Home    2001    2002    2003    2004 

Jan-Jun2005     July-Dec2005    2006

Jan 2007-THE E-MAIL

THE E-MAIL-Chase the Hunt

Chase the Hunt-Dec 07

Jan - May 2008    May - Oct 2008    Nov - Dec 2008

Jan - March 2009    April - June 2009

June - August 2009    Oct - Dec 2009

Family Tree

Jan - Mar 2010    April - June 2010

July  - Sept 2010    Oct - Dec 2010

Inserts     Eva Braun     Eva's Story

Paintings     Targets 02-04     05-07

Xmas 04     05   Tree     Notes   ISM

Bar     X-Targets     Tax-Mice

PresViv     E.Indicators     SepticTank

   NewLaws     NewSci

MostWanted     Attic      Fupi Is A Dummy Targets

Saturday September 08, 2007

*The term "of council" means a collection agent for the firm.  Very few firms have such.  This means clients don't want to pay.

If the law firm wants to dispute, they can e-mail to me copies of such licenses and I will reproduce such on this website and apologize.

I am currently in litigation.  The two attorneys who signed the motion papers, including the summons, against me are Linda St. Pierre and Peter Ventre.  Six months ago, while the satellites weren't watching me, I contacted the Connecticut Bar Association from a pay phone.  They couldn't find any record of the licenses of either of these individuals.  Of course, one possible explanation is that the person I spoke to didn't properly research this.  So the following table is awaiting such documentation.

5 pm

I still haven't heard from them, and my e-mail address is posted upon this web-page.  It was two weeks ago that I split 2007 in anticipation of what I had to do today.

My employer involved their attorneys who subliminally, through our private e-mail system, transmitted to me important legal advise.  I understood.  But it is icing on the cake.  And it seems to me that the cake consists of layers of phony attorneys, as well as those who are licensed out-of-state.  I can't say why, except that maybe it is how they avoid responsibility for their actions.  And their actions must be very interesting.  Perhaps the FBI might like to visit them?

I have more to say about Hunt, Leibert and Jacobson.  It will wait.  Would they like to provoke me?

6 pm

I still haven't heard form them.  Maybe at 9-10 pm, when al-Qaeda opens-up the phone lines, they will telephone me.  They have such number on file.  Otherwise, I have some helpful advise for Mr. Leibert and Mr. Jacobson.

Online Schedule EL AL Flights from New York to Tel Aviv on Monday, September 10, 2007 The duration of the flight is estimated between 10 hours and 10 minutes to 10 hours and 45 minutes, depending on the type of aircraft used. Please note that flights that have already departed are not displayed. No. Date Departure Time Arrival Time Stop en Route Date Change Flight Code Share Flight Classes A/C 01 10SEP EWR 14:30 TLV 08:05 0 YES LY 028 NO FCY 777 02 10SEP JFK 14:55 TLV 08:15 0 YES LY 032 NO FCY 744 03 10SEP JFK 19:55 TLV 13:15 0 YES LY 002 NO FCY 744 04 10SEP JFK 23:50 TLV 17:30 0 YES LY 008 NO FCY 777

Sunday September 09, 2007

As to Peter Ventre, his law degree is either in education, employment or health.  That is all his alma mater, Nova Southeastern University of Florida, offers.  The issue they have with me is within none of these categories.

As to Linda St. Pierre, her alma mater is Quinnipiac University of Connecticut.   The programs they offer are civil advocacy and dispute resolution, criminal law and advocacy, family and juvenile law, health law, intellectual property, and tax.  The issue they have with me is within none of these categories.

This suggests to me that they are signing paperwork which someone else prepared.  There must be a reason why that (those) individual(s) don't sign their own work.  We have to find that reason.

But nonetheless, I still have not received evidence of their licensure.  I know it is the weekend, but if I were in their position, I would find this too serious to wait until Monday morning.  Hopefully by then, the Connecticut Federal, State and local courts will be flooded with motions for Summary Judgment by Dismissal with Prejudice.

For September 11th, we are all supposed to perform a good deed.  Hopefully, mine will be arriving in Tel Aviv, Israel on such date.  As to the Saxon, Mr. Hunt, Paganland doesn't take back its Englanders.

The Superior Court Judge appointed in this action is

Hon. SAMUEL SFERRAZZA .

According to the American Bar Association, he is in private practice.

According to the Connecticut Bar, he is not on the list.

Monday September 10, 2007

I would appreciate

all of the help available

from my German cousins

for the deadline of

September 11, 2007

Midnight

The Imprisonment of FUPI.

I don't know how

Wall Street

is going to do it.

Wednesday September 12, 2007

I have just learned something.  To be included in the Connecticut Bar Association (CBA) listing, an attorney must pay an annual fee of $50.  That may explain why I am not finding Peter Ventre or Linda St. Pierre.

However, on Monday I telephoned their firm asking of each of them to submit evidence to the Superior Court that they are licensed to practice in the State of Connecticut.  Neither wanted to answer my question.  They had someone else return my call.  I did not want to discuss their licensure with anyone except the licensees.

The nationwide American Bar Association website includes names of those who pay the ABA annual fee, as well as those who don't.  To my knowledge, it is all inclusive.  So the names which I did not find there, are not attorneys.

Thursday September 13, 2007

I don't know what is going on with Fupi.  But what my German cousins need to know is that I suspect she is totally illiterate.  Is that piece of information good for something?

The litigation indirectly focuses on their interest in forcing me to buy back my New York home.  If William loves me so much, he could buy it for me.  And he and his fiancée could live there.  I could room with the raccoon in the attic.

But as my employer attempts to prepare me for what could be some acrimonious battles, the issue of licensure seems to have struck a weak point in my opposition.  They don't want to discuss it.  But if they choose to face me at the negotiations table or by filing any other motions, they will.  It is my Constitutional right to demand that all such documentation be attached to anything they file with the court.  I am making such demand upon them, without going via my attorney.  While I don't want to insult him, I do want to emphasize my civil liberties.

My employer is Crossmark.  The slogan is The Way to Market.  Major companies such as Nabisco of Kraft and Russell Stover Candies send us into stores such as Kmart to help with marketing.  Among other things, we perform resets--reorganizations according to new lists of active items.  This means we remove all discontinued products and place everything in their new position according to the new diagrams.  We are currently working on a big project at the Home Depot.  It involves resets of the aisles which are being converted into Christmas.  Our other services include reviewing items, such as pharmaceuticals, which are being marketed in stores such as CVS.  We have to verify that shelf tags are in place, and items are in stock.

My health has much improved.  My energy level is ascending.  My biggest enemy is still the alarm clock.  But I don't use that most of the time because I set my own hours as each small project has a window of 5-30 days.  I have found myself working five-days-straight/Monday-thru-Friday.  It was such a delightful surprise!  But occasionally, I experience extreme exhaustion for a day or two.  There is no forewarning.  These are being called collapses, but I don't like to apply that word unless I need an ambulance.

Onto family things...

As I tour each store, I have been collecting $1 long-and-narrow frames for my birthday.  It is amazing what I can find.  I have decided to use one of these to represent the title page of my great-grandfather's dissertation on the processus vermiformis.  I called the German embassy to ask what this is.  She said, considering the issue that it is a medical thesis, it must be a Latin expression.  I researched that and found it means appendix.  The only word I can't translate with the computer is vergelogt.  The embassy suggested I e-mail everything over.  I did and the Hitlers interfered.  The computer sent it back.  I think they also threatened her.

But nonetheless, I am concluding it means graduation.

This isn't exactly what it will look like.  Transposing from Word to Frontpage means a loss of quality.  It converts single-spacing into double.  I am not complaining. I feel very privileged to be living in a world in which it is this easy to preserve these memories.

