideration of this deduction, my payroll increased 10%. Before such
consideration, it was 20%. And January and February of this year
out-performed these same two months of these last years. But that is because
my hours-to-miles ratio improved as my health is improving. And I don’t need any union protection from this employer. They sent their attorneys to try to protect me. Rite Aid seems to appreciate that. They just gave us a large contract. |
Once we receive these acknowledgements from professional, political and
labor leaders, we will proceed with National Whisteblowers’ Day. I would like
to suggest of President Barack Obama to visit his grandmother and mother in
Kenya on April 9th. We won’t be in need of his collection services.
Part II
It is 4 pm Eastern Standard Time in Connecticut of the United States of
America. I have been watching the movie Air Force One with its
unrealistic ending.
In the Holy Land, nine hours later, the first of six Sundays of Lent has
begun. Here is the first of my demands. If these are not met, we will go into
L&G. And this time, Fupi will not be available to help. I know the Big-Baby
understands me.
My mother’s whistle-blowing.
As I now understand, her former boss is the daughter of the current
dictator of Cuba, Raul Castro. She was L&G-ed into FBI custody after my
ejectment. Her socialist responsibility was to engineer the New York
State Department of Labor’s Unemployment Insurance Division to direct taxpayer
monies into this South American regime. Her husband was, and possibly still is,
a computer programmer with IBM. At the time of my mother’s tenure, the Governor
of New York was Mario Cuomo. By marriage of his son, he is an associate of the
Kennedy family. I believe Senator Ted Kennedy, Robert Kennedy Junior, Joe
Kennedy, Andrew Cuomo, and all the other family members, are connected to the
Castro Administration. By the second Sunday of Lent, I want all of these IBM
wires cut, and then I want them to deliver themselves into FBI custody with
their full confessions.
Once this burden to the taxpayers has been released, the monies will be
returned as per my original instructions. It should be a shocking figure well
beyond $13/week.
If any associate of the Kennedy and/or Cuomo family would like to disagree
with me, please formulate a written statement with your signature, and I will
publish it on this website.
VIVIAN LEHMAN
PO BOX 629
COVENTRY, CT 06238
Monday March 02, 2009
In response to my allegations and assertions, yesterday I
was reminded of the fact that on March 01, 1961, President John F. Kennedy
performed the magnanimous and humanitarian act of establishing the
Peace Corps.
When I was in college, Antonio/Robert/Osama
Mendez/Crowe/Ben-Laden was an associate of the
Peace Club.
Among its priorities was its pro-Sandinista agenda.
The Kennedy/Cuomo confession must begin today, and the
IBM wires will be cut by midnight.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was very disappointed
to learn that she won’t be able to make any demands on me. Her Saxon/Pagan
smile deteriorated into wrinkles. There are four more Sundays before Palm
Sunday. Perhaps her resignation should be one of the demands. Our list is not
carved in stone.
Saturday March 07, 2009
1st Sunday of Lent
Cut the Wires
2nd Sunday of Lent
Open the Gates
I don’t know what Auschwitz means. I suspect it is Yiddish for out-of-tax.
And I believe this camp is a few centuries old. Allied troops marched through
it one day and assumed that because it was found in German occupied territory,
it was an invention of such government. The Jews all know this is not true.
When I worked in the supermarket, I witnessed the Orthodox Jewish Community
collect over $1,000/month/family of food stamps. And this was only the
beginning. They also received all other forms of welfare including money for
heating bills and Medicaid. The girls married at age 18, and reproduced through
age 40. And as they handled the free money to buy their groceries, they laughed
in our faces.
And they claim to be anti-assimilation.
It makes sense to me that a welfare-genocide machine could easily be
connected to a mass murder of all competitors of these taxpayer monies.
If I am correct, then a march through the backyards of United States
Orthodox Jewish communities should find Auschwitz-style activity. And such
march does not have to be with foot soldiers. Modern satellites should suffice.
They can start with the one which Linda St. Pierre must have visited. She
probably watched them burn-out the uteruses of teenage girls whose purpose was
to service such Jewish men who cannot reproduce outside of their sect. She
probably enjoyed listening to them scream while they were strapped down with
their legs spread. When that party was over, she decided to entertain herself
and burn-out her own uterus by using the same chemicals on both of us. Then she
wondered why she didn’t enjoy its destruction of her, as I performed a quick
and easy neutralization.
I realize that federal investigators would not want to publicize their
findings. So my question is would they use such information as a vehicle with
which to pressure the Jewish communities to surrender their systematic fraud
and embezzlement of the taxpayers.
If I am wrong about anything, then such people should invite the FBI into
their yards and financial accounts to assure the Dumb Goyem there is nothing to
resolve and return. The Jewish partners of Hunt & Leibert could also invite
such law enforcement agents into their synagogues.
Sunday March 08, 2009
Dear President Baby-Bama;
Today’s “welcoming” events of Maryville, Illinois should
tell you something.
