Coming Soon

Coming soon…

This Microsoft Works document when the free trial of Word is over.

Saturday November 22, 2008

Before I become sick again for no apparent reason, would the FBI please look at the occupant two-doors-down from me? Specifically, does he have a tattoo on his inner arm? Was he the third person in my hospital bed in January of 2002?

He moved-in with the single female occupant on the same day the giant hornet’s nest appeared. He knew more about its classification than anyone else.

I believe he is working for Hilary. She likes mixing violence and sex. I wonder how her new boss feels about it.

Tuesday November 25, 2008

Dear President-Elect Barack Obama;

I know there is $500 billion in the rebate account.

The sum of $160 billion is required for checks to be issued at a rate of $600/household member--a repeat of the Spring rebate rate.

There is enough for three checks:

December 1^st

January 1^st

February 1^st

!!!

Furthermore, you have some extra money. How about embracing the philosophy that if a taxpayer is entitled to a double-deduction (e.g., senior citizen, etc.), then s/he is also entitled to a double check?

You already met with President Bush. You have a powerful bargaining chip. You can blame the Republicans if the check is not in the mail by Christmas.

I don’t expect you to understand the significance of this Holiday because Kenyans have a very distinct religion. I am certain you have fond memories of such national celebrations as these occurred in your early childhood. Do you have an equal-but-different annual celebration that perhaps you can relate to?

Friday December 05, 2008

Dear Bank of America (formerly Countrywide);

You wanna play?

Saturday December 06, 2008

Yesterday, I telephoned the law firm of Hunt & Leibert and spoke to their paralegal. At first, she did not remember who I am. I explained to her that Bank of America will not stop telephoning me offering me a mortgage possibility. I told her I wanted it to stop. She acknowledged my concern and placed me on hold. When she returned, I believe she did know who I was and, with the professionalism I always receive from her, said, “Ms. Lehman, the phone calls will stop.” Then she was anxious to end the telephone call and did not want to hear my gratitude.

I was receiving as many as three of these calls per week.

If Linda St. Pierre was available, I assume she would have been assigned to return my telephone call to refute my claims on this website. If you will recall, I predicted that her death will occur by my birthday resultant of backfiring biochemical weapons. It is a reasonable assumption that she is dead.

I want State Marshal Tim Poloski, Sargeant Ochtera, and Lieutenant Solenski to visit her grave. No negotiations will be possible before.

And one more thing…

President-Elect Obama’s daughters have asked of me to NOT help their daddy. They have seen the shame which the Bush daughters have of their father and do not want to experience the same.

But I would very strongly ask of the President-Elect to consider what happened to me in that hospital bed, ask Hilary if she had anything to do with it, and if he receives a confirmation, consider the fact of this two daughters.

I want Hilary’s name withdrawn as a candidate for Secretary of State.

Saturday December 13, 2008

Why do the women of Wicca burn-out their own uteruses and lie on a bed all day with a law enforcement officer lying on top of them?

Tuesday December 16, 2008

Last night I telephoned Tim Poloski, the Judicial Marshall.

He said he did not know the name Linda St. Pierre.

He said he is right-handed.

He said he does not smoke.

I referred him to my website. He wasn’t interested.

He declined my invitation to provide his side of the story.

On a related issue…

I would like to ask of Bank of America, formerly Countrywide Home Loans, to please not induce another IRS red flag on my account. I would like to ask of them to officially report to the Connecticut Attorney General’s office that the law firm of Hunt and Leibert stole a mortgage worth $278,000. Although I am not an accountant, I believe I have enough experience filing annual taxes to say that they can take this as a tax deduction.

As to Hunt & Leibert, they will probably deduct their expenses for the property taxes and landscaping. I don’t know how much, I will guess at least $10,000.

I am certain they can’t do that.

In 2006, the mortgage of Vivian Lehman, mortgagee, with Countrywide Home Loans, mortgager, was of issue to us because we liked it.

But the name Countrywide Home Loans was too long for our attorneys to memorize. So we changed it to Wells Fargo by filing a phony Transfer of Mortgage with both the Superior Court and Town of Coventry. In this, we specified that the transfer amount was $1.

But it is still worth $278,000.

Vivian Lehman defaulted on her monthly payments to Wells Fargo. She is behind by a fraction of one cent.

Said Transfer of Mortgage is not herewith attached because it does not specify the who, what, where or when. Superior Court Judge Sferrazza is the only individual ignorant enough to recognize it, because he was never trained as a $7/hour supermarket cashier.

Our phony attorney, Andrew Barsom, signed and filed a Certificate of Foreclosure with said Town. Even though he is unlicensed, it is valid.

Since then we received a Judgment of Foreclosure. Copy not enclosed because it doesn’t exist.

In January of 2008, Countrywide Home Loans and Wells Fargo had to explain 2007 activity. The IRS was confused. It red-flagged Vivian Lehman and the corporations.

Then we decided to perform an eviction. But we never showed for the court date.

Then we decided to perform an ejection. We gave said mortgagee 41 hours to vacate.

Since then, the annual property tax bill was issued to her. But before she received it in early September, we paid the first half. We are planning on taking it as a tax deduction. We will also be deducting our landscaping and cleaning expenses.

The second half will be due on January 31^st. We don’t want to pay it.

And in January, more tax forms must be filed declaring 2008 activity. Neither Countrywide nor Wells Fargo can explain it comprehensibly.

In all of our activity, Countrywide Home Loans never presented itself to the Courts and ascertained its interest in the property known as 891 South Street. Henceforth, it is non-enforceable.

Countrywide’s new owner, Bank of America, is now demanding $278,000 for compensation.

Would you please give us the money?

My prediction is that the insurance company will find it shocking, then amusing. They will surmise a Christmas drunk wrote it as a bad joke. It will probably be tossed in the garbage, or used for training purposes to teach newcomers to recognize phony claims.

This means that by Christmas, Hunt & Leibert will have to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. And while it is true that the Bank of America will not collect its money by December 31^st, my additional guess is that some form should exist to explain to the IRS that the matter is pending, and does not involve me.

Friday December 19, 2008

Of course, I was referring to the malpractice insurance company. And it is my understanding that they are refusing to consider the claim.

It is also my understanding that Bank of America’s in house attorneys and tax accountants are agreeing with me.

And it is my understanding that Hunt & Leibert, a firm specializing in debt collection, has reached the responding conclusion that this must be resolved by a Federal Bankruptcy Court. They are going to try for a Chapter 11 which will allow them to remain in practice. But this may become a Chapter 7 liquidation.

And it is my understanding that the Bankruptcy Courts do not grant petitions for protection, unless the petitioner (i.e., Hunt & Leibert) can demonstrate its resolve that these same mistakes will not be repeated.

In my opinion, the only way they can satisfy the Courts on this issue, is by the partners blowing-the-whistle on attorneys Kenneth Pollock, Sean Sweeney, Peter Ventre, and, if she is still alive, Linda St. Pierre. They will also have to explain that Judge Sferrazza issued an ejectment order without a foreclosure judgment. They will have to file their official report with both the Attorney General’s office and American Bar Association.

They will finally understand that the answer to their problems does not depend on my behavior and the emotions which they believe they can manipulate.

Sunday December 21, 2008

According to the “missing” Hebraic version of Matthew, this is the day Joseph and Mary were rejected by the inn. The counterfeit human species of the Book of Ezra, Chapter 4, decrees this as a must-attack day against the Christians.

This year, it defaults to Saturday December 20^th.

Dear Bank of America;

You wanna play some more?

Wednesday December 24, 2008

One week left of 2008. Much happened this year. I know I am more fortunate than most. What dominated the news was the tragic fate of Florida toddler Caylee Anthony. This I my understanding of what happened.

The news media has mentioned the fact that her date of birth was August 09, 2005. But they don’t recognize the significance of it. The mother became pregnant on Halloween night. That wasn’t a broom she was straddling on at age 17.

Of course, this was an unplanned act of passion which resulted in pregnancy. In her Pro Life heroism, she decided not to abort. She then explained to the father that he has to assume financial responsibility for her.

But if this occurred at a Halloween party, she might not know who he is. It doesn’t matter. Someone has to.

No one did, except her parents who allowed her to stay at home. Of course, she could not get a job because the child was a full time responsibility.

As the child approached school age, she was no longer a convenient excuse. The mother had no further use for her.

As she is in jail and prosecutors try to decide what to do, her every move is recorded and watched. Among these, is a conversation she had with her parents through a glass window and microphones. She insisted the child is still alive, will come home, and she wants to be there for the arrival. I believe that she believed this is what law enforcement wanted to hear. She then probably calculated that her release was about to occur, with all suspicion eliminated.

Why would I believe that?

Let’s look at a few other cases.

1997. Princess Diana was murdered as she was about to make a Federal Court appearance on my behalf. The driver of the perpetrating car was a married man with AIDS and a $10,000,000 debt who wanted to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he may have one erection with me to achieve my pregnancy. He told the Clinton Administration that the murder was performed so he could have a second erection with his wife. President Clinton agreed it wasn’t his fault.

1998. I was in England and had an encounter with a pregnant government official. A few months later, she murdered the offspring, as per Wicca custom. She told law enforcement it was my fault because I never told her that babies are treated by pedestrians. Instead, she took her ailing child to a pharmacist with a suspended New York license who was living in London to avoid penalties. She insisted she didn’t know any better. Scotland Yard agreed I should have known enough to take such initiative. She was never criminally charged.

1998. I was surviving the poison which the people of Wicca had injected into my asthma inhaler while I was in England. They sent Monica Christiensen, the great-grand-niece of a man known as Adolph Hitler (real name Schicklegruber), to administer more poison. In early November, I had just began working at Lord & Taylor. She also acquired a job there, but was not entered into payroll until December 21^st. By Thanksgiving, she had perpetrated the act of entering the stockroom of our department, opening my bag, and injecting more poison into my asthma inhaler. Security video taped it, and turned the information over to the general manager, Kathy McTigue. She summoned the Nazi into her office who promised her $30,000 upon my demise. Monica also answered that she did not have enough disposable cash with which to buy the clothes to conform to the dress code. Kathy agreed to allow her to steal all of the clothes she wanted, while waiting for my demise. One year later, upon hearing the word I was considered terminal, Kathy signed an expensive contract to have her kitchen remodeled because she didn’t like it when guests entered her home, and could see directly in the kitchen.

2005. I have realized that Robert Flanagan, an Episcopal minister of the last church I routinely attended while living in New York, looks just like the supervisor of London’s government office. And they both look just like Qusai Hussein. He realized he had to remedy this. So he contacted Sargeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski of the local police department. He explained he was partially responsible for the murder of 60 of their colleagues on September 11, 2001, and that he wanted to murder all law enforcement agents. But I was in the way. He asked of them to visit me and tell me that he doesn’t look like Qusai Hussein. Instead of contacting the FBI, Ochtera and Solenski were delighted to help with this task. They told me that the dead bodies identified as Qusai and Uday Hussein were verified with DNA materials. Of course, the FBI had blood samples of both men from before the date of their demise. In fact, the military claimed for the record that dental records were used. Both men just happened to visit the dentist a few days before the attack, a full set of x-rays were taken, the FBI acquired these and compared to both undamaged faces. And that remedied all suspicion.

Today is, of course, Christmas Eve. I haven’t seen the FBI-Agent/midnight-stranger for a year. He was too much of a coward to go near me throughout all of the turmoil. He has sent the subliminal information he will be here tonight. I am not certain what is planned.

Either he will be here, and attempt to manipulate me into signing something.

Or he won’t be here. The cruel tease is expected to soften my emotions and I will be easier to negotiate with. If not, it isn’t Bank of America’s fault that I have a sex drive problem.

But I did receive one present from them.

I just researched my case on the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website. My silent prediction which I made earlier this year did not come to fruition.

December 29^th is the last Monday of this year. Henceforth, it is the last day of 2008 for short calendars of the Superior Court of Tolland County. The prediction I had was that my opposing counsel would file some motion to place us on this. Judge Sferrazza would demand a settlement as well as my explanation of the septic stench in the house.

Didn’t happen.

Sunday December 28, 2008

I would like to make the IRS aware of one more issue.

When the action against me was commenced in 2006, I stopped paying property taxes. As long as President Georgie-Pooh (and now Baby-Bama) was on their side, I knew I had only a small chance. After the Certificate of Foreclosure was filed in October of 2007, Hunt & Leibert paid all back taxes---$10,000.

My guess is they took this as a tax deduction.

I don’t believe they can do that because there is no authorized action against me. Wells Fargo has nothing in its records, not even my social security number, and Countrywide never filed any action against me. Would the IRS please audit? And if this is not the only phony foreclosure they have successfully filed, then there may be other inappropriate deductions. All proceeds should be deposited into the rebate account. I would like the check before the Eastern Orthodox Christmas.

To slightly change the subject…

On December 21^st (defaulting on December 20^th), this what they pulled…

In April, I left behind a tank-full of oil---350 gallons at approximately $4/gallon. I told the oil company to bill them. It went to collection. (This can’t damage my credit scores because I never signed for the deliveries.) On December 20^th, I received a letter from William G. Reveley and Associates, attorneys-at-law demanding $1,804.75.

I immediately researched Mr. Reveley on both abanet.org and the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website. He has two juris numbers--one for himself and one for the firm. However, there is no record of him on the former.

When researching on the American Bar Association’s website, this is what confuses people. It lists those who passed the Bar exam, as well as those of this group who are “members”. The latter, are people who pay their annual fee for their magazine, referral services, and other amenities.

I understand that Mr. Reveley is not a “member”, but unlike many other “non-members”, there is no record that he ever passed the Bar exam.

But if he tries to sue me, I will name Hunt & Leibert as a third party defendant. I can’t identify Countrywide because no Judgment is on file. I could identify Wells Fargo and force them to make an appearance. Unquestionably, the representative will state for the record that my name is not in their files and they don’t understand what the Courts are talking about.

The following are the cases on the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s short calendars of the Superior Courts for which Mr. Reveley is representing the plaintiffs on January 5^th. Although I am not an attorney nor a paralegal, what I would do if I was one of the defendants, is I would make my appearance and nicely explain that I do not do business with any professional until after I see a copy of his/her license. Additionally, I would make my plans known to Mr. Reveley before the Court date. Hopefully, a default judgment would be entered in my favor.

Jan 05 2009 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. XXXX CV-08-5003454-S

Windham County

MOTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE DEFENSE

Jan 05 2009 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. XXXXX CV-08-5003454-S

Windham County

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT-STRICT FORECLOSURE

Jan 05 2009 RAMAPO REALTY V. XXXX CV-08-5009916-S

Waterbury County

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT-STRICT FORECLOSURE

Jan 05 2009 RAMAPO REALTY V. XXXXX CV-08-5009916-S

Waterbury County

MOTION FOR POSSESSION

Jan 05 2009 COUNTY DISTRIBUTORS V. XXXXX CV-08-5009443-S

New London County

APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY

Jan 05 2009 CHASE HOME FINANCE V. XXXX CV-08-5019973-S

Bridgeport County

MOTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE DEFENSE

Jan 05 2009 CITY OF NEW HAVEN V. XXXXX CV-08-5020505-S

New Haven County

MOTION TO AWARD COMMITTEE FEE/EXPENSES

Jan 05 2009 DEUTSCHE BANK NAT'L V. XXXX CV-07-5003814-S

Milford County OBJECTION TO MOTION

Jan 05 2009 NEW HAVEN REGISTER L V. XXXX CV-08-5024536-S

New Haven County

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY / HEARING

Jan 05 2009 NEW HAVEN REGISTER L V. XXXX CV-08-5024536-S

New Haven County

APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY

Jan 05 2009 NEW HAVEN REGISTER L V. XXXX CV-08-5024536-S

New Haven County

MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF ASSETS

Part II---December 28, 2008

Today I heard a news report that Wells Fargo is a recommended stock purchase. The argument is that it is a profitable bank despite the collapse in this financial sector. And such success is resultant of the fact that unlike companies such as Countrywide, it has strict lending practices.

However, if you examine the foreclosure activity of the www.jud.ct.gov, you will see that they are plaintiffs just as often as anyone else. For Mr. Reveley, it is disproportionately high.

Wednesday December 31, 2008

As this year comes to a close, I researched my current credit status. Although I haven’t asked for a print-out of the details, it states I have four open accounts. I know that my car lease is one, my Victoria’s Secret charge is second, my Visa is third…

The fourth must be the mortgage. I assume it must be connected to the fact that the property taxes are still in my name. The second-half is due on January 31^st. This month they will either intensify the harassment campaign, or finally realize such is inconsequential. Only they can rescue themselves from their self-inflicted financial injuries.

Throughout all that happened, it was good to know that I could always rely on my job with Crossmark. It is the best job I ever had. Not only is it the best paying, but many of the projects can be fun and interesting. The leadership did not involve itself with the terror campaign, and disciplined anyone who collaborated. In March it will be my third anniversary. This is the longest I have been allowed to hold any job. In my script, my character works in a museum store. I am going to add-in that she is fired, and then returns routinely as a Crossmark representative.

(The FBI Special Agent also wants me to change her preference. He wants her to select him instead of the cat for the exotic moment. I am going to change it. She never notices the former.)

This year, my payroll is up 20%, whereas my mileage is up 40%. While it is true I am also paid per mile, I prefer the former as income. The problem is my new position within the territory. But as I am becoming stronger, and finally routinely working five-days straight, I can perform more hours within a day. Hopefully, this will counter-adjust the problem.

Included in my character’s assignments are resets of the book department, making clothes for exhibits, and placement of signage in the theater regions. And the executives of the company will find her former boss for a lesson on how to merchandise.

One thing we at Crossmark have to do is merchandise without a planogram. When I worked at Lord & Taylor from 1998-2000, I learned how to do this. We could not work with a permanent or semi-permanent planogram. The fashion world moves too fast. Filomena Serra was my first manager and an expert at setting up the colors and styles to maximize sales. (On November 27, 2000, as I received a clear diagnosis, she was promoted and transferred to another store, Monica was transferred from her department into ours, and Amy Robbins Salerno was issued her certificate to practice medicine even though she had no license.)

But during that year, I learned plenty.

In 2003, when I lived in New York, I routinely visited a store named Pins and Needles in Mount Kisco. If you will recall, my mother’s classic Singer sewing machine was not working. I now finally understand that the rayon I routinely work with is very sensitive. It requires a new sharp needle with every garment, not the universal needle my mother worked endlessly with. But at the time, I gave-up on her machine. For $10/hour, I worked with their Bernina machines in their classroom. I was once operating such during a class. They were preparing garments for a local museum.

TARGETS

As the new year begins, I want one thing from Wall Street. For the month of January, I would like them, under the guidance of my students, to place human rights on the negotiations table first. This includes OPEC.

I believe that the market will become so strong, that we will have to remind ourselves of one small principle.

During the year 2004, we were watching the scale which my father characterized as THE Leading Economic Indicator---ISM---Institute of Supply Management. I wanted it to increase from 62%. My father had a different idea. I hope I am correctly characterizing it.

If our statistics are too high, then what goes up must come down.

If we establish good statistics as normal, then we have strong, long-term economic growth.

But nonetheless, but the end of this month, I would like Wall Street’s Dow to cross the psychologically crucial 10,000 mark. But I do not want it to go to 20,000.

President Obama wants to know my secret for expanding the job market at the rate of 300,000/month. I didn’t do it.

During the year 2004, my students had the idea of pressuring their adopted companies into converting their multi-million dollar bonuses into $30,000/year+ jobs for the general public. That’s what did it.

FOR OBAMA’S YOUNGEST DAUGHTER

In language-of-choice

What is your birthday?

What is your favorite book?

In English,

How is your favorite cartoon created?

In language-of-science,

Does the right side of the brain control

the right side of the body?

In language-of-geography,

What is the United 50 States of North America?

FOR OBAMA’S OLDEST DAUGHTER

In language-of-choice

View favorite DVD.

Give synopsis to class.

In English,

How are movie-special-affects created?

In language-of-science,

Where are the controlling mechanisms of the brain?

In language-of-geography,

Are the terms United States of America

and North America

interchangeable?

Saturday January 03, 2009

I just faxed the following letter.

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

January 03, 2009

Ms. Linda St. Pierre

HUNT LEIBERT JACOBSON PC

50 Weston St.

Hartford, CT 06120

Re; 891 South Street, Coventry, CT 06238

Dear Ms. St. Pierre;

We first met on the night of March 15, 2008. You visited for tea at the above-specified address. We met again on April 07, 2008. You were with Judicial Marshall Tim Poloski and served me with ejectment papers. We met again on the day of the ejectment of April 09^th.

In Late August, I received the property tax bill for said address. You already paid such on July 02, 2008: $2765.60 + $69.00 (trash). I have the receipt from the Town of Coventry and thank you for your advanced-payment.

Because the bill and payments were in my name, for IRS purposes, I am planning on reporting a gift of $2834.60, and henceforth the deduction of $2765.60 on my Schedule A. My assumption is that the IRS will qualify all your landscaping and other expenses as gifts for which I must be taxed.

I would like a list of all your expenses, as well as your advanced payment to me. My tax rate is 12% plus tax preparation fees. If I receive overpayment from you, I will return extra monies. I would appreciate the responding courtesy for any underpayments.

Thank you very much.

Vivian Lehman

Wednesday January 08, 2009

Yesterday I was at Kmart performing a Nabisco project. As I was placing my empty boxes in the bailer, a man insisted on speaking to me about the professional problems his wife was having. She is a judge of the Department of Child and Family. According to him, she cannot focus on the children because dirty politics are dominating the system. We will be dealing with this. I don’t know when. I don’t expect anything of the Chief Justice of the Connecticut Courts nor Governor Jodi Rell who are not capable of understanding the problem. They will probably assemble a committee.

Next issue…

Governor Bill Richardson has withdrawn his name from the candidacy for Commerce Secretary to President-Elect Obama’s cabinet. The media is speculating why. I already know.

Obama promised 3,000,000 jobs in a short time span. He assured Mr. Richardson that our Targets will take care of this as well as all other facets of the aggressive and ambitious economic stimulus package. He forgot one detail.

His two daughters. They can’t do what I assigned. And what I assigned was not nearly as ambitious as my previous assignments. I expected that.

He is lucky my mother and grandmother are no longer alive. They endlessly ridiculed over-achieving men who married women with half their intelligence, and bequeathed such to the next generation. I can’t repeat their jokes because I was too young to understand these. But they would have had him laughed-out of his inauguration.

President Bush still wants us to Target the issues in the Middle East. I have decided to take care of myself first, especially since a nation of people who like to boast of their superior intelligence should not need anything from us. And if they are anti-assimilation, they cannot accept.

I currently have a huge IRS problem.

I suddenly realized that the $10,000 in back taxes the law firm paid in 2007, must also be reported to the IRS in the form of an amendment. Although I don’t like to make excuses, and I know the Federal Government doesn’t like to hear these, I did not know that the property taxes were still in my name until August of 2008. And I didn’t figure any of this out until January 1^st and 2^nd of this year, when I studied the tax website trying to pre-calculate my refund.

As to the taxes which must soon be filed for 2008, you are probably wondering why a gift of approximately $5,450 cannot be counterbalanced by an identical deduction. The answer is that this figure is the amount of the standard deduction. Without the counterbalancing gift, it augments the refund. With the gift, it creates a debt which must be paid.

Working on this website was not in my plans for today. But this morning I assembled my paperwork to perform some tasks for Crossmark. Even though I wasn’t going to be doing any sewing or museum-touring, I didn’t mind. I opened the front door and found myself greeted by a hail storm. I rescheduled everything. It is nice not to owe anyone any explanations.

I turned on the television set to Fox cable news. Immediately there was a report that the IRS understands this is a difficult economy. Arrangements and even compromises can be made. Of course, reporting still must be done accurately. This is what I need.

1. Next month, I want my refund. If the law firm provides me with full cooperation by then, great! If not, I want the IRS to allow me to file an amendment for this tax return, as well as that filed in 2008. I cannot control what Hunt & Leibert does with the information I need.

2. A pre-emptive IRS hearing to establish how this unique situation should be filed. And I want them, not my tax-preparer, to calculate how much money they owe. It would be best if they paid the IRS directly, rather than have me relay the money. I believe this because after they paid the September 2008 property taxes, they attempted to steal the money out of my bank account. The IRS can save me much trouble.

