Jan - March 2009

We first met on the night of March 15, 2008. You visited for tea at the above-specified address. We met again on April 07, 2008. You were with Judicial Marshall Tim Poloski and served me with ejectment papers. We met again on the day of the ejectment of April 09^th.

In Late August, I received the property tax bill for said address. You already paid such on July 02, 2008: $2765.60 + $69.00 (trash). I have the receipt from the Town of Coventry and thank you for your advanced-payment.

Because the bill and payments were in my name, for IRS purposes, I am planning on reporting a gift of $2834.60, and henceforth the deduction of $2765.60 on my Schedule A. My assumption is that the IRS will qualify all your landscaping and other expenses as gifts for which I must be taxed.

I would like a list of all your expenses, as well as your advanced payment to me. My tax rate is 12% plus tax preparation fees. If I receive overpayment from you, I will return extra monies. I would appreciate the responding courtesy for any underpayments.

Thank you very much.

Vivian Lehman

Wednesday January 08, 2009

Yesterday I was at Kmart performing a Nabisco project. As I was placing my empty boxes in the bailer, a man insisted on speaking to me about the professional problems his wife was having. She is a judge of the Department of Child and Family. According to him, she cannot focus on the children because dirty politics are dominating the system. We will be dealing with this. I don’t know when. I don’t expect anything of the Chief Justice of the Connecticut Courts nor Governor Jodi Rell who are not capable of understanding the problem. They will probably assemble a committee.

Next issue…

Governor Bill Richardson has withdrawn his name from the candidacy for Commerce Secretary to President-Elect Obama’s cabinet. The media is speculating why. I already know.

Obama promised 3,000,000 jobs in a short time span. He assured Mr. Richardson that our Targets will take care of this as well as all other facets of the aggressive and ambitious economic stimulus package. He forgot one detail.

His two daughters. They can’t do what I assigned. And what I assigned was not nearly as ambitious as my previous assignments. I expected that.

He is lucky my mother and grandmother are no longer alive. They endlessly ridiculed over-achieving men who married women with half their intelligence, and bequeathed such to the next generation. I can’t repeat their jokes because I was too young to understand these. But they would have had him laughed-out of his inauguration.

President Bush still wants us to Target the issues in the Middle East. I have decided to take care of myself first, especially since a nation of people who like to boast of their superior intelligence should not need anything from us. And if they are anti-assimilation, they cannot accept.

I currently have a huge IRS problem.

I suddenly realized that the $10,000 in back taxes the law firm paid in 2007, must also be reported to the IRS in the form of an amendment. Although I don’t like to make excuses, and I know the Federal Government doesn’t like to hear these, I did not know that the property taxes were still in my name until August of 2008. And I didn’t figure any of this out until January 1^st and 2^nd of this year, when I studied the tax website trying to pre-calculate my refund.

As to the taxes which must soon be filed for 2008, you are probably wondering why a gift of approximately $5,450 cannot be counterbalanced by an identical deduction. The answer is that this figure is the amount of the standard deduction. Without the counterbalancing gift, it augments the refund. With the gift, it creates a debt which must be paid.

Working on this website was not in my plans for today. But this morning I assembled my paperwork to perform some tasks for Crossmark. Even though I wasn’t going to be doing any sewing or museum-touring, I didn’t mind. I opened the front door and found myself greeted by a hail storm. I rescheduled everything. It is nice not to owe anyone any explanations.

I turned on the television set to Fox cable news. Immediately there was a report that the IRS understands this is a difficult economy. Arrangements and even compromises can be made. Of course, reporting still must be done accurately. This is what I need.

1. Next month, I want my refund. If the law firm provides me with full cooperation by then, great! If not, I want the IRS to allow me to file an amendment for this tax return, as well as that filed in 2008. I cannot control what Hunt & Leibert does with the information I need.

2. A pre-emptive IRS hearing to establish how this unique situation should be filed. And I want them, not my tax-preparer, to calculate how much money they owe. It would be best if they paid the IRS directly, rather than have me relay the money. I believe this because after they paid the September 2008 property taxes, they attempted to steal the money out of my bank account. The IRS can save me much trouble.

Thursday January 08, 2009

Dominating the news has been the issues concerning Illinois Governor Blagojevich. This state is, of course, the home of President-Elect Barack Obama. The Governor’s wife’s name is Patricia. It is my understanding that she was the realtor for the Obamas when they lived in Chicago.

I can’t find any record of her license. Of course, it could be under her former husband’s name.

I would like to know.

I found the following on freerepublic.com. Thank you!!!!

Looking For INFO-Patricia BlagoJevich Was The Realtor In Rezko-Obama House Deal?
TCRLAF | 12-10-08 | TCRLAF

Posted on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:27:38 PM by tcrlaf

I'm trying to find info and links to what Bill O'reilly just said on his show, NAMELY that Patricia Blagojevich was the Real Estate Broker in the Rezko-Obama land deal!!

IF TRUE, this could explain how Obama "Paid" for Governor Blutarsky's support for his Senate run!!!

ANY AND ALL HELP IS APPRECIATED....

I am finding links and story's from the trib describing some of her crooked deals, and she was a partner of Rezko's in his Real Estate ventures.

She has a "Home-Based" Real Estate business called "RIVER REALTY".

THANX IN ADVANCE!! LET's GET TO WORK!!

I researched RIVER REALTY and found nothing.

Is she a real estate agent or mortgage broker?

Saturday January 10, 2009

Dear Mr. Obama;

Ten days away from your inauguration and I want to reach an agreement with you. Before I go into the details I want you to consider a few facts.

If your eldest daughter were born a Bush, she would be three-years-away from her first abortion. During his time as a Texas governor, he spent more time executing prisoners than doing homework and spending quality time with his children. And while in the White House, he committed himself to constantly harassing me. While he was concentrating on sending trespassers into my home, one of his daughters was very relieved when she learned she did not have to abort her last pregnancy. The father did agree to marry her. But the wedding was postponed until after the delivery.

Is that the life you want?

If you spend one hour each day with each child, you can easily counter-balance the negative impact your wife’s negative intelligence has had. And they can do the Targets.

Give me back my house, no mortgage, a property tax bill reflective of a value of $1 + $30,000-down-payment, a salary payable through Crossmark as I continue to work for them, and a thorough cleansing of the Coventry Police Department. You will have to find competent, non-corruptible, well-trained officers. I don’t think it has ever been done before in any police precinct. But you did promise “change”.

And remove Hilary from her candidacy as Secretary of State. This is also in the best interest of your daughters.

Sunday January 11, 2009

I know what Nancy Grace is trying to do every night as she devotes a full hour to the Casey Anthony investigation. She is trying to force the obvious killer to confess. This person is NEVER going to admit to practicing Wicca/witchcraft. I hope watching this, that everyone understands the frustrations of law enforcement agents of past centuries.

When we intellectually discuss the witchcraft trials of Salem, Massachusetts, we recognize The Crucible as a truthful reflection of the alleged travesty of justice. The fact is that the author reconstructed these events, while never specifying if he was also such a witchcraft practitioner. I don’t know much about Arthur Miller. I do know he was Jewish. The book of Ezra Chapter 4 characterizes such people as witches.

The later-date book was published during the McCarthy era, when seemingly innocent people were accused of being communists. One of these was Lucille Ball. She and her Cuban husband divorced one year after Fidel Castro became the dictator of such country. After she and Desi Arnaz completed the television series I Love Lucy, they co-starred in the movie, The Long Long Trailer. In this, they assumed roles similar to Lucy and Ricky Ricardo. The difference is that in the end, the question is raised on whether or not they should stay together after the “project”. In the movie, they do, after he discusses everything with his father. But that is the Hollywood ending. In real life, he probably dumped her. The true test of whether or not he was a spy is by scrutinizing their children. Offspring of spies are not allowed to talk to anyone. Their children were not very conversational.

When I first noticed what the people of Wicca and “communism/socialism” are capable of, their first offensive strategy was to destroy my reputation. They were very good at it.

Nancy Grace is also outraged at the donations Casey Anthony is receiving into her prison account. Instead of forwarding the money into funeral expenses, she is purchasing snacks and health-and-beauty necessities such as body creams. In my opinion, Ms. Grace should not direct her attention at how the money is being received, but rather who is sending. My guess is these are “pro-life”/anti-abortionists who understand that mother is the one of many. And if the grandmother had not made the 9-1-1 phone call, no one would have noticed the child’s absence.

It is the only good thing I have to say about the parents. Otherwise, I believe that the practice of Wicca is genetic, and the secrecy is learned most likely from family.

I believe this because I once had a co-worker who looked very Saxon. She was raised by an adoptive family of whom I know nothing except one detail which was connected to her job-attendance-rate.

Her absenteeism was very high. I wondered why the manager was not firing her. He finally explained she was not routinely sick, but rather recovering from her father’s latest beating.

I would have called Department of Child and Family, but she was over 18-years-old.

This Saxon explained to me why she was adopted. Her mother was single and 21-years-old. It made sense. These people are always pregnant with children they don’t know what to do with.

One of the first things I learned about this co-worker is that she practices Wicca. She never mentioned that her adoptive-parents shared in this. So I assume they didn’t. Henceforth, it is genetic, except for the secrecy.

The only specific detail of witchcraft that she shared with me was the use of the herb bilberry. It affects the eyes. According to her, in large dosages, it creates hallucinations.

Maybe Casey Anthony had one when this occurred.

Tuesday January 13, 2009

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

If you kill me, then the house will have to be processed via my estate. This will require another court, justice, and one year of time.

If you settle peacefully with me, it would take one week.

Saturday January 17, 2009

As you probably guessed, another Ezra-4/ricen attack occurred last Sunday.

I took an afternoon nap, awoke, took my asthma pills, and then prepared for night-sleep. My blood-pressure dropped and the major heart attack began including left arm paralysis. I took one birth-control-pill, and one of each of Solaray’s Butterbur and Tart Cherry. It was a five-minute-event.

My guess is that some time earlier this month someone entered my room and removed one pill from the bottle. They submitted this to the lab which laced it with ricen. It was then returned.

The satellites must have helped by providing the necessary information on my routine.

A few days before I took it, while I was servicing one of my Home Depots, an FBI agent walked by me. Although I had never seen him before, they all share the same facial expression. I knew trouble was coming. He was unusually tall, even for an FBI agent. He wore a dark business suit which matched his dark hair and Caucasian skin.

I do not believe that the information on my schedule came from Crossmark. Rather, he arrived approximately one hour after I did. This suggests to me that the satellites provided such information.

If the Bureau knew I was about to be attacked, why didn’t they stay with me 24/7?

So therefore, I will tell you everything else I told them. You are much more useful than they are, and could probably do more with the anthropological information. Here it is…

Because Osama-Ben-Laden/Robert-Crowe/Antonio-Mendez is Aztec, I suggested that they decode with such. It is my understanding that it required approximately one year for their sub-organization, “CAT”, to perform this, but it was done.

And I suggested they study the Olmec.

When I was a college student, taking Prof. Bruce Byland’s brilliant course on Mesoamerican Archeology, studying Aztec sacrifices was included in the curriculum. I was actually the only student in the class, because I changed my major from physics into anthropology very late in the four year term. This course was required, and the only way we could beat the deadline was with an independent study.

When I arrived for our appointment one day with deep, dark circles under my eyes because I couldn’t sleep between nightmares, which included the sacrifice of my dog, Professor Byland realized I could never study these people. Most students would then flip-over to the Maya or Incas. But I had already begun very exciting research on the Olmec. They lived near the Aztec.

Included in my readings, I found a comment that Stela C of Tres Zapotes had never been interpreted. I asked him if I could do my term paper attempting to do just that. It would be more fun than the standard…

The Olmec were…

They lived in…

Etc.

He agreed.

Then I had to find a picture of this. At the time I thought that a Stela and a Monument were the same thing. When I later told him of my mistake, he thought it was funny. But I found an excellent sketch of Monument C of this same site. It would take me awhile to realize it wasn‘t what I was looking for, but it was a reasonable substitute.

Monument C is a frieze sculpture in three parts on a rectangular shaped rock which looks like it was once shaped into a building block. I thought the first image represented prosperity, and the third a drought-induced-famine. The middle had me perplexed.

As to this middle picture, Prof. Byland noted the aggressive pose of the warrior. I didn’t think it was aggressive. He imitated it until I agreed. He also noted it was upside-down. According to him, this represents a divine connection.

