April - June 2009

It was on March 16th that I served-and-filed my Motion to Substitute Defendants. In this, I compared his credentials with that of Sean Sweeney of the law firm of Hunt & Leibert. The latter lawyer has a license number.

March 12th was the last date of Mr. Reveley’s activity in this division of the Connecticut Court system.

I have done similar research in the Civil Division of the Superior Court. He does many foreclosures. His last filing date was Mar 26, 2009.

We will see what happens next.

Thursday April 02, 2009

I owe Mr. Reveley an apology. He initiated other Small Claims Court actions on March 19, 2009. Apparently, the computer is behind by two weeks.

Saturday April 04, 2009

1st Sunday of Lent

Cut the Wires

2nd Sunday of Lent

Open the Gates

3^rd Sunday of Lent

Imprison Donald Trump

4^th Sunday of Lent

Count the Cost

5^th Sunday of Lent

$8,000 in Vandalisms

6^th Sunday of Lent

Going Home

Although my physical journey will not begin today, my legal one will. The law firm of Hunt & Leibert will finally realize that the answer to their problems is not with me, but with themselves. They can harass and bully me all they want to. The only thing they accomplish is pushing everything into another court.

If they poison me, they (not me) will go into the Probate Court.

If they have a phony small claim filed against me, we all go the Small Claims Court. This could find its way into either the State Superior or Federal Bankruptcy Court.

In theory, the Family Court couldn’t possibly find its way into this. But I am certain if they keep thinking their way, that is where we all will be (e.g., a married man with AIDS and a ten million dollar debt who is willing to do me a favor and sign his name to my copyrights so he may have one erection with me).

The Last Supper was a Cedar commemorating the liberation of Israelis from slavery. Moses was the original whistleblower. This is why the connection to the archetypes is so strong. I believe Jesus is too recent for such a biological connection. Two-thousand-years is an insignificant length of time in the human evolutionary process.

It is difficult to date Moses. But we can date the Great Flood. In the past 1.2 million years, there have been four pluvials--many sequential centuries of torrential rainfall corresponding to the glacial activity. The first such event corresponds to the date Homo habilis, the original post-Australopith, is found in the archeological record. It is exclusively Eurasian. I believe the Bible recorded this date of human evolutionary history, yet mysteriously omitted the following pluvial events.

Hunt & Leibert are a Saxon and a Jew. The former is a Pagan who feigns Christianity. The latter, according to the Book of Ezra Chapter 4, is not an Israeli. While it is true that neither have the archetypical connection because they are missing the area of the brain which yearns to return to the Pre-Australopith/Aquatic-Ape/Mermaid condition, I also believe that they have advisors, such as the IRS. It is their influence which will lead to my liberation.

Sunday April 05, 2009

Dear Commander Monkey;

I realize you are busy with your exploding hormones resultant of your oversized penis (which is why you resent a female with a paycheck), but can you take a few minutes to make a decision?

Are you sure you want me to serve-and-file this?

RED=NOT SERVED-AND-FILED

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

AMENDMENT

COUNTERCLAIM

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned case and submit this Amendment to the Counterclaim.

2. The Claim. . . . . . . . . . .$1,967.42.

3. The Counterclaim . . . . . . . .$500.00.

4. The Amended Counterclaim. . . $1,500.00.

5. The truth. . . . .. . . . . . priceless.

6. 2009 Connecticut Practice Book:

Sec. 24-20. —Amendment of …Counterclaim

“The judicial authority may at any time allow any…counterclaim to be amended.”

(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 571.) (Amended June 26, 2000, to take effect Jan. 1, 2001.)

7. Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept, 3:05cv1396:

“Where the existence of subject matter jurisdiction turns on a factual issue, however, the court is permitted to look beyond the complaint itself and may consider evidence outside the pleadings. See Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1997).”

emphasis supplied

8. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the pattern of behavior as it relates to IRS day,

April-15^th/Form-1040.