Saturday March 14, 2009
Before I proceed, I would like to make a request of the civil rights
advocates. It relates to a civil action they recently filed against Wells Fargo
Bank claiming discriminatory practices against African-Americans applying for
mortgages. The plaintiffs seem to believe I will help them.
Condoleezza Rice made great efforts to prove that she could not perform her
duties as Secretary of State because of the color of her skin. She insisted I
must do it for her because I am Caucasian. The White House insisted she was
appointed to her position because she has a PhD on the subjects of national
defense and terrorism, but her dark skin inhibited her from making such application.
Inasmuch as I believe she is illiterate with no educational credentials, I also
believe that I should follow the directive of one of the most influential
people in the world---Oprah Winfrey. She never disputed this claim.
1st Sunday of Lent
Cut the Wires
2nd Sunday of Lent
Open the Gates
3rd Sunday of Lent
Imprison Donald Trump
As you already know, I believe Donald Trump is primarily responsible for
the removal of the World Trade Towers on September 11, 2001. I believe he
planned it years in advance. And I believe that when he recruited American
Airlines pilot Mark Mallon into his terrorist team, he changed his plans from
execution of another van-bomb, into a dual-plane-bomb. I believe that part of
such execution was the invention of new parachute-technology, and that all
hijackers are alive and well, except those who descended onto the terrain of
Pennsylvania. I believe that Osama/Robert/Antonio Ben-Laden/Crowe/Mendez was
recruited after the plot was initialized, but do not know if it was before or
after Mark’s recruitment. I believe that Ben-Laden’s primary purpose was to
capitalize on the racism of the United States, and accept all blame. Even
though he is Mexican, he would assume the status as an Arab. Caucasian-American
oil executives have characterized themselves as such people, defaming and
libeling them as genetically disposed to violence. It isn’t true.
If you don’t believe me, consider this fact. Donald Trump was the owner of
Trump Airlines. Its purpose was to fly business class between the cities of
Long Island, New York; Boston, Massachusetts; and Washington, D.C. Do those
cities sound familiar when considering the events of September 11?
If I were Antonio Mendez, I would make a deal with federal officials
agreeing to tell them everything, in exchange for sparing the death penalty.
Monday March 16, 2009
Dear Hunt & Leibert;
GO AHEAD, TELL THE COURT YOU DID NOT PROVIDE YOUR TENANT
WITH ANY HEAT. AND DON’T TRY TO TELL THEM I WASN’T A TENANT AFTER YOU TOLD THE
HOUSING COURT I WAS. IT ISN’T MY FAULT YOU DIDN’T SHOW FOR YOUR COURT DATES.
|
Small Claims Court of the State of Connecticut County of Middletown --------------------------------- ProTech Oil, Plaintiff, -vs.- Vivian Lehman, Defendant.
|
DOCKET NUMBER SCC-219909 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY |
----------------------------------
1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned
action, do hereby submit this MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY. Such action
relates to the property known as 891 South Street, in the Town of Coventry,
County of Tolland, State of Connecticut.
2. The action is for $1967.42, payment for heating fuel
for the winter of 2008.
3. As Defendant’s Exhibit A, I am herewith attaching
Internal Revenue Service form 1099-A for the tax year 2007. This document is
for “Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property”. Its issuer is Countrywide
Home Loans and specifies the date of “acquisition” as September 18, 2007. This
pre-dates the winter of 2008.
4. As Defendant’s Exhibit B, I am herewith attaching the
Certificate of Foreclosure. Its issuer is Wells Fargo Bank. It is executed on
stationary of the law firm of Hunt, Leibert and Jacobson, and is on file with
the Land Records Division of the Town of Coventry in Volume 1059, Pages
300-301. It is dated October 11, 2007 and pre-dates the winter of 2008.
5. Countrywide Home Loans truthfully informed the
Internal Revenue Service of its condition of “acquisition” of the residence at
issue.
6. Wells Fargo truthfully informed the Town of Coventry
of its condition of “foreclosure” of the residence at issue.
7. I vacated the residence on April 09, 2008.
8. Connecticut Statute;
“Sec. 47a-7. Landlord's responsibilities. (a) A landlord shall:
(1) Comply with the requirements of chapter 368o and all applicable building and
housing codes materially affecting health and safety of both the state or any
political subdivision thereof; …
(6) supply running water and reasonable amounts of hot water at all
times and reasonable heat…” (emphasis supplied)
9. The Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and
Tenants in Connecticut, published by Connecticut’s Superior Court,
synopsizes these statutes by stating;
“Landlords
are required to keep all heating, plumbing, electrical systems and
appliances in good working order. Unless the rental agreement states
that the tenant is responsible, the landlord must supply…” (emphasis supplied)
10. There was no rental agreement.
11. In November of 2007, as per these directives, ProTech
Oil changed the name on the account from Vivian Lehman to Countrywide Home
Loans and Wells Fargo Bank. Hunt, Leibert and Jacobson have the cancelled check
for said amount of $1967.42. It is dated April 2008.