Over the years, I decided that just because I don’t like the Aztecs, does not mean I don’t have to have literature on them. If I was going to be any good as an anthropologist, I had to be able to research anything. I collected such books at library sales, among others.

Two years ago, when I realized that Robert Crowe is Ben Laden, and already knew that he is Aztec, I pulled one of the books off of my shelves and researched a September annual ritual. In the first few pages, there it was. The War of Flowers. At the end of the harvest season, a major death toll of the enemy is required.

I remembered this Monument. I decided someone recorded this ritual, and left this for future investigators.

The plane in Pennsylvania was upside-down.

Other books mentioned that the Aztecs attacked the Olmecs at their site of San Lorenzo. This Monument was found at Tres Zapotes. I concluded the survivors must have fled there. This must have been carved on a piece which was salvaged from one of their wrecked structures.

When I was at the FBI office, I showed the Special Agent the picture. He anxiously wrote down Monument C of Tres Zapotes and was quite fascinated by this 2,000-year-old relic.

In my follow-up visit, I brought other books. One of these included dates of Aztec history recorded by two explorers. There are actually two columns of dates. Their accounts differ slightly. I explained that the second column must be the set-of-dates corresponding to that of the Aztec records. It can be used to predict future attacks.

(And because Ben Laden is pro-Sandinista of Nicaragua, any dates on which they lost power can also be used as predictors. All dates of attack are easily predictable.)

But why the same calendar as that of the Europeans, they wanted to know. How was it possible?

Let’s look at the archeological facts.

The Aztecs and Egyptians lived on approximately the same latitude. The former built pyramids within the last thousand years, the latter approximately 10,000 years ago. The Olmec built such approximately 2,000 years ago.

Modern anthropologists believe that American Natives peoples came from Asia across the Alaskan Bearing straights. Throughout the cycles of the last glacial age, water was frozen within the Pacific Ocean thereby routinely exposing this land.

According to that theory, 10,000-years-ago or more, in North Africa, there lived a people with pyramid technologies. They split. One stayed, the other eventually journeyed through Asia, across Alaska, and into Mexico. They then each developed their technologies nearly identically.

Let’s try something else.

Consider one other fact. Approximately 40,000,0000-years-ago, early-primates/pre-monkeys found their way from Africa into the Americas. No one knows how it happened. It wasn’t across the Bearing Straights because there is no fossil trail.

I suggested to the FBI the existence of another land-bridge across the Caribbean. They consulted with scientists who called me crazy. I suggested that they not talk to office-geologists, but rather the phone company. They set the cables. Very reluctantly, the FBI did as I instructed.

They confirmed the existence of this land-bridge.

And, of course, the European calendar is a derivative of that of the Ancient Egyptians.

Sunday January 18, 2009

A correction…The Olmec site attacked by the Aztecs, according to the literature I cited for the FBI, was Oaxaca, Mexico. San Lorenzo is another site. A fourth is La Venta. But I never mentioned that before.

To change the subject…

The Casey Anthony case in Florida.

Last night on Nancy Grace, a female caller made a very interesting observation. The murder victim’s date-of-birth is August 9, 2005. She disappeared in early June of 2008. Casey, the mother and accused murderer, said in a recorded jailhouse interview, that she believed Caylee would return home by her third birthday. On August 11^th, a meter-reader for the power company found her remains. The caller raised the question of whether a leak existed.

The meter-reader claims he called his supervisor and police. It is my understanding that he originally lead the police to the wrong area. It is also my understanding that the responding officer does not have a reputation for reliability. Three months later, the same civilian made the discovery a second time, called again, and lead them to the correct area.

It is also my understanding from watching Jane Valez Mitchell, that the former career of this meter-reader is a bail bondsman.

Where have we heard something like that before?

According to Wikipedia, on August 21^st, Casey Anthony was released after one month of incarceration. Her bond of $500,200 was posted by California bounty hunters Leonard Padilaa and his nephew Tony.

If I recall correctly, Casey Anthony’s father is in law enforcement. Although I admit it is difficult to keep-up with all the details of this case. All of my understandings and recollections may not be accurate.

I would like to know…

The identity of the “supervisor” the meter-reader/bail-bondsman claimed he called upon finding the body.

Why was bail posted ten-days after this original moment?

Is Mr. Anthony in law enforcement? If so, was he ever connected to any of these bail bondsmen and bounty hunters before this occurred?

I would like to “target” these issues, but I need assurances that no one will laugh at the Obama children. It isn’t their fault their father won’t help with homework.

Thursday January 22, 2009

Do I understand the subliminal information correctly?

The management company caring for the house to which I have title, turned the water back on in the house even though I purposefully turned-it-off? Then they did NOT turn the heat on, and now there is a burst pipe?

If this is true, I would like to ask the Town of Coventry if this is adequate grounds for revocation of the certificate of occupancy?

If not, does this change the value of the house? I would like reassessment.

Friday January 23, 2009

Two related issues…

It is my understanding that the midnight-stranger/FBI-Agent is considering proposing to me without apologizing for abandoning me. But despite that issue, he seems concerned that I am 42-years-old and may be past child-bearing age.

I would like to inform him of something I once briefly mentioned on this website. I think it was in 2001 that I had a complete abdominal sonogram. Because I was tired of everyone’s panic about this issue, I suggested that the gynecologist give the results to a radiologist who does not know me, and ascertain my age and potential. This person concluded I was a very healthy 25-year-old and confirmed I could have as many children as I want.

I should have also mentioned on more thing. When I had the exam, the technician showed me the photograph of the imminent ovulation.

While I probably can’t have ten children, I am certain I can have the standard quantity of 2.3. This is because I did not waste myself on any married man with AIDS and a $10,000,000 debt who wants to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he may have one erection with me.

The second issue…

I believe Bank of America, formerly Countrywide, finally looked at the paperwork.

I will never know what took them so long.

They are acknowledging that they have to settle with me. Before they approach, they must understand that they will have to present to me the following paperwork:

Certificate of Homeowner’s Insurance purchased by Wells Fargo, not Countrywide. If anything serious happens, I do not believe the courts will recognize a policy of the latter after they awarded ownership to the former.

Certificate of Occupancy dated within 30-days of the meeting.

Certificate that the Building Inspector of the Town of Coventry surveyed the condition of the house within said 30-day-period.

Assurances from the Town of Coventry Police Chief that their mushy sergeants and lieutenants have better things to do than wait for my dying phone call.

Receipt that the oil tank was filled and paid for within said 30-day-period.

An acknowledgment of the fact that attorney Sean Sweeney informed the Court on April 07^th that I did NOT default on my mortgage with Countrywide.

Reversal of all damage to my credit.

An apology for the fact that I was given 41-hours to vacate, and everyone was instructed not to help me, including the FBI agent.

Do you take this ass-licker…?

Part II--------Friday January 23, 2009

I just performed my routine surfing of the internet. I went on the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website and researched my name.

What I always find is two cases: 2006 foreclosure and 2007 eviction. The latter, if you will recall, I won by default.

Today, I only found the 2006 case. For some reason, Hunt & Leibert does not want Bank of America to see the Housing Court action. If they don’t want them to find the Assignment of Mortgage, it was filed by them in both actions. For the earlier, this was in January of 2007.

If they don’t want them to see the who, what, where, and when brief I filed, they may want to consider one critical issue.

The Bank-of-America/Countrywide representative visiting the courthouse will not ask to view any file captioned, Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman.

There is a very good reason for that.

So they will find that despite the law firm’s assurances that the matter was being resolved, they never filed anything on behalf of their paying client.

Bank of America is entitled to a refund of their fees, and rebate of the value of the mortgage of $278,000.

Saturday January 24, 2009

Bank of America is probably now considering the initiation of a foreclosure action. But they must understand that on March 19, 2007, my attorney filed a bankruptcy petition on my behalf. Although Sean Sweeney told the Superior Court it was denied, the fact is, it was granted. I am officially discharged from my debt to Countrywide Home Loans.

Part II---------Saturday January 24, 2009

Dear Bank of America;

Don’t tell me! Let me guess!

Yesterday your representative visited the Tolland County Superior Courthouse and could not find any file captioned, Countrywide Home Loans vs. Vivian Lehman. Then the person researched Bank of America vs. Vivian Lehman. While Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman was found, s/he didn’t review it. A waste of time.

The person then stood in front of the courthouse, probably pale and shaky because s/he was afraid that no manager would find this believable, and placed a cellular phone call to you. To this person’s surprise, it was believable. The manager probably then arranged a three-way conversation with an in-house attorney who, after careful consideration, suggested reviewing the Land Records of the Town of Coventry.

The employee then found the $1 Assignment of Mortgage and probably received permission from office personnel to use their FAX machine. You all looked at it last night, and then took as many pills as you could find in your medicine cabinet.

Let me continue to guess…

This morning you are having an emergency meeting with managers, in-house attorneys, and probably a few executives. My file is probably sitting on the conference table, open and empty except for a few pieces of paper; the bills from Hunt and Leibert which are stamped PAID. You are asking, Where is the les pendens document filed with the Town? Where is the Certificate of Foreclosure? Where are the original motion papers? Where is the judgment of foreclosure? You are probably considering firing the individual who was in direct contact with Hunt & Leibert. While these circumstances may seem unique, are these really? No money has ever been stolen from you before?

I believe you should fire this person.

Your attorneys are probably on their laptops, researching the judicial branch of the State of Connecticut. They found Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman and a resolution in their favor.

Now what?

An experienced attorney probably then raises the question of the time limitation for opening a judgment. They then research the State Laws and learn it is four months.

This has passed.

But there is an exception. Both parties must agree.

THAT’S IT!

Wait a minute, an executive says, We are not one of the parties.

Oh! They all sit back in disappointment.

There is only one thing which can stop Wells Fargo from going before Judge Sferrazza and explaining that they knew nothing about this.

I have a letter from them dated April of 2008 in which they confess to me that it was a malicious act. It came from an office positioned closely to the White House. In simpler terms, if I lie by omission to the court, it is perjury.

I won’t do that.

The first thing you need to do is threaten to sue and prosecute Wells Fargo and Hunt & Leibert. If you approach me nicely, I will give you a copy of the letter. Then a settlement can be reached. But understand this…

I am not giving you any money. My favor to you will be relieving you of your expenses for managing the house, and paying a law firm which obviously wants to go out of business.

Wednesday January 28, 2009

This week’s FBI Special Agent was at a different Home Depot and wore a black coat. I don’t believe another attack is coming. I think my so-called advocates are trying to crawl into the winner’s circle before the final victory. It amazes me how they see nothing wrong with that.

Otherwise, as to the national economy…

I have been watching the list of the companies which aren’t doing well. Crossmark’s primary stores are NOT included. And there are several reasons for that.

But first, an acknowledgement is long overdue.

Selection of the word Target was not my creative product. Rather, I borrowed it from Lord and Taylor. While statistics of the whole store were always monitored, every season the Area Sales Manager (my manager’s boss and Kathy McTigue’s immediate subordinate) would select a Target department. The logic to me was very obvious. Dina would devote extra attention to that and apply what she learned to the bigger picture. Loss Prevention (security) also used that term. One season the whole store was a Target in that our inventory discrepancies were too high (i.e., Monica’s theft).

For Crossmark I am given two types of Targets.

I either survey the store to learn what is on display and how it is being marketed. Sometimes, staff members believe I am there to recommend reprimands. It is the opposite. If they understand that, they explain everything which is going right or wrong. I relay the information to the project owner. This person works with the client.

Or I have to merchandise one department. In the Home Depot, for example, I care for the candy. At first I dreaded the assignment, then I invented a game. Now I enjoy it.

Recall the incident I had in 1992. I visited a Loehmann’s clothing store in Mount Kisco, New York. The bleach-blond manager was not on the floor. Neither was the staff, except for one moment. She emerged briefly, didn’t speak any English, and went to find the manager. That latter event took her 20-minutes. Despite all of that, these people still believed they were competent enough to make judgment calls on sales floor activity, and attempted to use such to damage my reputation. Obviously, upper management had no knowledge of the incompetence and negligence. Sending a Crossmark representative in there routinely would have resolved that. If we can’t find a manager, we can’t perform our tasks.

As far as I know, all departments I care for are doing well. I can’t give you statistics. Crossmark won’t allow it. They believe I will place such on my resume and leave.