The resemblance between the Kaiser and my ancestor startled me.  However, if you look at the position of the ears compared to the eyes, it is not the same.

But if you will recall, the ghost of my mother insists on focusing my framing project on the issue of the fact that I was very difficult breach-birth for her.  I was born with pigeon-toed feet.  My mother believed the breach caused the foot-problem.  But then I found in Selma's (i.e., Dr. Max's wife) album a picture of my grandmother (Max's daughter-in-law) pigeon-toed skiing.  So perhaps the foot-problem caused the breach?  Or perhaps there is no connection?

According to Wikipedia, this Kaiser had been a very difficult breach delivery for his mother.  It caused a nerve disability in one arm.  Because of this, he always posed for the camera exhibiting only one side such that the asymmetry was unnoticeable.  Maybe there is a connection?

For $3, I found at Wal-Mart a beautiful plastic frame made in the USA.  It includes the perfect matting.

An Interpretation  of Ernst Barlach’s Dramas Supported By the Psychology of C. G. Jung. [German Text]. Margaret Lehman, Ph.D. New York University, 1965	Ernst Barlach		Margaret Lehman	Eine Interpretation von Ernst Barlachs Dramen Gestützt Auf die  Psychologie von C. G. Jung. [German Text]. Margaret  Lehman,  Ph.D. New York  University, 1965
	1870- October 24, 1938		1899- October 24, 1990

One of the other two frames will be used for a book which a medical student wrote about my grandfather's work.  While my great-grandfather was an internist, my grandfather was a urological surgeon.  The book is in German and was published within such medical community after his death.

The fourth frame I will use for the sketch-work of Barlach.

Saturday September 15, 2007

I was on Wikipedia researching Ernst Barlach.   It referred to me to such namesake Society and Museum of Hamburg, Germany.

1914	1914 cropped	My grandmother 1920?

I have been working on the other two frames.

1929 Magdeburger Ehrenmal Farm Servant Citizen Honor Mark in the Kathedrale der Heiliger (Saints) Catherine und Maurice Ernst Barlach, sculptor 1870-1938 Photos from Wikipedia

Ernst Lehmann: `The investigation of Urological Diseases’   With contributions to Lehmann’s Bio- bibliography    Inaugural thesis for the acquisition				Ernst Lehmann: ‘Die Begutachtung Urologisher Krankheiten’   Mit Beiträgen zur Biobibliographie Lehmanns    Inaugural- Dissertation Zur Erlangung
	Dr. Ernst Lehmann  1900- Urological surgeon		Dr. Ernst Lehman- 1976 Author’s subject
of the doctorate from the medical faculty Bavarian Julius Maximiliana  University Graduation of Hans-Martin Bossert from Anabach (author) 1986			der Docktorwürde der Medizinishen Fakultät der Bayerischen Julius-Maximiliana- Universität zu Würzburg Vergelogt  von Hans-Martin Bossert aus Anabach (mfr.) 1986

An Interpretation  of Ernst Barlach’s Dramas Supported By the Psychology of C. G. Jung. [German Text]. Margaret Lehman, Ph.D. New York University, 1965	Ernst Barlach		Margaret Lehman	Eine Interpretation von Ernst Barlachs Dramen Gestützt Auf die  Psychologie von C. G. Jung. [German Text]. Margaret  Lehman,  Ph.D. New York  University, 1965
	1870, birth-1914 (above)-October 24, 1938, death photo from Ernst Barlach Society of Hamburg, Germany		1899- October 24, 1990

Sunday September 16, 2007

The other story which my mother has been insisting on including is about the elephant-which-was-still-in-my-room.

When my mother was a teenager, her parents divorced.  My grandfather re-married.

My grandfather visited us before and after my parents divorced.  He divided his time equally between us and his step-grandchildren.  He called them my-other-grandchildren.  This infuriated my mother who took the position that because these others had a live-in father, he should devote more time to us.  Whenever he used that expression, she answered, "You don't have any other grandchildren!"

One day he visited and brought me a pink-plastic-inflatable-elephant which I adored.  When he was packing to leave one week later, I noticed in his suitcase a giraffe and a few other animals.  I asked if I could have those too.  He said, "Those are for my other grandchildren."  I gave my mother's answer with her expression.  He didn't answer.

When I was approximately 20-years-old, I told my mother about this.  She remembered that when he returned they entered my room without me and he was amazed to see it prominently positioned, in excellent condition.  The other children had torn theirs to pieces on contact.

I was very satisfied.

I would have discarded the elephant in New York, but for that fact.  It is very large, and would occupy too much space on a wall.  It also doesn't look nice when it is flat.

Another story which my mother has been insisting on concerns my grandmother's childhood.  Like other children, she did not have a notebook but rather a small blackboard slate.  She broke it, and there was no money for a replacement.

I can't use that story because I don't have an artifact.  But nonetheless, the satellites caught me answering my mother's transmission and demanded to know the situation.  At the time, my connection with this website was not active.  So I typed everything onto the monitor and left the room.

Another story also concerns my grandmother as a fiancée of a medical student.  She was hospitalized and while she lay in her bed, the eminent professor entered with his entourage of students, including my grandfather.  Using the Latin language, he turned away from her and asked of them not to mention certain things in front of the woman.  He used the wrong gender-indicative-pronoun.  So she used her Latin proficiency to correct him.  My grandfather turned red.

Another great story, but I have no artifact.  If I had a favorite Latin book or poem with her notations on it, that would work.

Thursday September 20, 2007

Dear Mr. Hunt and Mr. Leibert;

I understand your client has strategized a one-month-harassment-campaign against me.

There is a piece of paper on my desk.  If you don't council them to stop, it will be submitted to the Superior Court.

Any questions, you have my phone number.

 

Dear Connecticut Lawyers;

Would somebody please set the precedent that any legal actions filed under the juris number of Hunt & Leibert must be voided because five attorneys practice in this firm who are not listed in www.abanet.org, as well as two attorneys who have refused my request to submit to the court evidence of their licensure in the State of Connecticut?

Friday September 21, 2007

Below are the court appearances which Hunt & Leibert must make on September 24th, October 1st, 15th and 22nd.  I want the attorneys of such law firm to bring with them proof that they are licensed to practice law, and licensed to practice law in the State of Connecticut.  It is possible that my perception of this law firm is incorrect.  But, it is the Constitutional right of any defendant to make this demand of the attorney(s) representing the party taking such action.  My request certainly can't hurt anyone, but it can help me.  If I am correct, then the Chief Justice of the Connecticut Courts must be immediately notified.

Monday September 24, 2007

What is a juris number?

I can't find the answer on either the website of the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, or the Connecticut Bar.  Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edition, doesn't discuss it either. My guess is that it is the equivalent to the certificate to practice.

If you will recall, in January of 2002, while I was living in my former state-of-residence, I was treated by an emergency room doctor, Amy Robbins Salerno, who interpreted my high white blood cell count (infection) as a "psychiatric disorder".  She also said I was depressed because I did not enjoy vomiting.  I found this suspicious.  The hospital's attorney was able to produce her certificate, but not her license.

In 1991, I had an attorney, Barbara Pickett, who liked to boast proudly that she had an Addition Consulting Business even though she was too illiterate to read her monthly checking account statement.  I found that suspicious and contacted the Westchester County Bar Association.  They confirmed her certification.  If I had a computer, I would have researched her in the American Bar Association's website.  She was a high school drop-out.

New York State issues certificates to physicians, nurses, architects, and those of many other professions.  The legal profession has a different name for it.  I don't know what it is.

The license is for life, but the certificate must be renewed every two or three years, depending on the field of study.  The attorney general's office must have given Salerno a certificate, even though she never attended medical school.