March 03, 2008	Due date of ProTech bill for $1967.	42-cents.
March 11, 2008	Motion for Ejectment filed seven months after foreclosure and served before vacate-deadline.**	41-hours
March 20, 2009	Service of ProTech’s Action.
March 28, 2009	End of my work-week resulting in take-home-pay. Unique!	$44 .

**see Case Detail, CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville.

9. The dates and numerical obsession are substantial evidence as defined by the United States District Court District of Connecticut, Maran v. Barnhart, 3:01CV2015;

“"such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Green-Younger v. Barnhart, 335 F.3d 99, 106 (2d Cir. 2003)(quotation omitted).”

10. The “factual issue” is the lack of identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States Government. (see Defendant’s Substitution Motion)

11. The “subject matter jurisdiction” is the plaintiff of herein case. It is NOT ProTech Oil. It is Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans who are venting their aggressions against me while acting in the guise of a company with whom my business relationship ended in November of 2007.

12. My opposing counsel and I agree that Wells Fargo should be a co-defendant. He tacitly disagrees with my Motion to add Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendant. (see my Motion for Substitution of Defendant and his Motion to Add Defendant) My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof. (see Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website)

13. The Bankruptcy Court identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt. Countrywide then abandoned the debt. According to the Connecticut Statutes,

“Sec. 3-64a. Property presumed abandoned generally. All property … which is held or owing in this state and has remained unclaimed by the owner for more than three years after it became due, payable or distributable, is presumed abandoned.”

emphasis supplied

14. It has been three years since my last payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo Bank in 2007. The complications remain unresolved.

15. In addition to my afore-mentioned defective take-home pay of 2009, late March and early April of same year were also abnormal. At trial, I will proffer all necessary pay-stubs exemplifying normal.

WHEREFORE defendant demands the following as part of, but not limited to, the Counterclaim:

Countrywide Home Loan admits to its abandonment of the mortgage and files a copy with:

Land Records of the Town of Coventry;

Bankruptcy Court of Federal District Court in Hartford, Connecticut;

Superior Court of Tolland County of said State; and the

Internal Revenue Service.

Wells Fargo Bank admits that it never had an interest nor title in the property and that it files such admission to all said Local, State and Federal Government offices.

All harassment against me immediately ceases, and compensation for lost wages immediately issued; $1,000.

In conjunction with the $500. for harassment, the total monetary relief sought is $1,500.

_____________________________________April 06, 2009

Vivian Lehman, Defendant pro se

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, enclosed this Amendment to Counterclaim in three pre-paid postage envelops and transmitted such via the United States Postal Service to both counsels of record and potentially impleaded, yet unrepresented defendant:

Mr. William G. Reveley

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC
P.O. BOX 657
VERNON , CT 06066

And

Mr. Sean Sweeney

Attorney for Countrywide Home Loans

HUNT LEIBERT AND JACOBSON P.C.

50 Weston Street

Hartford, CT 06120

And

Wells Fargo

Corporate Trust Services

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

______________________________________________________________April 06, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Defendant pro se

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

Thursday April 09, 2009

In red-type above are the drafts.

Served-and-filed today. . .

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman,

Defendant.

DEFENDANT’S

COMPROMISE

OFFER

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the defendant pro se in the above-captioned case and submit this Offer of Compromise.

2. The Claim . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .$1,967.42.

3. The Counterclaim. . . . . . . . . . . .$500.00.

4. The potential Cross-Claim .. . .Priceless Truth.

5. The potential co-Defendant, as per the unapplied agreement of both parties, is Wells Fargo Bank.

6. The Nature of the Counterclaim is harassment.

7. The Nature of the potential Cross-Claim is beyond the pleadings of this case. However. . .

8. Gibson v State of CT Judicial Dept, 3:05cv1396:

emphasis supplied

9. The “evidence outside the pleadings“ is the pattern of behavior as it relates to IRS day,

April-15^th/Form-1040.