Thursday January 08, 2009

Dominating the news has been the issues concerning Illinois Governor Blagojevich. This state is, of course, the home of President-Elect Barack Obama. The Governor’s wife’s name is Patricia. It is my understanding that she was the realtor for the Obamas when they lived in Chicago.

I can’t find any record of her license. Of course, it could be under her former husband’s name.

I would like to know.

I found the following on freerepublic.com. Thank you!!!!

Looking For INFO-Patricia BlagoJevich Was The Realtor In Rezko-Obama House Deal?
TCRLAF | 12-10-08 | TCRLAF

Posted on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:27:38 PM by tcrlaf

I'm trying to find info and links to what Bill O'reilly just said on his show, NAMELY that Patricia Blagojevich was the Real Estate Broker in the Rezko-Obama land deal!!

IF TRUE, this could explain how Obama "Paid" for Governor Blutarsky's support for his Senate run!!!

ANY AND ALL HELP IS APPRECIATED....

I am finding links and story's from the trib describing some of her crooked deals, and she was a partner of Rezko's in his Real Estate ventures.

She has a "Home-Based" Real Estate business called "RIVER REALTY".

THANX IN ADVANCE!! LET's GET TO WORK!!

I researched RIVER REALTY and found nothing.

Is she a real estate agent or mortgage broker?

Saturday January 10, 2009

Dear Mr. Obama;

Ten days away from your inauguration and I want to reach an agreement with you. Before I go into the details I want you to consider a few facts.

If your eldest daughter were born a Bush, she would be three-years-away from her first abortion. During his time as a Texas governor, he spent more time executing prisoners than doing homework and spending quality time with his children. And while in the White House, he committed himself to constantly harassing me. While he was concentrating on sending trespassers into my home, one of his daughters was very relieved when she learned she did not have to abort her last pregnancy. The father did agree to marry her. But the wedding was postponed until after the delivery.

Is that the life you want?

If you spend one hour each day with each child, you can easily counter-balance the negative impact your wife’s negative intelligence has had. And they can do the Targets.

Give me back my house, no mortgage, a property tax bill reflective of a value of $1 + $30,000-down-payment, a salary payable through Crossmark as I continue to work for them, and a thorough cleansing of the Coventry Police Department. You will have to find competent, non-corruptible, well-trained officers. I don’t think it has ever been done before in any police precinct. But you did promise “change”.

And remove Hilary from her candidacy as Secretary of State. This is also in the best interest of your daughters.

Sunday January 11, 2009

I know what Nancy Grace is trying to do every night as she devotes a full hour to the Casey Anthony investigation. She is trying to force the obvious killer to confess. This person is NEVER going to admit to practicing Wicca/witchcraft. I hope watching this, that everyone understands the frustrations of law enforcement agents of past centuries.

When we intellectually discuss the witchcraft trials of Salem, Massachusetts, we recognize The Crucible as a truthful reflection of the alleged travesty of justice. The fact is that the author reconstructed these events, while never specifying if he was also such a witchcraft practitioner. I don’t know much about Arthur Miller. I do know he was Jewish. The book of Ezra Chapter 4 characterizes such people as witches.

The later-date book was published during the McCarthy era, when seemingly innocent people were accused of being communists. One of these was Lucille Ball. She and her Cuban husband divorced one year after Fidel Castro became the dictator of such country. After she and Desi Arnaz completed the television series I Love Lucy, they co-starred in the movie, The Long Long Trailer. In this, they assumed roles similar to Lucy and Ricky Ricardo. The difference is that in the end, the question is raised on whether or not they should stay together after the “project”. In the movie, they do, after he discusses everything with his father. But that is the Hollywood ending. In real life, he probably dumped her. The true test of whether or not he was a spy is by scrutinizing their children. Offspring of spies are not allowed to talk to anyone. Their children were not very conversational.

When I first noticed what the people of Wicca and “communism/socialism” are capable of, their first offensive strategy was to destroy my reputation. They were very good at it.

Nancy Grace is also outraged at the donations Casey Anthony is receiving into her prison account. Instead of forwarding the money into funeral expenses, she is purchasing snacks and health-and-beauty necessities such as body creams. In my opinion, Ms. Grace should not direct her attention at how the money is being received, but rather who is sending. My guess is these are “pro-life”/anti-abortionists who understand that mother is the one of many. And if the grandmother had not made the 9-1-1 phone call, no one would have noticed the child’s absence.

It is the only good thing I have to say about the parents. Otherwise, I believe that the practice of Wicca is genetic, and the secrecy is learned most likely from family.

I believe this because I once had a co-worker who looked very Saxon. She was raised by an adoptive family of whom I know nothing except one detail which was connected to her job-attendance-rate.

Her absenteeism was very high. I wondered why the manager was not firing her. He finally explained she was not routinely sick, but rather recovering from her father’s latest beating.

I would have called Department of Child and Family, but she was over 18-years-old.

This Saxon explained to me why she was adopted. Her mother was single and 21-years-old. It made sense. These people are always pregnant with children they don’t know what to do with.

One of the first things I learned about this co-worker is that she practices Wicca. She never mentioned that her adoptive-parents shared in this. So I assume they didn’t. Henceforth, it is genetic, except for the secrecy.

The only specific detail of witchcraft that she shared with me was the use of the herb bilberry. It affects the eyes. According to her, in large dosages, it creates hallucinations.

Maybe Casey Anthony had one when this occurred.

Tuesday January 13, 2009

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

If you kill me, then the house will have to be processed via my estate. This will require another court, justice, and one year of time.

If you settle peacefully with me, it would take one week.

Saturday January 17, 2009

As you probably guessed, another Ezra-4/ricen attack occurred last Sunday.

I took an afternoon nap, awoke, took my asthma pills, and then prepared for night-sleep. My blood-pressure dropped and the major heart attack began including left arm paralysis. I took one birth-control-pill, and one of each of Solaray’s Butterbur and Tart Cherry. It was a five-minute-event.

My guess is that some time earlier this month someone entered my room and removed one pill from the bottle. They submitted this to the lab which laced it with ricen. It was then returned.

The satellites must have helped by providing the necessary information on my routine.

A few days before I took it, while I was servicing one of my Home Depots, an FBI agent walked by me. Although I had never seen him before, they all share the same facial expression. I knew trouble was coming. He was unusually tall, even for an FBI agent. He wore a dark business suit which matched his dark hair and Caucasian skin.

I do not believe that the information on my schedule came from Crossmark. Rather, he arrived approximately one hour after I did. This suggests to me that the satellites provided such information.

If the Bureau knew I was about to be attacked, why didn’t they stay with me 24/7?

So therefore, I will tell you everything else I told them. You are much more useful than they are, and could probably do more with the anthropological information. Here it is…

Because Osama-Ben-Laden/Robert-Crowe/Antonio-Mendez is Aztec, I suggested that they decode with such. It is my understanding that it required approximately one year for their sub-organization, “CAT”, to perform this, but it was done.

And I suggested they study the Olmec.

When I was a college student, taking Prof. Bruce Byland’s brilliant course on Mesoamerican Archeology, studying Aztec sacrifices was included in the curriculum. I was actually the only student in the class, because I changed my major from physics into anthropology very late in the four year term. This course was required, and the only way we could beat the deadline was with an independent study.

When I arrived for our appointment one day with deep, dark circles under my eyes because I couldn’t sleep between nightmares, which included the sacrifice of my dog, Professor Byland realized I could never study these people. Most students would then flip-over to the Maya or Incas. But I had already begun very exciting research on the Olmec. They lived near the Aztec.

Included in my readings, I found a comment that Stela C of Tres Zapotes had never been interpreted. I asked him if I could do my term paper attempting to do just that. It would be more fun than the standard…

The Olmec were…

They lived in…

Etc.

He agreed.

Then I had to find a picture of this. At the time I thought that a Stela and a Monument were the same thing. When I later told him of my mistake, he thought it was funny. But I found an excellent sketch of Monument C of this same site. It would take me awhile to realize it wasn‘t what I was looking for, but it was a reasonable substitute.

Monument C is a frieze sculpture in three parts on a rectangular shaped rock which looks like it was once shaped into a building block. I thought the first image represented prosperity, and the third a drought-induced-famine. The middle had me perplexed.

As to this middle picture, Prof. Byland noted the aggressive pose of the warrior. I didn’t think it was aggressive. He imitated it until I agreed. He also noted it was upside-down. According to him, this represents a divine connection.

Over the years, I decided that just because I don’t like the Aztecs, does not mean I don’t have to have literature on them. If I was going to be any good as an anthropologist, I had to be able to research anything. I collected such books at library sales, among others.

Two years ago, when I realized that Robert Crowe is Ben Laden, and already knew that he is Aztec, I pulled one of the books off of my shelves and researched a September annual ritual. In the first few pages, there it was. The War of Flowers. At the end of the harvest season, a major death toll of the enemy is required.

I remembered this Monument. I decided someone recorded this ritual, and left this for future investigators.

The plane in Pennsylvania was upside-down.

Other books mentioned that the Aztecs attacked the Olmecs at their site of San Lorenzo. This Monument was found at Tres Zapotes. I concluded the survivors must have fled there. This must have been carved on a piece which was salvaged from one of their wrecked structures.

When I was at the FBI office, I showed the Special Agent the picture. He anxiously wrote down Monument C of Tres Zapotes and was quite fascinated by this 2,000-year-old relic.

In my follow-up visit, I brought other books. One of these included dates of Aztec history recorded by two explorers. There are actually two columns of dates. Their accounts differ slightly. I explained that the second column must be the set-of-dates corresponding to that of the Aztec records. It can be used to predict future attacks.

(And because Ben Laden is pro-Sandinista of Nicaragua, any dates on which they lost power can also be used as predictors. All dates of attack are easily predictable.)

But why the same calendar as that of the Europeans, they wanted to know. How was it possible?

Let’s look at the archeological facts.

The Aztecs and Egyptians lived on approximately the same latitude. The former built pyramids within the last thousand years, the latter approximately 10,000 years ago. The Olmec built such approximately 2,000 years ago.

Modern anthropologists believe that American Natives peoples came from Asia across the Alaskan Bearing straights. Throughout the cycles of the last glacial age, water was frozen within the Pacific Ocean thereby routinely exposing this land.

According to that theory, 10,000-years-ago or more, in North Africa, there lived a people with pyramid technologies. They split. One stayed, the other eventually journeyed through Asia, across Alaska, and into Mexico. They then each developed their technologies nearly identically.

Let’s try something else.

Consider one other fact. Approximately 40,000,0000-years-ago, early-primates/pre-monkeys found their way from Africa into the Americas. No one knows how it happened. It wasn’t across the Bearing Straights because there is no fossil trail.

I suggested to the FBI the existence of another land-bridge across the Caribbean. They consulted with scientists who called me crazy. I suggested that they not talk to office-geologists, but rather the phone company. They set the cables. Very reluctantly, the FBI did as I instructed.

They confirmed the existence of this land-bridge.

And, of course, the European calendar is a derivative of that of the Ancient Egyptians.

Sunday January 18, 2009

A correction…The Olmec site attacked by the Aztecs, according to the literature I cited for the FBI, was Oaxaca, Mexico. San Lorenzo is another site. A fourth is La Venta. But I never mentioned that before.

To change the subject…

The Casey Anthony case in Florida.

Last night on Nancy Grace, a female caller made a very interesting observation. The murder victim’s date-of-birth is August 9, 2005. She disappeared in early June of 2008. Casey, the mother and accused murderer, said in a recorded jailhouse interview, that she believed Caylee would return home by her third birthday. On August 11^th, a meter-reader for the power company found her remains. The caller raised the question of whether a leak existed.

The meter-reader claims he called his supervisor and police. It is my understanding that he originally lead the police to the wrong area. It is also my understanding that the responding officer does not have a reputation for reliability. Three months later, the same civilian made the discovery a second time, called again, and lead them to the correct area.

It is also my understanding from watching Jane Valez Mitchell, that the former career of this meter-reader is a bail bondsman.

Where have we heard something like that before?

According to Wikipedia, on August 21^st, Casey Anthony was released after one month of incarceration. Her bond of $500,200 was posted by California bounty hunters Leonard Padilaa and his nephew Tony.

If I recall correctly, Casey Anthony’s father is in law enforcement. Although I admit it is difficult to keep-up with all the details of this case. All of my understandings and recollections may not be accurate.

I would like to know…

The identity of the “supervisor” the meter-reader/bail-bondsman claimed he called upon finding the body.

Why was bail posted ten-days after this original moment?

Is Mr. Anthony in law enforcement? If so, was he ever connected to any of these bail bondsmen and bounty hunters before this occurred?

I would like to “target” these issues, but I need assurances that no one will laugh at the Obama children. It isn’t their fault their father won’t help with homework.

Thursday January 22, 2009

Do I understand the subliminal information correctly?

The management company caring for the house to which I have title, turned the water back on in the house even though I purposefully turned-it-off? Then they did NOT turn the heat on, and now there is a burst pipe?

If this is true, I would like to ask the Town of Coventry if this is adequate grounds for revocation of the certificate of occupancy?

If not, does this change the value of the house? I would like reassessment.

Friday January 23, 2009

Two related issues…

It is my understanding that the midnight-stranger/FBI-Agent is considering proposing to me without apologizing for abandoning me. But despite that issue, he seems concerned that I am 42-years-old and may be past child-bearing age.

I would like to inform him of something I once briefly mentioned on this website. I think it was in 2001 that I had a complete abdominal sonogram. Because I was tired of everyone’s panic about this issue, I suggested that the gynecologist give the results to a radiologist who does not know me, and ascertain my age and potential. This person concluded I was a very healthy 25-year-old and confirmed I could have as many children as I want.

I should have also mentioned on more thing. When I had the exam, the technician showed me the photograph of the imminent ovulation.

While I probably can’t have ten children, I am certain I can have the standard quantity of 2.3. This is because I did not waste myself on any married man with AIDS and a $10,000,000 debt who wants to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he may have one erection with me.

The second issue…

I believe Bank of America, formerly Countrywide, finally looked at the paperwork.

I will never know what took them so long.

They are acknowledging that they have to settle with me. Before they approach, they must understand that they will have to present to me the following paperwork:

Certificate of Homeowner’s Insurance purchased by Wells Fargo, not Countrywide. If anything serious happens, I do not believe the courts will recognize a policy of the latter after they awarded ownership to the former.

Certificate of Occupancy dated within 30-days of the meeting.

Certificate that the Building Inspector of the Town of Coventry surveyed the condition of the house within said 30-day-period.

Assurances from the Town of Coventry Police Chief that their mushy sergeants and lieutenants have better things to do than wait for my dying phone call.

Receipt that the oil tank was filled and paid for within said 30-day-period.

An acknowledgment of the fact that attorney Sean Sweeney informed the Court on April 07^th that I did NOT default on my mortgage with Countrywide.

Reversal of all damage to my credit.

An apology for the fact that I was given 41-hours to vacate, and everyone was instructed not to help me, including the FBI agent.

Do you take this ass-licker…?

Part II--------Friday January 23, 2009

I just performed my routine surfing of the internet. I went on the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website and researched my name.

What I always find is two cases: 2006 foreclosure and 2007 eviction. The latter, if you will recall, I won by default.

Today, I only found the 2006 case. For some reason, Hunt & Leibert does not want Bank of America to see the Housing Court action. If they don’t want them to find the Assignment of Mortgage, it was filed by them in both actions. For the earlier, this was in January of 2007.

If they don’t want them to see the who, what, where, and when brief I filed, they may want to consider one critical issue.

The Bank-of-America/Countrywide representative visiting the courthouse will not ask to view any file captioned, Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman.

There is a very good reason for that.

So they will find that despite the law firm’s assurances that the matter was being resolved, they never filed anything on behalf of their paying client.

Bank of America is entitled to a refund of their fees, and rebate of the value of the mortgage of $278,000.

Saturday January 24, 2009

Bank of America is probably now considering the initiation of a foreclosure action. But they must understand that on March 19, 2007, my attorney filed a bankruptcy petition on my behalf. Although Sean Sweeney told the Superior Court it was denied, the fact is, it was granted. I am officially discharged from my debt to Countrywide Home Loans.

Part II---------Saturday January 24, 2009

Dear Bank of America;

Don’t tell me! Let me guess!

Yesterday your representative visited the Tolland County Superior Courthouse and could not find any file captioned, Countrywide Home Loans vs. Vivian Lehman. Then the person researched Bank of America vs. Vivian Lehman. While Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman was found, s/he didn’t review it. A waste of time.

The person then stood in front of the courthouse, probably pale and shaky because s/he was afraid that no manager would find this believable, and placed a cellular phone call to you. To this person’s surprise, it was believable. The manager probably then arranged a three-way conversation with an in-house attorney who, after careful consideration, suggested reviewing the Land Records of the Town of Coventry.

The employee then found the $1 Assignment of Mortgage and probably received permission from office personnel to use their FAX machine. You all looked at it last night, and then took as many pills as you could find in your medicine cabinet.

Let me continue to guess…

This morning you are having an emergency meeting with managers, in-house attorneys, and probably a few executives. My file is probably sitting on the conference table, open and empty except for a few pieces of paper; the bills from Hunt and Leibert which are stamped PAID. You are asking, Where is the les pendens document filed with the Town? Where is the Certificate of Foreclosure? Where are the original motion papers? Where is the judgment of foreclosure? You are probably considering firing the individual who was in direct contact with Hunt & Leibert. While these circumstances may seem unique, are these really? No money has ever been stolen from you before?

I believe you should fire this person.

Your attorneys are probably on their laptops, researching the judicial branch of the State of Connecticut. They found Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman and a resolution in their favor.

Now what?

An experienced attorney probably then raises the question of the time limitation for opening a judgment. They then research the State Laws and learn it is four months.

This has passed.

But there is an exception. Both parties must agree.

THAT’S IT!

Wait a minute, an executive says, We are not one of the parties.

Oh! They all sit back in disappointment.

There is only one thing which can stop Wells Fargo from going before Judge Sferrazza and explaining that they knew nothing about this.

I have a letter from them dated April of 2008 in which they confess to me that it was a malicious act. It came from an office positioned closely to the White House. In simpler terms, if I lie by omission to the court, it is perjury.

I won’t do that.

The first thing you need to do is threaten to sue and prosecute Wells Fargo and Hunt & Leibert. If you approach me nicely, I will give you a copy of the letter. Then a settlement can be reached. But understand this…

I am not giving you any money. My favor to you will be relieving you of your expenses for managing the house, and paying a law firm which obviously wants to go out of business.

Wednesday January 28, 2009

This week’s FBI Special Agent was at a different Home Depot and wore a black coat. I don’t believe another attack is coming. I think my so-called advocates are trying to crawl into the winner’s circle before the final victory. It amazes me how they see nothing wrong with that.

Otherwise, as to the national economy…

I have been watching the list of the companies which aren’t doing well. Crossmark’s primary stores are NOT included. And there are several reasons for that.

But first, an acknowledgement is long overdue.

Selection of the word Target was not my creative product. Rather, I borrowed it from Lord and Taylor. While statistics of the whole store were always monitored, every season the Area Sales Manager (my manager’s boss and Kathy McTigue’s immediate subordinate) would select a Target department. The logic to me was very obvious. Dina would devote extra attention to that and apply what she learned to the bigger picture. Loss Prevention (security) also used that term. One season the whole store was a Target in that our inventory discrepancies were too high (i.e., Monica’s theft).

For Crossmark I am given two types of Targets.

I either survey the store to learn what is on display and how it is being marketed. Sometimes, staff members believe I am there to recommend reprimands. It is the opposite. If they understand that, they explain everything which is going right or wrong. I relay the information to the project owner. This person works with the client.

Or I have to merchandise one department. In the Home Depot, for example, I care for the candy. At first I dreaded the assignment, then I invented a game. Now I enjoy it.

Recall the incident I had in 1992. I visited a Loehmann’s clothing store in Mount Kisco, New York. The bleach-blond manager was not on the floor. Neither was the staff, except for one moment. She emerged briefly, didn’t speak any English, and went to find the manager. That latter event took her 20-minutes. Despite all of that, these people still believed they were competent enough to make judgment calls on sales floor activity, and attempted to use such to damage my reputation. Obviously, upper management had no knowledge of the incompetence and negligence. Sending a Crossmark representative in there routinely would have resolved that. If we can’t find a manager, we can’t perform our tasks.

As far as I know, all departments I care for are doing well. I can’t give you statistics. Crossmark won’t allow it. They believe I will place such on my resume and leave.

It was Filomena Serra of Lord & Taylor who taught me to obsess myself with keeping everything out of the stockroom, and finding ways to reorganize the sales floor to accommodate everything, without looking over-stuffed. Kathy McTigue also taught me much. I applied one of her techniques to my Kmart Nabisco project. Over a year ago, I was explaining this to one of the managers as I applied it to an end-cap display. (These are found at either end of the aisles.) I offered to show him. He decided it was worth a few minutes of his time to walk over. When I returned two weeks later, he gave me a direct order to merchandise in this way. Obviously, it worked.

If I had statistics, I could also tell you how well Nabisco was doing as it relates to the whole store. My guess is very well. Because after January 1^stof this year, Kmart suddenly obsessed itself with cleaning-out the stockrooms. I am no longer climbing all over merchandise while resolving not to perform any archeological excavations to find cookies and crackers. Both of my stores have almost empty backrooms. Now they can use the area for sales space, such as a sewing department or a museum of Kmart history.

When I read Crossmark’s internal bulletins, I learn of other techniques. The most fascinating related to a coupon promotion. It encouraged the consumer to buy one product so they could save on another. But these were merchandised in different aisles. One of our representatives suggested converting an end-cap to display these two products. It worked because those of us on the field see things differently than those in the office.

On a related subject…

President Obama seems convinced he can include in the deal-making for my house my act of proving I am the only one capable of being president. This is, of course, because I was trained by a world leader, Eva Braun. He must understand this.

I will gladly rebuild the economy without his participation in my final negotiations with Hunt & Leibert. I am only asking for this in return.

His testimony, with non-compromised cross examinations, at the impeachment hearings of the Governor of Illinois. The issue is the possible act of selling the senate seat vacated by the current president. I personally believe that if Obama doesn’t know anything, he has no executive skills. But he does have such, and must know.

He can begin with the accounting of the Illinois home he and his wife purchased. I want copies of all documents submitted, with copies to the media.

And I want it now!

Thursday January 29, 2009

Dear FBI;

One is a silk chiffon, the other is a silk organza.

Saturday January 31, 2009

Good News! It has been over one week since I last had any asthma medication. The last time I went for 24-hours without needing such was when I was 17-years-old. I am 42 now.

A few weeks ago it became ferocious. I thought it was because I no longer needed the inhaler, but rather the pill. This didn’t always work for me. Suddenly, it was very effective. Then, I occasionally heard cracking noises in my neck and back---such as from chiropractic therapy. Then the big progression suddenly occurred.

Some weight has come off. At the time the asthma stopped, so too did the swelling in my feet. I found myself admiring these. I hadn’t seen them in so long. My house-slippers are too big. I have to wear sneakers when going up-and-down the stairs.

Otherwise…

As to impeachment proceedings of the Governor of Illinois, I heard a journalist characterizing one of the allegations against this individual as the selling of professional licenses.

These “professionals” are not licensed. Rather, they are certified or registered. The emergency room physician who characterized my high white blood cell count as a “psychiatric disorder” was certified, but unlicensed. The attorney who had an Addition Consulting Business, while she could not read her monthly checking account statement from the bank, was registered and unlicensed. The lawyer who is trying to collect on my last oil bill of the Coventry house, is unlicensed, but has a juris number. (Even if I wanted to give him money, I couldn’t.) I would complain to the State, but our Governor would give a juris number to a licensed dog. The people of Illinois should consider themselves lucky that he only issued such to human beings. Or maybe unlucky. I would like a dog-doctor, or a barking-attorney.

The Illinois gubernatorial impeachment hearings have concluded without President Baby-Bama’s testimony. So I would like to make another stipulation. For one week, if he only makes a public statement when he has something intelligent to say, I will rebuild the economy for him.