The State of Connecticut issues juris numbers to lawyers.  But apparently, it is not just individuals who receive these.  Law firms may also acquire such.  This provides an umbrella for those unlicensed to practice law, as well as those unlicensed in the State.

I added a few weeks to the table of Hunt & Leibert cases.

Tuesday September 25, 2007

Today, as I was working at KMart, a man walked into the store and gave me a peculiar look.  I sensed he is FBI.  He walked aimlessly around and left at the same time I did.

KMart was my last Crossmark stop of the day.

The only explanation I can think of is that maybe these companies did make these telephone calls.

The plaintiff in the law suit brought against me is Wells Fargo Bank.  They are claiming I am delinquent on a mortgage.

The problem is, I never had a mortgage with this company.

So while my neighbor's sister is waiting to move-in after the upcoming eviction, someone should explain to her she made a big mistake surrendering her other home.

The piece-of-paper upon my desk is a request for the price-quote for the preparation of the transcript of the hearing which occurred on July 30, 2007.  The plaintiff won a judgment of a "strict foreclosure".

I don't believe the hearing ever occurred.

Pooh is going to try to make a deal with me which involves his demand that I help the United States Government "finish what they started in Iraq."  A peaceful acquisition of oil monies, despite Fupi's constant attack on our soldiers with roadside bombs.

I won't ask for help from the feminists because they see nothing wrong with Fupi blow-jobbing her way into a professional position.

I won't ask for help from the civil rights activists because they see nothing wrong with Pooh's back-handed compliment to their movement.

I would like to ask of Hunt & Leibert to stop this, before that piece-of-paper moves.

Wednesday September 26, 2007

And how did I know the decree of the judgment?

Did I see it?

No.

Did my attorney know about it?

No.

I found the disposition.

	Plaintiff Name    VS    Defendant Name    WELLS FARGO BANK      v.   LEHMAN, VIVIAN       Docket Number: TTD-CV-06-5000959-S Court Location: Tolland File Date: Nov 01 2006 Return Date: Nov 21 2006 * Last Action Date: Sep 11 2007 ADR Status: Not Applicable Case Type: PROPERTY - FORECLOSURE List Type: .   Disposition Date: Jul 30 2007 Judge/Magistrate: Hon. S. SFERRAZZA Trial List Claim:   Disposition: JDGMT-STRICT FORECLOSURE  * 'Last Action Date' is a data entry date, not actual date   Parties / Attorneys Party Name & Address Pty No. Pltf / Def Pro Se Non Appear No Fee Party WELLS FARGO BANK 01 P . . .   Attorney: HUNT LEIBERT JACOBSON PC (Juris No. 101589) 50 WESTON STREET HARTFORD, CT 06120   COMMITTEE THE 02 P . . .   Attorney: TIMOTHY JOHNSTON (Juris No. 029787) 7 KEYNOTE DRIVE VERNON, CT 06066   VIVIAN LEHMAN 50 D . . .   Attorney: VAN STARKWEATHER (Juris No. 100338) STARKWEATHER & KIBLER 545 N. MAIN STREET MANCHESTER, CT 06042     Motions / Pleadings / Objections Entry No Entry Date Description Initiated By Argu able Result Result Date Ordered By 101.00 Dec 18 2006 MOT FOR DEFAULT-PLEADING P No Granted Jan 05 2007 BY THE CLERK 102.00 Dec 18 2006 DEMAND DISCLOSE DEFENSE P No       103.00 Dec 28 2006 MOT DFLT-FLR TO DISC DEF P No Granted Jan 08 2007 Hon. SAMUEL SFERRAZZA 104.00 Dec 28 2006 MOT STRICT FORECLOSURE P Yes Order Jan 08 2007 Hon. SAMUEL SFERRAZZA 105.00 Dec 28 2006 DEMAND DISCLOSE DEFENSE P No       106.00 Jan 08 2007 AFFIDAVIT OF DEBT P No       107.00 Jan 08 2007 ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE P No       108.00 Jan 08 2007 AFFIDAVIT P No       109.00 Jan 08 2007 OATH OF APPRAISERS P No       110.00 Jan 08 2007 APPRAISAL P No       111.00 Jan 08 2007 JDG-FORECLOSURE BY SALE Court No       112.00 Mar 19 2007 CLAIM D No       113.00 Mar 19 2007 AFFIDAVIT-DEF BANKRUPTCY D No       114.00 Apr 05 2007 MOTION FOR PAYMENT P No Granted May 07 2007 Hon. SAMUEL SFERRAZZA 115.00 Jul 17 2007 MOT TO OPEN JUDGMENT P No Granted Jul 30 2007 Hon. SAMUEL SFERRAZZA 116.00 Jul 30 2007 AFFIDAVIT OF DEBT P No       117.00 Jul 30 2007 AFFIDAVIT P No       118.00 Jul 30 2007 OATH OF APPRAISERS P No       119.00 Jul 30 2007 APPRAISAL P No       120.00 Jul 30 2007 JDGMT-STRICT FORECLOSURE   Yes   Jul 30 2007 Hon. SAMUEL SFERRAZZA 121.00 Sep 11 2007 NOTICE OF JDG - CERT/SRV P No         WELLS FARGO BANK   v.  LEHMAN, VIVIAN The following table lists events that have been individually scheduled for this case for today, or for a date in the future*. Other court activity may be separately scheduled on short calendars or assignment lists. This table was last updated on 9/25/2007. Individually Scheduled Court Dates # Date Time Event Description Status No Events Found
èèèè

 

In 1992 I was served with a law suit by my former New York attorneys for non-payment of fees.  When the summons was placed in my hands, I decided this wasn't a legal action, it was cheap tuition for the best law school in the country.  Sink-or-swim/my-own-money-on-the-line, what law school could do that for me?  I decided that time $10,000 was on the line, next time it will be the house.

Here is that time.

On this date of 2007, I have decided I can't ask my current Connecticut attorney, Frank Kibler (highly recommended) of the above-specified firm, for any more help.  This is now an anthropological issue.

The legal advise Crossmark provided will remain our secret.

Thursday September 27, 2007

A few facts...

1. In 1992, I also decided I was going to make all of my mistakes on that law suit.  But the Supreme Court judges never let me slip-off of the calendar.  They and their law secretaries (attorneys who assists them--not legal secretaries) gave me much advise on procedure, especially when they realized I could perform cross-examinations as well as any other anthropologist.  The mistake I made was not fully realizing the game phony attorneys play with the system.  In the small claims court action of 2003, when my opposing council placed in my hands the phony physician's certificate, and then my research could not find evidence of licensure, I finally understood everything.

2. On another related subject, last year, my last entry was on November 5th.  Then they shut me down.  The law suit was filed on November 1st.

3. On September 10th of this year, I left very nice messages on the answering machines of Peter Ventre and Linda St. Pierre informing them I was making a "friendly reminder" that they had until 5 pm on the 11th to submit to the court evidence that they are licensed to practice in the State of Connecticut.  Josie Lewis and Audrey Buckland left messages on my machine informing me they are returning my calls and that they would be happy to help me.  I saved their messages on my machine.  And every few days, I have been re-saving.

4. Last night, the FBI Special Agent was in my home.  Today I checked the messages, these are gone.  He should understand he will never have rights to this house.  Whether or not he did this, he never helped me fight.  On the contrary, as the battle intensified, he informed me I was completely isolated.  If I had ever woken-up for him, I would have asked if he could research their licensure. But I wonder why he sided with the gangsters.  Does he want me to call him inferior-brained?  My grandparents went to Hitler' rallies and voted for him.  They never told me why.  I finally understand.

Saturday September 28, 2007

On Monday, Hunt & Leibert will have a busy day in the Superior Courthouse of Bridgeport.  In addition to those I previously listed, I found one more case and added it to the table.  In this case, like three others, the defendant does not seem to be represented by council.  My guess is they probably won't show at all.