It was Filomena Serra of Lord & Taylor who taught me to obsess myself with keeping everything out of the stockroom, and finding ways to reorganize the sales floor to accommodate everything, without looking over-stuffed. Kathy McTigue also taught me much. I applied one of her techniques to my Kmart Nabisco project. Over a year ago, I was explaining this to one of the managers as I applied it to an end-cap display. (These are found at either end of the aisles.) I offered to show him. He decided it was worth a few minutes of his time to walk over. When I returned two weeks later, he gave me a direct order to merchandise in this way. Obviously, it worked.

If I had statistics, I could also tell you how well Nabisco was doing as it relates to the whole store. My guess is very well. Because after January 1^stof this year, Kmart suddenly obsessed itself with cleaning-out the stockrooms. I am no longer climbing all over merchandise while resolving not to perform any archeological excavations to find cookies and crackers. Both of my stores have almost empty backrooms. Now they can use the area for sales space, such as a sewing department or a museum of Kmart history.

When I read Crossmark’s internal bulletins, I learn of other techniques. The most fascinating related to a coupon promotion. It encouraged the consumer to buy one product so they could save on another. But these were merchandised in different aisles. One of our representatives suggested converting an end-cap to display these two products. It worked because those of us on the field see things differently than those in the office.

On a related subject…

President Obama seems convinced he can include in the deal-making for my house my act of proving I am the only one capable of being president. This is, of course, because I was trained by a world leader, Eva Braun. He must understand this.

I will gladly rebuild the economy without his participation in my final negotiations with Hunt & Leibert. I am only asking for this in return.

His testimony, with non-compromised cross examinations, at the impeachment hearings of the Governor of Illinois. The issue is the possible act of selling the senate seat vacated by the current president. I personally believe that if Obama doesn’t know anything, he has no executive skills. But he does have such, and must know.

He can begin with the accounting of the Illinois home he and his wife purchased. I want copies of all documents submitted, with copies to the media.

And I want it now!

Thursday January 29, 2009

Dear FBI;

One is a silk chiffon, the other is a silk organza.

Saturday January 31, 2009

Good News! It has been over one week since I last had any asthma medication. The last time I went for 24-hours without needing such was when I was 17-years-old. I am 42 now.

A few weeks ago it became ferocious. I thought it was because I no longer needed the inhaler, but rather the pill. This didn’t always work for me. Suddenly, it was very effective. Then, I occasionally heard cracking noises in my neck and back---such as from chiropractic therapy. Then the big progression suddenly occurred.

Some weight has come off. At the time the asthma stopped, so too did the swelling in my feet. I found myself admiring these. I hadn’t seen them in so long. My house-slippers are too big. I have to wear sneakers when going up-and-down the stairs.

Otherwise…

As to impeachment proceedings of the Governor of Illinois, I heard a journalist characterizing one of the allegations against this individual as the selling of professional licenses.

These “professionals” are not licensed. Rather, they are certified or registered. The emergency room physician who characterized my high white blood cell count as a “psychiatric disorder” was certified, but unlicensed. The attorney who had an Addition Consulting Business, while she could not read her monthly checking account statement from the bank, was registered and unlicensed. The lawyer who is trying to collect on my last oil bill of the Coventry house, is unlicensed, but has a juris number. (Even if I wanted to give him money, I couldn’t.) I would complain to the State, but our Governor would give a juris number to a licensed dog. The people of Illinois should consider themselves lucky that he only issued such to human beings. Or maybe unlucky. I would like a dog-doctor, or a barking-attorney.

The Illinois gubernatorial impeachment hearings have concluded without President Baby-Bama’s testimony. So I would like to make another stipulation. For one week, if he only makes a public statement when he has something intelligent to say, I will rebuild the economy for him.

I am only asking for seven days.

Otherwise…

I have been watching Nancy Grace cover the Casey Anthony court proceedings. As I watch Nancy carefully review every detail as this enigmatic situation is slowly understood, she seems to believe that the identity of the unknown father is not an issue. I believe it is. We still do not know the motive for the murder.

I will take a guess based on everything I understand of the people of Wicca.

It is possible that he, or someone else, finally agreed to marry her. But he didn’t want the child. Disposing of a child for a potential husband is not unusual for these women. We have seen many such cases in the media.

Casey Anthony sits in court and is escorted around the jail in handcuffs as she wears a smile indifferent to the circumstances. She believes that this guy will take care of everything. These women always believe that. That is why he has to marry her.

I believe prosecutors should try to communicate via her attorney using Wicca concepts. This defense lawyer will probably laugh at the idea, not understanding which area of her brain is dominant. It is not the same as his. They should talk to her about her act of becoming pregnant on Halloween night as a result of an unplanned act of passion. They should ask if she had any communication with the father or another male a few days before the death of Caylee. Did she receive a promise of marriage, or a subliminal promise of such?

Sunday February 01, 2009

On Friday, I met with my tax preparer. She didn’t look good. I even told her so. I think she knows about the issues and is having a hard time finding her way.

I showed her the receipt for the September property taxes. She said it is my deduction and I do not have to claim it as a gift. She cited the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007. I researched it on Wikipedia:

“The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act was introduced in Congress on September 25, 2007, and became law on December 20, 2007. This act offered relief to homeowners who would formerly owe taxes on forgiven mortgage debt after facing foreclosure. The act extends such relief for three years, applying to debts discharged in calendar year 2007 through 2009. (With the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, this tax relief was extended another three years, covering debts discharged through calendar year 2012.)

Normally in US law when a lender decides to forgive all or a portion of a borrower's debt and accept less, the forgiven amount is considered as income for the borrower and is liable to be taxed.

However, after the signing of the Mortgage Forgiveness Act, amendments have been made to remove such tax liability and allow the borrower and lender to work freely together to find a common solution that is beneficial to both parties. This protection is limited to primary residences -- rental properties are ineligible for relief -- so consultation with a tax advisor is necessary to ensure that a borrower qualifies.[1] The amount of forgiven mortgage debt allowed to be excluded from income tax is limited to $2 million per year.” (emphasis supplied)

I think it was passed with my situation as issue. And I will ask her about an amendment to my 2007 tax return filed in 2008. If you will recall, in 2006 I stopped paying property taxes when this action began because I believed I had a small chance of winning. In November of 2007, the law firm paid everything. I might be entitled to that deduction too, with retroactive refund.

I understand what my tax adviser is saying. But I reminded her of one thing---I NEVER HAD A MORTGAGE WITH WELLS FARGO. They do not have my social security number in their system. She said we will see what they file. She asked me if I received the Schedule B---discharge of debt. I didn’t. Above, I underlined the entries relating to this issue. Without the “discharge” and “forgiveness”, I don’t know if this law applies.

But there is one thing the IRS must understand, if we are proven wrong, it was NOT a malicious act to defraud the United States Government. They must understand as much as we do that the records must identify with each other. According to the tax assessor of the Town of Coventry, I am a tax payer. This must be cited on my tax returns or there can be complications at a later date.

Monday February 02, 2009

Dear Donald Trump;

Now that you have emerged from your bankruptcy and are no longer defaulting on your loans, do you think you can pay for the $1,300 in damage you did to my book in 1994? At the time, it was resolved I would pay because I had more money than you with no default record.

But if you really believe you know something about finance, would you like to explain which leading economic indicator is your favorite? If you can’t, should I assume that your specialty is theft? Such as the way you attempted to steal $4,500 out of the hands of my terminally ill mother in 1991, or break-into my mother’s safe deposit box in 1992?

In 1992, you also attempted to influence Barbara Pickett, the “attorney” administering the estate, to have me make a list of all my household expenses, while understanding that it would be cheaper for me to stay in the house I inherited, and then have me enter the labor market to find myself unable to support such. Then I was supposed to go to you for money, after I gave you my research for free so you could negotiate yourself from bankruptcy status. This was after you insisted I should never pursue you for money.

Why did that make sense to you? Was it because these are different areas of the brain dominating different moments? Or is there some other reason?

In 1995, the agreement you reached with my publisher, Dorrance; employer, Linda Mallon of 7-Eleven; and banker, Sue Hallinan of Citibank, was that you would leave me alone without paying for the damage you did to my book. You didn’t leave me alone. That means you must pay. And if you don’t, I must conclude that you can’t afford it.

Why would I want someone with no money?

Saturday February 07, 2009

Yesterday I picked-up the mail from my PO Box in Coventry. It had been three weeks since my last visit.

There was no Schedule B--write-off of the debt.

Last year, they threw me out before April 15^th.

This year, for all the same reasons, they must put me back in by this same date.

What was in the mail was a jury summons. I am on such duty on March 25^th, at that same courthouse. This means they either want me to sign something, or deliver something.

(I like jury duty. I consider it reverse-tuition for law school. I appreciate anything I learn.)

One emotional issue must be resolved first.

Mara Addison, assistant managing editor of my former publisher, must understand that it isn’t my fault that Donald Trump did not refund her gambling losses.

I signed the contract with Dorrance Publishing in September of 1993. The people I originally worked with were Diane Hartmen, Karen Van Winkle and Brenda Abretski. Their craftsmanship was extraordinary. By the summer of 1994, these people mysteriously disappeared. I now understand that their colleagues, Pamela Chapla and a few others, were transported by bus to Donald Trump’s Taj Mahal for a few days of compulsive gambling. For a reason I will never understand, they thought their losses were refundable if I would sit still for the sabotage.

By November, we were still reviewing the typeset piece. We were going back-and-forth as I carefully proofread 300 pages. It seemed like the last round. But according to them, the typesetter had locked everything in her apartment and left town for the holidays. They did not know when she would be back. This was my fault because it says in the contract that staffing their company was my problem.

As Pamela, my production assistant, was trying to force me to take the blame for the delay, I suddenly found myself talking on the phone to a woman named Mara Addison. Until that moment, I never heard of her.

By Christmas Eve, I found the $1,300 in damage. To continue with production, this must be paid for. They were going to do me a favor and allow me to do such.

They rallied my employer, banker and neighbors to help me rescue my book and make such payment. There was an unwritten guarantee of sales. The pressure was incredible.

I now believe it wasn’t myself they were concerned with, but rather investments they made. It was apparently an advertising contract which would also guarantee sales. I believe the contract was with THE NEW YORK TIMES. This is owned and managed by Jewish families. Descendants of journalists who are unofficially charged with the cover-up of the Holocaust. They had a right to push the Constitution aside and tell me what to do. They have the monopoly on the intelligence, and the victimization after the dumb Gouyem murdered 6,000,000 of their superior brains in less then a decade--a very believable story.

Mara Addison, who liked to boast proudly about her superior Jewish business brain, did not know that according to the contract, the original production quantity was 1,000 books.

By 1996, they decided to change strategy against me. They had David Duchovny, the married man with AIDS and the $10,000,000 debt, send me the subliminal information that he wanted to marry me. Before his wedding to his girlfriend, who I originally knew nothing about, I wrote a script. It was what they really wanted. But for some reason, to complete their plans, I would have to surrender copyrights.

For my inability to understand that this would enable me to become pregnant, I was given the reputation of a child-hater. All they had to do was inspire my sex-drive, and their problems would be resolved. By this time, the year 2000, I was working for Lord and Taylor. Out of payroll, this department store gave the television production company, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX, $10,000,000 without a contract. This would be easily compensated for as some raises were not issued, others were cut, and the proceeds from the movie-induced-sales-boost would overwhelmingly compensate the company. All I had to do was pursue the opportunity. There was something wrong with me. It was my fault they lost money.

In 2003, Sue Hallinan, my banker (remember her? She agreed that Fluffy was to blame for the illiteracy of another neighbor’s child.), finally caught-up with my website. She and her husband sold their home and moved away.

I have thought long and hard about why my side of the story frightened her. Her entire understanding of their story was that I had to give money to secure sales and profits of my book. (Is anybody really that dumb as to believe that?) The only explanation I can think of is that money was stolen. There was once an issue with missing paperwork. I transferred $2,000 from this account into my checking account of another bank. I did this by having a bank check prepared. Audrey, the teller who seemed to know what was going on, gave me the original, but never my copy. The bank copy mysteriously disappeared.

Before Hunt & Leibert, Bank of America and I settle anything, there must be some rules. The first will be that the Jews must blame themselves for what they do to themselves.

Part II------Saturday February 07, 2009

On another subject…

Before I picked-up the mail yesterday, I drove by the house. Instead of the usual one car parked in front, there were two. By the curb there were a few bags of garbage.