I am only asking for seven days.

Otherwise…

I have been watching Nancy Grace cover the Casey Anthony court proceedings. As I watch Nancy carefully review every detail as this enigmatic situation is slowly understood, she seems to believe that the identity of the unknown father is not an issue. I believe it is. We still do not know the motive for the murder.

I will take a guess based on everything I understand of the people of Wicca.

It is possible that he, or someone else, finally agreed to marry her. But he didn’t want the child. Disposing of a child for a potential husband is not unusual for these women. We have seen many such cases in the media.

Casey Anthony sits in court and is escorted around the jail in handcuffs as she wears a smile indifferent to the circumstances. She believes that this guy will take care of everything. These women always believe that. That is why he has to marry her.

I believe prosecutors should try to communicate via her attorney using Wicca concepts. This defense lawyer will probably laugh at the idea, not understanding which area of her brain is dominant. It is not the same as his. They should talk to her about her act of becoming pregnant on Halloween night as a result of an unplanned act of passion. They should ask if she had any communication with the father or another male a few days before the death of Caylee. Did she receive a promise of marriage, or a subliminal promise of such?

Sunday February 01, 2009

On Friday, I met with my tax preparer. She didn’t look good. I even told her so. I think she knows about the issues and is having a hard time finding her way.

I showed her the receipt for the September property taxes. She said it is my deduction and I do not have to claim it as a gift. She cited the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007. I researched it on Wikipedia:

“The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act was introduced in Congress on September 25, 2007, and became law on December 20, 2007. This act offered relief to homeowners who would formerly owe taxes on forgiven mortgage debt after facing foreclosure. The act extends such relief for three years, applying to debts discharged in calendar year 2007 through 2009. (With the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, this tax relief was extended another three years, covering debts discharged through calendar year 2012.)

Normally in US law when a lender decides to forgive all or a portion of a borrower's debt and accept less, the forgiven amount is considered as income for the borrower and is liable to be taxed.

However, after the signing of the Mortgage Forgiveness Act, amendments have been made to remove such tax liability and allow the borrower and lender to work freely together to find a common solution that is beneficial to both parties. This protection is limited to primary residences -- rental properties are ineligible for relief -- so consultation with a tax advisor is necessary to ensure that a borrower qualifies.[1] The amount of forgiven mortgage debt allowed to be excluded from income tax is limited to $2 million per year.” (emphasis supplied)

I think it was passed with my situation as issue. And I will ask her about an amendment to my 2007 tax return filed in 2008. If you will recall, in 2006 I stopped paying property taxes when this action began because I believed I had a small chance of winning. In November of 2007, the law firm paid everything. I might be entitled to that deduction too, with retroactive refund.

I understand what my tax adviser is saying. But I reminded her of one thing---I NEVER HAD A MORTGAGE WITH WELLS FARGO. They do not have my social security number in their system. She said we will see what they file. She asked me if I received the Schedule B---discharge of debt. I didn’t. Above, I underlined the entries relating to this issue. Without the “discharge” and “forgiveness”, I don’t know if this law applies.

But there is one thing the IRS must understand, if we are proven wrong, it was NOT a malicious act to defraud the United States Government. They must understand as much as we do that the records must identify with each other. According to the tax assessor of the Town of Coventry, I am a tax payer. This must be cited on my tax returns or there can be complications at a later date.

Monday February 02, 2009

Dear Donald Trump;

Now that you have emerged from your bankruptcy and are no longer defaulting on your loans, do you think you can pay for the $1,300 in damage you did to my book in 1994? At the time, it was resolved I would pay because I had more money than you with no default record.

But if you really believe you know something about finance, would you like to explain which leading economic indicator is your favorite? If you can’t, should I assume that your specialty is theft? Such as the way you attempted to steal $4,500 out of the hands of my terminally ill mother in 1991, or break-into my mother’s safe deposit box in 1992?

In 1992, you also attempted to influence Barbara Pickett, the “attorney” administering the estate, to have me make a list of all my household expenses, while understanding that it would be cheaper for me to stay in the house I inherited, and then have me enter the labor market to find myself unable to support such. Then I was supposed to go to you for money, after I gave you my research for free so you could negotiate yourself from bankruptcy status. This was after you insisted I should never pursue you for money.

Why did that make sense to you? Was it because these are different areas of the brain dominating different moments? Or is there some other reason?

In 1995, the agreement you reached with my publisher, Dorrance; employer, Linda Mallon of 7-Eleven; and banker, Sue Hallinan of Citibank, was that you would leave me alone without paying for the damage you did to my book. You didn’t leave me alone. That means you must pay. And if you don’t, I must conclude that you can’t afford it.

Why would I want someone with no money?

Saturday February 07, 2009

Yesterday I picked-up the mail from my PO Box in Coventry. It had been three weeks since my last visit.

There was no Schedule B--write-off of the debt.

Last year, they threw me out before April 15^th.

This year, for all the same reasons, they must put me back in by this same date.

What was in the mail was a jury summons. I am on such duty on March 25^th, at that same courthouse. This means they either want me to sign something, or deliver something.

(I like jury duty. I consider it reverse-tuition for law school. I appreciate anything I learn.)

One emotional issue must be resolved first.

Mara Addison, assistant managing editor of my former publisher, must understand that it isn’t my fault that Donald Trump did not refund her gambling losses.

I signed the contract with Dorrance Publishing in September of 1993. The people I originally worked with were Diane Hartmen, Karen Van Winkle and Brenda Abretski. Their craftsmanship was extraordinary. By the summer of 1994, these people mysteriously disappeared. I now understand that their colleagues, Pamela Chapla and a few others, were transported by bus to Donald Trump’s Taj Mahal for a few days of compulsive gambling. For a reason I will never understand, they thought their losses were refundable if I would sit still for the sabotage.

By November, we were still reviewing the typeset piece. We were going back-and-forth as I carefully proofread 300 pages. It seemed like the last round. But according to them, the typesetter had locked everything in her apartment and left town for the holidays. They did not know when she would be back. This was my fault because it says in the contract that staffing their company was my problem.

As Pamela, my production assistant, was trying to force me to take the blame for the delay, I suddenly found myself talking on the phone to a woman named Mara Addison. Until that moment, I never heard of her.

By Christmas Eve, I found the $1,300 in damage. To continue with production, this must be paid for. They were going to do me a favor and allow me to do such.

They rallied my employer, banker and neighbors to help me rescue my book and make such payment. There was an unwritten guarantee of sales. The pressure was incredible.

I now believe it wasn’t myself they were concerned with, but rather investments they made. It was apparently an advertising contract which would also guarantee sales. I believe the contract was with THE NEW YORK TIMES. This is owned and managed by Jewish families. Descendants of journalists who are unofficially charged with the cover-up of the Holocaust. They had a right to push the Constitution aside and tell me what to do. They have the monopoly on the intelligence, and the victimization after the dumb Gouyem murdered 6,000,000 of their superior brains in less then a decade--a very believable story.

Mara Addison, who liked to boast proudly about her superior Jewish business brain, did not know that according to the contract, the original production quantity was 1,000 books.

By 1996, they decided to change strategy against me. They had David Duchovny, the married man with AIDS and the $10,000,000 debt, send me the subliminal information that he wanted to marry me. Before his wedding to his girlfriend, who I originally knew nothing about, I wrote a script. It was what they really wanted. But for some reason, to complete their plans, I would have to surrender copyrights.

For my inability to understand that this would enable me to become pregnant, I was given the reputation of a child-hater. All they had to do was inspire my sex-drive, and their problems would be resolved. By this time, the year 2000, I was working for Lord and Taylor. Out of payroll, this department store gave the television production company, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX, $10,000,000 without a contract. This would be easily compensated for as some raises were not issued, others were cut, and the proceeds from the movie-induced-sales-boost would overwhelmingly compensate the company. All I had to do was pursue the opportunity. There was something wrong with me. It was my fault they lost money.

In 2003, Sue Hallinan, my banker (remember her? She agreed that Fluffy was to blame for the illiteracy of another neighbor’s child.), finally caught-up with my website. She and her husband sold their home and moved away.

I have thought long and hard about why my side of the story frightened her. Her entire understanding of their story was that I had to give money to secure sales and profits of my book. (Is anybody really that dumb as to believe that?) The only explanation I can think of is that money was stolen. There was once an issue with missing paperwork. I transferred $2,000 from this account into my checking account of another bank. I did this by having a bank check prepared. Audrey, the teller who seemed to know what was going on, gave me the original, but never my copy. The bank copy mysteriously disappeared.

Before Hunt & Leibert, Bank of America and I settle anything, there must be some rules. The first will be that the Jews must blame themselves for what they do to themselves.

Part II------Saturday February 07, 2009

On another subject…

Before I picked-up the mail yesterday, I drove by the house. Instead of the usual one car parked in front, there were two. By the curb there were a few bags of garbage.

After I picked-up the mail yesterday, I visited Town Hall. I needed a tax-payment history for my advisor. I believe that the clerk who helped me knew who I was and what this was about. I stepped-out of the office and walked up-and-down the hall looking for the Building Inspector. I found the Tax Assessor’s office. I entered and asked the person standing there where I might find this other person. He was he.

I gave a synopsis of the $1 transfer and the fact that I was kicked-out. I showed him the tax receipts with my name on them, my PO Box #, and the address of this Coventry house. I then explained that I heard a rumor that they turned-on the water in the house, without the heat. I explained that this mistake was inconceivable to me, especially by a company which is paid to know better. He knew what house I was talking about. In October a couple applied for a permit for a wood burning stove. He pulled the file and showed me.

Over-and-over I repeated that I could not understand the stupidity of inviting water damage. He said that a burst pipe is not adequate grounds for revocation of the Certificate of Occupancy. But he understood my concerns that I could not negotiate anything with them until I was certain that the house was in the same condition as I left it.

I explained that my experiences have been that water damage is more frightening than anything. Fire can be seen and smelled by someone other than the occupant. However, water can leak unnoticeably until there is several thousands of dollars in damage. It doesn’t take much before you fall threw the floors.

We concluded on a good rapport. I drove back and again passed the house. The garbage and second car were gone. To me, it is obvious that someone is using this property to dispose of their own trash, and is heating the living room during the wait.

I am now receiving the subliminal information that my concerns are a “pipe dream”. If they believe that, then they will have the Building Inspector write to me an official letter.

They obviously don’t believe it.

Part III---Saturday February 07, 2009

On a completely different subject…

Before the Anti-Defamation League meets with the Pope next week, I would like them to answer the following questions:

1. What religion was Adolph Hitler?

2. Is it true that Hitler’s real last name was Schicklegruber?

3. Is it true that Heil Hitler is a Yiddish expression which means Hail to the Leader?

4. Is it true that Gestapo is an abbreviated version of the term, Jewish Getto Police---the Jews whose responsibility was to bring other Jews into the Concentration Camps, but their behavior was excusable because they were just following orders?

5. Are the eye-witness accounts by the German people true---that the Jews who stood at the train stations waiting to go into the Concentration Camps were NOT under arrest?

6. Is it true that in Yiddish the word for Concentration is the same as that for Settlement?

7. Is it true that the Orthodox Jews consider their communities to be Settlements?

8. Is it true that the self-characterization by the Orthodox Jews as the only true Jews is a convenient excuse for extermination of other sects?

9. Is it true that the anti-assimilate Jews financially genocide the United States welfare system by billing such for their females’ inability to lactate for their babies---$1,000/year/baby?

10. If yes to question 8, is it also true that the cause of this inability is cannibalism, and that this also causes the peculiar tint to the Jewish skin-tone?

11. Is the Book of Ezra Chapter 4 accurate by describing the Jews as non-Israelis who “weakened the hands” of the latter people when they refused to share their identity because the former observed no holidays and paid no taxes?

12. Did the dumb Gouyem (a characterization ascribed to the Pope and his Bishops and Cardinals) incinerate 6,000,000 superior-brained/over-protective Jews in less than a decade?

February 10, 2009

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

I checked the court calendar. On March 25^th, only two cases are scheduled for jury selection. One is medical practice. It looks to me like it will be resolved before this date. The other captions Walmart as a party to the action.

As you may already have guessed, this department store is a client of Crossmark. Henceforth, I am an indirect employee. This conflict-of-interest prohibits my participation.

I will be on jury duty for one day.

Tell me the truth: Did you know this, or is this someone else’s sense of humor?

What happened today is probably just the beginning of your campaign. The more you harass me, the more you convey to me the information that you are in serious trouble with the IRS. Didn’t law school teach you anything about negotiations? You never reveal your disadvantaged position to your opponent.

Saturday February 14, 2009

Dear President Obama;

Is this your father?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_Awori

He is Arthur Moody Awori, born December 5, 1927. He was the 9^th Vice President of Kenya from September of 2003 until January of 2008. He holds an honorary doctorate degree from the University of New Hampshire, a state next to Massachusetts.

Obama was born in 1962. Mr. Awori was 45-years-old. So Obama’s mother was probably his third or fourth wife.

I do not believe that Obama was raised by his grandmother who died a few weeks before the election of November, 2008. I believe that he spent at least the first decade of his life in Kenya.

Why?

Because I recognized it.

President Obama forgot that I majored in anthropology. Yesterday, I received the subliminal information that if I reinitiate Targets while the first idiots are on excusable leaves from school for photo opportunities, he would arrange a marriage with me and a man who was going to “spoil” me. This is how a tribal chief talks.

The name Barack Obama is probably phony. Michelle Robison is probably not. The FBI needs to research her.

Sunday February 15, 2009

On Friday I picked-up the mail. There was nothing from the Town of Coventry’s Building Inspector. This suggests to me that he did find a problem. It is my understanding it is water damage. And it is my understanding that professional insurance of the caretakers does exist.

I am certain there is a $1,000 deductible-per-claim. This is standard for homeowners’ policies.

I am also certain the underwriters will need a copy of the court order. If they do not routinely require this, then all of the friends of these caretakers could collect on this policy. And this court order does not exist. If they are not careful, the caretakers could be charged with insurance fraud and criminal trespassing.

After I picked-up the mail, I drove-by the house. There was the second car awaiting trash service. The law firm obviously did not fire them for this negligence.

The neighbor in whose home I was routinely invited for the holidays, is also the sister of the purchaser they arranged. They made a down payment on the house in September of 2006. This sister with her two children, ages 6 and 10?, left their home down the street, and moved in there. They awaited the ejectment.

In January of 2007, my neighbor (not the sister) defaulted on their property tax payment. And they had fewer parties. In September, and January of the following year, they again defaulted. I was ejected. They attempted to close the deal. The title search revealed me as the title holder. Their down payment was refunded. They paid their back taxes.

I don’t know what home the sister left-behind. I think it was sold a few months after she left. My guess is that it was the property of her estranged husband who perhaps allowed her to live there rent free. She probably had an excellent arrangement, and threw it away for something silly.

This neighbor is also my landscaper. We otherwise have a good rapport. Their cat would often visit me. I would then call them and report, “I have Princess and I’m holding her ransom.” Then she invited me over for dinner and received her cat back.

I believe they learned their lesson of business dealings with such people. And if he she has, I would like to suggest that she watch-over the house. The mistake which the caretakers made is beyond her. I don’t know if her professional insurances would cover this. I do know that because she is a neighbor, no one can mistakenly charge her with criminal trespassing. Neighbors are often asked to watch-over homes. And I could give written permission for this activity.

So as Countrywide is preparing to offer me a compromised version of the $270,000 mortgage I once had, even they must agree with me that no deal can be reached until this matter is resolved.

And not until one other resolution…

The fact remains that Sargeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski knew of the existence of a tape recorded telephone conversation with a man I suspect as Ayman al-Zawarhi, second in command to Osama Bin Laden. They never told the FBI this.

And then there are a few other facts I did not mention before, because I was too enveloped in other issues.

In 2006, I had problems with trespassers going into my garage while I was home. I would call the police. They came, and had a few personal questions prepared. Their favorite cop killer needed this information. They obviously appreciate his act of murdering 60 of their colleagues on September 11, 2001.

(If that is the way the Blue Line feels about it, we can pardon every cop killer in America. And I would like to ask of prosecutors not to bring charges against the alleged hijackers for these murders. This is something which law enforcement has to work-out within themselves. They encouraged this activity before, during and after.)

And then, of course, came the incident on the night of March 15, 2008 in which Linda St. Pierre, with the help of another law enforcement agent, Judicial Marshall Tim Poloski, broke into my home and poisoned me. Coventry Police awaited my 9-1-1 call. Their loyalties went to her because she was their universal girlfriend.

This is an unacceptable conflict-of-interest. Any of these people who had sex with her must be suspended without pay until further investigation. Verifying who performed such is very simple. I am the granddaughter of a urological surgeon.

In my ancestor’s time, books were written on the affects witchcraft/Wicca has on the penis. Because their “magik potions” work on the circulatory system, these typically mutilate this organ. My grandfather had one book devoted to such photographs. My mother found it when she was a teenager and was shocked.

The only thing the Police Chief needs to do is to bring into the precinct a urologist. They can use the single-cell-prison as an examination room. Each male officer will have to drop his pants. If there is malformation, there was intercourse with a woman who practices Wicca and likes law enforcement agents. That woman is attorney Linda St. Pierre.

As I have stated many times on this website, anyone who wants to dispute anything I have published, may do so in writing. I will place it on this site and apologize. No malice was intended.

On March 25^th, I should be encountering these lawyers and a few colleagues of Marshal Poloski. If he wants to, he can be there. He is considered to be on the same courthouse staff. They all have the title of judicial marshal.

But if the law firm wants to refute me, they are going to have to include urological examinations of her colleagues, who probably have similar or identical damage.

Such altered males are typically violent, because of the hormonal imbalances which ensue. It is both emotional and physical.

The book my mother found was published before the McCarthy trials which were coupled by the publication of the book, The Crucible. The latter had the cultural consequence of ostracizing anyone who believes that witchcraft/Wicca is a threat. Television shows like Bewitched glorified it by portraying media-magic, without biochemical-“magik“. The international medical community stopped devoting so much research to it.

But anyone who has read the book of Ezra, Chapter 4, and has encountered such people, knows that the threat is very real and would like to add to Biblical text that their only improvement-mechanism is find new techniques to perform effective public relations. They are socially-non-adaptive-animals pretending to be adaptive-human beings---very dangerous.

Wednesday February 18, 2009

And one more thing happened in 2008 which now seems worth mentioning…

My primary employer is Crossmark, but in the last year I worked for six different companies. It is normal in this line of work. One was for a company named Channel Source. It sent me into three Rite Aid stores to assemble a display for Sally Hansen cosmetics. Each time, I toured the stockroom only to learn that the large box was thrown into the garbage a few days before my arrival.

My supervisor was confused, and advised me to credit myself with 60-minutes for each visit as well as mileage. Even though they offered me more work, the check never arrived. I never made it an issue, but never worked for them again.

In the fall season, a check for $44.19 suddenly arrived. I wondered why.

On December 15^th, a duplicate check was again issued. I didn’t understand why. I thought I misremembered what work I did for them. The check was of Wachovia Bank, and it has branches near me. I asked them if they could cash it for me even though I don’t have an account. For no fee, they said they could. But the check was bad.

I never received my W-2 from Channel Source.

In mid-January, I met with my tax advisor. I only had the W-2 from Crossmark. But I had enough information such that we could input everything into the computer. My refunds are $944 from the IRS and $142 from the State of Connecticut. She explained that all W-2s had to be postmarked by January 31^st.

On February 6^th and 13^th, I again checked my post office box. Channel Source’s W-2 still wasn’t there. My tax advisor explained that with my pay-stub, I could file after February 15^th.

On Monday the 16^th we again met. She said she cannot electronically file because of the missing Employer Identification Number. I e-mailed my supervisor as well as another office associate with whom I connected at the time of employment. They never responded. I also telephoned a man named Reggie who is the individual authorized to handle such issues. He said he would work on it today, but when I telephoned him this afternoon, he said he didn’t.

February 16, 2009

Channel Source, Inc.

Thank you for visiting our website. Currently we are undergoing a complete overhaul and appreciate your patience as we work to create a website that will allow us to serve you better.

Please contact us and let us know what we can do for you.

Operations Office:
2600 E. Southlake Blvd
Suite 120-367
Southlake, TX 76092

P: 972.401.4146
F: 469.327.0852

Corporate Office:
the Urban Towers
222 West Los Colinas Blvd.
Suite 1650
Irving, TX 75039

Thank You!

Thursday February 19, 2009

Dear Baby-Bama;

I should have my refund of $944 - $278 (preparation fees) today. But because civil liberties are an unknown concept in your Administration, I don’t.

I was going to use the money for a $300/60,000-mile servicing which my car needs. It is at 65,000. I don’t expect you to understand such because while my mother instilled in me an understanding of the care which automobiles require, your mother instilled in you an understanding of how to repair a mud-hut.

On March 1^st, I am going to begin a major research project on Kenyan government. My primary purpose will be to learn why your wife is so nervous, she cannot orgasm despite all the romance you claim to shower her with (i.e., one-date-per-week, no excuses). Such nervousness must have affected the gestation period of both of her children. She probably couldn’t transmit nutrition. The brain is the last area to develop. Theirs are defective, if these even exist. We should perform cat-scans.

Despite your instruction, I will perform this investigation while the first idiots are attending school. While I am demanding that no one should ridicule them because this isn’t their fault, I would also like to know if they are allowed to speak to anyone. Children of spies never are.

Part II-----February 19, 2009

Reggie of Channel Source just called and apologized to me. I have the Employer Identification Number, and they will replace the bad check. I explained that I don’t remember doing that additional work. He explained if they don’t give me the money, they will have to incur the expense of a payroll adjustment.

THANK YOU!!!!

Sunday February 22, 2009

The original EIN was missing one digit. I told Reggie it was phony and threatened to publish it on this website. There could be no legal ramifications because it is lawful to publish phony tax identification numbers. Then he telephoned me and explained where the missing digit was. Hopefully, everything is now fine.

Otherwise…

It is my understanding that the White House has released the information that I will be receiving the “foreclosed” house for free. I know because several people have approached me for the purpose of ass-licking. I would like to know why no one was that nice when I had nowhere to go. Knock it off!!!

On a related subject…

My former supervisors and executives of Lord and Taylor, Kathy McTigue, Chris Poleto, Dina Sturtevant and Deborah Walker Hauptman, have never answered any of my allegations. But I have received some subliminal information.

Everyday, at 5 pm, the managers and executives had a meeting. As I understand it, a few months after I was fired, Kathy McTigue’s daughter died. She knew who poisoned her. At the meeting, Kathy announced that her daughter Caitlin was dead, and, for the production of a corpse, demanded $30,000 from Monica. Although I wasn’t dead, she believed that she performed her duty and deserved something for her participation in biochemical experimentation. But suddenly, the revelation occurred that Monica had no money, which is why she had to steal clothes to conform to dress-code. Kathy had to be restrained as Monica expressed an attitude indifferent to human suffering, and justified her murderous act by insisting that Irish reproduction must be curtailed because if the Nazis don’t kill these children, their parents will. Kathy rebutted by saying that one of her children is still alive. And a survival rate of 50% is higher than zero. Monica couldn’t disagree.

But nonetheless, the anguished screams of a mother who buried her child in financial-vain is a scene which can never be forgotten. They are in a silent state of shock.

As for Dorrance Publishing…

After I fired my publisher, Pamela Chapla, my production assistant, made numerous phone calls to me asking for the money. One day, she called for routine issues as we were working on repairing the damage. In the middle of the conversation she suddenly remembered, with a giggle in her voice, that the other thing she had to tell me was that on a certain date, I will be receiving a telephone call from a certain person of the accounting department. A few days after this, and before that date, I received a letter demanding the money lest the issue will be turned-over to an attorney or collection agency. I immediately faxed a letter explaining that I have no obligation to pay for the damage which a billionaire did to my property, and forbade the accounting department from ever again telephoning me.

My supervisor of 7-Eleven, my then employer, left her pager in the office and went to a meeting. At the time, I thought she believed she was doing what was in the best interest of my book. The way she understood it, this was the only way I could have a publisher. And the rule in her store was that the victim pays for everything. I was the only one who understood they were no longer my publisher. But was I alone in this understanding?