One of the Monday-plaintiffs is Wells Fargo.  This morning I considered mentioning the defendants by names and offering encouragement.  But I changed my mind.  Nonetheless, I would like to urge these people to make their appearances.  If they as individuals set the precedent, rather than the lawyers involved in the other cases, the Connecticut Bar Association will have some explaining to do.

But if they don't want to appear, they can do as I did--leave a message on the attorney's answering machine nicely requesting that such be presented to the court by the end of the next business day.

If you are facing foreclosure because you haven't made your payments, you must bear something in mind.  Everyone has rights.

Perpetrators of the most heinous crimes have rights.  And they are not always convicted.

You have nothing to loose by asking of your opposing council if they are licensed to practice in the State of Connecticut.

If they are not, then their firm is probably not the only collection-agency in this country who has this problem.  Life experience has taught me that such people always have to play dirty, no matter what they are doing.

My guess--and this is only a guess--is that they never received state licensure because they could not present their driver's licenses to the state examination committee.  And that they could not present such, because they were not using their real names.

Sunday September 30, 2007

In tribute to my old high school days, I have decided to ask of Douglas MacDougal to please return to his wife, Sarah Latimer MacDougal.

He has to.

She will allow paternity tests on all three (or four) children.

He is a licensed insurance agent.  And I would like to ask of everyone to consider his investment strategies of accounts guaranteed to decline in value which are based on the premise that a woman who becomes a widow at age 40 has no expenses and immediately acquires employment of her husband's salary range.  His company calls it term life insurance.

Thursday October 04, 2007

As to the question of whether or not Wells Fargo purchased my mortgage from Countrywide Home Loans, the answer is, earlier this year I contacted both companies.  They do not do any business with each other.

On a related issue...

This morning, when I awoke, I thought it was a dream.  Someone broke into my house in the middle of the night and choked me into unconsciousness.  He didn't need much time or effort because of my severe asthma.

As the day progressed, I had some difficulty swallowing and pains in my neck.  I told the Coventry Police Department.  The officer concluded it was a dream.  No report was made.

Instead of asking law enforcement, I should have asked someone else.  I want an answer.

Saturday October 06, 2007

Hunt & Leibert did not make the claim that Countrywide sold or transferred to Wells Fargo the mortgage.  In paragraph 4 of the Complaint, this is what it is said:

"On said date (May 23, 2005) to secure said Note the Defendant(s), Vivian Lehman, did execute and deliver to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc as Nominee for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., a mortgage on the Property, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.  Said Mortgage was dated....Said Mortgage was assigned to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee for SARM 2005-15 by virtue of an Assignment of Mortgage to be recorded on the Coventry Land Records.  The Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee for SARM 2005-15, is the owner and holder of said Note and Mortgage."

No exhibit is attached explaining the "Assignment of Mortgage".  And the Complaint clearly states that such information is "virtuously to be recorded on the Coventry Land Records".  Obviously, it never was.

I have contacted both Countrywide and Wells Fargo and asked what all of this means.  Neither had an answer.  Wells Fargo does not own any Countrywide mortgage.

But it is interesting to note that the mortgage is attached as Exhibit A.

The significance is that it is standard trial practice and procedure to denote numbers to exhibits of plaintiffs, whereas defendants use letters.

The mistake of using letters instead of numbers was one which I made in 1992.  Should I conclude from such that an attorney did not write this, but rather copied it from other paperwork?

Saturday October 13, 2007

I think my opposition hacked into Crossmark's computer.

And even if they didn't, I am certain they would want me to think they did.

Should the piece-of-paper move?

Or should I file a motion asking of the Court to subpoena evidence of their licensure?

Or should I ask of the Connecticut Bar Association to investigate if the precedent was set?  I think it was, especially since I heard my neighbor's sister screaming at 5:30 am on Thursday.  If the Association doesn't act, there are many individuals in this State who can investigate this without the help of their lawyers.  And by the time they are finished acting on the precedent, the Association will be very embarrassed.  If that is what it wants, I won't interfere.

I would like to ask of Mr. Hunt and Mr. Leibert to select one of the above, or I will select all.

For the past year-and-a-half, I have not been watching any news programs.  Sometimes I can't avoid these, such as when I am sitting in the break-room of one of my stores.  On the 16th, there will be a slight change to my practice as I will no longer be able to directly enter my Charter e-mail, but rather will have to go via the news page.  They obviously have something to say to me as we are approaching the date of 90 days since the disposition.

Don't say it!

What is she thinking?

"U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice seen at a news conference in Moscow, Friday, Oct. 12, 2007"  Charter.net

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

Tell her to stop thinking!

Sunday October 14, 2007

What is he doing?
from whitehouse.gov, dated October 12, 2007

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

Tell him to stop whatever it is he is doing.

Monday October 15, 2007

Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 4:57 PM From: vlehman6463@charter.net To: Frank N. Kibler <XXXXX> Subject: Re: Strict Foreclosure Size: 2 KB Mr. Kibler; In early August my Charter e-mail system went down as they updated their security systems. I don't know what judgment you are talking about. Nonetheless, I don't know why Mr. Leibert is worrying about giving the ABA one more reason to disbar him, especially if the Court, by precedent, voided his law firm's Connecticut juris number of 101589. But if he wants to play the rules, so too should all of his friends. He will counsel them by noon of October the 16th. That is the end of this negotiation. Vivian ---- "Frank N. Kibler" <XXXX> wrote: > Vivian: > > > > As my e-mail of August 7, 2007 had indicated, Wells Fargo received a > judgment of strict foreclosure on July 30, 2007 with a law day of September > 17, 2007. In the event that you did not pay the entire debt due, the title > to the property would transfer to Wells Fargo the following day. Subsequent > to that day, the bank could seek an eviction through the marshal in the > event that you remained in the property. > > > > I received a phone call from Attorney Rich Leibert of Hunt Leibert & > Jacobson this morning indicating that you had left voice mail messages with > his office concerning the foreclosure - I suspect as a result of the marshal > serving an eviction notice on you. Attorney Leibert indicated that because > I represent you in the foreclosure he is barred from communicating directly > with you - such would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. > Should you want me to obtain or relay information to his office, please give > me a call. > > > > Frank N. Kibler > >

Thursday October 18, 2007

I spoke to my attorney yesterday.  Instead of researching attorneys Peter Ventre and Linda St. Pierre on the Connecticut Bar website, he looked them up in the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch's web-page:

He tried to convince me they are attorneys.  I didn't tell him the part of the FBI Special Agent erasing the messages from my answering machine thereby eliminating the evidence I had that they received my request for proof of licensure and registration.  So while it is true they have juris numbers, everyone's behavior tells me something very different.  They are going to have to do better than that.

My attorney also informed me that there is one other law firm in this State which performs foreclosures:  REINER REINER & BENDETT PC (Juris No. 102892).

My same instructions apply.

Saturday October 20, 2007

Yesterday and the day before, I spent much time in my attorney's office.  I was served with a NOTICE TO QUIT POSSESSION, which instructed me to move out of the premises by October 23, 2007 or an eviction action may be started...

I am not going anywhere.

It was not signed by Peter Ventre or Linda Jane St. Pierre, but rather by Sean Sweeney, who does appear on the abanet.org.

And the Notice does seem to be out-of-sequence.

My attorney printed-out for me a publication of the Connecticut Superior Court, A TENANT'S GUIDE TO SUMMARY PROCESS; STEPS IN AN EVICTION ACTION.   He will have another publication for me on the 23rd as we prepare counter-measures.

But considering the out-of-sequence issue, what I have been wondering is if I am the only one who was served with this.