After I picked-up the mail yesterday, I visited Town Hall. I needed a tax-payment history for my advisor. I believe that the clerk who helped me knew who I was and what this was about. I stepped-out of the office and walked up-and-down the hall looking for the Building Inspector. I found the Tax Assessor’s office. I entered and asked the person standing there where I might find this other person. He was he.

I gave a synopsis of the $1 transfer and the fact that I was kicked-out. I showed him the tax receipts with my name on them, my PO Box #, and the address of this Coventry house. I then explained that I heard a rumor that they turned-on the water in the house, without the heat. I explained that this mistake was inconceivable to me, especially by a company which is paid to know better. He knew what house I was talking about. In October a couple applied for a permit for a wood burning stove. He pulled the file and showed me.

Over-and-over I repeated that I could not understand the stupidity of inviting water damage. He said that a burst pipe is not adequate grounds for revocation of the Certificate of Occupancy. But he understood my concerns that I could not negotiate anything with them until I was certain that the house was in the same condition as I left it.

I explained that my experiences have been that water damage is more frightening than anything. Fire can be seen and smelled by someone other than the occupant. However, water can leak unnoticeably until there is several thousands of dollars in damage. It doesn’t take much before you fall threw the floors.

We concluded on a good rapport. I drove back and again passed the house. The garbage and second car were gone. To me, it is obvious that someone is using this property to dispose of their own trash, and is heating the living room during the wait.

I am now receiving the subliminal information that my concerns are a “pipe dream”. If they believe that, then they will have the Building Inspector write to me an official letter.

They obviously don’t believe it.

Part III---Saturday February 07, 2009

On a completely different subject…

Before the Anti-Defamation League meets with the Pope next week, I would like them to answer the following questions:

1. What religion was Adolph Hitler?

2. Is it true that Hitler’s real last name was Schicklegruber?

3. Is it true that Heil Hitler is a Yiddish expression which means Hail to the Leader?

4. Is it true that Gestapo is an abbreviated version of the term, Jewish Getto Police---the Jews whose responsibility was to bring other Jews into the Concentration Camps, but their behavior was excusable because they were just following orders?

5. Are the eye-witness accounts by the German people true---that the Jews who stood at the train stations waiting to go into the Concentration Camps were NOT under arrest?

6. Is it true that in Yiddish the word for Concentration is the same as that for Settlement?

7. Is it true that the Orthodox Jews consider their communities to be Settlements?

8. Is it true that the self-characterization by the Orthodox Jews as the only true Jews is a convenient excuse for extermination of other sects?

9. Is it true that the anti-assimilate Jews financially genocide the United States welfare system by billing such for their females’ inability to lactate for their babies---$1,000/year/baby?

10. If yes to question 8, is it also true that the cause of this inability is cannibalism, and that this also causes the peculiar tint to the Jewish skin-tone?

11. Is the Book of Ezra Chapter 4 accurate by describing the Jews as non-Israelis who “weakened the hands” of the latter people when they refused to share their identity because the former observed no holidays and paid no taxes?

12. Did the dumb Gouyem (a characterization ascribed to the Pope and his Bishops and Cardinals) incinerate 6,000,000 superior-brained/over-protective Jews in less than a decade?

February 10, 2009

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

I checked the court calendar. On March 25^th, only two cases are scheduled for jury selection. One is medical practice. It looks to me like it will be resolved before this date. The other captions Walmart as a party to the action.

As you may already have guessed, this department store is a client of Crossmark. Henceforth, I am an indirect employee. This conflict-of-interest prohibits my participation.

I will be on jury duty for one day.

Tell me the truth: Did you know this, or is this someone else’s sense of humor?

What happened today is probably just the beginning of your campaign. The more you harass me, the more you convey to me the information that you are in serious trouble with the IRS. Didn’t law school teach you anything about negotiations? You never reveal your disadvantaged position to your opponent.

Saturday February 14, 2009

Dear President Obama;

Is this your father?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_Awori

He is Arthur Moody Awori, born December 5, 1927. He was the 9^th Vice President of Kenya from September of 2003 until January of 2008. He holds an honorary doctorate degree from the University of New Hampshire, a state next to Massachusetts.

Obama was born in 1962. Mr. Awori was 45-years-old. So Obama’s mother was probably his third or fourth wife.

I do not believe that Obama was raised by his grandmother who died a few weeks before the election of November, 2008. I believe that he spent at least the first decade of his life in Kenya.

Why?

Because I recognized it.

President Obama forgot that I majored in anthropology. Yesterday, I received the subliminal information that if I reinitiate Targets while the first idiots are on excusable leaves from school for photo opportunities, he would arrange a marriage with me and a man who was going to “spoil” me. This is how a tribal chief talks.

The name Barack Obama is probably phony. Michelle Robison is probably not. The FBI needs to research her.

Sunday February 15, 2009

On Friday I picked-up the mail. There was nothing from the Town of Coventry’s Building Inspector. This suggests to me that he did find a problem. It is my understanding it is water damage. And it is my understanding that professional insurance of the caretakers does exist.

I am certain there is a $1,000 deductible-per-claim. This is standard for homeowners’ policies.

I am also certain the underwriters will need a copy of the court order. If they do not routinely require this, then all of the friends of these caretakers could collect on this policy. And this court order does not exist. If they are not careful, the caretakers could be charged with insurance fraud and criminal trespassing.

After I picked-up the mail, I drove-by the house. There was the second car awaiting trash service. The law firm obviously did not fire them for this negligence.

The neighbor in whose home I was routinely invited for the holidays, is also the sister of the purchaser they arranged. They made a down payment on the house in September of 2006. This sister with her two children, ages 6 and 10?, left their home down the street, and moved in there. They awaited the ejectment.

In January of 2007, my neighbor (not the sister) defaulted on their property tax payment. And they had fewer parties. In September, and January of the following year, they again defaulted. I was ejected. They attempted to close the deal. The title search revealed me as the title holder. Their down payment was refunded. They paid their back taxes.

I don’t know what home the sister left-behind. I think it was sold a few months after she left. My guess is that it was the property of her estranged husband who perhaps allowed her to live there rent free. She probably had an excellent arrangement, and threw it away for something silly.

This neighbor is also my landscaper. We otherwise have a good rapport. Their cat would often visit me. I would then call them and report, “I have Princess and I’m holding her ransom.” Then she invited me over for dinner and received her cat back.

I believe they learned their lesson of business dealings with such people. And if he she has, I would like to suggest that she watch-over the house. The mistake which the caretakers made is beyond her. I don’t know if her professional insurances would cover this. I do know that because she is a neighbor, no one can mistakenly charge her with criminal trespassing. Neighbors are often asked to watch-over homes. And I could give written permission for this activity.

So as Countrywide is preparing to offer me a compromised version of the $270,000 mortgage I once had, even they must agree with me that no deal can be reached until this matter is resolved.

And not until one other resolution…

The fact remains that Sargeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski knew of the existence of a tape recorded telephone conversation with a man I suspect as Ayman al-Zawarhi, second in command to Osama Bin Laden. They never told the FBI this.

And then there are a few other facts I did not mention before, because I was too enveloped in other issues.

In 2006, I had problems with trespassers going into my garage while I was home. I would call the police. They came, and had a few personal questions prepared. Their favorite cop killer needed this information. They obviously appreciate his act of murdering 60 of their colleagues on September 11, 2001.

(If that is the way the Blue Line feels about it, we can pardon every cop killer in America. And I would like to ask of prosecutors not to bring charges against the alleged hijackers for these murders. This is something which law enforcement has to work-out within themselves. They encouraged this activity before, during and after.)

And then, of course, came the incident on the night of March 15, 2008 in which Linda St. Pierre, with the help of another law enforcement agent, Judicial Marshall Tim Poloski, broke into my home and poisoned me. Coventry Police awaited my 9-1-1 call. Their loyalties went to her because she was their universal girlfriend.

This is an unacceptable conflict-of-interest. Any of these people who had sex with her must be suspended without pay until further investigation. Verifying who performed such is very simple. I am the granddaughter of a urological surgeon.

In my ancestor’s time, books were written on the affects witchcraft/Wicca has on the penis. Because their “magik potions” work on the circulatory system, these typically mutilate this organ. My grandfather had one book devoted to such photographs. My mother found it when she was a teenager and was shocked.

The only thing the Police Chief needs to do is to bring into the precinct a urologist. They can use the single-cell-prison as an examination room. Each male officer will have to drop his pants. If there is malformation, there was intercourse with a woman who practices Wicca and likes law enforcement agents. That woman is attorney Linda St. Pierre.

As I have stated many times on this website, anyone who wants to dispute anything I have published, may do so in writing. I will place it on this site and apologize. No malice was intended.

On March 25^th, I should be encountering these lawyers and a few colleagues of Marshal Poloski. If he wants to, he can be there. He is considered to be on the same courthouse staff. They all have the title of judicial marshal.

But if the law firm wants to refute me, they are going to have to include urological examinations of her colleagues, who probably have similar or identical damage.

Such altered males are typically violent, because of the hormonal imbalances which ensue. It is both emotional and physical.

The book my mother found was published before the McCarthy trials which were coupled by the publication of the book, The Crucible. The latter had the cultural consequence of ostracizing anyone who believes that witchcraft/Wicca is a threat. Television shows like Bewitched glorified it by portraying media-magic, without biochemical-“magik“. The international medical community stopped devoting so much research to it.

But anyone who has read the book of Ezra, Chapter 4, and has encountered such people, knows that the threat is very real and would like to add to Biblical text that their only improvement-mechanism is find new techniques to perform effective public relations. They are socially-non-adaptive-animals pretending to be adaptive-human beings---very dangerous.

Wednesday February 18, 2009

And one more thing happened in 2008 which now seems worth mentioning…

My primary employer is Crossmark, but in the last year I worked for six different companies. It is normal in this line of work. One was for a company named Channel Source. It sent me into three Rite Aid stores to assemble a display for Sally Hansen cosmetics. Each time, I toured the stockroom only to learn that the large box was thrown into the garbage a few days before my arrival.

My supervisor was confused, and advised me to credit myself with 60-minutes for each visit as well as mileage. Even though they offered me more work, the check never arrived. I never made it an issue, but never worked for them again.

In the fall season, a check for $44.19 suddenly arrived. I wondered why.

On December 15^th, a duplicate check was again issued. I didn’t understand why. I thought I misremembered what work I did for them. The check was of Wachovia Bank, and it has branches near me. I asked them if they could cash it for me even though I don’t have an account. For no fee, they said they could. But the check was bad.

I never received my W-2 from Channel Source.

In mid-January, I met with my tax advisor. I only had the W-2 from Crossmark. But I had enough information such that we could input everything into the computer. My refunds are $944 from the IRS and $142 from the State of Connecticut. She explained that all W-2s had to be postmarked by January 31^st.

On February 6^th and 13^th, I again checked my post office box. Channel Source’s W-2 still wasn’t there. My tax advisor explained that with my pay-stub, I could file after February 15^th.

On Monday the 16^th we again met. She said she cannot electronically file because of the missing Employer Identification Number. I e-mailed my supervisor as well as another office associate with whom I connected at the time of employment. They never responded. I also telephoned a man named Reggie who is the individual authorized to handle such issues. He said he would work on it today, but when I telephoned him this afternoon, he said he didn’t.

February 16, 2009

Channel Source, Inc.

Thank you for visiting our website. Currently we are undergoing a complete overhaul and appreciate your patience as we work to create a website that will allow us to serve you better.

Please contact us and let us know what we can do for you.

Operations Office:
2600 E. Southlake Blvd
Suite 120-367
Southlake, TX 76092

P: 972.401.4146
F: 469.327.0852

Corporate Office:
the Urban Towers
222 West Los Colinas Blvd.
Suite 1650
Irving, TX 75039

Thank You!

Thursday February 19, 2009

Dear Baby-Bama;

I should have my refund of $944 - $278 (preparation fees) today. But because civil liberties are an unknown concept in your Administration, I don’t.

I was going to use the money for a $300/60,000-mile servicing which my car needs. It is at 65,000. I don’t expect you to understand such because while my mother instilled in me an understanding of the care which automobiles require, your mother instilled in you an understanding of how to repair a mud-hut.

On March 1^st, I am going to begin a major research project on Kenyan government. My primary purpose will be to learn why your wife is so nervous, she cannot orgasm despite all the romance you claim to shower her with (i.e., one-date-per-week, no excuses). Such nervousness must have affected the gestation period of both of her children. She probably couldn’t transmit nutrition. The brain is the last area to develop. Theirs are defective, if these even exist. We should perform cat-scans.