12. The plaintiff’s commencement of this action 11 months
after this transaction, exemplifies this is a misunderstanding.
13. Connecticut Practice Book 2009, Sec. 9-18
directs of procedures in civil actions, “If a person not a party has an interest
or title which the judgment will affect, the judicial authority,
on its motion, shall direct that person to be made a party.” (emphasis
supplied)
14. As per the Internal Revenue Service document,
Countrywide Home Loans has the “interest”. As per the Land Records document,
Wells Fargo Bank has the “title”.
WHEREFORE, current defendant Vivian Lehman respectfully
requests of this Court to remove her as defendant and substitute WELLS FARGO
BANK and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS as co-defendants. Current Defendant also
requests the award to her of costs, disbursements, and all other relief as the
Court deems proper.
___________________________________ March 16, 2009
VIVIAN LEHMAN
PO Box 629, Coventry, CT 06238
TO: AND
|
REVELEY, WILLIAM G. License # ????????? REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC Juris # 423840 P.O. BOX 657 VERNON, CT 06066 |
Mr. Sean Sweeney License # 903288154 HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C. Juris # 101589 50 Weston Street Hartford, CT 06120 |
----------------------------------------------------
JUDGEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF VIVIAN LEHMAN AS
DEFENDANT AND SUBSTITUTED BY WELLS FARGO BANK AND COUNTRYWIDE HOME
LOANS AS CO-DEFENDANTS IS
GRANTED DENIED.
_______________________________ ____________, 2009
Justice
I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this MOTION FOR
SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY in two postage paid envelopes and transmitted such to
both above-specified law firms via the United States Postal Service on the date
of March 16, 2009.
_____________________________________March 16, 2009
Vivian Lehman
Wednesday March
18, 2009
I would like to
ask of everyone to telephone the White House and demand to know why our
employers were informed of a $15/week tax-hike, but we weren’t!
I just visited
the President’s White House website and sent the following message:
“I just learned from my employer that the IRS gave directive to deduct an
additional $15/week from my paycheck. The money is earmarked for the First
Lady's designer dresses. In my family, we make our own clothes.
I believe that the President is doing a wonderful job and that the reason
why this was never made public is because no one has enough common sense to
listen to anything he says. I also believe he is doing everything possible to
be a good role model husband and father. I want his children to understand that
good clothes make a good impression.
BUT I DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR IT.
I will place the First Lady's very impressive resume on Career Builder. I
am certain she has the competence to find a job to cover her expenses.”
Saturday March 21, 2009
1st Sunday of Lent
Cut the Wires
2nd Sunday of Lent
Open the Gates
3rd Sunday of Lent
Imprison Donald Trump
4th Sunday of Lent
Count the Cost
I don’t have all the figures. I do know that the law firm of Hunt &
Leibert accepted a down payment on my house one year (more or less) before I
was ejected. The buyer was the sister of my neighbor. The sister left her home,
which I guess was owned by her estranged husband, and moved in next door to me.
She and her two daughters occupied one large room. And then the family
defaulted on their property taxes.
I will guess my neighbors tried to buy the house, worth $300,000, for
$250,000.
I will guess the deposit was either 10% or 20%.
I know they received the refund of the down payment a few months after the
ejectment. The tax lien was removed as they must have finally paid all of that.
But I doubt if the refund was of the full amount. I just found on the Small
Claims Court website that my neighbor (not the sister) could not pay her doctor’s
bill. A default judgment was entered against her.
But they couldn’t sue for the remainder of the down payment because the
transaction was illegal. It is a fact they must have known because their
mother, who also lives there, is a real estate agent.
Recently, I believe that Countrywide Home Loans finally had the presence of
mind to send their own representative to the Tolland County Superior Courthouse
to see if Hunt & Leibert ever represented them against me. They didn’t.
This means this law firm will have to refund fees, property tax payments,
landscaping expenses, etc.
Hunt & Leibert have some plans for me this week, in conjunction with
their Small Claims action against me. The objective is to weaken me into
signing a new mortgage with Countrywide. They forgot one thing.
The underwriters of the mortgage will have to perform the same title search
which was performed after the ejectment, and will reach the same
conclusion--can’t do it!
They can do anything to me. But nothing will change the fact that they are
their own worst enemies. They don’t have the legal insight to recognize that
the only resolution they have left is to rescind everything---the $1 mortgage
transfer and the judgment of foreclosure.
They will soon
be writing out a check to Countrywide Home Loans. How much will it be? Will it
put them out of business?
Sunday March
22, 2009
Tomorrow, I
will be serving-and-filing the following two motions. I don’t know how Wells
Fargo Bank could let me do this to them.