March 03, 2008	Due date of ProTech bill for $1967 &	42-cents.
March 11, 2008	Motion for Ejectment filed seven months after foreclosure and served before vacate-deadline.**	41-hours
April 07, 2008	Service of Ejectment at	4 pm
March 20, 2009	Service of ProTech’s Action.
March 28, 2009	End of my work-week resulting in take-home-pay. Unique!	$44.

**see Case Detail, CV-06-5000959-S, Rockville.

10. The dates and numerical obsession are both circumstantial evidence, as well as substantial evidence. According to precedent, the latter is,

“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971).

11. The “factual issue” is the lack of identifying information between the records of the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, and the Internal Revenue Service records of the United States Government. (see Defendant’s Substitution Motion)

12. The “subject matter jurisdiction” is the plaintiff of herein case. It is NOT ProTech Oil. And the account number cited in the Plaintiff’s Affidavit of Debt, 64753L, is NOT of such company. In his original debt-collection letter to me dated December 17, 2008, Mr. Reveley demanded of me to, “make (my) check payable to the above client. . .and return it in the enclosed self-addressed envelope to my office”. The problem with that request is that ProTech Oil ceased to exist in the summer of 2007. Can Mr. Reveley verify such deposit-ability?

13. The actual, yet hidden, claimants are Wells Fargo and Countrywide Home Loans who are venting their aggressions against me while acting in the guise of a company with whom my business relationship ended in 2007.

14. My opposing counsel and I agree that Wells Fargo should be a co-defendant. He tacitly disagrees with my Motion to add Countrywide Home Loans as co-defendant. (see my Motion for Substitution of Defendant and his Motion to Add Defendant) My opposing counsel is William G. Reveley and Associates, Juris No. 423840. Both potential co-defendants are also his clients in other cases to which I am neither a party to nor a witness thereof. (see Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website)

15. The Bankruptcy Court of the District of Hartford, Connecticut, identifies Countrywide Home Loans as the mortgage lender. However, on June 27, 2007, I was discharged from such debt. Countrywide then abandoned the debt. According to the Connecticut Statutes,

emphasis supplied

16. It has been three years since my last payment. Said Superior Court of Tolland County awarded the claim to Wells Fargo Bank in 2007. The complications remain unresolved.

WHEREFORE defendant will accept the following compromise:

Withdrawal of claim;

$410.00 from my opposing counsel;

A statement from Wells Fargo Bank verifying that it has neither interest nor title to the house known as 891 South Street in the Town of Coventry, County of Tolland, Connecticut. And the filing of such statement with

Land Records of the Town of Coventry;

Superior Court of Tolland County; and

Federal Bankruptcy Court of Hartford City.

A copy of the future statement from the IRS to Countrywide Home Loans affirming that all complications have been resolved.

This offer will expire April 15, 2009.

_____________________________________April 10, 2009

Vivian Lehman, Defendant pro se

Certificate of Service

I, Vivian Lehman, due to the pressures of the IRS deadline, FAXed such to:

Mr. William G. Reveley

REVELEY WILLIAM G. & ASSOCIATES LLC

860-871-7991

______________________________________________________________April 10, 2009

Vivian Lehman

Defendant pro se

PO Box 629

Coventry, CT 06238

Friday April 10, 2009

My computer has been tampered with. I had some trouble opening this file. So if this is my last transmission, you know why.

Otherwise, there is some unfinished business.

I have decided that I want to help Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. I will be applying for a job in her Department. I am not a slave. Slavery was legally abolished in this country…

Sometime after President Lincoln freed the African-Americans and left them to the mercy of the lynch-mobs and carpet-baggers, and

Sometime before the labor laws were enforced disallowing working long hours for pennies.

Otherwise…

On March 25^th, I had jury duty. As per procedure, I called the day before to learn if the Courthouse was in need of my services. They were not. My guess is that the case was either resolved or postponed.

I looked at the website description of the case. Apparently, a man was charged with sexually assaulting a child. The arresting officers were of the Coventry Police Department.