Despite your instruction, I will perform this investigation while the first idiots are attending school. While I am demanding that no one should ridicule them because this isn’t their fault, I would also like to know if they are allowed to speak to anyone. Children of spies never are.

Part II-----February 19, 2009

Reggie of Channel Source just called and apologized to me. I have the Employer Identification Number, and they will replace the bad check. I explained that I don’t remember doing that additional work. He explained if they don’t give me the money, they will have to incur the expense of a payroll adjustment.

THANK YOU!!!!

Sunday February 22, 2009

The original EIN was missing one digit. I told Reggie it was phony and threatened to publish it on this website. There could be no legal ramifications because it is lawful to publish phony tax identification numbers. Then he telephoned me and explained where the missing digit was. Hopefully, everything is now fine.

Otherwise…

It is my understanding that the White House has released the information that I will be receiving the “foreclosed” house for free. I know because several people have approached me for the purpose of ass-licking. I would like to know why no one was that nice when I had nowhere to go. Knock it off!!!

On a related subject…

My former supervisors and executives of Lord and Taylor, Kathy McTigue, Chris Poleto, Dina Sturtevant and Deborah Walker Hauptman, have never answered any of my allegations. But I have received some subliminal information.

Everyday, at 5 pm, the managers and executives had a meeting. As I understand it, a few months after I was fired, Kathy McTigue’s daughter died. She knew who poisoned her. At the meeting, Kathy announced that her daughter Caitlin was dead, and, for the production of a corpse, demanded $30,000 from Monica. Although I wasn’t dead, she believed that she performed her duty and deserved something for her participation in biochemical experimentation. But suddenly, the revelation occurred that Monica had no money, which is why she had to steal clothes to conform to dress-code. Kathy had to be restrained as Monica expressed an attitude indifferent to human suffering, and justified her murderous act by insisting that Irish reproduction must be curtailed because if the Nazis don’t kill these children, their parents will. Kathy rebutted by saying that one of her children is still alive. And a survival rate of 50% is higher than zero. Monica couldn’t disagree.

But nonetheless, the anguished screams of a mother who buried her child in financial-vain is a scene which can never be forgotten. They are in a silent state of shock.

As for Dorrance Publishing…

After I fired my publisher, Pamela Chapla, my production assistant, made numerous phone calls to me asking for the money. One day, she called for routine issues as we were working on repairing the damage. In the middle of the conversation she suddenly remembered, with a giggle in her voice, that the other thing she had to tell me was that on a certain date, I will be receiving a telephone call from a certain person of the accounting department. A few days after this, and before that date, I received a letter demanding the money lest the issue will be turned-over to an attorney or collection agency. I immediately faxed a letter explaining that I have no obligation to pay for the damage which a billionaire did to my property, and forbade the accounting department from ever again telephoning me.

My supervisor of 7-Eleven, my then employer, left her pager in the office and went to a meeting. At the time, I thought she believed she was doing what was in the best interest of my book. The way she understood it, this was the only way I could have a publisher. And the rule in her store was that the victim pays for everything. I was the only one who understood they were no longer my publisher. But was I alone in this understanding?

I now understand that Donald Trump was at that meeting. He announced he was recruiting people for a project to ultimately become the owner and builder of the world’s tallest building. To this end, he would have to tear down two which were taller than his. Linda volunteered her son, Marc Mallon, a pilot for American Airlines, and his friend from high school, Officer Steven Patrick Driscoll of the Lake Carmel, New York Police Department. This law enforcement agent also volunteered his father, an engineer. Before this meeting, the plan was another car-bomb. After, it was different as they were each given Arab identities coupled by their Caucasian faces.

Linda knew she was not promoting the book, only herself.

Another person who may have been at that meeting, and involved herself in this, was Sue Hallinan, my neighbor and banker. After I left 7-Eleven because the harassment was unbearable, she learned of my new employer at the time I deposited my paycheck. She relayed the information. Until a few weeks ago, I believed that she was erroneously promoting the book.

What was her interest?

This is the same person who participated in the neighborhood effort to blame Fluffy for Whitney Whalen’s illiteracy. According to that story, the child was on a normal reading level until the age of six, when Fluffy bit her. Although her mother had no medical evidence and refused to sign the police complaint, this rendered the child unable to read-and-write.

Is Sue Hallinan really that dumb?

When I raised this question a few days ago, she subliminally answered that Mara Addison’s hormonal explosion was that overwhelming. But why jeopardize her banking career? And did she really believe that the publisher’s concern was for my best interest?

On a related subject…

Before Hunt & Leibert and I go into final negotiations, a few issues must be addressed. Of course, I will need a certificate from the Town Building Inspector, as well as from the Homeowners’ Insurance Company, but I will also need Leibert to be in his Jewish place.

I would like to ask of the governors of each state with large Jewish welfare “settlements” to stop such payments from going into such addresses. I would like to warn them that the dollar amount is grotesquely large. Please be sitting-down when you receive this figure. (It should adequately cover their deficits. And since many Republican governors do not want to accept the monies from President Baby-Bama’s economic stimulus package, this should counterbalance their loss.) The Orthodox, anti-assimilate Jews will vociferously protest. Then, state auditors should find an excuse to enter their premises. When they do, please search the backyards, there are probably mass-graves of “phony Jews” of other sects.

Wednesday February 25, 2009

I took another look at my jury summons. It is not for the Superior Court where all of my activity has been. Rather, it is for the criminal court across the street. I tried to research what cases are on this calendar for March 25^th, but such is not published.

I will bring you a list of all judicial marshals who did not have sex with Linda St. Pierre. I won’t bring a pad-and-pencil. It should be easy to memorize the few names.

I believe they are planning something. If they are going to launch a biochemical attack against me, it could place me in the hospital. This will jeopardize their deadline of April 15^th.

They must have noticed that such time limitation is not mine. It is theirs. All negative consequences are their problems. If this matter is not resolved by September 30^th, they will have another tax bill. And in the interim, they are paying a company to care for the house. When are they going to learn the lessons they teach themselves?

Saturday February 28, 2009

Holy Thursday is April 9^th. If this date sounds familiar, it is because this is the day of my ejectment from my Coventry home. This is no coincidence. And I would like to welcome everyone to the final stages of the trap. Although it didn’t go exactly as planned in that when I ran to Eric he did not receive me, everything should be adequate.

Of the three National Whistleblowers’ Days--Holy Thursday, September 11^th, and December 21^st-- the former has always been the most successful. The most logical explanation is the connection to the archetypes. This is very surprising to me. While Jungian theory ascertains that these are so young as a few thousand years old, in my book, I surmise these are a few million years old. Although I can’t compare myself to Jung, I can say that the evolutionary theory of the Aquatic Ape is very consistent with Biblical text found in Genesis. The “on-the-waters” mermaid emerged onto land four million years ago, followed by the first pluvial two million years later. It doesn’t make any sense to me that an archetype would only be 2,000 years old, because this is such a short span in cranial development, and because I believe that the archetypes are adaptations we still have and don’t use. These manifest themselves in art and other cultural conditions.

But anyway…

I believe the harassment against me which began when I was in graduate school, is directly connected to my mother’s Whistleblowing, which occurred just before I graduated college.

The concept of Holy Thursday as National Whistleblowers’ Day has been endorsed by the Vatican. This makes sense to me because I had the idea while attending services at an Episcopal Church. I appreciate that, but we can’t forget that retribution against the Whisteblower must be stopped. Every year I warn about this before the day, and every year people are maliciously fired from their jobs. And that is harassment I know about. I don’t want to think about what I don’t know about. I thought about telephone campaigns to help these people, but decided such would be ineffective.

This year, we are going to do it correctly.

Targets

What is the American Bar Association?

Who is the leader?

What is his/her address?

Are there any law libraries near you and accessible to the public, such as in a courthouse or school?

What is jurisprudence?

What are the state and federal laws protecting Whistleblowers?

Are these statutes?

Are these governed by the penal code?

When were these enacted into law?

Are there any precedents?

Explain everything to this leader of the ABA and ask for an acknowledgment coupled by his/her act of demanding compliance by the associates of the ABA.

Contact local leaders of the ABA and ask if such compliance demand was issued.

Convey all of this to your federal, state and local representatives, as well as all union leaders.

Bear in mind the fact that there is a clause in union/labor contracts disallowing court actions, including those to order whistleblower-protection. Remind all attorneys employed by these unions that their obligations are primarily to the American Bar Association and its principles, and secondarily to their employer and its lack of principles. The purpose of such protection is from both civil and criminal wrongs. The latter issue is not a union concern. Henceforth, they should comply with the conditions of their professional contract with the American Bar Association.

Before these unions boast of everything else they have to offer, remind them of the fact that as a non-union worker, I made more money-per-hour than when I was obligated to join a union and pay its membership fees of $5/week plus $50 initiation. The benefits of which they were so proud provided me with prescription medical coverage. As a union associate of the supermarkets, I made no more than $8/hour. Although I began at non-unionized Lord & Taylor for $7/hour, one year later I was at $9/hour with no benefits but more vacation time. In the year 2001, my only full year with this department store, I made more money than any other year in New York retail. The year 2007 broke all my records, and 2008 broke that. In the former Connecticut year, I had no medical coverage with Crossmark. In 2008, I did. After consideration of this deduction, my payroll increased 10%. Before such consideration, it was 20%. And January and February of this year out-performed these same two months of these last years. But that is because my hours-to-miles ratio improved as my health is improving.

And I don’t need any union protection from this employer. They sent their attorneys to try to protect me. Rite Aid seems to appreciate that. They just gave us a large contract.

Once we receive these acknowledgements from professional, political and labor leaders, we will proceed with National Whisteblowers’ Day. I would like to suggest of President Barack Obama to visit his grandmother and mother in Kenya on April 9^th. We won’t be in need of his collection services.

Part II

It is 4 pm Eastern Standard Time in Connecticut of the United States of America. I have been watching the movie Air Force One with its unrealistic ending.

In the Holy Land, nine hours later, the first of six Sundays of Lent has begun. Here is the first of my demands. If these are not met, we will go into L&G. And this time, Fupi will not be available to help. I know the Big-Baby understands me.

My mother’s whistle-blowing.

As I now understand, her former boss is the daughter of the current dictator of Cuba, Raul Castro. She was L&G-ed into FBI custody after my ejectment. Her socialist responsibility was to engineer the New York State Department of Labor’s Unemployment Insurance Division to direct taxpayer monies into this South American regime. Her husband was, and possibly still is, a computer programmer with IBM. At the time of my mother’s tenure, the Governor of New York was Mario Cuomo. By marriage of his son, he is an associate of the Kennedy family. I believe Senator Ted Kennedy, Robert Kennedy Junior, Joe Kennedy, Andrew Cuomo, and all the other family members, are connected to the Castro Administration. By the second Sunday of Lent, I want all of these IBM wires cut, and then I want them to deliver themselves into FBI custody with their full confessions.

Once this burden to the taxpayers has been released, the monies will be returned as per my original instructions. It should be a shocking figure well beyond $13/week.

If any associate of the Kennedy and/or Cuomo family would like to disagree with me, please formulate a written statement with your signature, and I will publish it on this website.

VIVIAN LEHMAN

PO BOX 629

COVENTRY, CT 06238

Monday March 02, 2009

In response to my allegations and assertions, yesterday I was reminded of the fact that on March 01, 1961, President John F. Kennedy performed the magnanimous and humanitarian act of establishing the

Peace Corps.

When I was in college, Antonio/Robert/Osama Mendez/Crowe/Ben-Laden was an associate of the

Peace Club.

Among its priorities was its pro-Sandinista agenda.

The Kennedy/Cuomo confession must begin today, and the IBM wires will be cut by midnight.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was very disappointed to learn that she won’t be able to make any demands on me. Her Saxon/Pagan smile deteriorated into wrinkles. There are four more Sundays before Palm Sunday. Perhaps her resignation should be one of the demands. Our list is not carved in stone.

Saturday March 07, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

I don’t know what Auschwitz means. I suspect it is Yiddish for out-of-tax. And I believe this camp is a few centuries old. Allied troops marched through it one day and assumed that because it was found in German occupied territory, it was an invention of such government. The Jews all know this is not true.

When I worked in the supermarket, I witnessed the Orthodox Jewish Community collect over $1,000/month/family of food stamps. And this was only the beginning. They also received all other forms of welfare including money for heating bills and Medicaid. The girls married at age 18, and reproduced through age 40. And as they handled the free money to buy their groceries, they laughed in our faces.