I am not an
attorney, and can’t give advise. However, I can make suggestions.
If you are a
defendant in the State of Connecticut, and your opposing counsel is the same as
mine, William Reveley, try to postpone the proceedings as long as possible. The
facts are he is not listed on the website of the American Bar Association, his
office does not have a copy of his license, and he doesn’t know what an
affidavit is. If I am correct in that all of this proves he is not an attorney
nor even a paralegal, then, hopefully, your case will be subjected to an
automatic dismissal. If you are a defendant in a foreclosure action, you have
seen from my experiences that the bank won’t notice anything until it is too
late.
I would like
to ask of everyone to try to acquire a free house from the judicial system.
Don’t feel guilty, after all of that bailout money the United States Government
gave them, it is the least the financial and judicial systems can do for you.
|
Small Claims Court of the State of Connecticut County of Middletown --------------------------------- ProTech Oil, Plaintiff, -vs.- Vivian Lehman, Defendant.
|
DOCKET NUMBER SCC-219909 MOTION TO CITE IN NEW PARTY DEFENDANT |
----------------------------------
1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned
action, do hereby submit this Motion To Cite In New Party Defendant.
2. On March 16, 2009, I served-and-filed a Motion to
Substitute the Defendant. Among the issues of my Wherefore clause, I
respectfully requested that Wells Fargo Bank be identified as a Defendant.
3. On March 18, 2009, my opposing counsel responsively
motioned that Wells Fargo Bank be identified as a Defendant; “Vivian Lehman
claims Wells Fargo Bank is responsible for this debt.” (paragraph 1)
4. We agree.
5. My opposing counsel could have revised his Complaint
as per 2009 Connecticut Practice Book:
“Sec. 10-59. Amendments;
Amendment as of Right by
Plaintiff
The plaintiff may amend any defect, mistake or
informality in the writ, complaint or petition and insert new counts in the
complaint, which might have been originally inserted therein, without costs,
during the first thirty days after the return day. (See General Statutes §
52-128 and annotations.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 175.)”
“Sec. 10-60. —Amendment by
Consent,
Order of Judicial Authority,
or Failure to Object
(a) … a party may amend his or her pleadings or
other parts of the record or proceedings … (2) By written consent of the
adverse party… (See General Statutes § 52-130 and annotations.) (P.B.
1978-1997, Sec. 176.)”
6. Mr. Reveley served his motion on Wells Fargo and used
the address represented in the Certificate of Foreclosure, Exhibit B of my
Substitution Motion;
Wells Fargo Bank
National Association as Trustee
for SARM 2005-15
c/o Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc.
7105 Corporate Drive, Plano, TX
75024-6000.
7. In previous proceedings against me, no Wells Fargo document
served-and-filed verifies or affirms this address as that of Wells Fargo with
such connection to Countrywide Home Loans. Exhibit C hereto attached affirms
another address for Wells Fargo.
8. According to Exhibit C, yet unknown to the Internal
Revenue Service, Wells Fargo is the “record owner”. Henceforth, for this Small
Claims Court Action, it should be cited-in as a defendant.
9. My service of the Motion presented herein is to the
corporate address of the letterhead of Exhibit C (see Certificate of Service
below).
10. The issue of Wells Fargo as party-defendant is not
contested. The separate issue of such service-address is contested, yet
currently not considered actionable nor subject to any revision-motion.
WHEREFORE defendant requests, without further
oral-hearings nor written-motions, that the Court caption Wells Fargo Bank as
defendant.
______________________________________March 23, 2009
VIVIAN LEHMAN
PO Box 629; Coventry, CT 06238
DECISION
THE MOTION TO CAPTION WELLS FARGO BANK AS DEFENDANT IS HEREBY
GRANTED DENIED.
Justice____________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this MOTION in two postage
paid envelopes and transmitted such via United States Postal Service to my
opposing counsel, Mr. William G. Reveley, PO Box 657, Vernon, CT 06066, as well
as to potential defendant;
WELLS FARGO BANK Corporate
Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia MD 21045
_____________________________________March 23, 2009
Vivian Lehman
|
Small Claims Court of the State of Connecticut County of Middletown --------------------------------- ProTech Oil, Plaintiff, -vs.- Vivian Lehman, Defendant.
|
DOCKET NUMBER SCC-219909 MOTION FOR DISMISSAL |
----------------------------------
1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned
action, do hereby submit this Motion for Dismissal.
2. According to the Complaint, the plaintiff, ProTech
Oil, is NOT suing me.
3. The only evidence presented by my opposing counsel is
an affidavit signed by Louise Zematis.
4. By the omission of the affidavit, she is NOT an
associate of the plaintiff. (see paragraph 1)
5. By the omission of the affidavit, NO services were
rendered. (see paragraph 3)
6. According to the affidavit, an “attached invoice”
exists, yet it doesn’t. (see paragraph 3)
7. I could include in this Dismissal Motion an
explanation to the Court of the definition of affidavit as per
Connecticut Civil Practice Procedures and as per Black’s Law Dictionary,
but I am certain that an accredited law school already provided the necessary
lectures.