I now understand that Donald Trump was at that meeting. He announced he was recruiting people for a project to ultimately become the owner and builder of the world’s tallest building. To this end, he would have to tear down two which were taller than his. Linda volunteered her son, Marc Mallon, a pilot for American Airlines, and his friend from high school, Officer Steven Patrick Driscoll of the Lake Carmel, New York Police Department. This law enforcement agent also volunteered his father, an engineer. Before this meeting, the plan was another car-bomb. After, it was different as they were each given Arab identities coupled by their Caucasian faces.

Linda knew she was not promoting the book, only herself.

Another person who may have been at that meeting, and involved herself in this, was Sue Hallinan, my neighbor and banker. After I left 7-Eleven because the harassment was unbearable, she learned of my new employer at the time I deposited my paycheck. She relayed the information. Until a few weeks ago, I believed that she was erroneously promoting the book.

What was her interest?

This is the same person who participated in the neighborhood effort to blame Fluffy for Whitney Whalen’s illiteracy. According to that story, the child was on a normal reading level until the age of six, when Fluffy bit her. Although her mother had no medical evidence and refused to sign the police complaint, this rendered the child unable to read-and-write.

Is Sue Hallinan really that dumb?

When I raised this question a few days ago, she subliminally answered that Mara Addison’s hormonal explosion was that overwhelming. But why jeopardize her banking career? And did she really believe that the publisher’s concern was for my best interest?

On a related subject…

Before Hunt & Leibert and I go into final negotiations, a few issues must be addressed. Of course, I will need a certificate from the Town Building Inspector, as well as from the Homeowners’ Insurance Company, but I will also need Leibert to be in his Jewish place.

I would like to ask of the governors of each state with large Jewish welfare “settlements” to stop such payments from going into such addresses. I would like to warn them that the dollar amount is grotesquely large. Please be sitting-down when you receive this figure. (It should adequately cover their deficits. And since many Republican governors do not want to accept the monies from President Baby-Bama’s economic stimulus package, this should counterbalance their loss.) The Orthodox, anti-assimilate Jews will vociferously protest. Then, state auditors should find an excuse to enter their premises. When they do, please search the backyards, there are probably mass-graves of “phony Jews” of other sects.

Wednesday February 25, 2009

I took another look at my jury summons. It is not for the Superior Court where all of my activity has been. Rather, it is for the criminal court across the street. I tried to research what cases are on this calendar for March 25^th, but such is not published.

I will bring you a list of all judicial marshals who did not have sex with Linda St. Pierre. I won’t bring a pad-and-pencil. It should be easy to memorize the few names.

I believe they are planning something. If they are going to launch a biochemical attack against me, it could place me in the hospital. This will jeopardize their deadline of April 15^th.

They must have noticed that such time limitation is not mine. It is theirs. All negative consequences are their problems. If this matter is not resolved by September 30^th, they will have another tax bill. And in the interim, they are paying a company to care for the house. When are they going to learn the lessons they teach themselves?

Saturday February 28, 2009

Holy Thursday is April 9^th. If this date sounds familiar, it is because this is the day of my ejectment from my Coventry home. This is no coincidence. And I would like to welcome everyone to the final stages of the trap. Although it didn’t go exactly as planned in that when I ran to Eric he did not receive me, everything should be adequate.

Of the three National Whistleblowers’ Days--Holy Thursday, September 11^th, and December 21^st-- the former has always been the most successful. The most logical explanation is the connection to the archetypes. This is very surprising to me. While Jungian theory ascertains that these are so young as a few thousand years old, in my book, I surmise these are a few million years old. Although I can’t compare myself to Jung, I can say that the evolutionary theory of the Aquatic Ape is very consistent with Biblical text found in Genesis. The “on-the-waters” mermaid emerged onto land four million years ago, followed by the first pluvial two million years later. It doesn’t make any sense to me that an archetype would only be 2,000 years old, because this is such a short span in cranial development, and because I believe that the archetypes are adaptations we still have and don’t use. These manifest themselves in art and other cultural conditions.

But anyway…

I believe the harassment against me which began when I was in graduate school, is directly connected to my mother’s Whistleblowing, which occurred just before I graduated college.

The concept of Holy Thursday as National Whistleblowers’ Day has been endorsed by the Vatican. This makes sense to me because I had the idea while attending services at an Episcopal Church. I appreciate that, but we can’t forget that retribution against the Whisteblower must be stopped. Every year I warn about this before the day, and every year people are maliciously fired from their jobs. And that is harassment I know about. I don’t want to think about what I don’t know about. I thought about telephone campaigns to help these people, but decided such would be ineffective.

This year, we are going to do it correctly.

Targets

What is the American Bar Association?

Who is the leader?

What is his/her address?

Are there any law libraries near you and accessible to the public, such as in a courthouse or school?

What is jurisprudence?

What are the state and federal laws protecting Whistleblowers?

Are these statutes?

Are these governed by the penal code?

When were these enacted into law?

Are there any precedents?

Explain everything to this leader of the ABA and ask for an acknowledgment coupled by his/her act of demanding compliance by the associates of the ABA.

Contact local leaders of the ABA and ask if such compliance demand was issued.

Convey all of this to your federal, state and local representatives, as well as all union leaders.

Bear in mind the fact that there is a clause in union/labor contracts disallowing court actions, including those to order whistleblower-protection. Remind all attorneys employed by these unions that their obligations are primarily to the American Bar Association and its principles, and secondarily to their employer and its lack of principles. The purpose of such protection is from both civil and criminal wrongs. The latter issue is not a union concern. Henceforth, they should comply with the conditions of their professional contract with the American Bar Association.

Before these unions boast of everything else they have to offer, remind them of the fact that as a non-union worker, I made more money-per-hour than when I was obligated to join a union and pay its membership fees of $5/week plus $50 initiation. The benefits of which they were so proud provided me with prescription medical coverage. As a union associate of the supermarkets, I made no more than $8/hour. Although I began at non-unionized Lord & Taylor for $7/hour, one year later I was at $9/hour with no benefits but more vacation time. In the year 2001, my only full year with this department store, I made more money than any other year in New York retail. The year 2007 broke all my records, and 2008 broke that. In the former Connecticut year, I had no medical coverage with Crossmark. In 2008, I did. After consideration of this deduction, my payroll increased 10%. Before such consideration, it was 20%. And January and February of this year out-performed these same two months of these last years. But that is because my hours-to-miles ratio improved as my health is improving.

And I don’t need any union protection from this employer. They sent their attorneys to try to protect me. Rite Aid seems to appreciate that. They just gave us a large contract.

Once we receive these acknowledgements from professional, political and labor leaders, we will proceed with National Whisteblowers’ Day. I would like to suggest of President Barack Obama to visit his grandmother and mother in Kenya on April 9^th. We won’t be in need of his collection services.

Part II

It is 4 pm Eastern Standard Time in Connecticut of the United States of America. I have been watching the movie Air Force One with its unrealistic ending.

In the Holy Land, nine hours later, the first of six Sundays of Lent has begun. Here is the first of my demands. If these are not met, we will go into L&G. And this time, Fupi will not be available to help. I know the Big-Baby understands me.

My mother’s whistle-blowing.

As I now understand, her former boss is the daughter of the current dictator of Cuba, Raul Castro. She was L&G-ed into FBI custody after my ejectment. Her socialist responsibility was to engineer the New York State Department of Labor’s Unemployment Insurance Division to direct taxpayer monies into this South American regime. Her husband was, and possibly still is, a computer programmer with IBM. At the time of my mother’s tenure, the Governor of New York was Mario Cuomo. By marriage of his son, he is an associate of the Kennedy family. I believe Senator Ted Kennedy, Robert Kennedy Junior, Joe Kennedy, Andrew Cuomo, and all the other family members, are connected to the Castro Administration. By the second Sunday of Lent, I want all of these IBM wires cut, and then I want them to deliver themselves into FBI custody with their full confessions.

Once this burden to the taxpayers has been released, the monies will be returned as per my original instructions. It should be a shocking figure well beyond $13/week.

If any associate of the Kennedy and/or Cuomo family would like to disagree with me, please formulate a written statement with your signature, and I will publish it on this website.

VIVIAN LEHMAN

PO BOX 629

COVENTRY, CT 06238

Monday March 02, 2009

In response to my allegations and assertions, yesterday I was reminded of the fact that on March 01, 1961, President John F. Kennedy performed the magnanimous and humanitarian act of establishing the

Peace Corps.

When I was in college, Antonio/Robert/Osama Mendez/Crowe/Ben-Laden was an associate of the

Peace Club.

Among its priorities was its pro-Sandinista agenda.

The Kennedy/Cuomo confession must begin today, and the IBM wires will be cut by midnight.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was very disappointed to learn that she won’t be able to make any demands on me. Her Saxon/Pagan smile deteriorated into wrinkles. There are four more Sundays before Palm Sunday. Perhaps her resignation should be one of the demands. Our list is not carved in stone.

Saturday March 07, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

I don’t know what Auschwitz means. I suspect it is Yiddish for out-of-tax. And I believe this camp is a few centuries old. Allied troops marched through it one day and assumed that because it was found in German occupied territory, it was an invention of such government. The Jews all know this is not true.

When I worked in the supermarket, I witnessed the Orthodox Jewish Community collect over $1,000/month/family of food stamps. And this was only the beginning. They also received all other forms of welfare including money for heating bills and Medicaid. The girls married at age 18, and reproduced through age 40. And as they handled the free money to buy their groceries, they laughed in our faces.

And they claim to be anti-assimilation.

It makes sense to me that a welfare-genocide machine could easily be connected to a mass murder of all competitors of these taxpayer monies.

If I am correct, then a march through the backyards of United States Orthodox Jewish communities should find Auschwitz-style activity. And such march does not have to be with foot soldiers. Modern satellites should suffice. They can start with the one which Linda St. Pierre must have visited. She probably watched them burn-out the uteruses of teenage girls whose purpose was to service such Jewish men who cannot reproduce outside of their sect. She probably enjoyed listening to them scream while they were strapped down with their legs spread. When that party was over, she decided to entertain herself and burn-out her own uterus by using the same chemicals on both of us. Then she wondered why she didn’t enjoy its destruction of her, as I performed a quick and easy neutralization.

I realize that federal investigators would not want to publicize their findings. So my question is would they use such information as a vehicle with which to pressure the Jewish communities to surrender their systematic fraud and embezzlement of the taxpayers.

If I am wrong about anything, then such people should invite the FBI into their yards and financial accounts to assure the Dumb Goyem there is nothing to resolve and return. The Jewish partners of Hunt & Leibert could also invite such law enforcement agents into their synagogues.

Sunday March 08, 2009

Dear President Baby-Bama;

Today’s “welcoming” events of Maryville, Illinois should tell you something.

Saturday March 14, 2009

Before I proceed, I would like to make a request of the civil rights advocates. It relates to a civil action they recently filed against Wells Fargo Bank claiming discriminatory practices against African-Americans applying for mortgages. The plaintiffs seem to believe I will help them.

Condoleezza Rice made great efforts to prove that she could not perform her duties as Secretary of State because of the color of her skin. She insisted I must do it for her because I am Caucasian. The White House insisted she was appointed to her position because she has a PhD on the subjects of national defense and terrorism, but her dark skin inhibited her from making such application. Inasmuch as I believe she is illiterate with no educational credentials, I also believe that I should follow the directive of one of the most influential people in the world---Oprah Winfrey. She never disputed this claim.

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

As you already know, I believe Donald Trump is primarily responsible for the removal of the World Trade Towers on September 11, 2001. I believe he planned it years in advance. And I believe that when he recruited American Airlines pilot Mark Mallon into his terrorist team, he changed his plans from execution of another van-bomb, into a dual-plane-bomb. I believe that part of such execution was the invention of new parachute-technology, and that all hijackers are alive and well, except those who descended onto the terrain of Pennsylvania. I believe that Osama/Robert/Antonio Ben-Laden/Crowe/Mendez was recruited after the plot was initialized, but do not know if it was before or after Mark’s recruitment. I believe that Ben-Laden’s primary purpose was to capitalize on the racism of the United States, and accept all blame. Even though he is Mexican, he would assume the status as an Arab. Caucasian-American oil executives have characterized themselves as such people, defaming and libeling them as genetically disposed to violence. It isn’t true.

If you don’t believe me, consider this fact. Donald Trump was the owner of Trump Airlines. Its purpose was to fly business class between the cities of Long Island, New York; Boston, Massachusetts; and Washington, D.C. Do those cities sound familiar when considering the events of September 11?

If I were Antonio Mendez, I would make a deal with federal officials agreeing to tell them everything, in exchange for sparing the death penalty.

Monday March 16, 2009

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

GO AHEAD, TELL THE COURT YOU DID NOT PROVIDE YOUR TENANT WITH ANY HEAT. AND DON’T TRY TO TELL THEM I WASN’T A TENANT AFTER YOU TOLD THE HOUSING COURT I WAS. IT ISN’T MY FAULT YOU DIDN’T SHOW FOR YOUR COURT DATES.

Small Claims Court of the

State of Connecticut

County of Middletown

---------------------------------

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DOCKET NUMBER

SCC-219909

MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION

OF PARTY

----------------------------------

1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned action, do hereby submit this MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY. Such action relates to the property known as 891 South Street, in the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland, State of Connecticut.

2. The action is for $1967.42, payment for heating fuel for the winter of 2008.

3. As Defendant’s Exhibit A, I am herewith attaching Internal Revenue Service form 1099-A for the tax year 2007. This document is for “Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property”. Its issuer is Countrywide Home Loans and specifies the date of “acquisition” as September 18, 2007. This pre-dates the winter of 2008.

4. As Defendant’s Exhibit B, I am herewith attaching the Certificate of Foreclosure. Its issuer is Wells Fargo Bank. It is executed on stationary of the law firm of Hunt, Leibert and Jacobson, and is on file with the Land Records Division of the Town of Coventry in Volume 1059, Pages 300-301. It is dated October 11, 2007 and pre-dates the winter of 2008.

5. Countrywide Home Loans truthfully informed the Internal Revenue Service of its condition of “acquisition” of the residence at issue.

6. Wells Fargo truthfully informed the Town of Coventry of its condition of “foreclosure” of the residence at issue.

7. I vacated the residence on April 09, 2008.

8. Connecticut Statute;

“Sec. 47a-7. Landlord's responsibilities. (a) A landlord shall: (1) Comply with the requirements of chapter 368o and all applicable building and housing codes materially affecting health and safety of both the state or any political subdivision thereof; …

(6) supply running water and reasonable amounts of hot water at all times and reasonable heat…” (emphasis supplied)

9. The Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants in Connecticut, published by Connecticut’s Superior Court, synopsizes these statutes by stating;

“Landlords are required to keep all heating, plumbing, electrical systems and appliances in good working order. Unless the rental agreement states that the tenant is responsible, the landlord must supply…” (emphasis supplied)

10. There was no rental agreement.

11. In November of 2007, as per these directives, ProTech Oil changed the name on the account from Vivian Lehman to Countrywide Home Loans and Wells Fargo Bank. Hunt, Leibert and Jacobson have the cancelled check for said amount of $1967.42. It is dated April 2008.

12. The plaintiff’s commencement of this action 11 months after this transaction, exemplifies this is a misunderstanding.

13. Connecticut Practice Book 2009, Sec. 9-18 directs of procedures in civil actions, “If a person not a party has an interest or title which the judgment will affect, the judicial authority, on its motion, shall direct that person to be made a party.” (emphasis supplied)

14. As per the Internal Revenue Service document, Countrywide Home Loans has the “interest”. As per the Land Records document, Wells Fargo Bank has the “title”.

WHEREFORE, current defendant Vivian Lehman respectfully requests of this Court to remove her as defendant and substitute WELLS FARGO BANK and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS as co-defendants. Current Defendant also requests the award to her of costs, disbursements, and all other relief as the Court deems proper.

___________________________________ March 16, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

PO Box 629, Coventry, CT 06238

TO: AND

REVELEY, WILLIAM G.

License # ?????????

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC

Juris # 423840

P.O. BOX 657

VERNON, CT 06066

Mr. Sean Sweeney

License # 903288154

HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.

Juris # 101589

50 Weston Street

Hartford, CT 06120

----------------------------------------------------

JUDGEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF VIVIAN LEHMAN AS DEFENDANT AND SUBSTITUTED BY WELLS FARGO BANK AND COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS AS CO-DEFENDANTS IS

GRANTED DENIED.

_______________________________ ____________, 2009

Justice

I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY in two postage paid envelopes and transmitted such to both above-specified law firms via the United States Postal Service on the date of March 16, 2009.

_____________________________________March 16, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Wednesday March 18, 2009

I would like to ask of everyone to telephone the White House and demand to know why our employers were informed of a $15/week tax-hike, but we weren’t!

I just visited the President’s White House website and sent the following message:

“I just learned from my employer that the IRS gave directive to deduct an additional $15/week from my paycheck. The money is earmarked for the First Lady's designer dresses. In my family, we make our own clothes.

I believe that the President is doing a wonderful job and that the reason why this was never made public is because no one has enough common sense to listen to anything he says. I also believe he is doing everything possible to be a good role model husband and father. I want his children to understand that good clothes make a good impression.

BUT I DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR IT.

I will place the First Lady's very impressive resume on Career Builder. I am certain she has the competence to find a job to cover her expenses.”

Saturday March 21, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

4^th Sunday of Lent

Count the Cost

I don’t have all the figures. I do know that the law firm of Hunt & Leibert accepted a down payment on my house one year (more or less) before I was ejected. The buyer was the sister of my neighbor. The sister left her home, which I guess was owned by her estranged husband, and moved in next door to me. She and her two daughters occupied one large room. And then the family defaulted on their property taxes.

I will guess my neighbors tried to buy the house, worth $300,000, for $250,000.

I will guess the deposit was either 10% or 20%.

I know they received the refund of the down payment a few months after the ejectment. The tax lien was removed as they must have finally paid all of that. But I doubt if the refund was of the full amount. I just found on the Small Claims Court website that my neighbor (not the sister) could not pay her doctor’s bill. A default judgment was entered against her.

But they couldn’t sue for the remainder of the down payment because the transaction was illegal. It is a fact they must have known because their mother, who also lives there, is a real estate agent.

Recently, I believe that Countrywide Home Loans finally had the presence of mind to send their own representative to the Tolland County Superior Courthouse to see if Hunt & Leibert ever represented them against me. They didn’t. This means this law firm will have to refund fees, property tax payments, landscaping expenses, etc.

Hunt & Leibert have some plans for me this week, in conjunction with their Small Claims action against me. The objective is to weaken me into signing a new mortgage with Countrywide. They forgot one thing.

The underwriters of the mortgage will have to perform the same title search which was performed after the ejectment, and will reach the same conclusion--can’t do it!

They can do anything to me. But nothing will change the fact that they are their own worst enemies. They don’t have the legal insight to recognize that the only resolution they have left is to rescind everything---the $1 mortgage transfer and the judgment of foreclosure.

They will soon be writing out a check to Countrywide Home Loans. How much will it be? Will it put them out of business?

Sunday March 22, 2009

Tomorrow, I will be serving-and-filing the following two motions. I don’t know how Wells Fargo Bank could let me do this to them.

I am not an attorney, and can’t give advise. However, I can make suggestions.

If you are a defendant in the State of Connecticut, and your opposing counsel is the same as mine, William Reveley, try to postpone the proceedings as long as possible. The facts are he is not listed on the website of the American Bar Association, his office does not have a copy of his license, and he doesn’t know what an affidavit is. If I am correct in that all of this proves he is not an attorney nor even a paralegal, then, hopefully, your case will be subjected to an automatic dismissal. If you are a defendant in a foreclosure action, you have seen from my experiences that the bank won’t notice anything until it is too late.

I would like to ask of everyone to try to acquire a free house from the judicial system. Don’t feel guilty, after all of that bailout money the United States Government gave them, it is the least the financial and judicial systems can do for you.

Small Claims Court of the

State of Connecticut

County of Middletown

---------------------------------

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DOCKET NUMBER

SCC-219909

MOTION TO CITE IN NEW PARTY DEFENDANT

----------------------------------

1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned action, do hereby submit this Motion To Cite In New Party Defendant.

2. On March 16, 2009, I served-and-filed a Motion to Substitute the Defendant. Among the issues of my Wherefore clause, I respectfully requested that Wells Fargo Bank be identified as a Defendant.

3. On March 18, 2009, my opposing counsel responsively motioned that Wells Fargo Bank be identified as a Defendant; “Vivian Lehman claims Wells Fargo Bank is responsible for this debt.” (paragraph 1)

4. We agree.

5. My opposing counsel could have revised his Complaint as per 2009 Connecticut Practice Book:

“Sec. 10-59. Amendments;

Amendment as of Right by Plaintiff

The plaintiff may amend any defect, mistake or informality in the writ, complaint or petition and insert new counts in the complaint, which might have been originally inserted therein, without costs, during the first thirty days after the return day. (See General Statutes § 52-128 and annotations.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 175.)”

“Sec. 10-60. —Amendment by Consent,

Order of Judicial Authority, or Failure to Object

(a) … a party may amend his or her pleadings or other parts of the record or proceedings … (2) By written consent of the adverse party… (See General Statutes § 52-130 and annotations.) (P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 176.)”

6. Mr. Reveley served his motion on Wells Fargo and used the address represented in the Certificate of Foreclosure, Exhibit B of my Substitution Motion;

Wells Fargo Bank

National Association as Trustee

for SARM 2005-15

c/o Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

7105 Corporate Drive, Plano, TX 75024-6000.

7. In previous proceedings against me, no Wells Fargo document served-and-filed verifies or affirms this address as that of Wells Fargo with such connection to Countrywide Home Loans. Exhibit C hereto attached affirms another address for Wells Fargo.

8. According to Exhibit C, yet unknown to the Internal Revenue Service, Wells Fargo is the “record owner”. Henceforth, for this Small Claims Court Action, it should be cited-in as a defendant.

9. My service of the Motion presented herein is to the corporate address of the letterhead of Exhibit C (see Certificate of Service below).

10. The issue of Wells Fargo as party-defendant is not contested. The separate issue of such service-address is contested, yet currently not considered actionable nor subject to any revision-motion.

WHEREFORE defendant requests, without further oral-hearings nor written-motions, that the Court caption Wells Fargo Bank as defendant.

______________________________________March 23, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

PO Box 629; Coventry, CT 06238

DECISION

THE MOTION TO CAPTION WELLS FARGO BANK AS DEFENDANT IS HEREBY GRANTED DENIED.

Justice____________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this MOTION in two postage paid envelopes and transmitted such via United States Postal Service to my opposing counsel, Mr. William G. Reveley, PO Box 657, Vernon, CT 06066, as well as to potential defendant;

WELLS FARGO BANK Corporate Trust Services

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

_____________________________________March 23, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Small Claims Court of the

State of Connecticut

County of Middletown

---------------------------------

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DOCKET NUMBER

SCC-219909

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

----------------------------------

1. I, Vivian Lehman, the defendant in the above-captioned action, do hereby submit this Motion for Dismissal.

2. According to the Complaint, the plaintiff, ProTech Oil, is NOT suing me.

3. The only evidence presented by my opposing counsel is an affidavit signed by Louise Zematis.

4. By the omission of the affidavit, she is NOT an associate of the plaintiff. (see paragraph 1)

5. By the omission of the affidavit, NO services were rendered. (see paragraph 3)

6. According to the affidavit, an “attached invoice” exists, yet it doesn’t. (see paragraph 3)

7. I could include in this Dismissal Motion an explanation to the Court of the definition of affidavit as per Connecticut Civil Practice Procedures and as per Black’s Law Dictionary, but I am certain that an accredited law school already provided the necessary lectures.

8. According to the affidavit, paragraph 2, “written demand” was made. If Louise Zematis witnessed this, then she is an associate of the law firm of my opposing counsel, William G. Reveley.

9. I first received his correspondence on December 21, 2008. Then, in compliance with my personal routine, researched his name on www.abanet.org. I didn’t find him. So I telephoned his office and spoke to Mattie Turk. I asked for a copy of his license. I had to explain that all she has to do is remove it from the wall and place it upon the copy machine and mail the reproduction to me.