And they claim to be anti-assimilation.

It makes sense to me that a welfare-genocide machine could easily be connected to a mass murder of all competitors of these taxpayer monies.

If I am correct, then a march through the backyards of United States Orthodox Jewish communities should find Auschwitz-style activity. And such march does not have to be with foot soldiers. Modern satellites should suffice. They can start with the one which Linda St. Pierre must have visited. She probably watched them burn-out the uteruses of teenage girls whose purpose was to service such Jewish men who cannot reproduce outside of their sect. She probably enjoyed listening to them scream while they were strapped down with their legs spread. When that party was over, she decided to entertain herself and burn-out her own uterus by using the same chemicals on both of us. Then she wondered why she didn’t enjoy its destruction of her, as I performed a quick and easy neutralization.

I realize that federal investigators would not want to publicize their findings. So my question is would they use such information as a vehicle with which to pressure the Jewish communities to surrender their systematic fraud and embezzlement of the taxpayers.

If I am wrong about anything, then such people should invite the FBI into their yards and financial accounts to assure the Dumb Goyem there is nothing to resolve and return. The Jewish partners of Hunt & Leibert could also invite such law enforcement agents into their synagogues.

Sunday March 08, 2009

Dear President Baby-Bama;

Today’s “welcoming” events of Maryville, Illinois should tell you something.

Saturday March 14, 2009

Before I proceed, I would like to make a request of the civil rights advocates. It relates to a civil action they recently filed against Wells Fargo Bank claiming discriminatory practices against African-Americans applying for mortgages. The plaintiffs seem to believe I will help them.

Condoleezza Rice made great efforts to prove that she could not perform her duties as Secretary of State because of the color of her skin. She insisted I must do it for her because I am Caucasian. The White House insisted she was appointed to her position because she has a PhD on the subjects of national defense and terrorism, but her dark skin inhibited her from making such application. Inasmuch as I believe she is illiterate with no educational credentials, I also believe that I should follow the directive of one of the most influential people in the world---Oprah Winfrey. She never disputed this claim.

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

As you already know, I believe Donald Trump is primarily responsible for the removal of the World Trade Towers on September 11, 2001. I believe he planned it years in advance. And I believe that when he recruited American Airlines pilot Mark Mallon into his terrorist team, he changed his plans from execution of another van-bomb, into a dual-plane-bomb. I believe that part of such execution was the invention of new parachute-technology, and that all hijackers are alive and well, except those who descended onto the terrain of Pennsylvania. I believe that Osama/Robert/Antonio Ben-Laden/Crowe/Mendez was recruited after the plot was initialized, but do not know if it was before or after Mark’s recruitment. I believe that Ben-Laden’s primary purpose was to capitalize on the racism of the United States, and accept all blame. Even though he is Mexican, he would assume the status as an Arab. Caucasian-American oil executives have characterized themselves as such people, defaming and libeling them as genetically disposed to violence. It isn’t true.

If you don’t believe me, consider this fact. Donald Trump was the owner of Trump Airlines. Its purpose was to fly business class between the cities of Long Island, New York; Boston, Massachusetts; and Washington, D.C. Do those cities sound familiar when considering the events of September 11?

If I were Antonio Mendez, I would make a deal with federal officials agreeing to tell them everything, in exchange for sparing the death penalty.

Monday March 16, 2009

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

GO AHEAD, TELL THE COURT YOU DID NOT PROVIDE YOUR TENANT WITH ANY HEAT. AND DON’T TRY TO TELL THEM I WASN’T A TENANT AFTER YOU TOLD THE HOUSING COURT I WAS. IT ISN’T MY FAULT YOU DIDN’T SHOW FOR YOUR COURT DATES.

Small Claims Court of the

State of Connecticut

County of Middletown

---------------------------------

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DOCKET NUMBER

SCC-219909

MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION

OF PARTY

----------------------------------

1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned action, do hereby submit this MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY. Such action relates to the property known as 891 South Street, in the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland, State of Connecticut.

2. The action is for $1967.42, payment for heating fuel for the winter of 2008.

3. As Defendant’s Exhibit A, I am herewith attaching Internal Revenue Service form 1099-A for the tax year 2007. This document is for “Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property”. Its issuer is Countrywide Home Loans and specifies the date of “acquisition” as September 18, 2007. This pre-dates the winter of 2008.

4. As Defendant’s Exhibit B, I am herewith attaching the Certificate of Foreclosure. Its issuer is Wells Fargo Bank. It is executed on stationary of the law firm of Hunt, Leibert and Jacobson, and is on file with the Land Records Division of the Town of Coventry in Volume 1059, Pages 300-301. It is dated October 11, 2007 and pre-dates the winter of 2008.

5. Countrywide Home Loans truthfully informed the Internal Revenue Service of its condition of “acquisition” of the residence at issue.

6. Wells Fargo truthfully informed the Town of Coventry of its condition of “foreclosure” of the residence at issue.

7. I vacated the residence on April 09, 2008.

8. Connecticut Statute;

“Sec. 47a-7. Landlord's responsibilities. (a) A landlord shall: (1) Comply with the requirements of chapter 368o and all applicable building and housing codes materially affecting health and safety of both the state or any political subdivision thereof; …

(6) supply running water and reasonable amounts of hot water at all times and reasonable heat…” (emphasis supplied)

9. The Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants in Connecticut, published by Connecticut’s Superior Court, synopsizes these statutes by stating;

“Landlords are required to keep all heating, plumbing, electrical systems and appliances in good working order. Unless the rental agreement states that the tenant is responsible, the landlord must supply…” (emphasis supplied)

10. There was no rental agreement.

11. In November of 2007, as per these directives, ProTech Oil changed the name on the account from Vivian Lehman to Countrywide Home Loans and Wells Fargo Bank. Hunt, Leibert and Jacobson have the cancelled check for said amount of $1967.42. It is dated April 2008.

12. The plaintiff’s commencement of this action 11 months after this transaction, exemplifies this is a misunderstanding.

13. Connecticut Practice Book 2009, Sec. 9-18 directs of procedures in civil actions, “If a person not a party has an interest or title which the judgment will affect, the judicial authority, on its motion, shall direct that person to be made a party.” (emphasis supplied)

14. As per the Internal Revenue Service document, Countrywide Home Loans has the “interest”. As per the Land Records document, Wells Fargo Bank has the “title”.

WHEREFORE, current defendant Vivian Lehman respectfully requests of this Court to remove her as defendant and substitute WELLS FARGO BANK and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS as co-defendants. Current Defendant also requests the award to her of costs, disbursements, and all other relief as the Court deems proper.

___________________________________ March 16, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

PO Box 629, Coventry, CT 06238

TO: AND

REVELEY, WILLIAM G.

License # ?????????

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC

Juris # 423840

P.O. BOX 657

VERNON, CT 06066

Mr. Sean Sweeney

License # 903288154

HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.

Juris # 101589

50 Weston Street

Hartford, CT 06120

----------------------------------------------------

JUDGEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF VIVIAN LEHMAN AS DEFENDANT AND SUBSTITUTED BY WELLS FARGO BANK AND COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS AS CO-DEFENDANTS IS

GRANTED DENIED.

_______________________________ ____________, 2009

Justice

I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY in two postage paid envelopes and transmitted such to both above-specified law firms via the United States Postal Service on the date of March 16, 2009.

_____________________________________March 16, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Wednesday March 18, 2009

I would like to ask of everyone to telephone the White House and demand to know why our employers were informed of a $15/week tax-hike, but we weren’t!

I just visited the President’s White House website and sent the following message:

“I just learned from my employer that the IRS gave directive to deduct an additional $15/week from my paycheck. The money is earmarked for the First Lady's designer dresses. In my family, we make our own clothes.

I believe that the President is doing a wonderful job and that the reason why this was never made public is because no one has enough common sense to listen to anything he says. I also believe he is doing everything possible to be a good role model husband and father. I want his children to understand that good clothes make a good impression.

BUT I DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR IT.

I will place the First Lady's very impressive resume on Career Builder. I am certain she has the competence to find a job to cover her expenses.”

Saturday March 21, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

4^th Sunday of Lent

Count the Cost

I don’t have all the figures. I do know that the law firm of Hunt & Leibert accepted a down payment on my house one year (more or less) before I was ejected. The buyer was the sister of my neighbor. The sister left her home, which I guess was owned by her estranged husband, and moved in next door to me. She and her two daughters occupied one large room. And then the family defaulted on their property taxes.

I will guess my neighbors tried to buy the house, worth $300,000, for $250,000.

I will guess the deposit was either 10% or 20%.

I know they received the refund of the down payment a few months after the ejectment. The tax lien was removed as they must have finally paid all of that. But I doubt if the refund was of the full amount. I just found on the Small Claims Court website that my neighbor (not the sister) could not pay her doctor’s bill. A default judgment was entered against her.

But they couldn’t sue for the remainder of the down payment because the transaction was illegal. It is a fact they must have known because their mother, who also lives there, is a real estate agent.

Recently, I believe that Countrywide Home Loans finally had the presence of mind to send their own representative to the Tolland County Superior Courthouse to see if Hunt & Leibert ever represented them against me. They didn’t. This means this law firm will have to refund fees, property tax payments, landscaping expenses, etc.

Hunt & Leibert have some plans for me this week, in conjunction with their Small Claims action against me. The objective is to weaken me into signing a new mortgage with Countrywide. They forgot one thing.

The underwriters of the mortgage will have to perform the same title search which was performed after the ejectment, and will reach the same conclusion--can’t do it!

They can do anything to me. But nothing will change the fact that they are their own worst enemies. They don’t have the legal insight to recognize that the only resolution they have left is to rescind everything---the $1 mortgage transfer and the judgment of foreclosure.

They will soon be writing out a check to Countrywide Home Loans. How much will it be? Will it put them out of business?

Sunday March 22, 2009

Tomorrow, I will be serving-and-filing the following two motions. I don’t know how Wells Fargo Bank could let me do this to them.

I am not an attorney, and can’t give advise. However, I can make suggestions.

If you are a defendant in the State of Connecticut, and your opposing counsel is the same as mine, William Reveley, try to postpone the proceedings as long as possible. The facts are he is not listed on the website of the American Bar Association, his office does not have a copy of his license, and he doesn’t know what an affidavit is. If I am correct in that all of this proves he is not an attorney nor even a paralegal, then, hopefully, your case will be subjected to an automatic dismissal. If you are a defendant in a foreclosure action, you have seen from my experiences that the bank won’t notice anything until it is too late.

I would like to ask of everyone to try to acquire a free house from the judicial system. Don’t feel guilty, after all of that bailout money the United States Government gave them, it is the least the financial and judicial systems can do for you.

Small Claims Court of the

State of Connecticut

County of Middletown

---------------------------------

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DOCKET NUMBER

SCC-219909

MOTION TO CITE IN NEW PARTY DEFENDANT

----------------------------------

1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned action, do hereby submit this Motion To Cite In New Party Defendant.

2. On March 16, 2009, I served-and-filed a Motion to Substitute the Defendant. Among the issues of my Wherefore clause, I respectfully requested that Wells Fargo Bank be identified as a Defendant.

3. On March 18, 2009, my opposing counsel responsively motioned that Wells Fargo Bank be identified as a Defendant; “Vivian Lehman claims Wells Fargo Bank is responsible for this debt.” (paragraph 1)

4. We agree.

5. My opposing counsel could have revised his Complaint as per 2009 Connecticut Practice Book:

“Sec. 10-59. Amendments;

Amendment as of Right by Plaintiff

The plaintiff may amend any defect, mistake or informality in the writ, complaint or petition and insert new counts in the complaint, which might have been originally inserted therein, without costs, during the first thirty days after the return day. (See General Statutes § 52-128 and annotations.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 175.)”

“Sec. 10-60. —Amendment by Consent,

Order of Judicial Authority, or Failure to Object

(a) … a party may amend his or her pleadings or other parts of the record or proceedings … (2) By written consent of the adverse party… (See General Statutes § 52-130 and annotations.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 176.)”

6. Mr. Reveley served his motion on Wells Fargo and used the address represented in the Certificate of Foreclosure, Exhibit B of my Substitution Motion;

Wells Fargo Bank

National Association as Trustee

for SARM 2005-15

c/o Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

7105 Corporate Drive, Plano, TX 75024-6000.

7. In previous proceedings against me, no Wells Fargo document served-and-filed verifies or affirms this address as that of Wells Fargo with such connection to Countrywide Home Loans. Exhibit C hereto attached affirms another address for Wells Fargo.