8. According to the affidavit, paragraph 2, “written
demand” was made. If Louise Zematis witnessed this, then she is an associate of
the law firm of my opposing counsel, William G. Reveley.
9. I first received his correspondence on December 21,
2008. Then, in compliance with my personal routine, researched his name on
www.abanet.org. I didn’t find him. So I telephoned his office and spoke to
Mattie Turk. I asked for a copy of his license. I had to explain that all she
has to do is remove it from the wall and place it upon the copy machine and
mail the reproduction to me.
10. She didn’t.
11. Even if I wanted to give my opposing counsel money, I
couldn’t.
WHEREFORE defendant respectfully requests dismissal and
that the Court submit all original file documents to the Attorney General’s
Office of the State of Connecticut. Defendant also requests costs,
disbursements, and all other relief as the Court deems proper.
______________________________________March 23, 2009
Vivian Lehman
PO Box 629
Coventry, CT 06238
THE MOTION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION IS
GRANTED DENIED
Justice_____________________________________________
Certificate of Service
I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Motion in a postage paid
envelop and transmitted such via United States Postal Service to my opposing
counsel, Mr. William G. Reveley.
____________________________________March 23, 2009
Vivian Lehman
Monday March 23,
2009
Today I filed
both motions with one more.
It was on March
14th that I found the Small Claims Court action on the website of the
Connecticut Judicial Branch. I research this weekly because Mr. Reveley
threatened me with such. I immediately filed the first motion.
It was on March
21st that I received official notification from the Court. It
included a form-Answer. I checked the box, Disagree, and explained, “No cause
of action exists.“
I also checked,
Counterclaim, and demanded $500 for harassment.
IF THERE IS ANY
TROUBLE, I WILL AMEND THE COUNTERCLAIM TO THE MAXIMUM SMALL CLAIMS COURT AMOUNT
OF $5,000. IF BABY-BAMA STATES ONE MORE TIME THAT HE CANNOT APPLY HIS HARVARD
EDUCATIONAL SKILLS TO HIS JOB BECAUSE HIS SKIN IS THE WRONG COLOR, I WILL
REMAND THIS ACTION INTO A HIGHER COURT, AND ASK FOR MORE MONEY.
I hope the Court
understands what this action is really about.
Isn’t this a
great trap?!
I know my former
attorney, Mr. Frank Kibler, is watching this. With all of my respect for him, I
know he is remembering one of our disagreements. During one of our
conversations in 2007, he demanded of me to stop looking for phony attorneys
under every couch and behind every curtain.
If he doubts my
evaluation of Mr. Reveley, I would like to ask of him to telephone his
“colleague” and ask, “Are you an attorney?”
And if that
doesn’t convince him of the quantity of these counterfeit people, maybe this
will.
On March 21st,
I received the Complaint-form as well as a copy of an affidavit. Unfortunately,
I do not currently have the technology to scan either into my computer and
reproduce it on this website. However, the latter is only one page, so I can reproduce
it verbatim.
|
I Louise Zematis, being duly sworn, depose and say the
following: 1. I am for the plaintiff and I am over the age of
eighteen and believe in the obligation of the oath. 2. There is a balance due to plaintiff from defendant,
VIVIAN LEHMAN, on Account No. 64753L the sum of $1,804.75, which balance
remains unpaid despite written demand. 3. Balance due is for heating oil delivered and/or
heating services and repairs and/or installation of heating equipment
rendered by plaintiff to defendant(s) at defendant(s) request in accordance
with attached invoice. 4. Plaintiff requests prejudgment interest be awarded
in the amount of $162.67 calculated from March 3, 2008 to the date hereof at
the rate of 10% per annum pursuant to Conn. Gen Stat. 37-3a as payment has been
wrongfully withheld by defendant. 5. There is a total due to plaintiff of $1,967.42, including prejudgment interest of $162.67, which sum remains unpaid despite demand. |
Need I do
anything more to prove that Mr. Reveley could not possibly be an attorney?
This morning, as
I waited in the Courthouse lobby for the offices to open, I discussed the
matter with an attorney. I only showed him the Answer form, and only mentioned
the non-existence of a cause of action. He agreed that an account manager would
normally sign the affidavit-of-debt, and identify his/herself as such.
I began today’s
conversation with a different issue. I struggled with grammar over the weekend.
Is the phrase, “By the omission of the affidavit”, correct?
My philosophy was connected to the fact that the phrase, “By the admission
of the affidavit” is correct. He didn’t know the answer to my question. He
did, however, suggest a different choice of words; “By virtue of the
information not presented in the affidavit, the defects are…”
Whatever may be
grammatically correct or not, my predictions are that several things can happen
now:
1. My opposing counsel will withdraw. This will leave my counterclaim
free-standing. He probably won’t show for the hearing and I will win by
default.