10. She didn’t.

11. Even if I wanted to give my opposing counsel money, I couldn’t.

WHEREFORE defendant respectfully requests dismissal and that the Court submit all original file documents to the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Connecticut. Defendant also requests costs, disbursements, and all other relief as the Court deems proper.

______________________________________March 23, 2009

Vivian Lehman

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

THE MOTION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION IS

GRANTED DENIED

Justice_____________________________________________

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Motion in a postage paid envelop and transmitted such via United States Postal Service to my opposing counsel, Mr. William G. Reveley.

____________________________________March 23, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Monday March 23, 2009

Today I filed both motions with one more.

It was on March 14th that I found the Small Claims Court action on the website of the Connecticut Judicial Branch. I research this weekly because Mr. Reveley threatened me with such. I immediately filed the first motion.

It was on March 21^st that I received official notification from the Court. It included a form-Answer. I checked the box, Disagree, and explained, “No cause of action exists.“

I also checked, Counterclaim, and demanded $500 for harassment.

IF THERE IS ANY TROUBLE, I WILL AMEND THE COUNTERCLAIM TO THE MAXIMUM SMALL CLAIMS COURT AMOUNT OF $5,000. IF BABY-BAMA STATES ONE MORE TIME THAT HE CANNOT APPLY HIS HARVARD EDUCATIONAL SKILLS TO HIS JOB BECAUSE HIS SKIN IS THE WRONG COLOR, I WILL REMAND THIS ACTION INTO A HIGHER COURT, AND ASK FOR MORE MONEY.

I hope the Court understands what this action is really about.

Isn’t this a great trap?!

I know my former attorney, Mr. Frank Kibler, is watching this. With all of my respect for him, I know he is remembering one of our disagreements. During one of our conversations in 2007, he demanded of me to stop looking for phony attorneys under every couch and behind every curtain.

If he doubts my evaluation of Mr. Reveley, I would like to ask of him to telephone his “colleague” and ask, “Are you an attorney?”

And if that doesn’t convince him of the quantity of these counterfeit people, maybe this will.

On March 21^st, I received the Complaint-form as well as a copy of an affidavit. Unfortunately, I do not currently have the technology to scan either into my computer and reproduce it on this website. However, the latter is only one page, so I can reproduce it verbatim.

I Louise Zematis, being duly sworn, depose and say the following:

1. I am for the plaintiff and I am over the age of eighteen and believe in the obligation of the oath.

2. There is a balance due to plaintiff from defendant, VIVIAN LEHMAN, on Account No. 64753L the sum of $1,804.75, which balance remains unpaid despite written demand.

3. Balance due is for heating oil delivered and/or heating services and repairs and/or installation of heating equipment rendered by plaintiff to defendant(s) at defendant(s) request in accordance with attached invoice.

4. Plaintiff requests prejudgment interest be awarded in the amount of $162.67 calculated from March 3, 2008 to the date hereof at the rate of 10% per annum pursuant to Conn. Gen Stat. 37-3a as payment has been wrongfully withheld by defendant.

5. There is a total due to plaintiff of $1,967.42, including prejudgment interest of $162.67, which sum remains unpaid despite demand.

Need I do anything more to prove that Mr. Reveley could not possibly be an attorney?　

This morning, as I waited in the Courthouse lobby for the offices to open, I discussed the matter with an attorney. I only showed him the Answer form, and only mentioned the non-existence of a cause of action. He agreed that an account manager would normally sign the affidavit-of-debt, and identify his/herself as such.

I began today’s conversation with a different issue. I struggled with grammar over the weekend. Is the phrase, “By the omission of the affidavit”, correct? My philosophy was connected to the fact that the phrase, “By the admission of the affidavit” is correct. He didn’t know the answer to my question. He did, however, suggest a different choice of words; “By virtue of the information not presented in the affidavit, the defects are…”

Whatever may be grammatically correct or not, my predictions are that several things can happen now:

1. My opposing counsel will withdraw. This will leave my counterclaim free-standing. He probably won’t show for the hearing and I will win by default.

2. My opposing counsel will contact me and request a mutual withdrawal. I will not agree to this because I intend to use this lawsuit to force Wells Fargo to tell the truth.

3. We do trial.

Thursday March 26, 2009

Although I haven’t receiving official notification, it is my understanding that the State Attorney General will be investigating the credentials of my opposing counsel, as well as the issue of why a non-associate of the oil company would file a supporting affidavit for the plaintiff.

I would like to ask of one favor of the attorney general.

If the results of the investigation are what I expect, would he please wait to release these results until after Wells Fargo states for the record that it has no interest or title in my house.

The expected answer date, “return date”, for the legal action is May 5^th. So I expect we will receive such statement by early June.

Saturday March 28, 2009

It has been suggested of me that I change the relief sought in my counterclaim from $500 to $5,000 for the purpose of law school tuition. Inasmuch as I appreciate the thoughtfulness, this is the problem with that legal argument.

The plaintiff, ProTech Oil, ceased to exist in the summer of 2007. It was bought by Scasco Energy. I still don’t know who Louise Zematis is, but I guess she is the retired owner. I researched her on the internet. She is 58 years old.

I will additionally guess that my opposing counsel is not producing invoices to the Court because the letterhead would read Scasco Energy. This would require some explaining which he does not want to do, nor does he know how.

When I filed the counterclaim, I knew that I could never see this money. But I decided it was a free question of the Court. The Judge can either say NO, or, if the Judge says YES, there is nothing to collect against.

Even if I wanted to give my opposing counsel money, I couldn’t.

If the Court identifies Wells Fargo Bank and Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendants, then I could cross-claim these. If I remand this into a higher Court, I could ask for more than $5,000 each. Would the Court understand if I asked for enough for law school tuition, without stating such purpose?

I prepared a draft for a remand. I have until April 19^th to file. I understand that one copy has to go into each Court, with copies of all other motions accompanying the paperwork into the new Court. I believe my argument for regular trial is strong enough if the Judge understands that I can only put in writing a small fraction of the problem.

Saturday March 28, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

4^th Sunday of Lent

Count the Cost

5^th Sunday of Lent

$8,000 in Vandalisms

If I inflicted such damage to anyone, everyone would be ganging-up on me to offer me labor as a $5/hour cashier to perform the necessary reimbursements.

But in 2002-04, when Prince William of Wales repeatedly smashed the exterior mirror of my car, cut-out a piece of the transmission, poured his weapons of Wicca down the drains of my household toilet and bathtub, among other things, the financial remedy was to instruct my co-workers of Staples to convince me I must improve my penny-pinching techniques. A few pennies everyday would eventually add-up to 800,000-cents.

I understand why that made sense to President George Bush. It is the definition of Pooh. It is why his mother owes the world an apology for not aborting him.

But I do not understand why this made sense to those who believed the dumb manager of Loehmann’s department store in Mount Kisco, New York who accused me of shoplifting from her store in 1992. They ganged-up on me to reimburse her the $15. But in 2005, I still had the receipt because I knew this would one day re-surface, and because it was part of a magenta-colored-outfitting I assembled for a ski trip. It has sentimental value.

I would like her to answer three curiosity questions of mine:

It is a fact that Loehmann’s was fully equipped with video cameras. If she believed I was a shoplifter, why didn’t she acquire my license plate number and submit that with the video-tape to the local police department, which was a half-a-block away?

Why did it take a floor representative ten minutes to surface onto the floor to greet me while I was the only customer?

Why did it take this representative twenty minutes to find her so she could attempt to reach into my pocketbook and steal the alleged ill-begotten item?

If I received the message which I think I just did, I would like to ask the messengers to relay the information to every member of the House and Senate for the commencement of impeachment hearings.

The cause of action will be the fact that a foreigner such as himself doesn’t know any better. This is the way his father manages his overseas government. They are all a bunch of animals with no hormonal control.

I believe his wife and children would appreciate it. They are very unhappy there.

If I file this, there will be a $75 filing fee.

I haven’t made any decision yet.

RED=NOT SERVED-AND-FILED

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Case #

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

Connecticut

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

MOTION

FOR

REMAND

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned case and submit this Motion for Remand.

2. The Motion for Remand is pursuant to

2009 Connecticut Practice Book

Sec. 24-21. Transfer to Regular Docket

(a) A case duly entered on the small claims docket of a small claims area…shall be transferred to the regular docket of the superior court…if the following conditions are met:

(1) The defendant… shall file a motion to transfer the case to the regular docket. This motion must be filed on or before the answer date with certification of service pursuant to Sections 10-12 et seq. ..

(2) The motion to transfer must be accompanied by

(A) a counterclaim in an amount greater than

the jurisdiction of the small claims court; or

(B) an affidavit stating that a good defense exists to the claim and setting forth with specificity the nature of the defense, or stating that the case has been properly claimed for trial by jury.

3. In conjunction with this Motion, I am filing an Answer-Affidavit stating my defense, as well as a separate motion amending my Counterclaim object of action from $500 to $15,000.

4. The nature of the plaintiff’s action is breach of contract for services rendered to a property known as 891 South Street in the County of Tolland, Town of Coventry, State of Connecticut.

5. The object of the plaintiff’s action is $1,967.42.

6. The contractual debt was satisfied by payment made to the plaintiff in April, 2008 for the amount specified. It was made by the law firm of Hunt & Leibert as it represented Wells Fargo Bank and Countrywide Home Loans. As of November of 2007, it was their ProTech account pursuant to the fact that the law firm claimed their ownership of said property. Henceforth, they had landlord status. (see Substitution Motion)

7. The law firm of Hunt & Leibert is very experienced and knowledgeable of the laws of Housing. They were not delinquent in their responsibilities to provide heat and hot water to a tenant. (see Substitution Motion)

8. The cause of the plaintiff’s action remains unspecified. According to the plaintiff’s supporting Affidavit, invoices were proffered to the Court, yet these weren’t.

9. The plaintiff’s case has a hidden cause of action which has no resemblance to the recorded nature of action.

10. In Small Claims Court, I have filed previous Motions requesting Substitution from myself as defendant to Wells Fargo Bank which, according to the Land Records of the Town of Coventry, has title to the property at issue. I also asked that the Court recognize as co-defendant the company which, according to its Internal Revenue Service document, has interest in the property; Countrywide Home Loans.

11. My opposing counsel agreed that Wells Fargo should be a defendant. (see his Motion to Add Defendant)

12. My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof. According to the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website, these are such recent cases of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut:

CV-08-5018020-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LN V. --------

CV-08-5003485-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-06-6000365-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-08-5008544-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-08-5022536-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-08-5009491-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN V. -------

CV-01-0095475-S COUNTRYWIDE HOME V. ----------

CV-05-4008567-S WELLS FARGO BANK MN V. -----

CV-08-5020008-S WELLS FARGO BANK NA V. ------

CV-06-4003674-S WELLS FARGO BANK NA V. -----

CV-06-5003707-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-08-5016887-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -------

CV-08-5004189-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-08-5018771-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-07-5013495-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. ------

CV-06-4018119-S WELLS FARGO BANK V. -----

CV-09-5026915-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N V. -----

CV-08-5024684-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-07-6001261-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-07-6000248-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-07-6002477-S WELLS FARGO BANK, N. V. -----

CV-08-5003454-S WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. -----

CV-08-5021460-S WELLS FARGO BANK, NA V. -----

13. According to the Small Claims Court definition of itself as presented in its Connecticut Judicial Branch website, its purposes are:

“unpaid debts;

breach of a written or verbal contract;

back rent;

return of security deposit;

broken or damaged property;

doctor/hospital bills for treatment of personal injuries; and,

issues valued at less than $5000. “

14. The plaintiff’s cause of action is not any of the above.

15. According to the Small Claims Court definition of itself, its purposes are not:

“libel or slander;

damage to your reputation;

name calling; or,

issues valued at more than $5000. “

16. The plaintiff’s off-the-record nature of action is “damage to my reputation” which renders it an issue “valued at more than $5,000”.

17. But it is not just about the object of the action that I am requesting the remand, but also about the peripheral facts of the case. According to the Decision of Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept, 3:05cv1396:

“Where the existence of subject matter jurisdiction turns on a factual issue, however, the court is permitted to look beyond the complaint itself and may consider evidence outside the pleadings. See Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1997).”

emphasis supplied

18. The herein discussed Small Claims Court case belongs in the Superior Court to appropriately conjoin its subject matter with issues of the jurisdiction of the Wells Fargo foreclosure action against me of the Tolland County Superior Court.

19. This case does not belong in the Federal District Court, the only other alternative.

“TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 89 > § 1441

§ 1441. Actions removable generally

(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.”

20. The Bankruptcy Court record of the Federal District Court in Hartford, Connecticut identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt. Countrywide then abandoned the debt. It has been three years since my last payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo Bank.

21. The first applicable “factual issue” is that my opposing counsel originally corresponded with me about the “breach of contract” over nine months after the alleged due date of the bill. He waited from March 03, 2008 to the end of the tax year of 2008. (See Exhibit A hereto attached)

22. The second “factual issue” is that the Small Claims Court action was served on March 20, 2009, 26-days before April 15, 2009, the deadline for tax filing with the Internal Revenue Service for the activity of the year 2008.

23. The third “factual issue” is that the Motion for Ejectment was filed on March 11, 2008 (see Case Detail of CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville), almost exactly one year before the Small Claims Court servicing of March 20, 2009. Even though this date of 2008 was five months after the foreclosure, the representing law firm of Hunt & Leibert thought ejecting me would resolve their inconsistencies with the records of the Internal Revenue Service.

24. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the lack of identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States Government. (see Substitution Motion)

25. Wells Fargo and Countrywide are venting their aggressions against me while acting in the guise of the identity of plaintiff ProTech.

26. If ProTech is the authorized plaintiff, the account manager and/or owner would have submitted an affidavit with invoices attached.

27. I would like to ask of the Court to recognize how serious this is, and how many issues of the bigger picture are best left for trial. I would like the opportunity to cross-examine that who signed the unsupported Affidavit, as well as the potentially impleaded defendants of Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans, against whom I intend to file cross-claims.

WHEREFORE defendant respectfully requests remand from the Small Claims Court into the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut.

____________________________________

Vivian Lehman

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

Decision

The foregoing motion to remand ProTech Oil versus Vivian Lehman from the Small Claims Court into the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut is hereby

Granted Denied

____________________________________________________

Justice

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this remand motion in three pre-paid postage envelops and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to all counsel of record and potential impleaded, yet unrepresented defendants:

Mr. William G. Reveley

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

And

Wells Fargo

Corporate Trust Services

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

And

Mr. Sean Sweeney

Attorney for Countrywide Home Loans

HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.

50 Weston Street

Hartford, CT 06120

_____________________________________________________________

Vivian Lehman

Sunday March 29, 2009

To my knowledge, I cannot file any cross-claims until after Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans are officially identified as co-defendants. I doubt if that will happen before the hearing. I very strongly doubt if the Judge will enter any Decisions before such date. Unlike with the higher Courts, there are no pre-trial hearings to determine such details, and there will be no preliminary conference.

And to my knowledge, my argument for a larger counterclaim is insufficient. All I have is circumstantial evidence of coincidental timing as well as previous associations between my opposing counsel and both these banks. And while I know the debt was satisfied, I can’t prove it unless Hunt & Leibert save themselves from much trouble with the Housing Authority, and produce the cancelled check.

What I am wondering is if the Court can remand this on its own motion. While it would be nice to save the $75 filing fee, it would also assure me this is the correct path to take. And perhaps the Judge can telephone his colleagues in the State and Federal Courts and ask who wants the case. Should it be remanded to the latter to conjoin it with the bankruptcy issues, or perhaps with the former to consider the case detail of the foreclosure?

So I am thinking about placing the above information in another motion, and making a between-the-lines suggestion to the Court.

But there is plenty of time for that. The earliest possible Small Claims Court hearing date is August.

Tuesday March 31, 2009

They have sent out a very strong hint that they want compromise. The FBI-Agent/midnight-stranger wrote out the CPB (Connecticut Practice Book) section number and title, “Sec. 17-11. Offer of Compromise by Defendant“, on a small legal pad and left it at the service desk, by the vendor-log-in book of one of the stores I service for Crossmark.

Part of his message was that I do not have to fully write-out the title every time I cite it in a motion. I can use the abbreviation. But my audience is not just the Court and the visitors of this website, it is also myself ten years from now. I won’t have any way of understanding what I was talking about if I do not provide a full citation.

What this law enforcement Agent also cannot understand, surprisingly, is that I cannot give money to my opposing counsel for licensure reasons, and the plaintiff cannot give money to me for existential reasons---it doesn’t exist.

And one more thing…

I want the truth from Wells Fargo. I want it to state for the record, under penalties of perjury, that it lied to me when it told me it had an interest in the house.

But I have a philosophical question for the FBI Agent.

When I win back my house, is he going to repeat his complaints?

He wants us to be in the bigger bed of the master bedroom.

He wants a place to put his clothes.

He wants me to continue to add to the museum.

And anything else I may not have noticed.

Wednesday April 01, 2009

This morning I received the subliminal information that my opposing counsel is formulating a Motion to Strike my Motion to Dismiss.

I know it is APRIL FOOLS! And here is why.

I researched his Small Claims Court cases on the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website.

The earliest case was filed three-years-ago on May 26, 2006.

Since then, he has filed 2899 such actions.

It was on February 09, 2009 that he filed ProTech vs. Vivian Lehman.

Between this date of this year until March 12^th, he filed 105 of his total case load.

It was on March 16th that I served-and-filed my Motion to Substitute Defendants. In this, I compared his credentials with that of Sean Sweeney of the law firm of Hunt & Leibert. The latter lawyer has a license number.

March 12th was the last date of Mr. Reveley’s activity in this division of the Connecticut Court system.

I have done similar research in the Civil Division of the Superior Court. He does many foreclosures. His last filing date was Mar 26, 2009.

We will see what happens next.

Thursday April 02, 2009

I owe Mr. Reveley an apology. He initiated other Small Claims Court actions on March 19, 2009. Apparently, the computer is behind by two weeks.

Saturday April 04, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

4^th Sunday of Lent

Count the Cost

5^th Sunday of Lent

$8,000 in Vandalisms

6^th Sunday of Lent

Going Home

Although my physical journey will not begin today, my legal one will. The law firm of Hunt & Leibert will finally realize that the answer to their problems is not with me, but with themselves. They can harass and bully me all they want to. The only thing they accomplish is pushing everything into another court.

If they poison me, they (not me) will go into the Probate Court.

If they have a phony small claim filed against me, we all go the Small Claims Court. This could find its way into either the State Superior or Federal Bankruptcy Court.

In theory, the Family Court couldn’t possibly find its way into this. But I am certain if they keep thinking their way, that is where we all will be (e.g., a married man with AIDS and a ten million dollar debt who is willing to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he may have one erection with me).

The Last Supper was a Cedar commemorating the liberation of Israelis from slavery. Moses was the original whistleblower. This is why the connection to the archetypes is so strong. I believe Jesus is too recent for such a biological connection. Two-thousand-years is an insignificant length of time in the human evolutionary process.

It is difficult to date Moses. But we can date the Great Flood. In the past 1.2 million years, there have been four pluvials--many sequential centuries of torrential rainfall corresponding to the glacial activity. The first such event corresponds to the date Homo habilis, the original post-Australopith, is found in the archeological record. It is exclusively Eurasian. I believe the Bible recorded this date of human evolutionary history, yet mysteriously omitted the following pluvial events.

Hunt & Leibert are a Saxon and a Jew. The former is a Pagan who feigns Christianity. The latter, according to the Book of Ezra Chapter 4, is not an Israeli. While it is true that neither have the archetypical connection because they are missing the area of the brain which yearns to return to the Pre-Australopith/Aquatic-Ape/Mermaid condition, I also believe that they have advisors, such as the IRS. It is their influence which will lead to my liberation.

Sunday April 05, 2009

Dear Commander Monkey;

I realize you are busy with your exploding hormones resultant of your oversized penis (which is why you resent a female with a paycheck), but can you take a few minutes to make a decision?

Are you sure you want me to serve-and-file this?

RED=NOT SERVED-AND-FILED

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

AMENDMENT

COUNTERCLAIM

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned case and submit this Amendment to the Counterclaim.

2. The Claim. . . . . . . . . . .$1,967.42.

3. The Counterclaim . . . . . . . .$500.00.

4. The Amended Counterclaim. . . $1,500.00.

5. The truth. . . . .. . . . . . priceless.

6. 2009 Connecticut Practice Book:

Sec. 24-20. —Amendment of …Counterclaim

“The judicial authority may at any time allow any…counterclaim to be amended.”

(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 571.) (Amended June 26, 2000, to take effect Jan. 1, 2001.)

7. Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept, 3:05cv1396:

emphasis supplied

8. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the pattern of behavior as it relates to IRS day,

April-15^th/Form-1040.

March 03, 2008	Due date of ProTech bill for $1967.	42-cents.
March 11, 2008	Motion for Ejectment filed seven months after foreclosure and served before vacate-deadline.**	41-hours
March 20, 2009	Service of ProTech’s Action.
March 28, 2009	End of my work-week resulting in take-home-pay. Unique!	$44 .

**see Case Detail, CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville.

9. The dates and numerical obsession are substantial evidence as defined by the United States District Court District of Connecticut, Maran v. Barnhart, 3:01CV2015;

“"such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Green-Younger v. Barnhart, 335 F.3d 99, 106 (2d Cir. 2003)(quotation omitted).”

10. The “factual issue” is the lack of identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States Government. (see Defendant’s Substitution Motion)

11. The “subject matter jurisdiction” is the plaintiff of herein case. It is NOT ProTech Oil. It is Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans who are venting their aggressions against me while acting in the guise of a company with whom my business relationship ended in November of 2007.

12. My opposing counsel and I agree that Wells Fargo should be a co-defendant. He tacitly disagrees with my Motion to add Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendant. (see my Motion for Substitution of Defendant and his Motion to Add Defendant) My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof. (see Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website)

13. The Bankruptcy Court identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt. Countrywide then abandoned the debt. According to the Connecticut Statutes,

“Sec. 3-64a. Property presumed abandoned generally. All property … which is held or owing in this state and has remained unclaimed by the owner for more than three years after it became due, payable or distributable, is presumed abandoned.”

emphasis supplied

14. It has been three years since my last payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo Bank in 2007. The complications remain unresolved.

15. In addition to my afore-mentioned defective take-home pay of 2009, late March and early April of same year were also abnormal. At trial, I will proffer all necessary pay-stubs exemplifying normal.

WHEREFORE defendant demands the following as part of, but not limited to, the Counterclaim:

Countrywide Home Loan admits to its abandonment of the mortgage and files a copy with:

Land Records of the Town of Coventry;

Bankruptcy Court of Federal District Court in Hartford, Connecticut;

Superior Court of Tolland County of said State; and the

Internal Revenue Service.

Wells Fargo Bank admits that it never had an interest nor title in the property and that it files such admission to all said Local, State and Federal Government offices.

All harassment against me immediately ceases, and compensation for lost wages immediately issued; $1,000.

In conjunction with the $500. for harassment, the total monetary relief sought is $1,500.

_____________________________________April 06, 2009

Vivian Lehman, Defendant pro se

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Amendment to Counterclaim in three pre-paid postage envelops and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to both counsels of record and potentially impleaded, yet unrepresented defendant:

Mr. William G. Reveley

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

And

Mr. Sean Sweeney

Attorney for Countrywide Home Loans

HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.

50 Weston Street

Hartford, CT 06120

And

Wells Fargo

Corporate Trust Services

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

______________________________________________________________April 06, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Defendant pro se

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

Thursday April 09, 2009

In red-type above are the drafts.

Served-and-filed today. . .

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DEFENDANT’S

COMPROMISE

OFFER

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned case and submit this Offer of Compromise.

2. The Claim . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .$1,967.42.

3. The Counterclaim. . . . . . . . . . . .$500.00.

4. The potential Cross-Claim .. . .Priceless Truth.

5. The potential co-Defendant, as per the unapplied agreement of both parties, is Wells Fargo Bank.

6. The Nature of the Counterclaim is harassment.

7. The Nature of the potential Cross-Claim is beyond the pleadings of this case. However. . .

8. Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept, 3:05cv1396:

emphasis supplied

9. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the pattern of behavior as it relates to IRS day,

April-15^th/Form-1040.