If I had been involved in the jury selection process, I would have been asked if there is anything the Court should know about me which would influence my verdict. I would have explained that I cannot convict anyone who has been arrested by such Department. While it is true they are all not Sergeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski, it is also true that such senior officers must have trained those of lower rank.

Aside from my allegations, let’s recall a few unequivocal facts.

In the Fall of 2005, I used the phrase “final kill”. I was referring to my former New York neighbors. The husband looks just like Ayman al-Zawarhi, second in command to Osama Bin Laden. The wife looks just like Mrs. Anthrax, biochemical weapons specialist to Sadaam Hussein. These are death penalty cases. I believed, and still do, that if I am giving law enforcement enough facts to strap these fugitives into his-and-her electric chairs and flip the switch, then I am “killing” them.

The Police Department of my former neighborhood in New York, telephoned Ayman Al-Zawarhi and spoke to him. All such telephone calls are tape recorded. The Town of Bedford installed such technology in 1970. They never turned this voice sample over to the FBI. The Coventry Police Department knew it existed, and never told them either.

Sergeant Ochtera and Lieutenant Solenski gave me a hostile visit feigning the belief that I was going to launch a karate attack. According to their interpretation of the facts, I was going to apply my swollen joints against a muscular man who is over 6’4”. This was construed as a threat of possible criminal nature.

I explained this is a “death penalty case.” Although law enforcement did not like my choice of words, I never edited, and they never followed-up. I know I am correct.

Sergeant Ochtera wrote in his report that these former neighbors of mine, “are the people with the death sentences.” His choice of words was not interchangeable with the concept of “death penalty case“.

He did not understand they were still presumed innocent. They were never sentenced to anything.

His report was libelous. He was not sued, most likely because these people do not allow themselves to be photographed. They look just like their Most Wanted posters.

So if I served on a jury, how could I have relied on the testimony of a Police Sergeant who makes libelous remarks because he doesn’t understand the Constitution? And how could I have relied on those who trained him or those he trained?

NOT GUILTY!

Saturday April 11, 2009

We are, of course, having an issue with African Somali pirates holding hostage a captain of an American ship. The ship was en-route to Kenya.

They want Targets.

The FBI can’ t figure this out.

How dumb can they be?

Did we have any trouble with Kenya before Baby Bama was elected President?

Tell the Baby to phone his father and have him knock-it-off.

If he doesn’t, here is what the FBI can hold hostage:

His Presidency

To my knowledge, there is no birth certificate nor any other documentation verifying his United States citizenship. And I have never seen any verification of the existence of the Hawaiian grandmother who raised him and died a few weeks before the election. It is my anthropological analysis that the Baby spent at least the first decade of his life in Kenya with his mother who was the third or fourth wife of his father, an official of such government.

His Comrade/ex-Governor

Impeached Illinois Governor Blagovich is believed to be a United States citizen because he speaks an accent-free English. But if he is television-educated, he could have learned that anywhere. Listen to his speeches. He repeats the same words over-and-over. Is this someone who was educated in this country? I hope not. If he was born and raised in Russia, how did he get here? It may have been legal. But if that is true, why is this fact unknown to his constituents?

If I am correct about everything, the FBI should be able to use these facts to completely control the Big Baby.

In exchange for my services, would the FBI please completely protect me from all future harassment?! I am finally feeling the road to excellent health. The mobility in my joints is amazing. My energy level is making me feel great. And, of course, to finally be asthma-free is an indescribable feeling of freedom. May I please enjoy these in peace?

Otherwise, my last legal brief hit a nerve.

Remember the missing tax documents which were required to accompany Schedule A? I needed a B and C, and still don’t have these. It is my understanding that Countrywide now has to perform a complete write-off of the debt, and, henceforth, file these latter two documents with the IRS. This will allow Wells Fargo and myself to finally reach an agreement.

I offered 41-cents.

Sunday April 26, 2009

I received the subliminal information that they want to offer me a mortgage.

Who?

Countrywide or Wells Fargo?