2. My opposing counsel will contact me and request a mutual withdrawal. I
will not agree to this because I intend to use this lawsuit to force Wells
Fargo to tell the truth.
3. We do trial.
Thursday
March 26, 2009
Although I
haven’t receiving official notification, it is my understanding that the State
Attorney General will be investigating the credentials of my opposing counsel,
as well as the issue of why a non-associate of the oil company would file a
supporting affidavit for the plaintiff.
I would like
to ask of one favor of the attorney general.
If the
results of the investigation are what I expect, would he please wait to release
these results until after Wells Fargo states for the record that it has no
interest or title in my house.
The expected
answer date, “return date”, for the legal action is May 5th. So I
expect we will receive such statement by early June.
Saturday March
28, 2009
It has been
suggested of me that I change the relief sought in my counterclaim from $500 to
$5,000 for the purpose of law school tuition. Inasmuch as I appreciate the
thoughtfulness, this is the problem with that legal argument.
The plaintiff,
ProTech Oil, ceased to exist in the summer of 2007. It was bought by Scasco
Energy. I still don’t know who Louise Zematis is, but I guess she is the
retired owner. I researched her on the internet. She is 58 years old.
I will
additionally guess that my opposing counsel is not producing invoices to the
Court because the letterhead would read Scasco Energy. This would require some
explaining which he does not want to do, nor does he know how.
When I filed the
counterclaim, I knew that I could never see this money. But I decided it was a
free question of the Court. The Judge can either say NO, or, if the Judge says
YES, there is nothing to collect against.
Even if I wanted
to give my opposing counsel money, I couldn’t.
If the Court
identifies Wells Fargo Bank and Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendants, then I
could cross-claim these. If I remand this into a higher Court, I could ask for
more than $5,000 each. Would the Court understand if I asked for enough for law
school tuition, without stating such purpose?
I prepared a
draft for a remand. I have until April 19th to file. I understand
that one copy has to go into each Court, with copies of all other motions
accompanying the paperwork into the new Court. I believe my argument for
regular trial is strong enough if the Judge understands that I can only put in
writing a small fraction of the problem.
Saturday
March 28, 2009
1st Sunday of Lent
Cut the Wires
2nd Sunday of Lent
Open the Gates
3rd Sunday of Lent
Imprison Donald Trump
4th Sunday of Lent
Count the Cost
5th Sunday of Lent
$8,000 in Vandalisms
If I inflicted such damage to anyone, everyone would be ganging-up on me to
offer me labor as a $5/hour cashier to perform the necessary reimbursements.
But in 2002-04, when Prince William of Wales repeatedly smashed the
exterior mirror of my car, cut-out a piece of the transmission, poured his
weapons of Wicca down the drains of my household toilet and bathtub, among
other things, the financial remedy was to instruct my co-workers of Staples to
convince me I must improve my penny-pinching techniques. A few pennies everyday
would eventually add-up to 800,000-cents.
I understand why that made sense to President George Bush. It is the
definition of Pooh. It is why his mother owes the world an apology for not
aborting him.
But I do not understand why this made sense to those who believed the dumb
manager of Loehmann’s department store in Mount Kisco, New York who accused me
of shoplifting from her store in 1992. They ganged-up on me to reimburse her
the $15. But in 2005, I still had the receipt because I knew this would one day
re-surface, and because it was part of a magenta-colored-outfitting I assembled
for a ski trip. It has sentimental value.
I would like her to answer three curiosity questions of mine:
It is a fact that Loehmann’s was fully equipped with video cameras. If she
believed I was a shoplifter, why didn’t she acquire my license plate number and
submit that with the video-tape to the local police department, which was a
half-a-block away?
Why did it take a floor representative ten minutes to surface onto the
floor to greet me while I was the only customer?
Why did it take this representative twenty minutes to find her so she could
attempt to reach into my pocketbook and steal the alleged ill-begotten item?
If I received
the message which I think I just did, I would like to ask the messengers to
relay the information to every member of the House and Senate for the
commencement of impeachment hearings.
The cause of
action will be the fact that a foreigner such as himself doesn’t know any
better. This is the way his father manages his overseas government. They are
all a bunch of animals with no hormonal control.
I believe his
wife and children would appreciate it. They are very unhappy there.
If I file this,
there will be a $75 filing fee.
I haven’t made
any decision yet.
RED=NOT SERVED-AND-FILED
|
Superior Court of the State of Connecticut Middletown Courthouse |
Case # |
|
ProTech Oil, Plaintiff, vs. Vivian
Lehman, Defendant. |
Connecticut Small Claims Case # SCC-219909 MOTION FOR REMAND |
1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in
the above-captioned case and submit this Motion for Remand.