March 03, 2008	Due date of ProTech bill for $1967 &	42-cents.
March 11, 2008	Motion for Ejectment filed seven months after foreclosure and served before vacate-deadline.**	41-hours
April 07, 2008	Service of Ejectment at	4 pm
March 20, 2009	Service of ProTech’s Action.
March 28, 2009	End of my work-week resulting in take-home-pay. Unique!	$44.

**see Case Detail, CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville.

10. The dates and numerical obsession are both circumstantial evidence, as well as substantial evidence. According to precedent, the latter is,

“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971).

11. The “factual issue” is the lack of identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States Government. (see Defendant’s Substitution Motion)

12. The “subject matter jurisdiction” is the plaintiff of herein case. It is NOT ProTech Oil. And the account number cited in the Plaintiff’s Affidavit of Debt, 64753L, is NOT of such company. In his original debt-collection letter to me dated December 17, 2008, Mr. Reveley demanded of me to, “make (my) check payable to the above client. . .and return it in the enclosed self-addressed envelope to my office”. The problem with that request is that ProTech Oil ceased to exist in the summer of 2007. Can Mr. Reveley verify such deposit-ability?

13. The actual, yet hidden, claimants are Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans who are venting their aggressions against me while acting in the guise of a company with whom my business relationship ended in 2007.

14. My opposing counsel and I agree that Wells Fargo should be a co-defendant. He tacitly disagrees with my Motion to add Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendant. (see my Motion for Substitution of Defendant and his Motion to Add Defendant) My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof. (see Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website)

15. The Bankruptcy Court of the District of Hartford, Connecticut, identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt. Countrywide then abandoned the debt. According to the Connecticut Statutes,

emphasis supplied

16. It has been three years since my last payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo Bank in 2007. The complications remain unresolved.

WHEREFORE defendant will accept the following compromise:

Withdrawal of claim;

$410.00 from my opposing counsel;

A statement from Wells Fargo Bank verifying that it has neither interest nor title to the house known as 891 South Street in the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland, Connecticut. And the filing of such statement with

Land Records of the Town of Coventry;

Superior Court of Tolland County; and

Federal Bankruptcy Court of Hartford City.

A copy of the future statement from the IRS to Countrywide Home Loans affirming that all complications have been resolved.

This offer will expire April 15, 2009.

_____________________________________April 10, 2009

Vivian Lehman, Defendant pro se

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, due to the pressures of the IRS deadline, FAXed such to:

Mr. William G. Reveley

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC

860-871-7991

______________________________________________________________April 10, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Defendant pro se

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

Friday April 10, 2009

My computer has been tampered with. I had some trouble opening this file. So if this is my last transmission, you know why.

Otherwise, there is some unfinished business.

I have decided that I want to help Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. I will be applying for a job in her Department. I am not a slave. Slavery was legally abolished in this country…

Sometime after President Lincoln freed the African-Americans and left them to the mercy of the lynch-mobs and carpet-baggers, and

Sometime before the labor laws were enforced disallowing working long hours for pennies.

Otherwise…

On March 25^th, I had jury duty. As per procedure, I called the day before to learn if the Courthouse was in need of my services. They were not. My guess is that the case was either resolved or postponed.

I looked at the website description of the case. Apparently, a man was charged with sexually assaulting a child. The arresting officers were of the Coventry Police Department.

If I had been involved in the jury selection process, I would have been asked if there is anything the Court should know about me which would influence my verdict. I would have explained that I cannot convict anyone who has been arrested by such Department. While it is true they are all not Sergeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski, it is also true that such senior officers must have trained those of lower rank.

Aside from my allegations, let’s recall a few unequivocal facts.

In the Fall of 2005, I used the phrase “final kill”. I was referring to my former New York neighbors. The husband looks just like Ayman al-Zawarhi, second in command to Osama Bin Laden. The wife looks just like Mrs. Anthrax, biochemical weapons specialist to Sadaam Hussein. These are death penalty cases. I believed, and still do, that if I am giving law enforcement enough facts to strap these fugitives into his-and-her electric chairs and flip the switch, then I am “killing” them.

The Police Department of my former neighborhood in New York, telephoned Ayman Al-Zawarhi and spoke to him. All such telephone calls are tape recorded. The Town of Bedford installed such technology in 1970. They never turned this voice sample over to the FBI. The Coventry Police Department knew it existed, and never told them either.

Sergeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski gave me a hostile visit feigning the belief that I was going to launch a karate attack. According to their interpretation of the facts, I was going to apply my swollen joints against a muscular man who is over 6’4”. This was construed as a threat of possible criminal nature.

I explained this is a “death penalty case.” Although law enforcement did not like my choice of words, I never edited, and they never followed-up. I know I am correct.

Sergeant Ochtera wrote in his report that these former neighbors of mine, “are the people with the death sentences.” His choice of words was not interchangeable with the concept of “death penalty case“.

He did not understand they were still presumed innocent. They were never sentenced to anything.

His report was libelous. He was not sued, most likely because these people do not allow themselves to be photographed. They look just like their Most Wanted posters.

So if I served on a jury, how could I have relied on the testimony of a Police Sergeant who makes libelous remarks because he doesn’t understand the Constitution? And how could I have relied on those who trained him or those he trained?

NOT GUILTY!

Saturday April 11, 2009

We are, of course, having an issue with African Somali pirates holding hostage a captain of an American ship. The ship was en-route to Kenya.

They want Targets.

The FBI can’ t figure this out.

How dumb can they be?

Did we have any trouble with Kenya before Baby Bama was elected President?

Tell the Baby to phone his father and have him knock-it-off.

If he doesn’t, here is what the FBI can hold hostage:

His Presidency

To my knowledge, there is no birth certificate nor any other documentation verifying his United States citizenship. And I have never seen any verification of the existence of the Hawaiian grandmother who raised him and died a few weeks before the election. It is my anthropological analysis that the Baby spent at least the first decade of his life in Kenya with his mother who was the third or fourth wife of his father, an official of such government.

His Comrade/ex-Governor

Impeached Illinois Governor Blagovich is believed to be a United States citizen because he speaks an accent-free English. But if he is television-educated, he could have learned that anywhere. Listen to his speeches. He repeats the same words over-and-over. Is this someone who was educated in this country? I hope not. If he was born and raised in Russia, how did he get here? It may have been legal. But if that is true, why is this fact unknown to his constituents?

If I am correct about everything, the FBI should be able to use these facts to completely control the Big Baby.

In exchange for my services, would the FBI please completely protect me from all future harassment?! I am finally feeling the road to excellent health. The mobility in my joints is amazing. My energy level is making me feel great. And, of course, to finally be asthma-free is an indescribable feeling of freedom. May I please enjoy these in peace?

Otherwise, my last legal brief hit a nerve.

Remember the missing tax documents which were required to accompany Schedule A? I needed a B and C, and still don’t have these. It is my understanding that Countrywide now has to perform a complete write-off of the debt, and, henceforth, file these latter two documents with the IRS. This will allow Wells Fargo and myself to finally reach an agreement.

I offered 41-cents.

Sunday April 26, 2009

I received the subliminal information that they want to offer me a mortgage.

Who?

Countrywide or Wells Fargo?

And another thing…

If you own, rent or otherwise use a private airplane, journey upon a “settlement” of Orthodox Jews. If the one you visit is near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and you witness what I think you will, tell Mara Addison, of my former publisher, that she will find there a refund of her gambling losses.

Otherwise, if you see a plumage of smoke from the chambers or ovens, call the fire department.

Saturday May 16, 2009

Two judgments are in, decreed by Magistrate O‘Keefe…

FIRST…”Motion to add party defendant (Wells Fargo) granted. Plaintiff must file amended writ for service on new defendant.”

SECOND…”The defendant has filed a counterclaim against the plaintiff. The plaintiff is required to file an answer on or before the reply answer date June 09, 2009.”

The caption of the case is now, ProTech Oil versus Vivian Lehman and Wells Fargo with an answer date of June 9^th.

AND MORE GOOD NEWS…

On March 23, 2009, Countrywide Home Loans wrote-off the mortgage. I am certain it is not a coincidence that this occurred on the same day I submitted to the Court a copy of the letter in which Wells Fargo decrees it is the record owner.

Sunday May 17, 2009

Everyone is waiting for me to file the cross-claim. This is why I am waiting.

1. I need a service address.

The plaintiff has been directed by the Court to file a revised Writ. This is the form which identifies the plaintiff(s), defendant(s), nature of action (breach of contract) and object of action (amount of unpaid bill). While I have explained to the Court my position on the service address, I believe I have to follow the directive of my opposing counsel. When I have this, I will have an obligation to serve a copy of the Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Compromise Offer which expired on IRS tax day.

2. I don’t know if the Judge wants to hear it.

The Judge has acknowledged receiving my Motion to Substitute Defendant, as well as my opposing counsel’s Motion to Add Defendant. He has acknowledged nothing else. I respect that. He has his reasons and I think I know what these are. He probably knows that Countrywide-Home-Loans/Bank-of-America wrote-off the debt. Wells Fargo, for the first time, has an obligation to communicate with the Court. They don’t need any help from me. They know they lied.

3. I am too tired to write a motion.

In mid-April my employer, Crossmark, lost a major contract with Home Depot. It wasn’t our fault. Another contractor did not deliver the materials in quantities which were executable. Either I helplessly looked at 20 totes of merchandise to be packed-out in 90 minutes, or I had a few totes of one product. We all did our best.

This meant finding another job. Near me, is one of the three nationwide call centers for Flower Transworld Delivery, FTD. These are the people you call when you want to send flowers. Mother’s Day is our busiest weekend. I was given much overtime. I didn’t mind. Helping people select what flowers to send can be much fun.

The message of honoring our mothers by sending flowers is archetypical. Remember the Boticelli painting of Venus emerging from the waters?

My favorite website is www.justflowers.com. On Mother’s Day eve, some areas of the country were sold-out of some items, such as tulips. It was hard to tell customers that their selection was non-deliverable until after the holiday. But I learned that one item, the Basket of Cheer, was always available anywhere. I called it, Old Faithful. It was, and still is, featured on the home page. I directed my disappointed customers to that. They agreed it is beautiful and sends the correct message. It also stayed within their budgets.

On Monday morning, May 11^th, one of my supervisors placed two bouquets on my desk. I was in the middle of telephoning a customer who, according to the computer, provided the wrong address for the recipient. There was no answer. I pushed the release button on my phone and asked her what I had done to deserve these. I won two contests.

I did not want to see the flowers suffer from moisture-deprivation. She suggested I wrap a wet towel around their stems. I did.

A few minutes later, I was on the phone again deeply engaged in conversation. She placed another on my desk. We laughed.

So I went in the break area and found on a backroom shelf an old, glass coffee pot for a brewer which, by today’s standards, would be considered old fashioned. I placed these in such.

At the end of the day, I walked toward the backroom and was told by a few people what an extraordinary cup-of-coffee I had.

I came home, and had to find a glass vase. But, of course, a male homemaker doesn’t have such. I called him on his cell phone and explained the situation. He didn’t understand me, at first, and thought I was telling him that I “needed flowers”. But eventually, the message came through the static and he borrowed such from his father. But before he returned home, I found a jar for tea bags and used that. The kitchen was the only room in the condominium which doesn’t have computer wires running all around. So I removed all of his papers and place the jar upon such table. I hoped he would not be angry at me when he saw the pile in the dining room. Instead he thanked me for forcing him to organize.

Mother’s Day is over. It was only a five week temporary position. And it is complete. I am on the waiting list if any permanent positions open.

But I am tired. It was much work. Every time I completed a call my phone rang again. To ease the exhaustion, we were provided with free meals for two days in a row, Thursday the 7th and Friday the 8th. On Saturday the 9th, we were provided with snacks. I wondered why. But when I felt my lack of appetite as a result of overwork, I understood. On Mother’s Day, we were again served with a meal. And on Monday the 11^th and Tuesday the 12th, we received snacks.

Monday May 18, 2009

I learned my lesson again!

I have to mention everything on this website, even if I think it is irrelevant.

It was on Wednesday May 13^th. I woke-up and looked out the window in the parking lot. There was a woman standing upon my neighbor’s car. Originally, I thought it was the neighbor’s mother who visited for the holiday. I decided she was waiting for her ride home. She seemed to be wearing a long laboratory coat. Why? I looked again. It must be a raincoat. Why? It was sunny.

My neighbor emerged from her condominium and walked around her car to find her there. She asked if she was lost. I knew then this was not her mother. My neighbor then nicely asked of her to step away from her car so she could drive her son to school. The woman could barely walk and staggered over to my car. I grabbed the phone and called 9-1-1. My neighbor did the same from her cell phone. I looked out the window again. My neighbor was running into her house.

I had too much pride to go outside in my pajamas. I quickly changed and went out. My neighbor had placed some shoes on her and a blanket. She was rubbing her to keep her warm. I eventually noticed that the long coat was a polyester robe. She was naked underneath.

We learned her name and the fact that she lives in #2 of the units.

I remembered my training at CVS pharmacy and asked a few questions. Was she on any diabetic medications? No. Was she on any anti-depressant medications? No. Was she on any antibiotics? No.

She said she was nurse, and had not paid her fees to the administration in a few months because she had not worked much. She explained she was with a friend, Marissa, who was seated on the lawn. My neighbor directed me to look for this person. There was no one.

The woman also said there was a female police officer who visited her earlier and instructed her to sit on the lawn.

Two police vehicles arrived with two large, male State Officers, and an ambulance. The woman explained to them what medications she is on including those for high blood pressure and Klonisin. (I think she meant Klonipin.) She also pointed-out to the officers where she lived, and the fact that the car in the corresponding driveway was hers.

The ambulance departed and I went to work at FTD.

Yesterday, I had nothing much to do. So I went for a walk up there. Her car wasn’t in the driveway, and the unit was dark. I returned. The owner of my condominium said to me, with curiosity, that I had a short walk. I finally told him about what happened. We discussed it with his father, who is in the real estate business.

I told them both that I believed the police may have thrown her out in the middle of the night. His father explained that such is illegal. I said I know. He explained that because it is illegal, it is impossible. I said I didn’t know.

I researched it on the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website. She is a defendant against the Administration. We know why. She told us.

And she is facing foreclosure. We didn’t know that.

The plaintiff is Wells Fargo as represented by Hunt & Leibert. It was filed on March 23, 2009, the same date I submitted the Wells Fargo letter to the Court, and Bank of America wrote-off my original mortgage. On May 15^th, two days after her collapse, they filed a set of motions including a demand for Strict Foreclosure.

And a third party defendant in both actions is Webster Bank. According to the father of the owner of my condominium, that means it has a lean on the property.

To date, the woman has no recorded benefit of counsel representing her.

A few minutes ago I drove-past her home. The car is back.

Dear Mr. Hunt, Mr. Leibert & Mr. Jacobson;

I have said many times on this website, anyone who wants to tell his/her side of the story, please do so. I will apologize for any non-malicious misrepresentations I may have published. Since opening this website, I received one such response. It was from the man I believe is Ayman al-Zawarhi, second-in-command to Osama Ben Laden. He was induced by the German government when I begged my distant cousins to help me. The quality of Zawarhi’s words convinced everyone that while he is innocent until proven guilty, I am not crazy.

You may not know my new address, but you do often converse with my attorney, Frank Kibler. You can provide him with your written response to my question.

ARE YOU PERFORMING A PHONY FORECLOSURE ON MY NEIGHBOR?

Saturday May 23, 2009

This is good news. Although on the surface, it doesn’t look that way.

The Judge denied my Motion to Substitute Defendant. After he acknowledged the Counterclaim, he can’t replace defendants.

Earlier this month, the Motion which was granted was my opposing counsel’s follow-up to my Substitution Motion. It was to Add a defendant.

The Counterclaim was not planned by me. As I was about to serve-and-file the Answer form which includes such an option, I thought about all of my recent research. Pressuring me to pay a bill which they know is not due is specifically included in the legal dictionary under harassment. And my opposing counsel knows that if he produced an invoice, the account holder would be identified as Wells Fargo and the balance due would be zero. So in such section of the Answer form, I wrote, “$500. for harassment”.

The Judge has not yet considered my Motion to Dismiss. I am certain it will be denied because my opposing counsel was instructed to formulate a revised Writ.

This is the cross-claim I am considering. (Red ink means it is not yet the served-and-filed, and might not be.)

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut,

Small Claims Court

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman &

Wells Fargo,

Co-Defendants.

CROSS-CLAIM

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the co-defendant pro se in the above-captioned action. Herewith, is my cross-claim against co-defendant Wells Fargo.

2. As the hitherto fore proffered foreclosure action indicates, my co-defendant wants the asset known as 891 South Street, Town of Coventry, County of Tolland of the State of Connecticut.

3. As this legal action indicates, my co-defendant does not want the liabilities.

4. While a price cannot be ascribed to the truth, such can be ascribed to a deterrent.

WHEREFORE, I respectfully request $4,999. in cash, as well as said asset valued at $1. as per attached Assignment of Mortgage of the Land Records of the Town of Coventry, Volume 1027, Page 84. This is a total award of $5,000, the maximum allowable in Small Claims Court. I also request costs, disbursements and all other relief as the Court deems proper.

_______________________________________ May 27, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

If Wells Fargo wants to work with me directly, rather than through the Court, these are my demands.

Tuition for law school. Although I am too late for the application process to enroll in the Fall, they can arrange something. The house is not far from the Law School of the Connecticut State University.

Pay-off my car lease. I have three payments left at $320/month. The purchase option is $8,831. They can pay Ford Credit directly. I do not need to be a middleman.

Cash. Although I intend to keep my job at Crossmark, I will not be employable full time. I need enough to satisfy my cost of living in the house:

$1,000/month

12 months/year

3 years law school

$36,000.

Monday May 25, 2009

Dear Big Baby;

I understand that the Korean nuclear weapons program is developing. And I understand the necessity to Target this issue.

I would like to remind you of your previous demand of me to only publish such on this website when the First Idiots are on vacation so that no one will notice how dumb they are.

Would you please tell me when your daughters’ school vacations will begin?

I also understand the necessity to Target the conversion of Republicans into Democrats. When you were a teenager in your father’s country, this was what you witnessed.

Until your marriage and collegiate years, you never attended school in the United States. There is a technique which has been successfully attempted in European civilization. It is called turn-or-burn. In our Christian culture, we use Crucifixes. What do you use in your religion?

If our justice system imprisons your wife for illegally importing you, would anyone notice?

Sunday June 14, 2009

Dear Dr. Henderson Cole;

Now that I have your attention, I have a few questions about Eva/Jean Braun/Bouricius’ side of the story.

I understand that during the last days of World War II, you were all in the bunker with Adolph/Stanley Schicklegruber/Schweitzer. I also understand that the text books explain this was in Berlin. It sounds more like Berchtesgaden.

WHERE WAS IT?

I understand there was an elaborate tunnel system. And I understand that Adolph’s Great Grand Niece, Monica Christiensen, learned how to create one. This was how she escaped her imprisonment in Yemen.

WHY GO UNDERGROUND WITH YOUR SYSTEM?

I understand that the Nazi flag-emblem was a reproduction of the shape of the antenna used to communicate with the allied countries.

WHICH ALLIED COUNTRY?

During one of our telephone conversations, Prince William of Wales informed me that his ancestors worked with Adolph/Stanley. This suggests to me the possibility that communication was with Great Britain. It also suggests to me the possibility that Keith Pennington was with you all. He, of course, has a British accent.

WAS HE?

Robert Tallman was also a member of your secretive group. I can’t imagine what you needed a corporate attorney for.

WERE ANY GERMANS WITH YOU?

I understand that during these last days of World War II, Adolph/Stanley presented two flight tickets.

WAS THIS TO ARGENTINA OR THE U.S.?

I understand that during these last days, you needed a bride with a similar physique to you. I realize that similar wedding gowns were made for each of you. First, you ran out of there veiled, then she, unveiled.

WHY? WHO WAS OUT THERE?

If this was Berlin, it was not the Allied military. We did not have foot soldiers patrolling while bombing the area. And it wasn’t the Prussian Generals. You already killed them.

WAS IT GERMAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE?

I understand that Eva/Jean’s mathematician-husband Willard was in Los Alamos, New Mexico, helping to develop the first nuclear bomb. And I understand that he imported this technology to Germany. The United States Government could not wait to use this weapon. It had to attack before this country was attacked.

WAS DR. BOURICIUS ALSO IN THE BUNKER?

When I was growing-up, I knew you had three children. According to the Fellowship telephone directory, there were four. Her name was Dawneva. I understand that as an associate of IBM (Inferior Brained Massacre), you have an obligation to provide one child for human experimentation. These children are strapped-down and injected with various potential biochemical weapons. They scream all night, and then are dumped into a medical waste dump.

WAS THAT HER FATE?

They developed Hogwort’s Juice and Privet Berry Poisoning. These produce large warts in the lymphatic system. The glands swell around the vagina in the form of a W for Wicca. It is a slow death with no diagnosable symptoms. The patient looks like she is going crazy to death.

WHAT DO YOU DO WITH THAT?

Nonetheless, you continued to give your loyalties to this corporate giant. During the Cold War, you traveled to Russia to teach the KGB how to hack into FBI files. And during the 1990’s, you lived in Venezuela to teach the socialists how to drain our economy. I understand their latest venture is identity theft.

WHAT DID YOU DO?

I am giving you one day to deprogram this financial drain before I tell everyone where to find your picture in the media. Don’t tell me you can’t do it. It isn’t complicated. It is just set in many countries, including Kenya.

DO IT!!!!

Tuesday June 16, 2009

Today I would like to change the subject to the Small Claims Court action against me.

As you already know, I am the defendant.

And, as you already know, I motioned the Court that I be substituted as the defendant by Wells Fargo Bank. My opposing counsel agreed that the Bank should be added as a defendant. I agreed and then counterclaimed the plaintiff. To preserve my counterclaim, Judge O’Keefe granted my opposing counsel’s add-motion and instructed my opposing counsel to file a revised writ. The writ is the Small Claims Court form. The Judge also gave my opposing counsel until June 09^th to answer my counterclaim.

To my knowledge, my opposing counsel has filed nothing. I researched Connecticut Practice Law and learned that there was nothing to stop me from filing the revised writ.

As you also already know, the service-address of Wells Fargo was in dispute. I used the address of the house.

I asked for $1.00 with the following argument;

“The 2006-2008 foreclosure action (Superior Court TTD-CV06-5000959S) by above co-defendant/cross-claim-respondent Wells Fargo Bank against above co-defendant/cross-claimant Vivian Lehman, was for the purpose of acquiring the asset without the liabilities. The asset is known as 891 South Street of the Town of Coventry, State of Connecticut (see above service-address). As per the 2009 Small Claims Court plaintiff’s Nature of Action, Wells Fargo does not accept the liability of the heating bill. As per the Land Records of said Town, Volume 1027, page 84, the value of the house is $1.00 (see attached). According to www.lectlaw.com, “money” includes “bank notes… and negotiable notes”. Vivian Lehman demands unencumbered title to the house.”

Wednesday June 17, 2009

I would like to make one more point.

What is common knowledge to the Connecticut Small Claims Court practitioners, is that “money” is the only object of action recognized by this judicial domain.

I researched it. Cash is one form of “money”. So I believe Judge O’Keefe can give me my house back.

One complication may occur…

In the revised writ, the service-address for Wells Fargo is my house. It is non-deliverable to addressee because the post office does not recognize their occupation of the house, and because I never had a mail box, only a post office box.

Typically, when the service-address is unusable, the Court must automatically dismiss the action. But in this case, the Court must understand I mechanically reproduced the information of the Land Records. Therefore, I should not be penalized.

What will happen next?

Will I be required to revise the writ again?

Or will the Court use the address I provided in a letter I received over one year ago from Wells Fargo which originated in its Maryland office?

Or something else?

But if it is non-deliverable to addressee, that proves my point that a phony foreclosure occurred. So my amateur legal advise to Wells Fargo is to inform the post office of its presence, and either erect a mail box, or rent a post office box.