And another thing…

If you own, rent or otherwise use a private airplane, journey upon a “settlement” of Orthodox Jews. If the one you visit is near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and you witness what I think you will, tell Mara Addison, of my former publisher, that she will find there a refund of her gambling losses.

Otherwise, if you see a plumage of smoke from the chambers or ovens, call the fire department.

Saturday May 16, 2009

Two judgments are in, decreed by Magistrate O‘Keefe…

FIRST…”Motion to add party defendant (Wells Fargo) granted. Plaintiff must file amended writ for service on new defendant.”

SECOND…”The defendant has filed a counterclaim against the plaintiff. The plaintiff is required to file an answer on or before the reply answer date June 09, 2009.”

The caption of the case is now, ProTech Oil versus Vivian Lehman and Wells Fargo with an answer date of June 9^th.

AND MORE GOOD NEWS…

On March 23, 2009, Countrywide Home Loans wrote-off the mortgage. I am certain it is not a coincidence that this occurred on the same day I submitted to the Court a copy of the letter in which Wells Fargo decrees it is the record owner.

Sunday May 17, 2009

Everyone is waiting for me to file the cross-claim. This is why I am waiting.

1. I need a service address.

The plaintiff has been directed by the Court to file a revised Writ. This is the form which identifies the plaintiff(s), defendant(s), nature of action (breach of contract) and object of action (amount of unpaid bill). While I have explained to the Court my position on the service address, I believe I have to follow the directive of my opposing counsel. When I have this, I will have an obligation to serve a copy of the Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Compromise Offer which expired on IRS tax day.

2. I don’t know if the Judge wants to hear it.

The Judge has acknowledged receiving my Motion to Substitute Defendant, as well as my opposing counsel’s Motion to Add Defendant. He has acknowledged nothing else. I respect that. He has his reasons and I think I know what these are. He probably knows that Countrywide-Home-Loans/Bank-of-America wrote-off the debt. Wells Fargo, for the first time, has an obligation to communicate with the Court. They don’t need any help from me. They know they lied.

3. I am too tired to write a motion.

In mid-April my employer, Crossmark, lost a major contract with Home Depot. It wasn’t our fault. Another contractor did not deliver the materials in quantities which were executable. Either I helplessly looked at 20 totes of merchandise to be packed-out in 90 minutes, or I had a few totes of one product. We all did our best.

This meant finding another job. Near me, is one of the three nationwide call centers for Flower Transworld Delivery, FTD. These are the people you call when you want to send flowers. Mother’s Day is our busiest weekend. I was given much overtime. I didn’t mind. Helping people select what flowers to send can be much fun.

The message of honoring our mothers by sending flowers is archetypical. Remember the Boticelli painting of Venus emerging from the waters?

My favorite website is www.justflowers.com. On Mother’s Day eve, some areas of the country were sold-out of some items, such as tulips. It was hard to tell customers that their selection was non-deliverable until after the holiday. But I learned that one item, the Basket of Cheer, was always available anywhere. I called it, Old Faithful. It was, and still is, featured on the home page. I directed my disappointed customers to that. They agreed it is beautiful and sends the correct message. It also stayed within their budgets.

On Monday morning, May 11^th, one of my supervisors placed two bouquets on my desk. I was in the middle of telephoning a customer who, according to the computer, provided the wrong address for the recipient. There was no answer. I pushed the release button on my phone and asked her what I had done to deserve these. I won two contests.

I did not want to see the flowers suffer from moisture-deprivation. She suggested I wrap a wet towel around their stems. I did.

A few minutes later, I was on the phone again deeply engaged in conversation. She placed another on my desk. We laughed.

So I went in the break area and found on a backroom shelf an old, glass coffee pot for a brewer which, by today’s standards, would be considered old fashioned. I placed these in such.

At the end of the day, I walked toward the backroom and was told by a few people what an extraordinary cup-of-coffee I had.