2. The Motion for Remand is pursuant to
2009 Connecticut
Practice Book
Sec. 24-21. Transfer
to Regular Docket
(a) A case duly entered on the small
claims docket of a small claims area…shall be transferred to the regular docket
of the superior court…if the following conditions are met:
(1) The defendant… shall file a
motion to transfer the case to the regular docket. This motion must be filed on
or before the answer date with certification of service pursuant to Sections
10-12 et seq. ..
(2) The motion to transfer must be
accompanied by
(A) a counterclaim in an amount
greater than
the jurisdiction of the small claims
court; or
(B) an affidavit stating that a good
defense exists to the claim and setting forth with specificity the nature of
the defense, or stating that the case has been properly claimed for trial by
jury.
3. In conjunction with this Motion, I am filing an
Answer-Affidavit stating my defense, as well as a separate motion amending my
Counterclaim object of action from $500 to $15,000.
4. The nature of the plaintiff’s action is breach of
contract for services rendered to a property known as 891 South Street in the
County of Tolland, Town of Coventry, State of Connecticut.
5. The object of the plaintiff’s action is $1,967.42.
6. The contractual debt was satisfied by payment made to
the plaintiff in April, 2008 for the amount specified. It was made by the law
firm of Hunt & Leibert as it represented Wells Fargo Bank and Countrywide
Home Loans. As of November of 2007, it was their ProTech account pursuant to
the fact that the law firm claimed their ownership of said property.
Henceforth, they had landlord status. (see Substitution Motion)
7. The law firm of Hunt & Leibert is very experienced
and knowledgeable of the laws of Housing. They were not delinquent in their
responsibilities to provide heat and hot water to a tenant. (see Substitution
Motion)
8. The cause of the plaintiff’s action remains
unspecified. According to the plaintiff’s supporting Affidavit, invoices were
proffered to the Court, yet these weren’t.
9. The plaintiff’s case has a hidden cause of action
which has no resemblance to the recorded nature of action.
10. In Small Claims Court, I have filed previous Motions
requesting Substitution from myself as defendant to Wells Fargo Bank which, according
to the Land Records of the Town of Coventry, has title to the property at
issue. I also asked that the Court recognize as co-defendant the company which,
according to its Internal Revenue Service document, has interest in the
property; Countrywide Home Loans.
11. My opposing counsel agreed that Wells Fargo should be
a defendant. (see his Motion to Add Defendant)
12. My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and
Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients
in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof.
According to the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website, these are such recent
cases of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut:
CV-08-5018020-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LN V. --------
CV-08-5003485-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------
CV-06-6000365-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------
CV-08-5008544-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------
CV-08-5022536-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------
CV-08-5009491-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------
CV-01-0095475-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME V. ----------
CV-05-4008567-S WELLS FARGO BANK MN V. -----
CV-08-5020008-S WELLS FARGO BANK NA V. ------
CV-06-4003674-S WELLS FARGO BANK NA V. -----
CV-06-5003707-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----
CV-08-5016887-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -------
CV-08-5004189-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----
CV-08-5018771-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----
CV-07-5013495-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. ------
CV-06-4018119-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----
CV-09-5026915-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N V. -----
CV-08-5024684-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----
CV-07-6001261-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----
CV-07-6000248-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----
CV-07-6002477-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----
CV-08-5003454-S WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. -----
CV-08-5021460-S WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. -----
13. According to the Small Claims Court definition of
itself as presented in its Connecticut Judicial Branch website, its purposes
are:
“unpaid debts;
breach of a written or verbal contract;
back rent;
return of security deposit;
broken or damaged property;
doctor/hospital bills for treatment of
personal injuries; and,
issues valued at less than $5000. “
14. The plaintiff’s cause of action is not any of
the above.
15. According to the Small Claims Court definition of
itself, its purposes are not:
“libel or slander;
damage to your reputation;
name calling; or,
issues valued at more than $5000. “
16. The plaintiff’s off-the-record nature of action is
“damage to my reputation” which renders it an issue “valued at more than
$5,000”.
17. But it is not just about the object of the action
that I am requesting the remand, but also about the peripheral facts of the
case. According to the Decision of Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept,
3:05cv1396:
“Where the existence of subject matter
jurisdiction turns on a factual issue, however, the court is
permitted to look beyond the complaint itself and may consider evidence
outside the pleadings. See Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace
Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1997).”
emphasis supplied
18. The herein discussed Small Claims Court case belongs
in the Superior Court to appropriately conjoin its subject matter with
issues of the jurisdiction of the Wells Fargo foreclosure action against
me of the Tolland County Superior Court.
19. This case does not belong in the Federal District
Court, the only other alternative.
“TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 89 > §
1441
§ 1441. Actions removable generally
(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of
Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district
courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the
defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the
district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.”
20. The Bankruptcy Court record of the Federal District
Court in Hartford, Connecticut identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the
mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt.