8. According to Exhibit C, yet unknown to the Internal Revenue Service, Wells Fargo is the “record owner”. Henceforth, for this Small Claims Court Action, it should be cited-in as a defendant.

9. My service of the Motion presented herein is to the corporate address of the letterhead of Exhibit C (see Certificate of Service below).

10. The issue of Wells Fargo as party-defendant is not contested. The separate issue of such service-address is contested, yet currently not considered actionable nor subject to any revision-motion.

WHEREFORE defendant requests, without further oral-hearings nor written-motions, that the Court caption Wells Fargo Bank as defendant.

______________________________________March 23, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

PO Box 629; Coventry, CT 06238

DECISION

THE MOTION TO CAPTION WELLS FARGO BANK AS DEFENDANT IS HEREBY GRANTED DENIED.

Justice____________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this MOTION in two postage paid envelopes and transmitted such via United States Postal Service to my opposing counsel, Mr. William G. Reveley, PO Box 657, Vernon, CT 06066, as well as to potential defendant;

WELLS FARGO BANK Corporate Trust Services

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

_____________________________________March 23, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Small Claims Court of the

State of Connecticut

County of Middletown

---------------------------------

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DOCKET NUMBER

SCC-219909

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

----------------------------------

1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned action, do hereby submit this Motion for Dismissal.

2. According to the Complaint, the plaintiff, ProTech Oil, is NOT suing me.

3. The only evidence presented by my opposing counsel is an affidavit signed by Louise Zematis.

4. By the omission of the affidavit, she is NOT an associate of the plaintiff. (see paragraph 1)

5. By the omission of the affidavit, NO services were rendered. (see paragraph 3)

6. According to the affidavit, an “attached invoice” exists, yet it doesn’t. (see paragraph 3)

7. I could include in this Dismissal Motion an explanation to the Court of the definition of affidavit as per Connecticut Civil Practice Procedures and as per Black’s Law Dictionary, but I am certain that an accredited law school already provided the necessary lectures.

8. According to the affidavit, paragraph 2, “written demand” was made. If Louise Zematis witnessed this, then she is an associate of the law firm of my opposing counsel, William G. Reveley.

9. I first received his correspondence on December 21, 2008. Then, in compliance with my personal routine, researched his name on www.abanet.org. I didn’t find him. So I telephoned his office and spoke to Mattie Turk. I asked for a copy of his license. I had to explain that all she has to do is remove it from the wall and place it upon the copy machine and mail the reproduction to me.

10. She didn’t.

11. Even if I wanted to give my opposing counsel money, I couldn’t.

WHEREFORE defendant respectfully requests dismissal and that the Court submit all original file documents to the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Connecticut. Defendant also requests costs, disbursements, and all other relief as the Court deems proper.

______________________________________March 23, 2009

Vivian Lehman

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

THE MOTION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION IS

GRANTED DENIED

Justice_____________________________________________

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Motion in a postage paid envelop and transmitted such via United States Postal Service to my opposing counsel, Mr. William G. Reveley.

____________________________________March 23, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Monday March 23, 2009

Today I filed both motions with one more.

It was on March 14th that I found the Small Claims Court action on the website of the Connecticut Judicial Branch. I research this weekly because Mr. Reveley threatened me with such. I immediately filed the first motion.

It was on March 21^st that I received official notification from the Court. It included a form-Answer. I checked the box, Disagree, and explained, “No cause of action exists.“

I also checked, Counterclaim, and demanded $500 for harassment.

IF THERE IS ANY TROUBLE, I WILL AMEND THE COUNTERCLAIM TO THE MAXIMUM SMALL CLAIMS COURT AMOUNT OF $5,000. IF BABY-BAMA STATES ONE MORE TIME THAT HE CANNOT APPLY HIS HARVARD EDUCATIONAL SKILLS TO HIS JOB BECAUSE HIS SKIN IS THE WRONG COLOR, I WILL REMAND THIS ACTION INTO A HIGHER COURT, AND ASK FOR MORE MONEY.

I hope the Court understands what this action is really about.

Isn’t this a great trap?!

I know my former attorney, Mr. Frank Kibler, is watching this. With all of my respect for him, I know he is remembering one of our disagreements. During one of our conversations in 2007, he demanded of me to stop looking for phony attorneys under every couch and behind every curtain.

If he doubts my evaluation of Mr. Reveley, I would like to ask of him to telephone his “colleague” and ask, “Are you an attorney?”

And if that doesn’t convince him of the quantity of these counterfeit people, maybe this will.

On March 21^st, I received the Complaint-form as well as a copy of an affidavit. Unfortunately, I do not currently have the technology to scan either into my computer and reproduce it on this website. However, the latter is only one page, so I can reproduce it verbatim.

I Louise Zematis, being duly sworn, depose and say the following:

1. I am for the plaintiff and I am over the age of eighteen and believe in the obligation of the oath.

2. There is a balance due to plaintiff from defendant, VIVIAN LEHMAN, on Account No. 64753L the sum of $1,804.75, which balance remains unpaid despite written demand.

3. Balance due is for heating oil delivered and/or heating services and repairs and/or installation of heating equipment rendered by plaintiff to defendant(s) at defendant(s) request in accordance with attached invoice.

4. Plaintiff requests prejudgment interest be awarded in the amount of $162.67 calculated from March 3, 2008 to the date hereof at the rate of 10% per annum pursuant to Conn. Gen Stat. 37-3a as payment has been wrongfully withheld by defendant.

5. There is a total due to plaintiff of $1,967.42, including prejudgment interest of $162.67, which sum remains unpaid despite demand.

Need I do anything more to prove that Mr. Reveley could not possibly be an attorney?　

This morning, as I waited in the Courthouse lobby for the offices to open, I discussed the matter with an attorney. I only showed him the Answer form, and only mentioned the non-existence of a cause of action. He agreed that an account manager would normally sign the affidavit-of-debt, and identify his/herself as such.

I began today’s conversation with a different issue. I struggled with grammar over the weekend. Is the phrase, “By the omission of the affidavit”, correct? My philosophy was connected to the fact that the phrase, “By the admission of the affidavit” is correct. He didn’t know the answer to my question. He did, however, suggest a different choice of words; “By virtue of the information not presented in the affidavit, the defects are…”

Whatever may be grammatically correct or not, my predictions are that several things can happen now:

1. My opposing counsel will withdraw. This will leave my counterclaim free-standing. He probably won’t show for the hearing and I will win by default.

2. My opposing counsel will contact me and request a mutual withdrawal. I will not agree to this because I intend to use this lawsuit to force Wells Fargo to tell the truth.

3. We do trial.

Thursday March 26, 2009

Although I haven’t receiving official notification, it is my understanding that the State Attorney General will be investigating the credentials of my opposing counsel, as well as the issue of why a non-associate of the oil company would file a supporting affidavit for the plaintiff.

I would like to ask of one favor of the attorney general.

If the results of the investigation are what I expect, would he please wait to release these results until after Wells Fargo states for the record that it has no interest or title in my house.

The expected answer date, “return date”, for the legal action is May 5^th. So I expect we will receive such statement by early June.

Saturday March 28, 2009

It has been suggested of me that I change the relief sought in my counterclaim from $500 to $5,000 for the purpose of law school tuition. Inasmuch as I appreciate the thoughtfulness, this is the problem with that legal argument.

The plaintiff, ProTech Oil, ceased to exist in the summer of 2007. It was bought by Scasco Energy. I still don’t know who Louise Zematis is, but I guess she is the retired owner. I researched her on the internet. She is 58 years old.

I will additionally guess that my opposing counsel is not producing invoices to the Court because the letterhead would read Scasco Energy. This would require some explaining which he does not want to do, nor does he know how.

When I filed the counterclaim, I knew that I could never see this money. But I decided it was a free question of the Court. The Judge can either say NO, or, if the Judge says YES, there is nothing to collect against.

Even if I wanted to give my opposing counsel money, I couldn’t.

If the Court identifies Wells Fargo Bank and Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendants, then I could cross-claim these. If I remand this into a higher Court, I could ask for more than $5,000 each. Would the Court understand if I asked for enough for law school tuition, without stating such purpose?

I prepared a draft for a remand. I have until April 19^th to file. I understand that one copy has to go into each Court, with copies of all other motions accompanying the paperwork into the new Court. I believe my argument for regular trial is strong enough if the Judge understands that I can only put in writing a small fraction of the problem.

Saturday March 28, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

4^th Sunday of Lent

Count the Cost

5^th Sunday of Lent

$8,000 in Vandalisms

If I inflicted such damage to anyone, everyone would be ganging-up on me to offer me labor as a $5/hour cashier to perform the necessary reimbursements.

But in 2002-04, when Prince William of Wales repeatedly smashed the exterior mirror of my car, cut-out a piece of the transmission, poured his weapons of Wicca down the drains of my household toilet and bathtub, among other things, the financial remedy was to instruct my co-workers of Staples to convince me I must improve my penny-pinching techniques. A few pennies everyday would eventually add-up to 800,000-cents.

I understand why that made sense to President George Bush. It is the definition of Pooh. It is why his mother owes the world an apology for not aborting him.

But I do not understand why this made sense to those who believed the dumb manager of Loehmann’s department store in Mount Kisco, New York who accused me of shoplifting from her store in 1992. They ganged-up on me to reimburse her the $15. But in 2005, I still had the receipt because I knew this would one day re-surface, and because it was part of a magenta-colored-outfitting I assembled for a ski trip. It has sentimental value.

I would like her to answer three curiosity questions of mine:

It is a fact that Loehmann’s was fully equipped with video cameras. If she believed I was a shoplifter, why didn’t she acquire my license plate number and submit that with the video-tape to the local police department, which was a half-a-block away?

Why did it take a floor representative ten minutes to surface onto the floor to greet me while I was the only customer?

Why did it take this representative twenty minutes to find her so she could attempt to reach into my pocketbook and steal the alleged ill-begotten item?

If I received the message which I think I just did, I would like to ask the messengers to relay the information to every member of the House and Senate for the commencement of impeachment hearings.

The cause of action will be the fact that a foreigner such as himself doesn’t know any better. This is the way his father manages his overseas government. They are all a bunch of animals with no hormonal control.

I believe his wife and children would appreciate it. They are very unhappy there.

If I file this, there will be a $75 filing fee.

I haven’t made any decision yet.

RED=NOT SERVED-AND-FILED

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Case #

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

Connecticut

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

MOTION

FOR

REMAND

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned case and submit this Motion for Remand.

2. The Motion for Remand is pursuant to

2009 Connecticut Practice Book

Sec. 24-21. Transfer to Regular Docket

(a) A case duly entered on the small claims docket of a small claims area…shall be transferred to the regular docket of the superior court…if the following conditions are met:

(1) The defendant… shall file a motion to transfer the case to the regular docket. This motion must be filed on or before the answer date with certification of service pursuant to Sections 10-12 et seq. ..

(2) The motion to transfer must be accompanied by

(A) a counterclaim in an amount greater than

the jurisdiction of the small claims court; or

(B) an affidavit stating that a good defense exists to the claim and setting forth with specificity the nature of the defense, or stating that the case has been properly claimed for trial by jury.

3. In conjunction with this Motion, I am filing an Answer-Affidavit stating my defense, as well as a separate motion amending my Counterclaim object of action from $500 to $15,000.

4. The nature of the plaintiff’s action is breach of contract for services rendered to a property known as 891 South Street in the County of Tolland, Town of Coventry, State of Connecticut.

5. The object of the plaintiff’s action is $1,967.42.

6. The contractual debt was satisfied by payment made to the plaintiff in April, 2008 for the amount specified. It was made by the law firm of Hunt & Leibert as it represented Wells Fargo Bank and Countrywide Home Loans. As of November of 2007, it was their ProTech account pursuant to the fact that the law firm claimed their ownership of said property. Henceforth, they had landlord status. (see Substitution Motion)

7. The law firm of Hunt & Leibert is very experienced and knowledgeable of the laws of Housing. They were not delinquent in their responsibilities to provide heat and hot water to a tenant. (see Substitution Motion)

8. The cause of the plaintiff’s action remains unspecified. According to the plaintiff’s supporting Affidavit, invoices were proffered to the Court, yet these weren’t.