 Did the law firm serve this on every defendant,

especially those not represented by an attorney?

If so, I want the Chief Justice of the Connecticut Courts immediately notified.

Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers

I can't find an address for her, but according to the ABA website, she is located in Stamford, Connecticut.

Sunday October 21, 2007

Yesterday I should have mentioned that it is only those not represented by attorneys who are accomplishing dismissals.   I would like to mention these people by name, because I believe they deserve high esteem.  It is not easy to walk into a courtroom after a non-attorney like myself made some suggestions.  But they did.  So if you have to cite a precedent, you can try using their case numbers.  Normally, precedents are cited by using the names of plaintiff v. defendant,  but I don't want to embarrass anyone.

And I should have mentioned that on September 24, October 1st & 15th, there were a total of 18 cases including those represented by council.  Five of these were dismissed-----almost one-third.  This is very high, of course.  And all dismissals were in the Bridgeport Court.

Hunt and Leibert have a very heavy calendar on the 22nd.  This would explain why they want me, and possibly everyone else, out of our houses by the 23rd.

But the Notice I received does not specify a court date.  The procedure becomes more complicated than the foreclosure.  I would urge anyone served with such to hire an attorney if they have not already.  My attorney has some excellent ideas on how to counter.

Frank Kibler

545 North Main St.

Manchester, CT  06040

860-643-2109

Wednesday October 24, 2007

Results are still coming in.  You must remember that all court paperwork must be processed.  Nothing can be posted immediately.  But I am glad the attorneys are catching-up with the rest of us...

Highlighted in Pink----------Danbury

Highlighted in Yellow---------Bridgeport

Highlighted in Green--------Stamford

Highlighted in Blue-----New London

No highlight-----New Haven

All dismissed cases were also listed in the non-updated list.

And guess what I found on the Connecticut Judicial Branch's website?!

Friday October 26, 2007

Another foreclosure judgment was recorded for the 22nd.

And on the 29th...

Highlighted in Pink----------Danbury

Highlighted in Yellow---------Bridgeport

Highlighted in Green--------Stamford

Highlighted in Blue-----New London

Highlighted in Purple----Putnam

No highlight-----New Haven

Saturday October 27, 2007

You are probably wondering about what happened at the first meeting of the Bench-Bar Foreclosure Committee.  I would recommend asking one of its members.  I found his e-mail address on the website of the law firm of which he is a partner.

rleibert@huntleibert.com

860-246-5889

Good job Chase!  We will discuss it further in 2009.

Sunday October 28, 2007

The behavior of Justice Chase Rogers is probably baffling you.  And the fact that Governor Jodi Rell appointed her is probably even more perplexing.

Some of the individuals representing themselves who achieved dismissals, are females with no co-defendants.  My guess is they are probably single parents whose husbands, upon whom they established financial dependency, walked away from the bills.  But if my former friend from high school was one of those defendants, she probably would not appear.  She is afraid of the bureaucracy.  What she would probably do is wait for the world to understand its obligations to her three financial-dependency-mechanisms (children).  And she would wait, and wait...  And then never blame herself for the consequences.

Wouldn't this be an issue of concern for both prominent women?

No.  And there is a reason for that.

I know nothing about the Chief Justice, but Jodi Rell looks like a Saxon.  This means that her career was to support her husband's.  I don't know the specifics.  I don't have to.  They all behave identically.  And she is very proud of herself for tolerating all of her husband's issues and holding-onto him.  She probably doesn't understand these single women and blames them for their own problems.

You have to bear in mind that the Saxons were the servant class.  These are the people whose services we replaced with a dishwasher, washer/dryer, and vacuum cleaner.  My mother had maids when she was a child.  She described how she and her mother could not just give them a lump of cash as their pay at the end of the week.  Every tender had to be explained.  She would place one in the maid's hands and explain this is for Monday, this next note is for Tuesday, etc.

Our culture threw these maids out of our homes and forgot all about them.  Now they have to go to school and learn how to read and add these numbers.  They can't.  But they didn't just disappear.  And because they often reproduce without any sense of responsibility, they typically hold the majority.  They can always exploit their population explosions to acquire the welfare benefits they need.

And this prominent Saxon, who arrives for work every morning and accomplishes nothing, is receiving welfare in the form of a paycheck.  So what more could you expect from Governor Dishwasher and her Chief Justice Vacuum Cleaner?

I am going to try to avoid these judges, and would never hire these lawyers.

Monday October 29, 2007

I just received my instructions.

The questions are:

Does Hunt & Leibert have professional malpractice insurance?

If so, does such cover the dismissals?

If so, how much more before the policy is cancelled?

Tuesday October 30, 2007

Fupi must have returned to the United States after planting her latest roadside bomb in Iraq.  This one injured a Brigadier General.

November 8th is the L&G deadline for her to turn-herself-into the FBI.

I would like to remind these special agents that she may have biochemical weapons.  At the gates, she must be stripped and hosed down as they wear environmental protection suits.  They should also have Solaray's Tart Cherry herb nearby because she may use ricen.

Wednesday October 31, 2007

No results from any jurisdiction.  Maybe tomorrow?

I am anxious too.

Friday November 02, 2007

Once again, our heroic judge is in Bridgeport.  And once again, a single individual without the benefit of counsel steals the show.  But unlike our heroines of the past few weeks, this one is a male.  And I wonder when Deutsche Bank is going to get upset.

NOVEMBER 05, 2007

Sunday November 04, 2007

November 10, 2007

As you can see, this is a separate Superior Court Action from the last one.  And, as you can see, my attorney has decided I should handle this without representation.  And, as you can see, on November 8th, I served and filed my Motion to Dismiss.  A few weeks ago, he gave me the forms and the manual.  In the brief, I repeated my behaviors of 1992 in that I infused anthropological expression.  It was force of habit, but the Court was completely unprepared for it.

The John and Jane Does which you see above is an acknowledgement by my opposition of the possibility that other people may reside in the house.  I was served with several copies of the Summons-and-Complaint----one for each party.  And, as you can see by the position of the "Y" is the pro se column,  I am the only one who has served and filed an appearance.  Pro se means I am representing myself.

In my brief I describe the inadequacy of their timing.  I don't describe their reason.  It is their obsession with ruining my birthday on November 9th.  But yesterday morning I awoke to find the Tolland County Courthouse is doing an excellent job keeping all records up-to-date.  And by 1 pm I realized the United States Postal Service is doing an excellent job delivering the mail.  I knew my opposing counsel received his copy.

What they wanted me to awaken to was the news that the hearing is scheduled on November 16th.  But the reality is, I then reached a decision not to wait any longer to serve and file my Answer.  Because this is typewritten on a form, and  I don't currently have a scanner, I have retyped such into this webpage.

NOVEMBER 05, 2007

Friday November 16, 2007

Today I had a court date.  Nothing happened.  There is nothing to become excited about.  It wasn't good or bad.

This is the whole story.

On November 8th, the Court transmitted to me via the United States Postal Service a notice of the court date.  It never arrived.  On Wednesday the 14th, the housing clerk telephoned me to explain that it was accidentally sent to my street address rather than my PO Box.  Henceforth, it was returned to her.  Although I never said it, I found this peculiar because the earlier transmission by the Court informing me of the docket number was addressed correctly, and did arrive.  As I conversed with her, I learned that my Answer (i.e., the statement in which I request the "whole truth"), which I hand-delivered on November 9th, was not in the file.  Yesterday, I delivered a copy.  It was filed.

Yesterday, a paralegal from Hunt & Leibert telephoned me to explain that while they were aware of the court date, they had no attorney available.  They were therefore motioning for a continuance (i.e., postponement).  I asked her for an e-mail of this.  She immediately transmitted such.  It didn't arrive.  She did it again.  It didn't arrive.  We tried my other e-mail address.  It immediately arrived.