Thursday June 18, 2009

The news show of FOX has been advocating my statement that title is a form of “money”. They argue that their MONEY shows include discussion of cash, but can’t be limited to it.

It is also my understanding that the Court will arrange for a complete service. Wells Fargo Bank cannot pretend it does not exist.

There is also some concern for the fact that I did not ask for any cash. Since the maximum request of Small Claims is $5,000, I could have asked for $4,999.

I researched everything in the Connecticut Practice Book. The only time a judge is limited to the cash relief requested is in a personal injury default case. So as far as I know, if Judge O’Keefe wants to take further initiative, he can. Unless, of course, Federal and/or State law states otherwise. But I don’t believe he should.

My opinion is because I believe the plaintiff’s attorney has decided not to handle this case any further. Wells Fargo will probably behave the same way. I should win by default on the counter-, cross- and original claims. If I am awarded cash from my co-defendant, a connection is made. Wells Fargo may contest.

The only thing I need is a default Decision made by the Court, and filed by such Court in the Land Records specifying value at $1.00.

On a related issue…

The property tax bill is still in my name. This is because the Town does not want to recognize the $1.00 transaction and make the appropriate adjustment.

It was on May 23, 2005 that we closed on the house. In early September, I received the property tax bill based on the original assessment which was below the purchase price. I paid the Town by the end of the month. And in October I received a supplemental bill for the added value.

If you are a homeowner in Bedford, New York, you know that the deadline to challenge your assessed value is April 1^st for affect in the same calendar year. In Coventry, Connecticut, it is March 1^st. These Spring dates are because the fiscal calendar year is actually an academic year: Fall plus Spring semesters. But when a transaction rather than a paperwork challenge occurs, it is different. It takes affect immediately, and may take a few months to fully process between the offices.

In January of 2007, if the Town officially recognized the $1.00 assignment of mortgage, it would have cancelled all succeeding property tax bills. And had one more affect.

Any homeowner with a house similar to mine would have been entitled to an adjustment. And Eric Gregan as an independent contractor, as well as his original employer, Mr. Blanchard, built many of them. The Town could go bankrupt.

Before this occurs, I would like to remind the Town of two officials of the Police Department who have nothing to do. They can go. The Town would probably be safer. Burglars and stalkers know when no one is watching. And who needs people who interfere with FBI investigations?

The two Police Officers who just followed orders can also go. They participated in the ejectment on April 09, 2008. I believe they knew better. And I don’t want to hear any sob stories from them about having a family to support. My mother did not just follow orders. She blew-the-whistle instead. Maybe if they had her for a parent, they would have done better.

So let’s fire the four, then watch the Town’s safety statistics improve for the better.

I just found this…

“Sec. 17-41. Relief Permissible on Default

Upon a default, the plaintiff can have no greater

relief than that demanded in the complaint…”

On a very different subject, I have not had any spending money. But that didn’t stop an unoccupied frame from jumping in front of my car. I parked behind my bank, and there it was, underneath a tree. It had no glass, no matting and no backing. It is 16 x 20” wood with a beautiful red trim. It must have been $50 at original price.

For Red Frame

Friday June 19, 2009

So let’s return to the subject of Hitler’s bunker.

Until a few days ago, there were television commercials advertising Lifelock. Its purpose is identity theft protection. One of the features of these advertisements is a crowd of street people receiving a lecture on the benefits of purchasing this service. The person who is front and center is large, quite bald and is stroking his face while thinking about something.

He is Dr. Henderson Cole, or his twin brother.

I heard the word targets.

Once I realized we were Internet-communicative, I went out to my car, reached into my trunk, and pulled out a purple tote. I bought it at Staples because of its unique color. When I left my New York home, I placed only one thing in it.

After I removed it from my trunk, I returned to my room and packed-it-out from all of the styrophone chips. I placed it in the window.

The satellites have recognized it for its grotesqueness. I would like to remind everyone of the story behind it.

I was in college. My mother, brother and I were celebrating Christmas at the Unitarian Fellowship of Northern Westchester located in Mount Kisco, New York. This is where I was baptized and raised.

The building was constructed during my early childhood around 1970. There were a group of people who, every Sunday, arrived at services before we did. I now understand these were Stanley/Adolph Schweitzer/Schiklegruber (Hitler); one of his two wives, Gertrude/Gertrude Schweitzer/Weiskar; her cousin, Jean/Eva Bouricius/Braun; her husband, Willard Bouricius; Henderson Cole; Robert Tallman; and a few others.

Jean Bouricius was the one who taught me world leadership.

And it is her writing style which I imitate.

In high school, college and graduate school, she helped me with my scientific homework. She never had to look anything up. Her understanding of biology is that extraordinary.

In my early childhood, I had a difficult time relating to Dr. Henderson Cole. He is a physicist with IBM who went on to a career of selling such computers. When I was a physics major, he tried to help me with my homework, but agreed that the professor had presented it in unworkable format.

So I went into anthropology.

The corporate attorney was required for negotiations with the oil companies. If you were in Germany during World War II, you would know that the United States oil refineries were there, not in China nor Russia as these are today.

Those issues aside, let’s return to the Christmas party.

The annual tradition was that everyone brings an anonymous, wrapped gift, and then takes one. My brother selected the large box. The man who made its content was very disappointed to see it received by someone young who may not appreciate it. My mother was with him at the time. She assured him it will be well cared for. I don’t know if she acquired his name. I did not.

It is black metal with some candles. A few weeks after the images of the Iraqi prison Abu Ghraib were released to the media, I realized what the sculpture was exhibiting. This must have been Fellowship activity during those early mornings.

Should I put Todd Davis’ Lifelock out of business, or is someone going to explain something?

Part II----------June 19, 2009

If you will recall, my opposing counsel had until June 09^th to answer my counterclaim.

I just received service of this in the mail. It was sent yesterday.

“1. The plaintiff in the above-entitled action hereby denies the Defendant’s counterclaim.”

And that’s it.

He knows Hunt & Leibert have the cancelled check.

My guess is that a hearing will be scheduled for the counterclaim only. Wells Fargo will have the option of appearing because it is a party to the action, although not directly affected by the claim and counterclaim.

My guess is that my opposing counsel will not show for the hearing because in a default judgment case, the Judge cannot award anything over the demand. And my opposing counsel knows that $500.00 is a very fair request for such harassment.

This is what I was thinking about on Thursday…

“Sec. 16-19. Reading of Statement of Amount

in Demand or Statement of Claim; Arguing

Amount Recoverable

In any action seeking damages for injury to the

person, the amount demanded in the complaint

shall not be disclosed to the jury. In the event that

the jury shall return a verdict which exceeds the

amount demanded, the judicial authority shall

reduce the award to, and render judgment in, the

amount demanded. Counsel for any party to the

action may articulate to the jury during closing

argument a lump sum or mathematical formula

as to damages claimed to be recoverable. The

judicial authority shall issue cautionary instructions

pursuant to General Statutes § 52-216b.”

emphasis supplied

It is my interpretation of the situation, that because this is not in injury case, and if either or both of my opposing counsels representing the plaintiff and co-defendant, appear at the hearing, Judge O’Keefe can, on his own motion(s), raise the object of the action to as high as $5,000. I have to research if this is the combined sum, or if each has the potential to loose up to $5,000 in “money” including cash.

Tuesday June 23, 2009

There has been no activity with the law suit. I will file amendments to the objects of the actions. I will go for maximum on BOTH, and let the Court decide what is appropriate. But these amendments will have to wait.

I am having some car trouble; $300. The owner of the condominium where I am renting a room insisted that I re-learn how to drive an automatic transmission car. Then he insisted I borrow his Cadillac. His father also lent me his extra car. This is a very old Cadillac. I found it more comfortable than the modern version.

I have been completing all of my work. But, nonetheless, I have my limitations. I have not been taking the time on the road to purchase a replacement printer cartridge. So I have been using the local library’s computer. It has been a nice place to routinely visit.

The following Motion will soon be filed with the Court. And after that is resolved, I will make the amendments.

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs-

Vivian Lehman &

Wells Fargo Bank,

Co-Defendants.

MOTION TO

CHANGE CAPTION

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the Defendant pro se in the above-captioned action. I hereby file this motion to change its caption from that above to

VIVIAN LEHMAN, plaintiff

-vs-

PROTECH OIL & WELLS FARGO BANK, co-defendants

2. On May 11, 2009, Magistrate O’Keefe granted Protech Oil’s Motion to add Wells Fargo as co-Defendant; “(Protech Oil) must file Amended Writ for service on new Defendant.”

3. On June 18, 2009, Protech Oil Answered the Counterclaim nine days after its Answer Date of June 09, 2009. The caption heading such legal brief was Protech Oil versus Vivian Lehman. It was without the Added co-Defendant. Henceforth, original Plaintiff was non-compliant with Order.

4. On June 16, 2009, original co-Defendant Vivian Lehman suspected a Revised Writ had never been filed by Protech Oil. She therefore filed a Revised Writ as part of her efforts to preserve her Counterclaim, and to ensure full resolution to all of the confusion involved in this case.

5. The Counterclaim requires of Protech Oil to pay Vivian Lehman $500.00 in cash.

6. The Revised Writ requires of Wells Fargo to pay Vivian Lehman $1.00 in money.

7. There is nothing in Connecticut Practice Book 2009 which requires same object of action for multiple defendants of same caption.

WHEREFORE, Vivian Lehman respectfully requests said change of caption.

_________________________________June ___, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Vivian Lehman, did enclose this Motion to Change Caption in two pre-paid postage envelopes, and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to

Mr. William G. Reveley and Associates LLC

PO Box 657

Vernon, CT 06066

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

_________________________________June ___, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

Thursday June 25, 2009

Yesterday, I served Wells Fargo at the house. I know it will be returned, Non-Deliverable to Addressee. So I will have to spend $30 to hire a State Marshall (such as Tim Poloski who served me with the ejectment notice) to serve the unoccupied house.

And because I am still having car trouble, I mailed-in my paperwork to Magistrate O’Keefe.

Before we go any further, a clarification is long overdue.

I was very confused by the difference between the status of judge and magistrate. As I understand it, a magistrate is an attorney who is appointed by the Courts to handle issues such as small claims.

I sent Magistrate O’Keefe the Motion to Change the Caption of the case, as well as another Revised Writ which, I believe, says what he wants to hear.

I want $5,000.00;

“In 2007, Wells Fargo Bank seized the asset known as 891 South Street in Coventry, Connecticut. In 2009, Protech Oil took action against Vivian Lehman for the liability of the post-seizure heating bill. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, 7^th edition, “money” is, “Assets that can be easily converted to cash”--such as a house valued at $1.00, as per the Land Records of said Town, volume 1027, page 84. Protech Oil originated this action aware of Wells Fargo’s unwillingness to accept the liabilities coupled with the asset. This is evidenced by its lack of presentation of Cause of Action which would have included invoices and a witness identifying herself as an associate of Protech Oil. It would also have included a substantive argument against Vivian Lehman’s counter-argument of harassment. Vivian Lehman demands the house valued at $1.00 as well as $4,999.00 compensation for harassment. She also demands costs, disbursements, and all other relief as the Court deems proper.”

I can’t give the Town of Coventry legal advise. I can say I think it should try to convene a hearing to void the Land Records document. And then present its conclusions to the Court.

Don’t blame me when the Town goes bankrupt because no one has any tax liability on $1.00 homes!!!!!

Friday June 26, 2009

It required the involvement of the whole neighborhood, but the car did start this morning. We needed jumper cables, a car with an accessible battery operated by a person who just happened to be leaving for work a half-an-hour early, someone who knew how to apply all the technology, and me in the driver’s seat. But the car successfully arrived at its destination.

The shop.

$398.

There has been no activity on the law suit.

No news is good news because it suggests to me the possibility that the Magistrate rejected the $1.00 object of action. It also reassures me that my opposing counsel did not file the Revised Writ. I doubt if I will see $4,999 cash. But if I do, I will go directly to the frame shop and sewing store.

Sunday June 28, 2009

Dear Lieutenant Solenski;

Do you ever wonder about the fact that the last day I drove through Coventry, was also the day after Palm Sunday?

Tuesday June 30, 2009

The bad news is that it is my understanding that the Court delay in rulings on the selection of Revised Writs and other Motions, is being caused by Connecticut’s intolerance to the concept of a $1.00 house.

The good news is that no one is blaming me.

Wednesday June 01, 2009

The only law suit news I have is that the Court has acknowledged my opposing counsel’s denial of the counterclaim;

Parties / Attorneys

Party No	Party Name	Answer	Attorney Name & Address

1 Plaintiff	PROTECH OIL	Denied	REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC Juris No : 423840 P.O. BOX 657 VERNON , CT 06066

50 Defendant	VIVIAN LEHMAN	Counterclaim

51 Defendant	WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TTEE SARM 2005-15	No Answer

But no hearing has been scheduled yet.

Otherwise, the copy of the Motion to Change Caption which I sent to Wells Fargo at the house, was returned, unopened.

Friday July 03, 2009

The events of the past few months have reminded me of a few things which occurred in the early days of my parents‘ marriage.

My paternal grandfather died before I was born. He left my paternal grandmother $100,000 cash, not money.

In their lifetime, they had two sons. Growing up, I had an Uncle Ross and Aunt Peggy. They had three children who were all born before me.

In my childhood, I addressed this grandmother as Grandma, and my maternal grandmother as Oma. This is German for grandmother. There were no ethnic issues on my father’s side, as he is sixth generation American with little understanding of his roots. Grandma knew of an ancestor from Vienna, Austria. I believe this was confirmed by my ability to play Waltzes on the piano when I took lessons. I astonished my instructor, Mrs. Edith Harris, every time. Although I wasn’t meant to be a musician, this was too easy. I also believe there was an Italian ancestor, which is why in my earliest days of piano playing, before Mrs. Harris, I could easily play Tarantellas. This is also why I can only eat Italian foods when I have the flu. This would explain my dark brown eyes.

My father left when I was two-years-old. My mother distanced herself from his family. So I never witnessed the fighting.

According to my mother, Grandma tried to orchestrate a battle between her two sons and their spouses for the inheritance. My parents refused to participate. My Aunt and Uncle tried to talk to my mother, explaining that $100,000 is much money.

My mother answered; “That’s $50,000 for each couple. Besides, who knows how many nurses she is going to run-around-the clock before her death. We will be lucky if she doesn’t cost us. And it would be easier for me to go out and earn the money than to bother with her.”

My mother tried to explain to me the expression in my Aunt Peggy’s face when $100,000 was reduced to the negative. Then my Aunt decided to put her secretarial skills to work and opened a business of typing dissertations. (She typed my father’s for no charge.)

My Uncle Ross never figured-it-out.

Before I was served with the Small Claims Court Action, it was made very clear to me that Mara Addison had a payment on her home equity line of credit due on March 23^rd. Henceforth, the $1967.42 plus interest and court costs were due by then.

So $2,000 which I was billed for, was turned around into $5,000 which I believe I am owed.

Tuesday July 07, 2009, 1:30 pm

Before 5 pm today, I want the Coventry Police Department to perform routine on-the-job drug tests of an Officer who telephoned the Police Department local to my current residence, and have him talk to me about repeated offenses of trespassing on the property and telephone calls to 891 South Street.

I called this Officer at the Coventry Police Department. He said he lied to my local Police Department and that the issue was letters I had been writing. According to him, and I think this is what I understood, I sent them a “Blank Midget Notice”.

I assume the “Blank” refers to a profanity.

I was too shocked to answer this allegation.

If the Coventry Police Department wants to dispute this, they can provide me with a copy of the tape recorded telephone conversation. I have the technology to hyperlink it to this website.

I asked for this Officer’s allegations in writing. He refused to provide such.

Is it possible he is too drug-induced to write?

When I spoke to the Dispatcher of the Coventry Police Department, I was informed that the Union does require routine drug tests.

I want the results of someone who talking to ghosts and cannot write a written report!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wednesday July 08, 2009

These are the next papers to be filed. I was certain they would never force me to do this.

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-vs-

Vivian Lehman &

Wells Fargo Bank,

Co-Defendants.

REVISION OF SERVICE ADDRESS

　1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the Defendant pro se, in the above-captioned action. I originally served a copy of the Motion to Change the Caption of the above-specified case to,

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

It was returned, unopened. The new address should be;

Wells Fargo Bank of 891 South Street

c/o Officer Robert Dexter

Coventry Police Department

1585 Main Street

Coventry, CT 06238

I would like to ask the Court to recognize the necessity of invoking law enforcement to ensure compliance with all issues of Constructive Notice. While captioned as a business, this house is residential, and unoccupied.

_______________________________________July 08, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Motion to change co-Defendant’s Service Address, in two pre-paid postage envelopes and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to

Wells Fargo Bank of 891 South Street

c/o Officer Robert Dexter

Coventry Police Department

1585 Main Street

Coventry, CT 06238

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

_______________________________________July 08, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Friday July 10, 2009

Dear Mr. Kibler;

Would you please telephone Mr. Kevin Williams, TAC of the Superior Court of Tolland County, and ask him if that is his signature on the Judgment of Strict Foreclosure? I assure you, it is not.

Then, would you please review the Courthouse file, and find this original Judgment of Strict Foreclsoure? I assure you, it isn’t there.

Then, would you please look at signatures of Andrew Barsom of the law firm of Hunt & Leibert, and compare his signature of this Strict Foreclosure Judgment to his signature on other documents in your files of other cases? I assure you, it is characteristically identical.

Then, would you please contact Mr. Barsom and ask him for a copy of his license? I assure you, it doesn’t exist.

Judgment

Yes, I received your first e-mail in August of 2007 with the attached Judgment. I lied to you when I said I never received it. But I knew it was a phony Judgment.

Before I go further in this, please understand, I am not blaming you for anything. You did all you could. But you are not an anthropologist. You cannot see through lies. And you have not lived with these people as long as I have. If anyone wants to become angry with you, let’s remember a few things:

At the time Hunt & Leibert tried to take me into Housing Court to evict me, you, for no charge, copied the 200-page manual with all the forms and written instructions. You gave me a complimentary set of oral instructions. There is textbook law, and practitioner law. I had both. Hunt & Leibert never showed for the Court date. I won by default.

At the time Hunt & Leibert tried to take me into Superior Court to eject me, you, for no charge advised me to file an Ex Parté e Motion. I lost, but that is not your fault.

And no one saw you laughing at Hunt & Leibert after my WHO, WHAT, WHERE… legal brief. When I delivered to your office front desk a copy of a later date motion, you were standing in the hallway with a big smile, “Hi Vivian. Shaking them up some more?!”

At the time of your e-mail with the attachment of the Strict Foreclosure Judgment, is when Crossmark decided to play a pro-active role in all this. They sent me a carefully worded e-mail explaining I had no obligation to acknowledge this. They thought I did not understand. So they sent it again. I did understand something else before their first e-mail.

I had no obligation to acknowledge your e-mail with the attached Judgment because the document is not stamped by the Court. Henceforth, it is null and void. This means that legally, it never existed.

Saturday July 11, 2009

And if you are still not convinced that this is a phony judgment, please call Countrywide Home Loans and ask them for a copy of the Deficiency Motion they attempted to file in March of 2009. Why would they want to do that?

Monday July 13, 2009

Dear Mr. Michael Blouin;

Do yourself a favor. Call the law firm of Hunt & Leibert and ask if you will ever recover the $10,000 you spent on a driveway, fencing and everything else purchased and installed to prove to me that someone is living in 891 South Street of Coventry, Connecticut.

The purpose of the improvements was to play with my emotions. I was expected to drive-by on June 09^th, the answer date for my opposing counsel. He was assured by Hunt & Leibert that my emotions would be adequately tampered with by then, and I would submit to his legal claim. And, of course, my lack of responsiveness was because I have not driven through Coventry since early April, and because my emotions cannot be abused.

The associates of Hunt & Leibert surmised that my resistant emotions are resultant of my lack of emotions. In 1997, instead of giving me equal-pay-for-equal-work, these cohorts sent me a married man with AIDS and a ten million dollar debt who was going to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he could have one erection with me.

Their purpose was to steal my second book. They inspired me to write this so Mara Addison, the assistant managing editor of my former publisher, Dorrance, could recover her gambling losses at Donald Trump’s Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. I don’t know exactly how the theft was going to work, but I don’t think she knew either.

In 1997, they assumed my non-responsiveness to the emotional abuse was either because

I have no sex drive;

I hate children; or

I don’t understand that my biological clock is ticking.

Their solution was to cure my problems. I was declared to have a psychological disorder because I could not be lured into a death camp. Any professional could cure this.

Mara Addison believed that her gambling losses were refundable if I would sit still for Donald Trump’s sabotage of my first book. It was my fault she gambled away her home equity line of credit.

In 1998, Kathy McTigue believed that Addison‘s associate, Monica Christiensen, had $30,000 to give away upon my demise. The latter female had to steal clothes from Kathy’s department store so she could conform to the dress policy. The store’s other executives, Dina Sturtevant, Debbie Walker Hauptman and Chris Poleto, also believed Monica had even more money she would want to give to them.

Are you joining the idiot list?

Wednesday July 15, 2009

The quiet of the Court led to my conclusion that I did not ask for enough money. So I revised the writ again. This time I did two writs, one for each co-defendant. The object of action of each is $5,000 in cash and title for a total of $10,000 money. This is the Cause of Action for Wells Fargo Bank:

“In 2007, Wells Fargo Bank seized the asset known as 891 South Street, Town of Coventry, Connecticut. In 2009, ProTech Oil, this Small Claims Court Action's original Plaintiff, filed suit against Vivian Lehman for the liability of the post-seizure heating bill. As per my April 2008 interactions with this Oil Company and the foreclosing law firm of Hunt & Leibert, I will offer Court testimony supporting my claim that ProTech Oil originated this Action aware of Wells Fargo's unwillingness to accept the liabilities coupled with the asset. My claim is also evidenced by ProTech Oil's lack of presentation of Cause of Action (see other writ). In addition to my testimony, I will be serving-and-filing interrogatories to support my argument and profer an explanation as to why I was given 41 hours to vacate, and then handed the $1967.42 heating bill. Vivian Lehman demands the house valued at $1.00 as per the Land Records of theTown of Coventry, Volume 1027, Page 84, as well as $4,999.00 cash for harassment.”

And this is the Cause of Action for ProTech Oil;

“ProTech Oil was this Action’s original Plaintiff. Connecticut Practice Book, Sec. 36-a-646, “No creditor shall use any… deceptive or misleading representation… to collect or attempt to collect any debt.” ProTech Oil’s Writ attached a supporting affidavit signed by Louis Zematis. She was “for the plaintiff”, but no one knows why. Under penalties of perjury, she included an “attached invoice (paragraph 3)”, but no one knows where that is. Paragraph 3 also provided a list of possible explanations for the debt: “heating oil delivered and/or heating services and repairs and/or installation of heating equipment rendered by plaintiff to defendant at defendant’s request”. The affidavit is “deceptive” and “misleading” and is presented to the Court in the guise of a Cause of Action. According to Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, “harassing litigation” is “vexatious litigation”. Henceforth, Vivian Lehman’s Cause of Action against original Plaintiff ProTech Oil is harassment.

I also included a Memorandum of Law:

Small Claims Court

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Case #

SCC-219909

Protech Oil,

Plaintiff,

-v-

Vivian Lehman &

Wells Fargo

Co-Defendants.

Defendant’s

Memorandum

Law

1) I, Vivian Lehman, am the Defendant pro se in the above-captioned action. I am herewith submitting this Memorandum of Law in support of my Counterclaim against Wells Fargo Bank.

2) Connecticut Practice Book; “Sec. 24-2. Allowable Actions These rules (of Small Claims) shall apply to actions claiming money damages only” (emphasis supplied).

3) According to Black’s Law Dictionary, 7^th Edition, “money” is “Assets that can be easily converted to cash”.

4) According to www.lectlaw.com, “money” is “bank notes, a check, and negotiable notes ... To support a count for money had and received, the receipt by the defendant of bank notes, promissory notes… is sufficient and will be treated as money.”

5) The issue of the Counterclaim is the fact that in September of 2007, Wells Fargo seized the asset of my former residence known as 891 South Street of the Town of Coventry, State of Connecticut. However, as this Claim against original Defendant Vivian Lehman (not added co-Defendant Wells Fargo) exemplifies, it refused the liabilities, such as the heating bill of ProTech Oil, above-Plaintiff.