I came home, and had to find a glass vase. But, of course, a male homemaker doesn’t have such. I called him on his cell phone and explained the situation. He didn’t understand me, at first, and thought I was telling him that I “needed flowers”. But eventually, the message came through the static and he borrowed such from his father. But before he returned home, I found a jar for tea bags and used that. The kitchen was the only room in the condominium which doesn’t have computer wires running all around. So I removed all of his papers and place the jar upon such table. I hoped he would not be angry at me when he saw the pile in the dining room. Instead he thanked me for forcing him to organize.

Mother’s Day is over. It was only a five week temporary position. And it is complete. I am on the waiting list if any permanent positions open.

But I am tired. It was much work. Every time I completed a call my phone rang again. To ease the exhaustion, we were provided with free meals for two days in a row, Thursday the 7th and Friday the 8th. On Saturday the 9th, we were provided with snacks. I wondered why. But when I felt my lack of appetite as a result of overwork, I understood. On Mother’s Day, we were again served with a meal. And on Monday the 11^th and Tuesday the 12th, we received snacks.

Monday May 18, 2009

I learned my lesson again!

I have to mention everything on this website, even if I think it is irrelevant.

It was on Wednesday May 13^th. I woke-up and looked out the window in the parking lot. There was a woman standing upon my neighbor’s car. Originally, I thought it was the neighbor’s mother who visited for the holiday. I decided she was waiting for her ride home. She seemed to be wearing a long laboratory coat. Why? I looked again. It must be a raincoat. Why? It was sunny.

My neighbor emerged from her condominium and walked around her car to find her there. She asked if she was lost. I knew then this was not her mother. My neighbor then nicely asked of her to step away from her car so she could drive her son to school. The woman could barely walk and staggered over to my car. I grabbed the phone and called 9-1-1. My neighbor did the same from her cell phone. I looked out the window again. My neighbor was running into her house.

I had too much pride to go outside in my pajamas. I quickly changed and went out. My neighbor had placed some shoes on her and a blanket. She was rubbing her to keep her warm. I eventually noticed that the long coat was a polyester robe. She was naked underneath.

We learned her name and the fact that she lives in #2 of the units.

I remembered my training at CVS pharmacy and asked a few questions. Was she on any diabetic medications? No. Was she on any anti-depressant medications? No. Was she on any antibiotics? No.

She said she was nurse, and had not paid her fees to the administration in a few months because she had not worked much. She explained she was with a friend, Marissa, who was seated on the lawn. My neighbor directed me to look for this person. There was no one.

The woman also said there was a female police officer who visited her earlier and instructed her to sit on the lawn.

Two police vehicles arrived with two large, male State Officers, and an ambulance. The woman explained to them what medications she is on including those for high blood pressure and Klonisin. (I think she meant Klonipin.) She also pointed-out to the officers where she lived, and the fact that the car in the corresponding driveway was hers.

The ambulance departed and I went to work at FTD.

Yesterday, I had nothing much to do. So I went for a walk up there. Her car wasn’t in the driveway, and the unit was dark. I returned. The owner of my condominium said to me, with curiosity, that I had a short walk. I finally told him about what happened. We discussed it with his father, who is in the real estate business.

I told them both that I believed the police may have thrown her out in the middle of the night. His father explained that such is illegal. I said I know. He explained that because it is illegal, it is impossible. I said I didn’t know.

I researched it on the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s website. She is a defendant against the Administration. We know why. She told us.

And she is facing foreclosure. We didn’t know that.

The plaintiff is Wells Fargo as represented by Hunt & Leibert. It was filed on March 23, 2009, the same date I submitted the Wells Fargo letter to the Court, and Bank of America wrote-off my original mortgage. On May 15^th, two days after her collapse, they filed a set of motions including a demand for Strict Foreclosure.

And a third party defendant in both actions is Webster Bank. According to the father of the owner of my condominium, that means it has a lean on the property.

To date, the woman has no recorded benefit of counsel representing her.

A few minutes ago I drove-past her home. The car is back.