This morning I went on the court's website and saw the hearing was "proceeding".  I decided it is better to make an appearance than not.  I went and spoke to the clerk.  She had no knowledge of any motion for any continuance.  I was also informed that I am the first case.

This was just a hearing.  It was not before a judge, but rather a housing specialist.

While I was waiting outside, I spoke to a couple who also received a Notice to Quit Possession.  They said they were only 20 days late on their rent.  I asked if the eight-day-rule was observed (i.e., eight-days from the time they were served with Notice until the deadline date they must depart).  They didn't know what it was.  I demanded to see the Notice.  It wasn't observed.  However, the plaintiff did provide a reason--"non-payment of rent".  If you recall, no reason was provided in the Notice I was served.  I told the couple about the Statute, wrote down the citation upon their folder, and suggested they try for a dismissal.

The Courtroom door opened and we all entered.  My case was called.  I responded as did my opposing council.  The specialist immediately informed me there was a continuance and said I could leave.  My opposing council did not.  I assume because he had other cases.

I don't know why my case was first.  It is possible it was because of the continuance.  It is also possible that I was lucky.  There is one more possibility.

Maybe our government doesn't want me to see what I have already noticed from personal experience in the Courts and from studying the judicial branch's website---defense attorneys are not allowed in the housing courts.  I witnessed this also in New York.  Corporate America is playing a shrewd, ruthless game.

I suppose you are waiting for me to request of everyone to telephone the American Bar Association and demand a change.

I am NOT NOT NOT!!!!!!!

Instead, I want you to know your rights.  Even if you are behind on your rent or mortgage payments, don't just stand there in a courtroom and let a judge or housing specialist talk down to you.  Remember, the judge is depending on your vote.  S/he works for you.  You pay this individual's salary.  So make certain you have something to say:

You would like the plaintiff's attorney to place on the public record evidence of licensure and state certification.  You don't just want to rely on what the computers tell you.  You are a human being and rely on yourself.  You are NOT accusing anyone of anything, but you have a right to see this for yourself.

Are there laws in your state specifying a certain time span between the date you are informed you will leave your premises, and the deadline date for such departure?

Was the plaintiff's attorney specific enough in the paperwork you were given?  Maybe you do know the reason why (e.g., non-payment of rent), but that doesn't make you a mind-reader.

Is the plaintiff's name identified correctly in the caption (e.g., Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman)?

After we have humiliated the American Bar Association enough, the defensive attorneys will flood the courts.

These are all of the cases before the Tolland County Court today.  My opposing council was there for #6--TTD-CV-07-4008078-S.  Apparently, they have not identified the defendant.

Saturday November 17, 2007

In 1992, the anthropological expression I used was the phrase, in the guise of.  I used it again in the WHEREFORE clause of the above Motion for Dismissal:

"...defendant respectfully requests of the Court to recognize the plaintiff’s initiatives as an attempt to acquire the premises by filing an Action formulated in the guise of judicial pursuit..."

Fifteen-years-ago, it stunned the Courthouse.  It is normally used to describe how cultures clothe their traits "in the guise of" mythological characters.  In this case, the concept that I ever had a mortgage with Wells Fargo is the myth.  Back then, I minimally grasped the concept that my former attorneys did not believe I owed them anything, but I could not develop this theory.

I don't know which of the above list is the case of the couple I spoke to yesterday, although I have a guess.  They lost.  But I don't know if they used the information I suggested.

On another subject...

In a few days is Thanksgiving.  The day we observe the busiest hospitalization day of the year.  Please remember what it is really all about.

Whenever I visit WalMart to perform services for my employer, I hear the announcement that it is also Family History Day.  How true!  What better opportunity to formulate a family tree!  It isn't just about remembering, it is also about legal protection.  Maybe there are unclaimed accounts and/or properties out there somewhere?  When you find such, this is evidence you will need.  I would like to ask of all grammar school educators to allow this to be admissible as a term paper.  I would like to ask of students to remember to include all you learned about geography, as well as at least one language lesson featuring a sagacious phrase and its translation.  And I would like to you to search for assets, but you don't have to include this information in your presentation.

Suggested Questions

What is your mother's maiden name?

What is her mother's maiden name?

What is your paternal grandmother's maiden name?

What were the occupations of your ancestors?

Where did they live?

What language(s) did they speak?

Were arranged marriages practiced?  Was such a good concept?

Were they allowed to marry outside of their religious or social background?

Were bride-prices and/or dowries transmitted?

Were they patri- or matrilineal?

Were they patri- or matrilocal?

Were women allowed to have money and/or land?

Were women formally or informally educated?

What was a good sagacious phrase and how was it expressed in its original language?

Why and how did they come to the United States?

How many States were in the Union at the time of their arrival?

Who was President at the time?

Did they arrive via Ellis Island?

Was their arrival before or after the Statue of Liberty graced its presence on the waters?

When was their first presidential election and for whom did they vote?

How much was a loaf of bread?

What were their voting priorities back then and how have these changed?

Where should you look for the unclaimed monies and/or properties?

Suggested Term Paper Vocabulary

Acculturate

Antebellum

Bequeath

Codicil

Emigrate

Enculturation

Escheat

Immigrate

Lineage

Probate

Question

There is a word defined as a good sagacious phrase, but I can't think of what it is.

Try to find out and use it in your term paper.

 

Sunday November 18, 2007

This is the Notice to Quit Possession which was served upon me.  As you can see, Hunt & Leibert are a little confused.

 

Monday November 19, 2007

The British FBI Special Agent broke into my house over the weekend and stole some legal paperwork.  I believe they are looking for my strategy.

I can do two things:

I can telephone his supervisor and explain I know what he looks like naked--information I never wanted but received anyway.

or

I can file a counter-claim.  It won't be against Wells Fargo.  I have contacted them several times and they have no knowledge of this.  I believe them.  This is why I have never monitored the activity of their stock nor requested a boycott of their financial services.  The law suit will be against the firm of Hunt & Leibert.  My attorney turned-me-loose in the courts, this is what will happen next.

Friday November 23, 2007

Today I arrived at the Buckland Hills Mall of Manchester, Connecticut to perform one project which I forgot to do a few days ago.  As I was arriving, someone ran-up from behind me, grabbed my pocketbook, and ran off.  I screamed and hollered for someone to acquire his license plate number.  One teenage girl ran after him.  She wasn't quite as fast.

Another person called 9-1-1 and the police soon arrived and took everyone's statement.  They had me use their cell and office phones to cancel the two cards which were in there.  Mall Security assured me they would review the video cameras.

This is the only time in my life my pocketbook was ever stolen.  My wallet was stolen once.  It was in 1991 when my mother and I visited Germany.

I would like to welcome Hunt & Leibert, as well as Wells Fargo, to assure me that this was not an attempt to acquire my social security number.  I welcome them to state in writing that they were not involved in this.  I will print such, and apology for any non-malicious misconceptions I may have created.

If this theft is connected to these issues, then I can only say one thing:

ONE MORE QUESTIONABLE INCIDENT,

AND I AM GOING TO COUNTER-CLAIM.

I AM GOING TO ASK FOR ENOUGH MONEY

SUCH THAT THEIR LANDLORD

FORECLOSES ON THEM.

And if Wells Fargo was involved in this, I would like to remind this company that their signature is on nothing.  So they should not want my social security number.

Saturday November 24, 2007

Has my supervisor met the new retail representative?  That is, the individual who attempted to steal the Home Depot project from me, and rearranged my schedule such that I did the wrong Mall project on Wednesday.  This rearrangement was obviously in anticipation I would try again on a day on which I would park far from the store cameras.  If she has met him, would a nice FBI Special Agent (if one exists) please show the satellite video of the theft to my supervisor?   If one does not exist, can the German government help me again?  The people who stole my pocketbook in 1992 were Romanians visiting the train station.