9. The plaintiff’s case has a hidden cause of action which has no resemblance to the recorded nature of action.

10. In Small Claims Court, I have filed previous Motions requesting Substitution from myself as defendant to Wells Fargo Bank which, according to the Land Records of the Town of Coventry, has title to the property at issue. I also asked that the Court recognize as co-defendant the company which, according to its Internal Revenue Service document, has interest in the property; Countrywide Home Loans.

11. My opposing counsel agreed that Wells Fargo should be a defendant. (see his Motion to Add Defendant)

12. My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof. According to the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website, these are such recent cases of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut:

CV-08-5018020-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LN V. --------

CV-08-5003485-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-06-6000365-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-08-5008544-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-08-5022536-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-08-5009491-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-01-0095475-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME V. ----------

CV-05-4008567-S WELLS FARGO BANK MN V. -----

CV-08-5020008-S WELLS FARGO BANK NA V. ------

CV-06-4003674-S WELLS FARGO BANK NA V. -----

CV-06-5003707-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-08-5016887-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -------

CV-08-5004189-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-08-5018771-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-07-5013495-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. ------

CV-06-4018119-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-09-5026915-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N V. -----

CV-08-5024684-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-07-6001261-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-07-6000248-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-07-6002477-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-08-5003454-S WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. -----

CV-08-5021460-S WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. -----

13. According to the Small Claims Court definition of itself as presented in its Connecticut Judicial Branch website, its purposes are:

“unpaid debts;

breach of a written or verbal contract;

back rent;

return of security deposit;

broken or damaged property;

doctor/hospital bills for treatment of personal injuries; and,

issues valued at less than $5000. “

14. The plaintiff’s cause of action is not any of the above.

15. According to the Small Claims Court definition of itself, its purposes are not:

“libel or slander;

damage to your reputation;

name calling; or,

issues valued at more than $5000. “

16. The plaintiff’s off-the-record nature of action is “damage to my reputation” which renders it an issue “valued at more than $5,000”.

17. But it is not just about the object of the action that I am requesting the remand, but also about the peripheral facts of the case. According to the Decision of Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept, 3:05cv1396:

“Where the existence of subject matter jurisdiction turns on a factual issue, however, the court is permitted to look beyond the complaint itself and may consider evidence outside the pleadings. See Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1997).”

emphasis supplied

18. The herein discussed Small Claims Court case belongs in the Superior Court to appropriately conjoin its subject matter with issues of the jurisdiction of the Wells Fargo foreclosure action against me of the Tolland County Superior Court.

19. This case does not belong in the Federal District Court, the only other alternative.

“TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 89 > § 1441

§ 1441. Actions removable generally

(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.”

20. The Bankruptcy Court record of the Federal District Court in Hartford, Connecticut identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt. Countrywide then abandoned the debt. It has been three years since my last payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo Bank.

21. The first applicable “factual issue” is that my opposing counsel originally corresponded with me about the “breach of contract” over nine months after the alleged due date of the bill. He waited from March 03, 2008 to the end of the tax year of 2008. (See Exhibit A hereto attached)

22. The second “factual issue” is that the Small Claims Court action was served on March 20, 2009, 26-days before April 15, 2009, the deadline for tax filing with the Internal Revenue Service for the activity of the year 2008.

23. The third “factual issue” is that the Motion for Ejectment was filed on March 11, 2008 (see Case Detail of CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville), almost exactly one year before the Small Claims Court servicing of March 20, 2009. Even though this date of 2008 was five months after the foreclosure, the representing law firm of Hunt & Leibert thought ejecting me would resolve their inconsistencies with the records of the Internal Revenue Service.

24. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the lack of identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States Government. (see Substitution Motion)

25. Wells Fargo and Countrywide are venting their aggressions against me while acting in the guise of the identity of plaintiff ProTech.

26. If ProTech is the authorized plaintiff, the account manager and/or owner would have submitted an affidavit with invoices attached.

27. I would like to ask of the Court to recognize how serious this is, and how many issues of the bigger picture are best left for trial. I would like the opportunity to cross-examine that who signed the unsupported Affidavit, as well as the potentially impleaded defendants of Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans, against whom I intend to file cross-claims.

WHEREFORE defendant respectfully requests remand from the Small Claims Court into the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut.

____________________________________

Vivian Lehman

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

Decision

The foregoing motion to remand ProTech Oil versus Vivian Lehman from the Small Claims Court into the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut is hereby

Granted Denied

____________________________________________________

Justice

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this remand motion in three pre-paid postage envelops and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to all counsel of record and potential impleaded, yet unrepresented defendants:

Mr. William G. Reveley

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

And

Wells Fargo

Corporate Trust Services

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

And

Mr. Sean Sweeney

Attorney for Countrywide Home Loans

HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.

50 Weston Street

Hartford, CT 06120

_____________________________________________________________

Vivian Lehman

Sunday March 29, 2009

To my knowledge, I cannot file any cross-claims until after Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans are officially identified as co-defendants. I doubt if that will happen before the hearing. I very strongly doubt if the Judge will enter any Decisions before such date. Unlike with the higher Courts, there are no pre-trial hearings to determine such details, and there will be no preliminary conference.

And to my knowledge, my argument for a larger counterclaim is insufficient. All I have is circumstantial evidence of coincidental timing as well as previous associations between my opposing counsel and both these banks. And while I know the debt was satisfied, I can’t prove it unless Hunt & Leibert save themselves from much trouble with the Housing Authority, and produce the cancelled check.

What I am wondering is if the Court can remand this on its own motion. While it would be nice to save the $75 filing fee, it would also assure me this is the correct path to take. And perhaps the Judge can telephone his colleagues in the State and Federal Courts and ask who wants the case. Should it be remanded to the latter to conjoin it with the bankruptcy issues, or perhaps with the former to consider the case detail of the foreclosure?

So I am thinking about placing the above information in another motion, and making a between-the-lines suggestion to the Court.

But there is plenty of time for that. The earliest possible Small Claims Court hearing date is August.

Tuesday March 31, 2009

They have sent out a very strong hint that they want compromise. The FBI-Agent/midnight-stranger wrote out the CPB (Connecticut Practice Book) section number and title, “Sec. 17-11. Offer of Compromise by Defendant“, on a small legal pad and left it at the service desk, by the vendor-log-in book of one of the stores I service for Crossmark.

Part of his message was that I do not have to fully write-out the title every time I cite it in a motion. I can use the abbreviation. But my audience is not just the Court and the visitors of this website, it is also myself ten years from now. I won’t have any way of understanding what I was talking about if I do not provide a full citation.

What this law enforcement Agent also cannot understand, surprisingly, is that I cannot give money to my opposing counsel for licensure reasons, and the plaintiff cannot give money to me for existential reasons---it doesn’t exist.

And one more thing…

I want the truth from Wells Fargo. I want it to state for the record, under penalties of perjury, that it lied to me when it told me it had an interest in the house.

But I have a philosophical question for the FBI Agent.

When I win back my house, is he going to repeat his complaints?

He wants us to be in the bigger bed of the master bedroom.

He wants a place to put his clothes.

He wants me to continue to add to the museum.

And anything else I may not have noticed.

If they have a phony small claim filed against me, we all go the Small Claims Court. This could find its way into either the State Superior or Federal Bankruptcy Court.

In theory, the Family Court couldn’t possibly find its way into this. But I am certain if they keep thinking their way, that is where we all will be (e.g., a married man with AIDS and a ten million dollar debt who is willing to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he may have one erection with me).

The Last Supper was a Cedar commemorating the liberation of Israelis from slavery. Moses was the original whistleblower. This is why the connection to the archetypes is so strong. I believe Jesus is too recent for such a biological connection. Two-thousand-years is an insignificant length of time in the human evolutionary process.

It is difficult to date Moses. But we can date the Great Flood. In the past 1.2 million years, there have been four pluvials--many sequential centuries of torrential rainfall corresponding to the glacial activity. The first such event corresponds to the date Homo habilis, the original post-Australopith, is found in the archeological record. It is exclusively Eurasian. I believe the Bible recorded this date of human evolutionary history, yet mysteriously omitted the following pluvial events.

Hunt & Leibert are a Saxon and a Jew. The former is a Pagan who feigns Christianity. The latter, according to the Book of Ezra Chapter 4, is not an Israeli. While it is true that neither have the archetypical connection because they are missing the area of the brain which yearns to return to the Pre-Australopith/Aquatic-Ape/Mermaid condition, I also believe that they have advisors, such as the IRS. It is their influence which will lead to my liberation.

8. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the pattern of behavior as it relates to IRS day,

April-15^th/Form-1040.

March 03, 2008	Due date of ProTech bill for $1967.	42-cents.
March 11, 2008	Motion for Ejectment filed seven months after foreclosure and served before vacate-deadline.**	41-hours
March 20, 2009	Service of ProTech’s Action.
March 28, 2009	End of my work-week resulting in take-home-pay. Unique!	$44 .

**see Case Detail, CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville.

9. The dates and numerical obsession are substantial evidence as defined by the United States District Court District of Connecticut, Maran v. Barnhart, 3:01CV2015;

“"such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Green-Younger v. Barnhart, 335 F.3d 99, 106 (2d Cir. 2003)(quotation omitted).”

10. The “factual issue” is the lack of identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States Government. (see Defendant’s Substitution Motion)

11. The “subject matter jurisdiction” is the plaintiff of herein case. It is NOT ProTech Oil. It is Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans who are venting their aggressions against me while acting in the guise of a company with whom my business relationship ended in November of 2007.

12. My opposing counsel and I agree that Wells Fargo should be a co-defendant. He tacitly disagrees with my Motion to add Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendant. (see my Motion for Substitution of Defendant and his Motion to Add Defendant) My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof. (see Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website)

13. The Bankruptcy Court identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt. Countrywide then abandoned the debt. According to the Connecticut Statutes,

“Sec. 3-64a. Property presumed abandoned generally. All property … which is held or owing in this state and has remained unclaimed by the owner for more than three years after it became due, payable or distributable, is presumed abandoned.”

emphasis supplied

14. It has been three years since my last payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo Bank in 2007. The complications remain unresolved.

15. In addition to my afore-mentioned defective take-home pay of 2009, late March and early April of same year were also abnormal. At trial, I will proffer all necessary pay-stubs exemplifying normal.

WHEREFORE defendant demands the following as part of, but not limited to, the Counterclaim:

Countrywide Home Loan admits to its abandonment of the mortgage and files a copy with:

Land Records of the Town of Coventry;

Bankruptcy Court of Federal District Court in Hartford, Connecticut;

Superior Court of Tolland County of said State; and the

Internal Revenue Service.

Wells Fargo Bank admits that it never had an interest nor title in the property and that it files such admission to all said Local, State and Federal Government offices.

All harassment against me immediately ceases, and compensation for lost wages immediately issued; $1,000.

In conjunction with the $500. for harassment, the total monetary relief sought is $1,500.

_____________________________________April 06, 2009

Vivian Lehman, Defendant pro se

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Amendment to Counterclaim in three pre-paid postage envelops and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to both counsels of record and potentially impleaded, yet unrepresented defendant:

Mr. William G. Reveley

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

And

Mr. Sean Sweeney

Attorney for Countrywide Home Loans

HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.

50 Weston Street

Hartford, CT 06120

And

Wells Fargo

Corporate Trust Services

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

______________________________________________________________April 06, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Defendant pro se

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

Thursday April 09, 2009

In red-type above are the drafts.

Served-and-filed today. . .

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DEFENDANT’S

COMPROMISE

OFFER

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned case and submit this Offer of Compromise.

2. The Claim . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .$1,967.42.

3. The Counterclaim. . . . . . . . . . . .$500.00.

4. The potential Cross-Claim .. . .Priceless Truth.

5. The potential co-Defendant, as per the unapplied agreement of both parties, is Wells Fargo Bank.

6. The Nature of the Counterclaim is harassment.

7. The Nature of the potential Cross-Claim is beyond the pleadings of this case. However. . .

8. Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept, 3:05cv1396:

emphasis supplied

9. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the pattern of behavior as it relates to IRS day,

April-15^th/Form-1040.

March 03, 2008	Due date of ProTech bill for $1967 &	42-cents.
March 11, 2008	Motion for Ejectment filed seven months after foreclosure and served before vacate-deadline.**	41-hours
April 07, 2008	Service of Ejectment at	4 pm
March 20, 2009	Service of ProTech’s Action.
March 28, 2009	End of my work-week resulting in take-home-pay. Unique!	$44.