Dear Mr. Hunt, Mr. Leibert & Mr. Jacobson;

I have said many times on this website, anyone who wants to tell his/her side of the story, please do so. I will apologize for any non-malicious misrepresentations I may have published. Since opening this website, I received one such response. It was from the man I believe is Ayman al-Zawarhi, second-in-command to Osama Ben Laden. He was induced by the German government when I begged my distant cousins to help me. The quality of Zawarhi’s words convinced everyone that while he is innocent until proven guilty, I am not crazy.

You may not know my new address, but you do often converse with my attorney, Frank Kibler. You can provide him with your written response to my question.

ARE YOU PERFORMING A PHONY FORECLOSURE ON MY NEIGHBOR?

Saturday May 23, 2009

This is good news. Although on the surface, it doesn’t look that way.

The Judge denied my Motion to Substitute Defendant. After he acknowledged the Counterclaim, he can’t replace defendants.

Earlier this month, the Motion which was granted was my opposing counsel’s follow-up to my Substitution Motion. It was to Add a defendant.

The Counterclaim was not planned by me. As I was about to serve-and-file the Answer form which includes such an option, I thought about all of my recent research. Pressuring me to pay a bill which they know is not due is specifically included in the legal dictionary under harassment. And my opposing counsel knows that if he produced an invoice, the account holder would be identified as Wells Fargo and the balance due would be zero. So in such section of the Answer form, I wrote, “$500. for harassment”.

The Judge has not yet considered my Motion to Dismiss. I am certain it will be denied because my opposing counsel was instructed to formulate a revised Writ.

This is the cross-claim I am considering. (Red ink means it is not yet the served-and-filed, and might not be.)

Superior Court of the

State of Connecticut,

Small Claims Court

Middletown Courthouse

Small Claims Case #

SCC-219909

ProTech Oil,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Vivian Lehman &

Wells Fargo,

Co-Defendants.

CROSS-CLAIM

1. I, Vivian Lehman, am the co-defendant pro se in the above-captioned action. Herewith, is my cross-claim against co-defendant Wells Fargo.

2. As the hitherto fore proffered foreclosure action indicates, my co-defendant wants the asset known as 891 South Street, Town of Coventry, County of Tolland of the State of Connecticut.

3. As this legal action indicates, my co-defendant does not want the liabilities.

4. While a price cannot be ascribed to the truth, such can be ascribed to a deterrent.

WHEREFORE, I respectfully request $4,999. in cash, as well as said asset valued at $1. as per attached Assignment of Mortgage of the Land Records of the Town of Coventry, Volume 1027, Page 84. This is a total award of $5,000, the maximum allowable in Small Claims Court. I also request costs, disbursements and all other relief as the Court deems proper.

_______________________________________ May 27, 2009

VIVIAN LEHMAN

If Wells Fargo wants to work with me directly, rather than through the Court, these are my demands.

Tuition for law school. Although I am too late for the application process to enroll in the Fall, they can arrange something. The house is not far from the Law School of the Connecticut State University.

Pay-off my car lease. I have three payments left at $320/month. The purchase option is $8,831. They can pay Ford Credit directly. I do not need to be a middleman.

Cash. Although I intend to keep my job at Crossmark, I will not be employable full time. I need enough to satisfy my cost of living in the house:

$1,000/month

12 months/year

3 years law school

$36,000.

Monday May 25, 2009

Dear Big Baby;

I understand that the Korean nuclear weapons program is developing. And I understand the necessity to Target this issue.

I would like to remind you of your previous demand of me to only publish such on this website when the First Idiots are on vacation so that no one will notice how dumb they are.

Would you please tell me when your daughters’ school vacations will begin?

I also understand the necessity to Target the conversion of Republicans into Democrats. When you were a teenager in your father’s country, this was what you witnessed.

Until your marriage and collegiate years, you never attended school in the United States. There is a technique which has been successfully attempted in European civilization. It is called turn-or-burn. In our Christian culture, we use Crucifixes. What do you use in your religion?

If our justice system imprisons your wife for illegally importing you, would anyone notice?