6) As per the Land Records said Town, Volume 1027, page 84, the value of the house is $1.00. This is within the purview of the Small Claims Court of the State of Connecticut.

WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests of the Court to consider the Title of said property as an actionable object of this Small Claims Court case.

_________________________________July 15, 2009

Vivian Lehman

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Memorandum in a pre-paid postage envelope, and addressed such to the counsel representing ProTech Oil;

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
Juris No : 423840
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

However, I could not perform the same for;

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

Officer Robert Dexter of the Coventry Police Department demanded of me to cease all postal activity. This request was initialized on June 30, 2009 by Michael and Holly Blouin. These are the caretakers hired by the foreclosing law firm of Hunt & Leibert. I would greatly appreciate if the Court would counsel these attorneys on the concept of Constructive Notice. That is, returning legal papers in an unopened envelope with the handwritten note, “This is a residence not a business” while they know their original employer is the Bank, does not exempt the co-Defendant from liability.

__________________________________July 15, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Thursday July 16, 2009

I believe the Blouins do finally understand their $10,000 will not be reimbursed.

Their job is to mow-the-lawn. I paid my neighbor $60/mow. But I never had the silt fence removed and the brush cleared. The law firm invested in such landscaping. The lawn is much larger now. They are probably charging $100/mow.

$100 x 100 = $10,000

Five years.

And the $10,000 is what I know about.

If you will recall, my troubles began in 1990. Donald Trump began finding all of my friends and asking questions. When Sarah and her mother became involved, they immediately bought a Volvo Station Wagon. Even though Trump’s issues with bankruptcy were publicly known, they thought they would earn a fortune selling my privacy.

In 1999, when Kathy McTigue learned I was terminally ill, she signed a contract to have her kitchen remodeled. She didn’t like it when guests walked into the house and were able to immediately see into her kitchen. She also wanted a half-kitchen near her children in the upper floor.

It is very likely that the Blouins already spent the non-existent money. For some mysterious reason, people believe that abuse is profitable.

The bottom line is that the Blouin children will not have the financial means to pursue college careers.

Friday July 17, 2009

Dear Satan;

Thank you for your interference.

Thank you for changing this matter from the intelligent police officer to the dumb COP.

I have the letter.

I will await your further instructions.

P.S. Are you sure you want to scare Joe? I thought you are targeting the other one.

Dear FBI;

I have the letter from the Coventry Police Department of the State of Connecticut. It is signed by Officer Robert Dexter. It verifies that Holly and Michael Blouin are residents of 891 South Street.

While it is true they are not such residents, only caretakers, it is also true that detail is no longer a relevant legal issue.

According to the Land Records of the Town of Coventry, Wells Fargo is the record owner of this residence.

According to the property tax records, I am.

Neither this company nor I authorized this occupation. Henceforth, they can be charged with felony trespassing. Additionally, you need a search warrant, especially for their garage. There you will find all you need to prevent any future Trump activity.

Don’t believe me? Go look at it while they are not looking.

Dan….Please shut the water off in the basement by raising both levers up. And please pay Debbie to mow-the-lawn until I return.

PART II, July 17, 2009

Unfortunately, I cannot scan-in the letter. I can reproduce in verbatim. It was sent registered mail, return-receipt. And because they thought I would reject it, it arrived on a day at a time when I was not at home to receive the mail. They thought I would reject it. They were wrong. I have been waiting for it. It is dated July 07^th, yet arrived on the 17^th.

Vivian Lehman

This letter serves as a notice for you not to contact Holly or Michael Blouin who reside at 891 South Street. Any further contact by you in violation of this statute will be considered harassment;

Sec. 53a-183. Harassment in the second degree: Class C misdemeanor. (a) A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when: (1) By telephone, he addresses another in or uses indecent or obscene language; or (2) with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he communicates with a person by telegraph or mail, by electronically transmitting a facsimile through connection with a telephone network, by computer network, as defined in section 53a-250, or by any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or (3) with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm.

(b) For purposes of this section such offense may be deemed to have been committed either at the place where the telephone call was made, or at the place where it was received.

(d) Harassment in the second degree is a class C misdemeanor.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Officer Robert Dexter #346

If anyone does not understand this letter, please ask any of the helpful officers for assistance. For example,

What is a “class C misdemeanor“?

What is “second degree”?

What is Sec. 53a-250?

Why a “psychiatrist” rather than psychologist?

Does this suggest the perpetrator requires medication?

Don’t you have anything else to do?

(860) 742-7331

Tuesday July 21, 2009

WELFARE TARGETS FOR

BABY BAMA

The Presidential Baby can’t do his job.

So I would like to ask each of my students

to act as a welfare case worker

to interview him

and establish his defects.

Don’t forget to ask:

How many children do you have?

Do you have any teenage parents in the family?

Are you behind on your rent?

Do you need food stamps?

What work skills do you have?

Were your skills replaced by the

vacuum cleaner, washer/dryer, dishwasher, or some other electric appliance?

Remember, the taxpayer hasn’t paid him since he arrived on office because

You have to work to be paid.

He claims he has no work ethic.

But that is not his fault.

He was born that way.

I don’t know why.

Otherwise…

Re; Officer Robert Dexter‏

From:	vivian lehman
Sent:	Tue 7/21/09 10:16 AM
To:	mpalmer@coventryct.org

Dear SA Palmer;

As per our conversation today, I would like to explain my complaint, and demand a public apology.

On Tuesday July 07, 2009, I received a visit from Officer Ray Sypher of the Deep River Police Department. According to him, Officer Robert Dexter had told him that I was systematically trespassing on my former residence of 891 South Street, as well as making harassing phone calls.
I explained that was impossible. My car was disabled in my driveway for two weeks, and there was no phone in an abandoned house.

I then telephoned Officer Dexter. He had a different story. First, he explained I was transmitting letters. Then he said I sent a BLANK MIDGET NOTICE. (Today you explained Blank Eviction Notice).
As I was accusing him of falsifying everything, he reminded me of the fact that I was talking into a tape recorder. In simpler terms, I am not allowed to contradict him.

I should not have to explain to someone who graduated from the police academy that there is an American flag waving above your building which stands for a very different concept. If I can't contradict him, then this is a militia.

By the end of the day, I telephoned your dispatcher and left a message for you that I wanted emergency drug tests on Officer Dexter. He was not lucid, could not understand the Constitution, and was continually changing his story.

I also could not acquire the name(s) of those who complained. He did not know. I personally believe he was talking to ghosts.

As I explained to you on the telephone, Holly and Michael Blouin bought $2,000 worth of oil in my name for this house. I don't know why. They don't live there. I am now being sued for this money. I have to send copies of all papers to this address. There are two at issue now: Motion to Change Caption, and Memorandum of Law. In the former, I am requesting that my status change from defendant to plaintiff as I followed the instructions of the Court, but my opposing counsel did not. In the latter, I am requesting of the Court to understand my interpretation of a facet of the laws at issue.

You are aware of the July 07th letter which Officer Dexter transmitted to me, registered mail, return receipt, at taxpayer's expense. In this, he finally identifies who complained; Holly and Michael Blouin.

Are you sure he is not taking hallucinogenic drugs?

If you believe I am making false and malicious allegations, then please hold a public hearing at which Officer Dexter will have to face my cross-examination.

If you believe I am making false and malicious allegations against Holly and Michael Blouin concerning purchasing $2000 of fuel in my name, then please give them a copy of this e-mail. I am certain they will file a civil action against me for defamation of character and libel. And then they will have to explain why their visitations to the residence known as 891 South Street, is not criminal trespassing. They do not own nor rent this residence. The owner, Wells Fargo Bank, did not hire them to do anything.

I would like a letter from you, copy corresponded to Magistrate O'Keefe of the Small Claims Court, that affirms that transmitting copies of legal briefs is not in violation of the Harassment Laws as quoted by Officer Dexter in his letter to me. And that I am allowed to continue this practice after the transmission of Officer Dexter's letter to me.

As I offered today, I will provide law enforcement with a set of my fingerprints to confirm my denial that the Blank Eviction Notice was transmitted by me. Although you don't want incontrovertible evidence, you will receive it.

I WANT A PUBLIC APOLOGY.

Vivian Lehman

Friday July 24, 2009

I had long talks with Coventry Police Chief Palmer about the letter. According to him, while Officer Dexter forbade me from contacting Holly and Michael Blouin, sending them copies of the necessary legal papers is not a violation of the statute cited in his letter.

Two-days-ago, I offered to visit this Police Station and stuff the envelops in front of any of the Officers involved. The Chief declined my offer. So yesterday I visited my local Police Station. The Officer who visited my home was not there, but a State Trooper unfamiliar with the situation was. He did not understand the purpose of my visit, but I showed him every document before it was stuffed into each envelop, and sealed. I offered to mail it from there. He declined.

The envelops are addressed to

Wells Fargo Bank

891 South Street

Coventry, CT 06238

I would like everyone to understand how significant Officer Dexter’s letter is to me. The issue had to explode before it would stabilize. The Blouins did not have a right to speak on behalf of their employer and return the Motion papers, unopened, with a handwritten note, “RETURN TO SENDER. THIS IS A RESIDENCE, NOT A BUSINESS”. But without this explosion, this matter would never have been clarified. I do not believe these people are still there. I do not believe the envelops will be returned.

But if these are returned, I will file a motion to have the Blouins added as co-defendants. I still do not have the invoices. My original assumption was that claim was made for the heating fuel for the winter of 2008. And my original knowledge was that the foreclosing law firm has the cancelled check. I should not have assumed anything. It is possible that this involves heating fuel purchased after my ejectment. If I am correct, then the Blouins must be criminally prosecuted. This is fraud.

Yesterday, I stuffed everything into three envelops because there was so much of it. In the fourth envelop I stuffed a few items not hitherto fore received by my opposing counsel.

Wells Fargo received

Motion to Change Caption

Memorandum of Law

Copies of both Revised Writs

Lis Pendens (soon to be filed)

My opposing counsel received

Copies of both Revised Writs

Lis Pendens

The Lis Pendens will be filed with the Courts and with the Land Records of the Town of Coventry. It is a statement to anyone with any interest in buying the property who appropriately performs a title search, that a judgment may soon be entered affecting ownership. As you can see, such filing will have to wait until after the Magistrate rules on the caption, and until after the he recognizes my Revised Writ against Wells Fargo.

Superior Court

Small Claims Division

State of Connecticut

Case #

SCC-219909

Vivian Lehman

Plaintiff,

-vs.-

ProTech Oil and

Wells Fargo Bank,

Co-Defendants.

NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS

Notice is given that the above-entitled action was filed in the above-entitled Court on July 15, 2009 by Vivian Lehman, plaintiff Against ProTech Oil and Wells Fargo Bank, co-defendants. The action affects 891 South Street of the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland, State of Connecticut, and described below. Its current title-holder is Wells Fargo Bank. Title to specific real property is taken action upon by the claim. The Object of the Action is title to said property. Any persons in any manner dealing with the above-described real estate subsequent to the filing of this action will take subject to the rights of the Plaintiff Vivian Lehman as established in this action.

The property is described as follows:

A certain parcel of land in the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland and the State of Connecticut and shown as Assessor’s Lot 6 on a map entitled “Boundary & Wetland Survey, Prepared for Sonia Cohn, Showing reconfiguration of lots 6, 7, & 8. Lot 8 split into Parcel A and Parcel B, for property located at 85 South Street, Coventry, Connecticut. Sheet 1 of 1, Job #2003-0029, Scale 1’ = 100’, Dated February 2^nd, 2004, Revised 3/18/04. 4/04/04 and 4/13/04, Prepared by Bob Hellstrom Land Surveying”, which map is on file in the Coventry Town Clerk’s Office, and more particularly bounded and described as follows:

Said parcel is more particularly bounded and described as follows:

Beginning at an iron pin on the west street line of South Street as the southeast corner of lot 6 and the northwest corner of lot 7, thence

S 06° 27’ 54” W for a distance of 52.11’ to an iron pin, thence

S 14° 59’ 50” W for a distance of 129.17’ to an iron pin, thence

N 86° 08’ 16” W for a distance of 87.90 to an iron pin, thence

S 47° 13’ 46” W for a distance of 88.41’ to an iron pin found;

the preceding three (3) courses are along the land known as lot 7, thence

N 46° 20’ 37” W for a distance of 243.08’ to an iron pin, thence

N 43° 17’ 08” E for a distance of 309.67’ to an iron pin found; the preceding two (2) courses are along the land now or formerly of Hayes; thence

S 42° 39’ 47” E for a distance of 149.03” to an iron pin found, thence

S 45° 46’52”E for a distance of 75.97’ to the point of beginning, the preceding two (2) courses are along the west side of South Street.

_____________________________________, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Plaintiff pro se

Monday July 27, 2009

I have had many job interviews lately to supplement the $100 I am permitted to earn and the $180 I am permitted to receive through unemployment insurance benefits.

In April and May I was a seasonal at the FTD, Floral Transworld Delivery, call center. When the “season” was over, they apologized to me and let me go. Today I saw the HELP WANTED sign again. I assume it is for the Fall holidays. But the human resources manager researched me and learned I am not eligible for re-hire. She refused to say why. I was not even permitted to greet my old friends.

I have had many job interviews over the past few months. The interviews go well, and then there is no phone call. I call, and the phone call is disconnected.

I know why.

It is because former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and President Barack Obama want me to believe and practice the concept of White Supremacy. The FBI endorses this concept. My midnight stranger went from giving me good sex to grotesque sex as this issue was developing. His name is Special Agent Dan Curtain of the New Haven, Connecticut FBI headquarters. I do not know the color of his hair because he is bald with very little chest and pubic hair. His penis is approximately eight inches long. He explained to me that he often can’t have an erection. He did this by presenting his impotence to my face one night.

I believe that White People are more intelligent than Black. I believe it is the WHITE HOUSE not UNCLE TOM’S CABIN. And I moved to Connecticut because it is considered the wealthiest state in the United States. This means it has the smallest welfare population and henceforth, the smallest quantity of minorities. I believe it was natural for Secretary of State Rice to assume her role without showing-up for work. To her, it is a fancy welfare check. I believe the same for President Obama. I believe that God’s purpose for placing them in such roles was to prove such supremacy. After the failures of these two, no one would elect nor allow appointment of other Blacks, including Black people. I saw Blacks quit their jobs after he was elected. They assumed the welfare check was in the mail. It wasn’t. The White governors refused the money.

I had one Black friend in high school. I did not know her “younger sister” was her daughter until it came to the fore that every Saturday morning she was in the welfare office demanding an apartment for the two of them. According to her, she became pregnant after an unplanned act of passion, and did not understand that the consequences of her actions would be a pregnancy. In simpler terms, she characterized herself as a monkey.

So I would like a list of the tasks which the President cannot perform, as well as those which Rice could not, and I will begin to Target each one. The only one I cannot help him with is the fact that his wife does not orgasm. Is he asking for my help with that too?

I have observed that only White children do the Targets. The reason is obviously that the Blacks, including the First Children, cannot.

Tuesday July 28, 2009

Yesterday I received a circular letter from the Office of the Attorney General, State of Connecticut, Richard Blumenthal. It stated;

“You are eligible to receive a payment as a part of the settlement entered into between the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut and Countrywide Financial Corporation...”

I researched it on the Internet. It is an $8.3 billion settlement resolving issues with its clients concerning inappropriately mortgage marketing practices.

This is why Nancy’s Pelosi’s House of Representatives can Bank of America all of that money.

Can you guess how much I am entitled to?

Countrywide Settlement	$1944.35
Protech Oil’s claim	1967.42
	-$13.07

I wish I knew exactly how much Mara Addison’s mortgage payment is for. I am certain Mr. Blumenthal knows. They belong to the same Synagogue.

To receive this payment, I must sign a release and return it postmarked no later than October 22, 2009.

It is no coincidence that on October 09^th, my car lease expires. I have attempted to work-out a new lease with the dealer to purchase the car, not replace it with a new one. My dealer, Michael Howard, never returned my calls. According to his colleague, Sean Murphy of Columbia Ford in Connecticut, I need a $2,000 down payment. He informed me of this a few days ago.

On a related subject…

I researched the KKK on the Internet. I want to join. The only problem is that they require that I purchase my own robe and hood. In this economy, I can’t afford it. They probably loose many potential members that way. They should begin a Black Victimized Program.

Part II-----July 28, 2009

Dear Holly and Michael Blouin;

I told Satan you would never do it.

Don’t believe it? Look at all the snakes on the cable channels after your lie to the police in June 30, 2009. And there were suddenly many of these reptiles with the news reporters talking about a “recoil“. The satellites which observe me never noticed my lack of fear. And I am normally terrified of these animals, even tiny gardener snakes.

One of them was he.

You forgot that in

January of 2009,

I checked the Coventry Land Records as I was researching the related issue of the property tax payments. The transaction which you claim was made on

July 02, 2008

---sale of the house for $277,900--did

not

happen.

Felony trespassing is one thing. Falsification of Land Records is another. And according to this Land Records print-out you sent me, the record is Volume 1083, page 253. The Magistrate finds you very convincing. If he researched the Land Records and/or communicated with my friends, he would not.

On the date of this transaction, your husband did not have a profession. No mortgage lending association would have given you any credit.

And if you are living in the Coventry house, why was your print-out of the Land Records mailed from Hartford, 30-miles away?

The FBI did not arrest you for felony trespassing, nor did they perform the search of your garage. It doesn’t matter. I have something better.

Michael Blouin is an associate of Alliance Mortgage. He has a temporary mortgage origination license. If Governor Jodi Rell has any intelligence (and I do mean any), she should use this falsification as an excuse to revoke it.

What could that possibly mean?

The house in Coventry is almost within walking distance of a branch of New Alliance Bank. When I moved my accounts from New York, I refused to enter this bank. I never even asked for change. The FBI never thought to ask why.

“New Alliance” is a code for al-Qaeda. It means itself.

If this bank and such financial institution want to disagree with me, then they can place their denials in writing, and I will publish such on this website with an apology.

If the FBI plays its legal cards exactly right (and they probably won’t) this can go from a title-records-falsification, to other accounting issues. Once they enter the New Alliance financial radius, they can destroy all of al-Qaeda.

My grandfather was a urological surgeon. If you will recall, he said, “The key to surgery is to enter the correct layer, then you can excise everything.”

President Baby Bama is constantly teasing me with the “key”. He never noticed the engraved choice of words which were made long before his.

Satan, a child of God, is the tempter. Humans are the evil-doers.

Dear Coventry Land Records;

The print-out sent to me indicates that on July 02, 2008, Holly and Michael Blouin purchased 891 South Street and that such is recorded on

Volume 1083, page 253.

Would you please print-out this page and transmit to

Magistrate Thomas O’Keefe

Centralized Small Claims Court

80 Washington Street

Hartford, CT 06106

Thursday July 30, 2009

..and, of course, if the house sold in 2008, I would have received a 1099-c in January of this year.

Otherwise, the three envelops I sent to 891 South Street were returned, unopened with the note that “you used to live here and should know this is a residence, not a bank.”

I followed God’s instructions. I did everything possible to bring Countrywide to the negotiating table. I can’t stop what will happen next.

If everything proceeds as per the planned trap, Countrywide will throw a tantrum at the thought of paying the next property tax bill. It is due in September. If you will recall, last year it was paid in August, before I received the bill and had an opportunity to explode in wrath.

Countrywide/Bank-of-America has no choice but to sue Hunt & Leibert as well as report all involved to the Connecticut Bar Association. Disbarments are likely, as well as revelations about who has phony credentials.

Countrywide paid a fortune in property taxes, without the benefit of the tax break. It also paid for landscaping, caretaking, and legal fees They must be out at least $50,000 as well as the $278,000 mortgage. They will probably consider offering me a deal which includes my agreement to open the foreclosure judgment. That would force Wells Fargo to tell the Court the truth. Won’t happen. And I can’t change the fact that it has been over three years since my last Countrywide mortgage payment. This means that Countrywide legally abandoned the mortgage as per Connecticut statutes. And, of course, I have a print-out of the land records history of the house. Countrywide is not included on it. This means the mortgage never existed. I can’t change that either.

It is now in Satan’s domain.

Monday August 17, 2009

Legally, I have performed some research. The Countrywide legal settlement is not for foreclosure activity, but rather mortgage marketing. They believe I was not treated properly as a client.

I still have not filled-out the form. I have until October 22^nd. Checks will be issued in January of 2010. I have been thinking about taking a little trip. If I loose weight, it would be to Florida. If I still do not look presentable in a swimsuit, I would go on an ice skating trip into the crisp mountain air. Many years ago, a friend recommended her home state of Vermont for my asthma.

I would go, except for one problem; money. I listened to the commercials promising any flight-package, anywhere, for $99 or less. Of course, I couldn’t find one. This is what a trip to Vermont would cost:

$450 round trip flight or

$ 83 round trip train tickets

$200 = $50/hotel-night x 4 nights

$390 ice skates***

Totals

$1040 or

$673

***You are probably thinking I should rent ice skates. But each shoe size is different. I ice skated during elementary and graduate schools. The only way for me is custom made.

Tuesday August 18, 2009

I should have also mentioned that my friend is a paralegal who, several years ago, advised me of extreme caution in reading the fine print of those “deals” offered. In traveling to Vermont, the most important issue is flexibility of the dates in case of snow storms. I do not want to become one of those travelers who sits endlessly in an airport watching through the window as Mother Nature decides my fate. The law firm that she works for specializes in contract disputes.

I should have also reminded everyone of the fact that on July 28^th I announced that I may be eligible to receive $1944.35. It is now three weeks later. It is obvious that my friend performed the same research as I; reviewing the judgment in the Countrywide Home Loans settlement. After careful consideration, we obviously reached the same conclusion. Signing the waiver precluding myself from future legal activity against Countrywide concerning actionable mortgage related issues would not adversely affect my legal position as a defendant in the currently non-disposed case against Wells Fargo Bank.

The next question I anticipate inquires as to why she did not contact me herself, but rather used the “enhanced” system. The answer is that she does not have my phone number nor e-mail address. If you will recall, I am renting a room. The phone is not in my name and I never stated on this website in whose name it is.

She has privileged information on a certain law firm. It is pursuant to a contract dispute. She is willing to show me the file, but not give me a copy nor provide the name through the enhanced system. They will never be able to prosecute her, because I won’t reveal her name. But if they prosecute, they admit its validity. If they sue for libel and/or slander, they must explain under penalties of perjury it was false.

A signatory has a previous conviction for prostitution and felony drug dealing in another state. She or he should have been disbarred from the State of Connecticut.

Research it yourself! Then tell me who it is, because I am very curious.

Thursday August 20, 2009

I might have misunderstood her. I might have heard what I wanted to hear. Or I might have conjoined the information with something unrelated. She knows something that she believes I need to know. And three weeks after I announced I was going to receive almost $2,000, she extended the invitation.

I believe that the people calling me liar performed research by asking a certain law firm. Is that enough to call me a liar? Are they so credible? Do you really think they are going to admit to anything because they were asked?

Something to think about…

Concerning the ejectment over one year ago, my opposing counsel, Sean Sweeney, looks twice my age. Yet I am certain that our birth certificates will reflect a nearly identical year. This means he has had twice my life. Why?

How about if I take a long overdue vacation and find out?

Sunday August 23, 2009

This is what has been happening in my world.

Officer Robert Dexter was never disciplined for walking up to a vacant house, receiving a complaint from a ghost, and then aggressively acting upon such. According to the Coventry Police Chief Palmer, these are not symptoms of on-the-job hallucinogenic drug use. According to the Great Uncle of their neighbor Monica Christiansen, these are symptoms of an inferior British brain. If I ever have a face to conversation with this Uncle Adolph Schicklegruber, what would Officer Dexter want me to say in his defense? I would like a written answer. They have my address and phone number.

And the President arranged with my new part time employer that my $40 first paycheck would be sent to the nation of Kenya. According to him, the Natives are restless and can’t work. The new nationalized health insurance plan should fix that. We will become sick while watching them waste our money.

On an unrelated subject…

The lady who is my local postal delivery person is out sick for a few