Countrywide then abandoned the debt. It has been three years since my last
payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo
Bank.
21. The first applicable “factual issue” is that my
opposing counsel originally corresponded with me about the “breach of contract”
over nine months after the alleged due date of the bill. He waited from March
03, 2008 to the end of the tax year of 2008. (See Exhibit A
hereto attached)
22. The second “factual issue” is that the Small Claims
Court action was served on March 20, 2009, 26-days before April 15, 2009,
the deadline for tax filing with the Internal Revenue Service for the activity
of the year 2008.
23. The third “factual issue” is that the Motion for
Ejectment was filed on March 11, 2008 (see Case Detail of
CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville), almost exactly one year before the Small
Claims Court servicing of March 20, 2009. Even though this date of 2008
was five months after the foreclosure, the representing law firm of Hunt &
Leibert thought ejecting me would resolve their inconsistencies with the
records of the Internal Revenue Service.
24. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the lack of
identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State
of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States
Government. (see Substitution Motion)
25. Wells Fargo and Countrywide are venting their
aggressions against me while acting in the guise of the identity of plaintiff
ProTech.
26. If ProTech is the authorized plaintiff, the account
manager and/or owner would have submitted an affidavit with invoices attached.
27. I would like to ask of the Court to recognize how serious
this is, and how many issues of the bigger picture are best left for trial. I
would like the opportunity to cross-examine that who signed the unsupported
Affidavit, as well as the potentially impleaded defendants of Wells Fargo and
Countrywide Home Loans, against whom I intend to file cross-claims.
WHEREFORE defendant respectfully requests remand from the
Small Claims Court into the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut.
____________________________________
Vivian Lehman
PO Box 629
Coventry, CT 06238
Decision
The foregoing motion to remand ProTech Oil versus Vivian
Lehman from the Small Claims Court into the Superior Court of the State of
Connecticut is hereby
Granted Denied
____________________________________________________
Justice
Certificate of
Service
I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this remand motion in three
pre-paid postage envelops and transmitted such via the United States Postal
Service to all counsel of record and potential impleaded, yet unrepresented
defendants:
Mr. William G. Reveley
REVELEY WILLIAM G. &
ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066
And
Wells Fargo
Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
And
Mr. Sean Sweeney
Attorney for Countrywide Home
Loans
HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.
50 Weston Street
Hartford, CT 06120
_____________________________________________________________
Vivian Lehman
Sunday March
29, 2009
To my
knowledge, I cannot file any cross-claims until after Wells Fargo and
Countrywide Home Loans are officially identified as co-defendants. I doubt if
that will happen before the hearing. I very strongly doubt if the Judge will
enter any Decisions before such date. Unlike with the higher Courts, there are
no pre-trial hearings to determine such details, and there will be no
preliminary conference.
And to my
knowledge, my argument for a larger counterclaim is insufficient. All I have is
circumstantial evidence of coincidental timing as well as previous associations
between my opposing counsel and both these banks. And while I know the debt was
satisfied, I can’t prove it unless Hunt & Leibert save themselves from much
trouble with the Housing Authority, and produce the cancelled check.
What I am
wondering is if the Court can remand this on its own motion. While it would be
nice to save the $75 filing fee, it would also assure me this is the correct
path to take. And perhaps the Judge can telephone his colleagues in the State
and Federal Courts and ask who wants the case. Should it be remanded to the
latter to conjoin it with the bankruptcy issues, or perhaps with the former to
consider the case detail of the foreclosure?
So I am
thinking about placing the above information in another motion, and making a
between-the-lines suggestion to the Court.
But there is
plenty of time for that. The earliest possible Small Claims Court hearing date
is August.
Tuesday March
31, 2009
They have sent
out a very strong hint that they want compromise. The
FBI-Agent/midnight-stranger wrote out the CPB (Connecticut Practice Book)
section number and title, “Sec. 17-11. Offer of Compromise by Defendant“, on a
small legal pad and left it at the service desk, by the vendor-log-in book of
one of the stores I service for Crossmark.
Part of his
message was that I do not have to fully write-out the title every time I cite
it in a motion. I can use the abbreviation. But my audience is not just the
Court and the visitors of this website, it is also myself ten years from now. I
won’t have any way of understanding what I was talking about if I do not
provide a full citation.
What this law
enforcement Agent also cannot understand, surprisingly, is that I cannot give
money to my opposing counsel for licensure reasons, and the plaintiff cannot
give money to me for existential reasons---it doesn’t exist.
And one more
thing…
I want the truth
from Wells Fargo. I want it to state for the record, under penalties of
perjury, that it lied to me when it told me it had an interest in the house.
But I have a
philosophical question for the FBI Agent.
When I win back
my house, is he going to repeat his complaints?
He wants us to be in the bigger bed of the master bedroom.
He wants a place to put his clothes.
He wants me to continue to add to the museum.
And anything else I may not have noticed.