Tuesday November 27, 2007

Dear FBI;

I understand that a woman prostitute cannot be employed by your agency.  And I understand that any such agent of al-Qaeda would be imprisoned.  But what about a male Special Agent who allows the record to reflect that he has been climbing into bed with me for the purpose of financial manipulation as his friends of al-Qaeda prepare their next move?

By your own standards of decency, shouldn't he be fired?

And, of course, the fact that I cannot be so manipulated is reflective of my lack of sex-drive.  That was the official position of the Billy-Goat (Clinton) Administration.  But what about that of the Pooh?

Saturday December 08, 2007

I would like to ask of my opposing council, Sean Sweeney, Ken Pollock, and the supervising partner of their domain, Richard Leibert, to stop hiding behind the subliminal messaging system and start fighting like men.

Three Male Attorneys

vs.

One Female of German Descent

What are they so afraid of?

The cowardly British FBI Special Agent is on their side, while demanding from me an invitation for Christmas with presents.  Is this what Eva Braun is talking about when she insists it was Germany which was under attack?

I would like to herewith invite the three men for a conference in my home.  Would they like me to select a date and time?

Tuesday December 11, 2007

Today I served and filed the following:

 

Superior Court Housing Session of Tolland at Rockville, Connecticut   Wells Fargo Financial,          Plaintiff,     vs. Vivian Lehman, pro se,          Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )     Case No.: TTD-CV-07-4008210-S   REQUEST FOR A REVISED COMPLAINT   1.  I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned action. 2.  As of this date, the Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Financial, has not submitted any statement affirming and/or verifying its responsibility for the Nature of, Cause of, and/or Object of this Action. WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests such document with a signature of a Wells Fargo executive.  And that such be served-and-filed within 30 days of below specified date as per 2007 Connecticut Practice Book, Section 10-37.   ______________________________   __________________ VIVIAN LEHMAN, Defendant pro se  December 11, 2007 891 South St/PO Box 629 Coventry, CT  06238 860-742-6463 TO: Kenneth J. Pollock Hunt, Leibert & Jacobson 50 Weston Street Hartford, CT  06120

Thursday December 13, 2007

It wasn't an easy decision to serve-and-file that.  Before I arrived at the post office and then the courthouse, I performed as many Crossmark tasks as possible as I allowed myself as much time as possible to think it through.

I have been watching the DVD, A Few Good Men.  I have been listening over-and-over to Daniel Kaffee (i.e., Tom Cruise) yell at Joanne Galloway (Demi Moore), "It doesn't matter what I believe.  It only matters what I can prove."

My mother always said, "You can go into a courtroom and be absolutely right, and loose."

In 1992, my opposing counsel admitted, during my cross-examination, that they did not disagree with my positions.  Or, in simpler terms, they agreed with me in that I owed them nothing for their legal services.  The Judge then called me into his office and insisted we settle.  He also said I should appreciate their efforts to impose their Addition Consulting Business upon me.  He is a graduate of Cornell University.

So what I will eventually tell my children is that it isn't about whose right, wrong, or what you can or can't prove.  It is about what the judge thinks.  And try to avoid those who don't think.

The court date of Wells Fargo vs. Vivian Lehman should have been on November 16, 2007.  My opposing counsel motioned for, and received, a continuance.  Our next court date should be tomorrow.  It isn't.  This suggests to me that the Judge thinks we should settle.

I have had several telephone conversations with Wells Fargo.  Several supervisors have insisted that even if I wrote a check for $310,000, they couldn't process it because there is no account to apply it to.  I want the Judge to understand this.

As I thought everything through on the morning of December 11th, I reminded myself of the fact that last month, they had the plumber cancel our appointment two hours after he was supposed to arrive.  While it is true that they enjoy routinely doing this to me with any professional I hire, I think that this time the issue is that they believe I am leaving.

Otherwise, they have been quiet.  That means something is coming.  So with the Holiday spirit, I decided that giving is better than receiving.

My employer wants me to hasten the deadline date.  But time is on my side.  If I loose I will become homeless.

My Request for a Revised Complaint still hasn't appeared in the Courthouse Case Detail.  This could be because the Courthouse is a few days behind processing paperwork.  If not, nothing will change the fact that the plaintiff cannot receive any money from me.

Friday December 14, 2007

This morning my Request to Revise did appear on the Case Detail.  I believe the Court now understands this is not a regular foreclosure, but rather a crazy one.

My employer is adamant that I must counterclaim.  I would first like someone to explain why we are in a hurry.  As far as I know, the only something my opposition is planning is a sentimental journey to Bedford.  Which won't happen, and even if it did, I am living a much nicer life here.

If Wells Fargo does not sign the document, I am assuming that the law firm will have full liability, if I win.

On a related subject, if you will recall, this law firm's equal-but-different law firm is Reiner, Reiner & Bendett.  I found an article in the Hartford Courant that the State Attorney General had some issue with them, and they settled without admitting to guilt.  They will have to pay $700,000 to satisfy kickback allegations.  The important point, as it relates to me, is this law firm took a hit, but kept on going.

My counterclaim will have to be with the objective of ceasing all activity against me.  Today, it is a malicious foreclosure with all the harassment I can endure.  Tomorrow, it could be something else.  I need help making a decision.

Should I go for $10,000,000?

Before I make my final decision on this,

I would like to ask of the

Superior Court Judges of Tolland County,

to telephone Wells Fargo Financial

and ask what they would do if

I wrote a check for $310,000

payable to this company,

with my social security number

entered into the memo section

(because I have no account number).

COULD THEY MAKE SUCH DEPOSIT

??????????

Saturday December 15, 2007

I have received no feedback.  Let my try this again...

Before I make my final decision on this,

I would like to ask of the

Superior Court Judges of Tolland County,

to telephone Wells Fargo Financial

and ask what they would do if

I wrote a check for $310,000

payable to this company,

with my social security number

entered into the memo section

(because I have no account number).

COULD THEY MAKE SUCH DEPOSIT

??????????

Dear Hunt & Leibert;

The counterclaim for $10,000,000

is ready-to-go.

This is your last warning to stop all harassment

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I understand you do not want

my neighbor to plow my driveway

after 12" of snow was dropped upon it

and more is on the way

and my car sank 6"

while I tried to go to work.

At 9:30 this morning

her cousin made the excuse that she was

asleep and had a 10 am hair-dresser-appointment.

Maybe God wants me to

loose my temper.

And while I have everyone's attention, for the third time...

Before I make my final decision on this,

I would like to ask of the

Superior Court Judges of Tolland County,

to telephone Wells Fargo Financial

and ask what they would do if

I wrote a check for $310,000

payable to this company,

with my social security number

entered into the memo section

(because I have no account number).

COULD THEY MAKE SUCH DEPOSIT

??????????

And this is what happened next.

I called for Chinese take-out to be delivered to my home.  I explained I will shovel the end of my driveway for their car.  That part isn't gravel like the rest of it.  Rather, it is paved because the first six-feet of the property belongs to the Town.

Shovel...Shovel...Shovel...

Angry-face...Angry-face...Angry-face...

Then a man with a small child and his plow arrived.  He did the driveway.  I tried to pay him.  He insisted it was an unsolicited service and said "Merry Christmas".

Except it wasn't unsolicited because I could have stood in his way.

As I was trying to pay him, I asked him to also do before the front door.  As he carefully worked it, he stepped out of his truck and insisted on returning the patches of grass to their original position.  I explained I am not a lawn-oriented person.  But he wanted to.

After he left, I ate my meal and then dug my car out.  It is back in the garage.  I am not going to work.

I would have called my neighbor yesterday.  Yet in all my years of living in the North-East, I have never needed a plow in December.  I had no idea how bad this was until this morning when I tried to exit the garage, and sank.

Twelve-inches, and more is to come tonight.

If Hunt & Leibert sent him, that was a very quick act of desperation.

I am still not certain what is going on with Wells Fargo.  My guess is that the events in 1995 were much worse than I thought.  At the time the legal action was filed in 2006, I finally understood that the personnel of my former publisher visited Donald Trump's Taj Majah Casino, and gambled everything and more away.  They assumed their losses were refundable with large bonuses if they could convince me there was a market for books with half-sentences.  They neglected the obvious fact that Trump has been fighting bankruptcy for many years.  And the reason why he invited them with a bus for a comfortable ride, was because this business was loosing money.

Before I fired the publisher, my relationship with The New York Times was extraordinary.  They helped me in my personal and human rights battles.  It all began when we fought together for justice after the Tiananmen massacre in Beijing, China.  But at some point, their partner, NBC, partnered with Donald Trump in the Miss Universe, Miss USA and Miss Teen USA Pageants.

I now understand something else must have happened.  As they anticipated making money off of my book, they must have secured a loan, and now have to make the payments.

Sunday December 16, 2007

I still don't think they heard me.

 

Before I make my final decision on this,

I would like to ask of the

Superior Court Judges of Tolland County,

to telephone Wells Fargo Financial

and ask what they would do if

I wrote a check for $310,000

payable to this company,

with my social security number

entered into the memo section

(because I have no account number).

COULD THEY MAKE SUCH DEPOSIT

??????????

 

If they ever do make the phone call, I would like them to explain what I found on www.ct.gov.   The date the following was posted is the same as the Court date we should have had to dismiss the case.  Apparently, the Dishwasher and Vacuum Cleaner, with their mouths full of soap and heads full of dust, are waiting for me to make this call.

Do they require an account number?

Monday December 17, 2007

I know the Judges have a busy schedule.  Maybe today they have time for me?  Is five-times a charm?

Before I make my final decision on this,

I would like to ask of the

Superior Court Judges of Tolland County,

to telephone Wells Fargo Financial

and ask what they would do if

I wrote a check for $310,000

payable to this company,

with my social security number

entered into the memo section

(because I have no account number).

COULD THEY MAKE SUCH DEPOSIT

??????????

Thursday December 20, 2007

If you will recall it was on October 16th that I was served with the Notice to Quit Possession of  my home.  My guess is that this fact was known to the woman who is planning on moving in here after I am thrown out.  Because on October 17th, she had a near heart attack.  I just learned of this as I noticed her taking prescription medication.

She must be terrified of the courts, with good reason.

I suggest her family, and attorneys, take a good look at what is at stake.

Sunday December 23, 2007

Dear Prime Minister Gordon Brown;

I realize you are very busy practicing WICCA (i.e., women-infants-children--------"I'm pregnant!  This is how much money you owe me!").  And I realize you are very busy manipulating the work ethic of United States citizens to finance your socialism.

I would appreciate if you would take time out of your busy schedule to address one issue.  A United States government official of British descent has subliminally issued a death threat to me.  What exactly is his objective?  There are only two possibilities:

To prove Eva Braun is telling the truth when she says it was Germany which was under attack.

or

To prove the superior qualities of my German brain.  He cannot attack me, and expect to win.  My grandfather was a urological surgeon, and I know what to do.

If he makes any such attempt, both issues will be entered into my presidential platform, and I will have to advocate the reinstatement of a German military.  Guns versus Biochemical-Weapons.  It has been attempted before.

When my grandparents went to the rallies to support their candidate, Adolph Hitler, they chanted enthusiastically as he explained that German war reparations were financing British, French and Russian women who had no knowledge of who fathered their children.  Taking the position that efficient, competent Germans had no obligation to finance promiscuity, Hitler immediately stopped such payments when he took office.

The female who is waiting to move into my home as she expects a successful conclusion of the illegal foreclosure action against me, is of British descent.  She can't sue the fathers of her two children for rent money, because she doesn't know who they are.

I can't ask of you and your people to evolve into human beings, because the separation between the real and counterfeit species occurred over ten million years ago.

But I can ask of you to consider what is at issue.

I will never be able to visit your country, because I am wanted for murder.  The British customs official, who, at the time of our encounter, was pregnant with one of the many children (i.e., lab specimens) of Qusai/Dennis/Robert  Hussein/Thompson/Flanagan, blames me for the death of her baby because I never told her that babies are treated by pediatricians.  Your law enforcement agency agreed, writing in their report, "Descendant of Germany ancestry failed to take initiative on the inferior qualities of the British brain."

If he attempts to murder me, I will never be able to visit your country for more than just legal reasons.  I will not want to cope with your inability to forgive me.  I will have to by-pass the United Kingdom and go directly to Germany, where I have many friends who know who fathered their children, and understand that babies are treated by pediatricians.

Are you sure that is what you want?

Monday December 24, 2007

I just spoke to Linda Mallon.  Remember her?  She was my boss in 1995 when I fired my publisher.  She took the official position that the rule in her store was that the-victim-pays-for-everything.  I let her live by that rule.

Her son, I believe, looks just like Majed Moqed, one of the September 11th hijackers whose plane crashed into the Pentagon.  And if you will also recall, I believe the terrorists jumped-off of the plane before impact.  And if you will also recall, he was a pilot for American Airlines at the time this occurred.

As I was talking to Linda, Mark arrived for his Christmas visit.  She said he won't stay long.

THE FBI HAS ITS CHANCE!

Otherwise...

On December 14, 2007, the law firm mailed its Objection to my Dismissal Motion, but they still haven't filed it.  I think they are trying to play a game.  They will file it, if I don't cooperate with their upcoming demands.

And why would I take their ridiculous objection-argument seriously?

Let's put this in anthropological perspective.

In 1995, I refused to pay my former publisher for the damage which a billionaire did to my property--$1200.  Then a few days later, as I was talking to my production assistant, she had a giggle in her voice as she explained that someone from the accounting department was going to be telephoning me on a certain date.  Then I received a letter threatening me with legal action if I failed to give them that money.  I FAXed my answer, forbidding them from telephoning my home and informing them that I had no legal obligation to pay that.  A fact they already knew but chose to ignore.

Then Linda left her beeper in the office, and went to a meeting to figure-out how they were going to harass me into understanding that this was the only way the book could succeed.  I now understand Donald Trump must have been at that meeting, and must have recruited her son and his friend, Officer Stephen Patrick Driscoll of the Lake Carmel, New York Police Department.  The original attack plan was probably for a bomb, like what they had used a few years before.  Mark gave him a better idea.

My point as it relates to this law suit is that they believed that because I received a letter, I would be intimidated.

Let's go back to 1987.

Whitney Whalen, my six-year-old neighbor, didn't want to do her homework (and never did).  Margie, her mother, needed an excuse as the men in the family are college-oriented.  So she told the police department that our dog bit her child.  She had no medical report and refused to sign the complaint.  She telephoned the dog catcher several times a day for a week demanding of him to telephone my mother.  He did.  He explained, "I am not getting in the middle of any neighborhood disputes."  Margie didn't know that part.  But it was her understanding that the telephone call validated the complaint.  She told my mother that a nurse's report was written by another neighbor, Laurie Schultz.

Margie thought that put her in power.

Whitney, the child, walked around everywhere with her head down, a frown on her face, and her hands clasped together upon her waist expressing----------poor-me-can't-do-anything-because-poor-me-was-bitten-by-a-dog.

The anthropological point is that these people believe that one phone call or one document is highly influential.  While it would influence them, it has no affect on me.

Today I served and filed the following.